Cardinal: True faith is found in compassion, not just creed
Cardinals and bishops attending one of the Novemdiales Masses in St. Peter's Basilica.(Photo: Vatican News)
By Justin McLellan, Catholic News Service
True discipleship is not measured by the creeds Christians recite or the theology they know, but by how deeply they love, a cardinal said at a memorial Mass for Pope Francis.
"It is not the profession of faith, the theological knowledge or the sacramental practice that guarantees participation in the joy of God," said Cardinal Mauro Gambetti, archpriest of St. Peter's Basilica, "but the qualitative and quantitative involvement in the human experience of the least of our brothers and sisters."
Celebrating Mass in the basilica April 29 for the fourth day of the "novendiali" -- nine days of mourning for Pope Francis marked with Masses -- the cardinal said that Christ's final judgment will not be based on knowledge or status, but on acts of mercy toward the hungry, the stranger, the sick and the imprisoned.
His message came as cardinals gathered in Rome said they are beginning to reflect on what qualities the next pope must embody. The cardinals are meeting daily in general congregation meetings ahead of the conclave, which is scheduled to begin May 7.
Concelebrating the Mass with Cardinal Gambetti were the cardinals who lead the three other papal basilicas in Rome: Cardinal Baldassare Reina, papal vicar of Rome and archpriest of the Basilica of St. John Lateran; Cardinal Rolandas Makrickas, coadjutor archpriest of the Basilica of St. Mary Major; and U.S. Cardinal James M. Harvey, archpriest of St. Paul Outside the Walls.
Patrick Kelly, supreme knight of the Knights of Columbus, was seated in a front row.
Reflecting on the Gospel's imagery of sheep and goats, Cardinal Gambetti explained that those who are welcomed into God's kingdom are not those who sought independence and self-interest, but those who lived with gentleness, solidarity and compassion.
"At the personal and institutional level, we must ask ourselves: which of these two styles do we embody?" he said.
Pope Francis' humanity, tenderness and commitment to peace touched believers and nonbelievers alike, the cardinal said. Quoting Edith Bruck, a Holocaust survivor, poet and friend of Pope Francis, Cardinal Gambetti said the late pope was "a man who loved, who wept, who invoked peace, who embraced and spread warmth wherever he went."
True evangelization, the cardinal said, does not come through grand proclamations but through humble acts of solidarity that reveal God's love in tangible ways.
"Who touches humanity touches God; who honors humanity honors God; who scorns humanity scorns God," he said.
Recalling Pope Francis' conviction that "all, all, all, are called to live in the church," Cardinal Gambetti reflected the on the episode from the Acts of the Apostles in which St. Peter meets Cornelius.
In that account, St. Peter enters the gentile's home despite Jewish custom forbidding him to do so, and, after preaching about Jesus, the Holy Spirit descends upon them both, and the apostle baptizes Cornelius.
The Gospel account is "an episode that, in an age that is globalized, secularized and thirsting for truth and love such as ours" reveals the first pope's attitude toward evangelization, the cardinal said: "Openness to the human person without reservation, gratuitous concern for others, sharing and deepening experiences to help every man and woman give credit to life, to the grace of creation."--ucanews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Israeli writer David Grossman denounces Gaza 'genocide'
Award-winning Israeli author David Grossman called his country's campaign in Gaza "genocide" and said he was using the term with a "broken heart". This came days after a major Israeli rights group also used the same term, amid growing global alarm over starvation in the besieged territory. "For many years, I refused to use that term: 'genocide'," the prominent writer and peace activist told Italian daily La Repubblica in an interview published on Friday. "But now, after the images I have seen and after talking to people who were there, I can't help using it." Grossman told the paper he was using the word "with immense pain and with a broken heart." "This word is an avalanche: once you say it, it just gets bigger, like an avalanche. And it adds even more destruction and suffering," he said. Grossman's works, which have been translated into dozens of languages, have won many international prizes. He also won Israel's top literary prize in 2018, the Israel Prize for Literature, for his work spanning more than three decades. He said it was "devastating" to "put the words 'Israel' and 'famine' together" because of the Holocaust and our "supposed sensitivity to the suffering of humanity." The celebrated author has long been a critic of the Israeli government. - AFP
Malaysiakini
2 days ago
- Malaysiakini
Peace comes from wisdom, not raw emotions
LETTER | The people of Cambodia and Thailand must have heaved a sigh of relief that peace talks in Malaysia ended quickly with both sides agreeing to an immediate ceasefire. The cessation of hostilities is welcomed by Asean nations and peace-loving people throughout the world. However, when a country is enjoying peace, there will be selfish leaders out to exploit race, religion, language, nationalism and all forms of identity politics to condemn others just to gain popularity. Unfortunately, most of them succeed because people are usually more emotional than rational - including those deemed to be highly educated, intelligent, religious, or ought to know better. Religions do not discriminate against people by race or language. Yet throughout history, devout followers have often victimised their fellow human beings. For example, slavery was practised for over 200 years in the US by white Christians who read the Bible daily. Today, we have a political party in Malaysia using the name of Islam, playing the race card to win support from the majority of the voters, ignoring the fact that Islam spread overland to China soon after it was founded in the 7th century via the ancient Silk Road. Much later, Islam was brought to Malacca in the 15th century by Muslim traders via sea routes and also by Muslim missionaries from China, including those that came after the seven expeditions between 1405 and 1433 led by Admiral Zheng He, who was himself a Muslim. Understanding Trump Back to Southeast Asia, mercifully, the powers that be in Cambodia and Thailand did not wish to play the nationalist card, unlike US President Donald Trump. Sadly, most people could not differentiate between being ultra-nationalistic and genuinely patriotic. Trump may be a nationalist but he is not a patriot. Being nationalistic means to do everything for one's country, disregarding other nations and also the harm it may bring to its own citizens. US President Donald Trump His "Make America Great Again" (Maga) slogan and tariff wars are hurting not only countries trading with the US, but are also harming the American people and its economy. Patriots contribute positively to the nation and are admired universally. Nationalists may raise national flags, sing national anthems and engage in rhetoric, but these are just for show, On the other hand, patriots silently study or work hard, are productive, pay taxes, do voluntary work, contribute to society and charity, and live in harmony with others. Hypocrites Those who claim to fight for our country but look down on fellow citizens are actually hypocrites. Many choose the easy path by sowing hatred, instead of working hard to lift their community. Those living near country borders may have different nationalities, but they are largely the same people and lifestyles. Many have family members and relatives living on both sides, not just at the Cambodia-Thai border, but also the Malaysian-Thai and Malaysian-Singapore borders. It is unlikely that the local people on both sides of a border would want to cause harm to one another. However, it is a different story when leaders of a central government or military are on shaky ground and use offence as the best defence in justifying an invasion or bombing raid to muster support. As for the US, all countries it has ever bombed, invaded and occupied after World War II are growing. The best example is Vietnam. Today, visitors to Vietnam would be wondering how the unnecessary Vietnam War served the US. In 1960, there were only 900 American troops in South Vietnam, which grew to 23,300 in 1964 and peaked at 543,400 in 1969, before withdrawing totally in 1973, with 58,220 already dead. In 1995, the US and Vietnam established diplomatic relations, which allowed for the resumption of travel and trade. Although a few million Vietnamese were killed in the war along with several hundred thousand Cambodians and tens of thousands of Laotians, past hostilities were quickly forgotten. This is because people desire peace much more than nationalism and other forms of identity politics. On our part, we must always have the wisdom to know what is good for our country and not let raw emotions consume us and do foolish things. YS Chan is a master trainer for Mesra Malaysia and Travel and Tours Enhancement Course and an Asean Tourism Master Trainer. He is also a tourism and transport business consultant. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
Herald Malaysia
5 days ago
- Herald Malaysia
UN human rights lawyer appeals for humanitarian action to save dying in Gaza
A UN human rights lawyer speaks to Vatican News about the famine emergency in Gaza and the need for nations to act immediately to save the population, including 320,000 children, before it is too late. Jul 31, 2025 Palestinian baby Zainab Abu Haleeb, dies due to malnutrition, in Khan Younis By Thaddeus JonesThe latest information from the United Nations shows that more than one third of the residents of Gaza are going without food for days, and more than half a million people are enduring famine-like conditions. All others are facing emergency levels of hunger. The UN agencies providing emergency food aid, helping babies and children with nutrition and medicine have appealed to the international community to act immediately as famine conditions spread. They say without an immediate full-scale humanitarian response, thousands will die very soon, since less than five percent of what is needed to prevent mass starvation is being allowed to enter Gaza. The Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organization, QU Dongyu, has warned that, 'Gaza is now on the brink of a full-scale famine. People are starving not because food is unavailable, but because access is blocked, local agrifood systems have collapsed, and families can no longer sustain even the most basic livelihoods.' He has appealed for 'safe and sustained humanitarian access and immediate support to restore local food production and livelihoods," the only way to prevent further deaths. "The right to food is a basic human right.' Focusing on the human rights questions regarding Palestine is Australian lawyer Chris Sidoti, who is a commissioner of the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel . In an interview with Vatican News / Vatican Radio, he appealed for full-scale emergency food aid to be allowed in immediately, as time is running out very quickly to save thousands from dying. This action is essential in the short term, he underscores, while a durable ceasefire is also needed to stop the killing. He also looks at the long-term prospects for a two-state solution that would allow a Palestinian state and Israel to live side by side in peace and security. Vatican Radio interview with Chris Sidoti, a commissioner with the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and Israel. Q: About the humanitarian situation in Gaza, there's been a bit of a change with some airdrops, a little more aid being allowed in. But overall, how do you see the situation there? How would you describe it? 'A little more aid getting in' is an accurate description. It is a very small amount at this stage. Airdrops are good, but no substitute in terms of quantity for the provision of aid by trucks. We have to get trucks into Gaza if we are to relieve the desperate situation there. Before this war, before October 2023, there were up to 2,000 trucks a day going into Gaza, and that was still under a situation of very tight Israeli control of the kinds of goods that were able to enter. After October 2023, the supplies were curtailed dramatically. And even during the brief ceasefire this year, from January into late March, there were only 600 trucks a day going into Gaza. Now, the UN agencies and international non-government organisations estimate that at least 2,000 trucks a day are required simply to maintain a very basic level of food supply. Now, during that period that that ceasefire period, it was 600 trucks a day. (On 28 July), under the loosened conditions that the Israeli Prime Minister proclaimed, 90 trucks went in. So that's less than a sixth of the number that went in during the ceasefire, and less than 5% of the number that is required to simply sustain the basic quantity of food and water for the people of Gaza. So it's clearly totally inadequate. It is literally a sop to opinion coming from countries all over the world that are saying that this Israeli imposed mass starvation is a most serious war crime. Do you think, finally, countries speaking up that there's a positive effect this can have and that's led to what is this slight improvement? Certainly this speaking up has led to this very slight improvement, but that's not adequate. As I say this, this is a sop to international pressure. What is really required is not speaking up, but serious action. Action that will place real pressure on the Israeli government and not simply the pressure of words. So, there is certainly a requirement, a desperate need, but also a legal obligation on other states to do everything in their power, short of invading Gaza, to force the Israeli government to allow adequate food supplies to enter Gaza. There are thousands of trucks, in fact, outside the borders of Gaza, waiting to enter if the Israeli authorities will let them in. They need to be allowed in. It's as simple as that. What else needs to happen? Obviously, we're at a critical point from the humanitarian point of view because the time is really running out. But what else needs to happen here, would you say, for the situation to improve even a little bit? Well, the most important thing that needs to happen is adequate quantities of food and water and medical supplies need to be allowed in. Now that is desperate. Some of the UN agencies are saying that the red line has already been crossed, that retrieving the situation without thousands or even tens of thousands of people dying is already too late. I hope that's not the case. I'm not an expert on humanitarian assistance and what people need to eat and how much is required. But I hope against hope, that it is not too late to stop mass starvation in Gaza. But that's the first and most immediate need food, water, and proper medical supplies and fuel to enable hospitals to operate. Power to be provided so that incubators for babies can work, oxygen can be provided, and so forth. The Israeli authorities are showing no sign whatsoever of permitting this. The concession that was given yesterday (27 July), and that has started to be implemented today (28 July), is very, very small and far from adequate to ensure that starvation is adequately addressed. So that's what needs to happen immediately. But it's about time that other states took seriously their obligations under international law that were laid out very clearly by the International Court of Justice last July. The International Court of Justice said unequivocally, any actions by states that aid or assist in any way the unlawful actions of the Israeli government must cease. Now, that should have led governments around the world last July to undertake an urgent examination of all aspects of their relationship with the State of Israel to determine what aspects of the relationship were in any way aiding and abetting Israel's illegality. So it's about time that other states took seriously the legal obligations that the International Court of Justice has identified, and respond by ending all relationships with Israel, that in any way aid or assist Israel's illegalities. How can this be done today, especially at a time when more and more people are questioning the legitimacy of international institutions, and even the whole idea of multilateralism and approaching serious crises like this is under threat? Well, the criticisms of the institutions are coming from two directions. Firstly, there is the small number of states and political leaders who are out to destroy international law and international institutions. The great majority are simply frustrated that the international legal system is not delivering what it promised to deliver. And so there is a crisis in international law. There is a crisis in the multilateral system, in the system of the United Nations itself. And that crisis can only be addressed by the international system demonstrating that it is capable of responding to the most serious violations of international law. And the sad truth is that to date, they have not responded. It's true that there is a crisis in the international system now. I think that this is the most serious crises that the international legal system has faced in the 80 years since World War Two when the steps were taken to establish the system that we now have. Do you see this obviously complicating the whole idea of a two-state solution, which is being discussed in New York today and tomorrow (28-29 July)? How do you see the whole process there, even short-term ending the conflict, long term a two-state solution? It certainly complicates that process. Unless states are prepared to move from rhetoric to action, we will see no progress on the two state solution. It's quite clear that international action is required. It's quite clear that there needs to be pressure placed on the Israeli government in particular, and on the Palestinian authorities as well, to actually implement what has been seen as the necessary response to the situation in the Middle East for the last almost 80 years, 75 years. The United Nations General Assembly passed its resolution on a two-state approach to the Middle East in 1947. And everything that has been done since then, or at least almost everything, perhaps excluding the Oslo Accords of the early 1990s, everything that has been done has been a step, and then another step and then another step away from that decision taken in 1947. And so the problem is not the law. The problem is not the rhetoric. The problem is the failure to act.--Vatican News
