SNP ban on nuclear energy is ‘abdication of responsibility'
It prompted an angry response from the GMB Scotland union which has written to the Scottish energy secretary calling for a change in stance.
Torness, East Lothian. (Image: Getty Images) Louise Gilmour, GMB Scotland secretary, said it is 'beyond time for SNP ministers to exploit the potential of new nuclear energy to achieve net zero and create jobs'.
She said: 'New nuclear can help provide a baseload of safe, clean and secure energy while creating thousands of skilled, well-paid, unionised jobs in Scotland.
'The Holyrood government's absolute refusal to seriously consider its potential is an abdication of responsibility and needs to change.
'It makes no sense if ministers want to achieve net zero targets and it makes no sense if they want Scotland's economy to grow again.'
The nuclear industry supports almost 3,700 jobs in Scotland adding £400 million to the economy but Ms Gilmour said that is 'only a fraction of the potential economic benefits if the Scottish Government reverses its ban on new nuclear power'.
She has urged ministers to trigger an immediate review of future options.
READ MORE:
'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis.
'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action, investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.'
A spokesperson also said: 'The announcement comes as the UK Government is set to confirm one of Europe's first Small Modular Reactor programmes. This comes alongside record investment in R&D for fusion energy, worth over £2.5bn over five years. Taken together with Sizewell C, this delivers the biggest nuclear building programme in a generation.'
Ms Gilmour wrote to Gillian Martin, Scottish energy secretary: 'A total of 10,000 jobs will be created at Sizewell alone. Where in Scotland are jobs being created at such a scale?'
I reported this week that among the Labour government's plans is the redevelopment of a major nuclear base in Scotland.
It signals a 'multi-decade' commitment to the site where around 6,500 people work.
The UK Government plans a multi-billion-pound redevelopment of His Majesty's Naval Base (HMNB) Clyde.
An initial £250 million of funding will be made over three years which will help support 'jobs, skills and growth' at Faslane, the Royal Navy's main presence in Scotland.
Westminster said that the "Clyde 2070 programme represents one of the most significant and sustained UK Government investments in Scotland over the coming decades".
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: "The Scottish Government is focussed on supporting growth and creating jobs by capitalising on Scotland's immense renewable energy capacity rather than expensive new nuclear energy which takes decades to build, creates toxic waste which is difficult and costly to dispose of and does not generate power at a cost that will bring down energy bills."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Welsh Labour can call out their UK boss. Why can't Scottish Labour?
Some people might be tempted to think this is proof positive that devolution works; that there is no need for Scotland to follow slavishly in English and Welsh footsteps. They could not be more wrong. The truth of the matter is that taking a different path from our southern neighbours is a costly business. According to Shirley-Anne Somerville, the Social Justice Secretary, we spent a not-so-small fortune last year trying to stop Westminster policies affecting Scots voters. Mitigating the iniquitous bedroom tax cost us a kick in the pants off £75 million, while ignoring the benefit cap rushed us another £7.8m with even more spent ameliorating hardship payments in housing. A grand total of more than £90m annually. READ MORE: Pat Kane: Scotland is heading back into a cycle of 'extraction without consent' All of which has to be found from an annual grant which also restricts our ability to borrow and expressly forbids bursting our budget. These are the penalties of proffering a begging bowl rather than demanding independence of thought and making our own fiscal rules. Not so much an indication that devolution works, but evidence in scarce cash of how demanding it has become to do our own thing. We're not alone. The Welsh First Minister made a speech last month which emphasised what she called the 'Red Welsh Way'. The kind of speech Labour voters in Scotland never hear from Anas Sarwar; a speech making it clear that Wales needs and enjoys a seat at the top table. Eluned Morgan told her troops at Labour's Welsh conference: 'Here in Wales, we don't follow the crowd. We lead in our own way – shaped by our Welsh values, our people and our priorities. The Red Welsh Way … proudly distinct, rooted in justice.' Welsh Labour leader and First Minister Eluned MorganShe was careful, of course, to talk up the partnership with Keir Starmer and endorse devolution, but left little doubt that where London and Cardiff differed, she would encourage Wales to go its own way. It went down rather well. Given that eradicating child poverty is a stated aim of both the Scottish and Westminster governments, it's instructive to note that only in Scotland do we have the child support payment, widely regarded as a major source of poverty relief for hard-pressed families, while the hated two-child cap on benefits – and the associated rape clause – will go in Scotland from early March next year, while Westminster continues to prevaricate and dither. Already there are dark hints that scrapping the two-child cap will be among the collateral damage of the recent Commons rebellion if Rachel Reeves continues to play hardball. Here in Scotland, it will mean that families already in receipt of universal benefits will be able to access monthly payments matching the Universal Credit child element: £292.81 per eligible child. READ MORE: Poverty levels in Scotland below UK for 20 years, graphs show Now that we have our own Social Security agency, you might think this offers a layer of protection. It has meant we no longer use Pip or personal independence payments. Instead, we use Adult Disability Payments, which means that any alteration in the Commons won't apply here. Unalloyed good news you might think, except that the London-based Department of Work and Pensions still operates Universal Credit payments. Any alteration to them will inevitably impact on the Barnett formula, which is used to calculate the block grant to Scotland. Or, as I prefer to think of it, Scotland's pocket money. Just the same, we do now have a range of payments which are unique to this country – as I say, an expensive but necessary hobby. Social Security Scotland is now responsible for delivering a range of benefits, including some that are new and unique to Scotland, such as the Scottish Child Payment and Best Start Payments. The Best Start element covers a whole range of payments, many of which start during pregnancy and continue through early learning and school years. John Swinney's SNP Government has said ending child poverty is its top priority (Image: Jane Barlow) Of course, these are only available to families already poor enough to qualify for other benefits, but isn't that the point? Giving money to people who don't need it is what irritates the hell out of many taxpayers, even when they acknowledge the eye-watering cost of means testing. The massive row which engulfed Labour over proposed 'reforms' to the benefits system wasn't just because of the ballooning cost of sickness benefit, but because the folk who promised change to their new constituents on their doorsteps never envisaged that the change in question was to emerge as red Tories. The UK Government will argue that they have done many fine things which go largely unacknowledged. That may be so, but when among your first acts in office are to hit pensioners, threaten to disenfranchise thousands of benefit recipients and get the farming community on the march, you can hardly blame people for muttering that this was certainly not why they voted for the people's party. The other morning, I heard a GP pushing back very hard on the idea that the people going through her consulting room were swinging the lead rather than avoiding paid employment. She said that the Covid years had changed her clients beyond recognition and that we were facing an explosion in mental health problems. READ MORE: Reform UK attack King Charles over small boats comments in UK-France speech When you look at the waiting lists for appointments in that area, it's difficult to disagree. Bit by bit, we are beginning to learn how profoundly those three years of social restrictions have impacted huge swathes of society. Some of the people most severely affected were those who did work during the pandemic, who kept the show on the road for the rest of us. Everyone from health professionals to delivery drivers didn't have the luxury of observing social distancing. That period also saw the birth of them and us – the people stuck up high rises with small children who tried to marry their own need to keep working and put food on the table with the imperative to ensure their children were still being home-schooled. And those of us who had ready access to wide open spaces and could construct a social bubble in our own locality. That divide was mirrored in the teaching profession – I know of teachers who worked their socks off providing oven-ready lessons for the children of already stressed parents, and some others who didn't seem to give too much of a stuff. Let's hope we can recall some of the fallout from those years, because most of the scientific community is convinced that we are not that far away from another pandemic, given the nature of globalisation and travel. Not a pretty thought, but one essential to confront. Let's hope that if there is a next time round, the door won't be flung open to all the chancers who thought it perfectly OK to line their own pockets on the back of national misery. Let's hope too that if there is a next time round, Scotland will finally be in charge of its own destiny. It has become fashionable in some quarters to decry any notion that Scotland is in any way exceptional. That we are somehow more thirled to social justice than elsewhere and less racist with it. In truth, so many people in this country are too preoccupied with surviving, with trying to have some month left at the end of their money, to fret about matters constitutional. It doesn't mean they can't be inspired and motivated by clarion calls to a different future. Morgan in Wales has doubtless got more than half an eye on the Welsh elections next year. Surely time for some Scots politicians to enthuse their troops too. The electoral clock is ticking ever more loudly.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Ian Murray panned for ‘disgraceful' U-turns as past motions resurface
The Scottish Secretary signed Early Day Motions on a range of topics while Labour were in opposition, including demanding full compensation (and free bus passes) for the Waspi women, membership of the EU's customs union and unilateral nuclear disarmament. They have all now ditched by Labour after coming to power. A motion that Murray backed in 2019 also took aim at the record of US president Donald Trump, including his "misogynism, racism and xenophobia'. READ MORE: Octopus Energy to pay £1.5 million for prepayment meter billing errors It also called on the then UK Government to rescind the offer of a full state visit to President Trump. Now as Scottish Secretary, Murray has said he would 'meet Donald Trump off the plane'. It also comes as Trump is reportedly expected to touch down in Scotland to visit his golf courses at the end of July or the beginning of August. The SNP have now hit out at Murray, saying that the U-turns are 'disgraceful' – also taking aim at what they said was his previous 'uncharacteristically strong' support for Palestine and gender reform. (Image: NQ) The party pinpointed a motion in 2017, which Murray supported, raised concerns over the Israeli government's treatment of Palestinian children while another from 2011 called for the UK Government to officially recognise a Palestinian state – the new Labour Government has not yet done so. Murray also supported a motion in 2017 which said gender identity "includes those who do not identify as either male or female, identify as both, a third gender or are fluid in their identity". But as Scottish Secretary, he refused to rule out lifting the Tory-imposed veto on the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill. "Labour's Secretary of State for Scotland's transformation from backbench idealist to Cabinet loyalist is not just disappointing, it's disgraceful,' SNP MSP Gordon MacDonald told the Sunday National. 'From Palestine to pensioners, nuclear weapons to the EU, he has abandoned almost every principle he once claimed to champion. 'His constituents, and Scotland, deserve better than a minister who has traded his principles for power - as ever, Scotland is an afterthought for Labour politicians.' Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Scottish Tories splash £150k of taxpayer cash on 'media training'
The party spent a total of £154,700 on media training between March 2022 and March 2024, according to the Holyrood expenses register. Gen Comms Limited – which is led by its former director of media between 2000 and 2012, Ramsay Jones – benefitted to the tune of £118,200 in that timeframe from training the 31 Scottish Tory MSPs, including both 'individual' and 'group' broadcast training. Shorthand PR, meanwhile, which is led by the party's former head of media Adam Morris, also received £26,000 for 'written media' and 'social media' training in 2023 and 2024. READ MORE: Octopus Energy to pay £1.5 million for prepayment meter billing errors The funding was raised through contributions from Scottish Tory MSPs' support budgets, which are given to every MSP to help them carry out their official duties. But the Scottish Tory total is far higher than anything claimed by other parties – bolstered by their high media training spend. Using the same mechanism, Scottish Labour notably paid £30,000 in March 2024 to Ebor Political Consultants Limited – a consultancy run by former spin doctor Alan Roden. (Image: PA) MSPs from other parties have also undergone training. For example, Scottish Labour MSP Neil Bibby expenses £459 for video editing training for staff last year. Now SNP minister Angela Constance's staff underwent social media training in 2023 for £199. Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater spent £3000 on 'communication skills' training in 2023. Scottish Tory MSP Edward Mountain also paid Shorthand PR a total of £10,500 in three separate payments spanning January to March 2024 for 'consultancy fees for communications'. The more than £150,000 of taxpayer money spent by the Scottish Tories for media training comes as its leader Russell Findlay has pushed – to much fanfare – for Scotland to have its very own Department for Government Efficiency (Doge). In February this year, Findlay pledged to set up his own version of Elon Musk's powerful cost-cutting US government department. The Scottish Conservative leader said the Scottish version of Doge would be tasked with 'cutting waste, identifying savings and delivering better value for taxpayers'. An SNP source told the Sunday National that this story will be 'raising eyebrows among voters'. They added: 'Anyone watching Tory MSPs media performances will be demanding a refund.' Meanwhile, Scottish LibDem MP Alistair Carmichael said: "The best spin doctors and media training in the world could not make any difference when it comes to the car crash interviews we've seen from Conservative parliamentarians defending Boris Johnson and Liz Truss in recent years." The Scottish Greens have said it "raises ethics questions". '£155,000 is a lot of public funds to spend on media training over just two years, and I don't think anyone would argue they got value for money," MSP Maggie Chapman said. "It's right that elected representatives can get support and training to do their jobs, but it has to be within reason. And handing such large sums of money to former party colleagues raises further ethics questions." She added: 'Nobody will be surprised by the Tories wasting money. We still remember the Tory MPs shamelessly caught claiming for duck houses and moats on expenses. Not to mention the £700 million they spent on the illegal Rwanda scheme, or the £22 billion they cost bill payers by cutting energy efficiency schemes. 'For all their talk, when you actually look at the books, there's nobody better at wasting money than a Tory.' In response, a Scottish Conservative spokesperson said: 'This contract covered the delivery of specialist media training to all Scottish Conservative MSPs throughout the financial year. 'It was financed through pooled contributions drawn from the individual support budgets allocated to each MSP.' Morris from Shorthand PR said: 'We provide media support and training across business and the political spectrum, and were delighted to assist the Scottish Conservatives.' Gen Comms Limited didn't respond to a request for comment.
