
The Big Beautiful Bill Fixes One Drug Problem—But Highlights An Even Bigger One
Buried within the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law July 4, is a provision that could improve or even save the lives of the 30 million Americans suffering from rare diseases.
That provision is the Orphan Cures Act, which exempts certain drugs that treat rare diseases from the scheme of price controls Democrats established in Medicare as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. The first round of price controls takes effect on ten medicines dispensed through the Part D drug benefit in January 2026.
This exemption is common sense. Why should federal policy discourage companies from investing in drugs that treat rare diseases—defined as those that afflict fewer than 200,000 Americans per year—by threatening them with price controls?
But that's exactly what the IRA did. Drugs that were approved for treating just one rare disease were carved out from the law's price controls. But if a manufacturer secured approval for a second indication for a given rare-disease drug, then it lost that exemption.
That's obviously not in patients' interests. Shouldn't public policy encourage pharmaceutical companies to investigate whether their drugs have multiple applications?
Thousands of rare diseases lack effective therapies of any kind. The IRA, wittingly or not, aimed to keep it that way.
It's a good thing that the Orphan Cures Act was added to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. But it would be better had the legislation not been necessary in the first place.
The IRA's price controls stifle pharmaceutical innovation. The Incubate Coalition's Life Sciences Investment Tracker shows that drug companies have discontinued more than 50 research programs and canceled 26 drug projects since the passage of the IRA.
And there's evidence that companies have been curtailing their research into orphan drugs, in particular. According to the National Pharmaceutical Council, 'the percentage of drugs with a first orphan designation that later received a second designation decreased by 48.0%' after the Inflation Reduction Act passed.
That's especially shocking considering that, over the four years prior to the passage of the bill, the number of orphan drugs that received a second indication had been steadily increasing.
Orphan drug research may be an especially risky proposition. But developing more mainstream drugs is hardly a blue-chip process. It costs $2.6 billion and can take more than a decade for companies to bring a single new drug to market. Roughly one in ten drug candidates successfully makes it from phase one clinical trials to the market.
Drug development would almost certainly be a money-losing industry more often than not, were it not for the fact that pharmaceutical companies in America have a period of exclusive, market-driven sales during which they can earn a return on their investment. The money they earn from the drugs that do get approved allows them to recoup their losses from failed drugs and earn enough money to invest in future lines of research.
Price controls upend that economic calculus. If drug makers know that the government will swoop in and set arbitrarily low prices on the products they manage to bring to market, they'll be discouraged from investing the billions it takes to do so.
The IRA's price controls could lead to the development of 135 fewer drugs by 2039, according to one study. That disruption in innovation could cost the United States $18 trillion in 'health losses' in the same window, according to research from University of Chicago economist Tomas Philipson.
The inclusion of the Orphan Cures Act in the One Big Beautiful Bill may ward off some of those potential losses. But making a single exemption to the IRA is not enough. Congress must roll back price controls on prescription drugs altogether.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Smithsonian explains why a Trump reference was removed from impeachment exhibit
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History in Washington, D.C., has removed references to President Donald Trump in a display about impeachments, despite Trump being the first and only president in American history to be impeached twice. But the museum says the move is temporary. The Washington Post first reported the change on Thursday, July 31. On Friday, Aug. 1, the Smithsonian clarified the museum's removal. Here's what we know. Smithsonian: Display restored to 2008 appearance The "impeachment" display is housed within the larger, permanent gallery called "The American Presidency," which opened in 2000, according to an emailed statement from the Smithsonian. It features information and artifacts about Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, according to the display's companion website. Nixon resigned before he could be formally impeached. In September 2021, a "temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump" was added, according to the Smithsonian's statement. "It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025." The display has since been returned to how it appeared nearly 20 years ago, according to the Smithsonian statement and the Washington Post's report, which also noted that the exhibit now says, "only three presidents have seriously faced removal," omitting Trump. 'In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed," the museum's statement said. "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the 'Impeachment' case back to its 2008 appearance." Website highlights other impeached presidents The companion website for the display does not include a dedicated section for the Trump impeachments but notes in an introductory sentence, "The House of Representatives impeached Andrew Johnson in 1868, William J. Clinton in 1998, and Donald Trump in 2019 and again in 2021. In all four cases the Senate voted to acquit." It includes sections about Johnson's impeachment, including tickets and newspaper clips from the time; Nixon's Senate hearing and resignation, including testimony papers and photos from the proceedings; and Clinton's trial, with tickets and Senate question cards. 'All impeachments' coming in the future "A future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments," the Smithsonian statement said, noting that updating and renewing permanent galleries"requires a significant amount of time and funding." The Smithsonian declined to answer further questions about the change and the timeline for an updated exhibit. The controversy around the Smithsonian's change to the display comes after the White House in May pushed for the removal of art director Kim Sajet from her role as director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, citing her "strong support" of "DEI." In March, Trump also signed an executive order demanding the removal of "anti-American ideology" from the Smithsonian and other cultural institutions. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Smithsonian responds after Trump removed from impeachment exhibit

Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal Reserve Governor Kugler steps down, giving Trump slot to fill
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve governor Adriana Kugler announced that she will step down next Friday, opening up a spot on the central bank's powerful board that President Donald Trump will be able to fill. Kugler, who did not participate in the Fed's policy meeting earlier this week, would have completed her term in January. Instead, she will retire Aug. 8. She did not provide a reason for stepping down in her resignation letter. Trump has stepped up his criticism of the Fed since chair Jerome Powell said Wednesday that the central bank would keep its short-term interest rate unchanged. Powell also said the Fed could take months to evaluate the impact of tariffs on the economy before deciding to cut rates, as Trump has demanded.
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVO: Novo Nordisk Stock Climbs After Major FDA Approval
Aug 1 - Novo Nordisk (NYSE:NVO) gained nearly 3% in Friday morning trading after the company secured expanded U.S. approval for its Alhemo injection. The therapy can now help prevent or reduce bleeding episodes in adults and children 12 and older with hemophilia A or B. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with NVO. Previously, Alhemo was only authorized for patients with hemophilia A or B who developed inhibitors. The new decision from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration followed a late?stage clinical trial that demonstrated the drug's safety and ability to lower bleeding risk in a broader patient group. Analysts say this approval could significantly expand Alhemo's market potential. The hemophilia space is becoming increasingly competitive with gene therapies and new clotting factor treatments, but Novo Nordisk's broader label should reinforce its rare disease portfolio. The company expects Alhemo to contribute to revenue growth in the second half of 2025 as more patients gain access. Investors will watch whether this momentum continues into upcoming quarters as the therapy reaches a larger base of hemophilia patients. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data