‘There will be repercussions' Homeland Security official targets Nashville mayor over immigration
Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell continued to serve as a social media target for federal officials Thursday over his response to the mass detainments of immigrants in Nashville earlier this month.
On Thursday a Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary for public affairs accused O'Connell of 'harboring' immigrants without legal status and 'doxxing' immigration enforcement agents — echoing comments made by Tennessee 5th District Congressman Andy Ogles the day before.
'It certainly looks like Mayor O'Connell was involved in some sort of obstruction or the harboring of criminal illegal aliens in the great city of Nashville,' Tricia McLaughlin said in a media interview posted on the official X account of the Department of Homeland Security.
'But also just last night his office put out the names of Homeland Security investigators and doxxed our ICE enforcement officers,' she said. 'They claimed it was a mistake. There's zero chance it was a mistake and there will be repercussions.'
Late Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security published a list of cities, counties and states across the nation it said were 'deliberately and shamefully obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws endangering American communities.' The list came with this demand that 'these jurisdictions immediately review and revise their policies to align with Federal immigration laws and renew their obligation to protect American citizens, not dangerous illegal aliens.'
Nashville and Shelby County in west Tennessee, the county seat of Memphis, appear on the list, which was entitled 'Sanctuary Jurisdictions Violating Federal Immigration Law.' Neither Nashville nor Shelby County have adopted so-called sanctuary city policies, which are barred under Tennessee law.
The accusations against O'Connell center on a longstanding executive order requiring city departments to report interactions with immigration officials.
O'Connell revised the order in early May to require the reporting to take place within 24 hours.
U.S. border czar: Nashville mayor, a critic of immigration sweeps, now faces investigation
The revision took place in the midst of a joint operation by the Tennessee Highway Patrol and the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which led to the detainment of nearly 200 immigrants during traffic stops in South Nashville, a diverse neighborhood that is home to many of the city's immigrant communities. The majority of those detained had no criminal records.
The mayor's order requires all emergency and some non-emergency city agencies and officials to report any interaction with federal immigration to the Mayor's Office of New and Indigenous Americans, a department created to foster civic participation.
The department posted a spreadsheet with summaries of the interactions on its website. As of Wednesday, there were 35 interactions reported between city officials and immigration authorities in May.
One entry identified an ICE analyst by first name. Two others listed the full names of Homeland Security Investigations officials. A fourth entry listed the full name of an immigration supervisor.
By Thursday morning, the names had been removed from the city's website.
A statement from the mayor's office said the names had been posted in error.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement 'dragnet' in Nashville results in detentions
'It is not the normal practice to include the names of individuals in EO30 (the executive order) reporting. Any names mistakenly included have been removed.'
Questions to the Department of Homeland Security on Thursday to clarify McLaughlin's comments about 'repercussions' for the mayor's actions went unanswered.
The public comments about O'Connell by federal officials came a day after the announcement by White House 'border czar' Tom Homan that — as a result of O'Connell's public stance against the mass enforcement actions — multi-agency immigration crackdowns could soon return to Nashville.
'We'll flood the zone in the neighborhoods to find the bad guy. We'll flood the zone at work sites to find the bad guy, but we're going to do it, and he's (O'Connell) not going to stop us,' said Homan, the White House executive director of enforcement and removal operations.
Earlier this week, Ogles held a press conference to denounce O'Connell, a Democrat, for 'aiding and abetting illegal immigration.' Ogles accused the Nashville mayor of obstructing the work of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials, citing O'Connell's public statements and executive order.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Richmond Confederate statues removed in 2020 head to LA
The peed-on Jefferson Davis statue that protesters took down in 2020 is temporarily moving out of Richmond. Why it matters: It's one of several of Richmond's Confederate monuments being shipped to Los Angeles for an exhibit about how these statues — and their recent removal from public spaces — have shaped American history. Driving the news: The Valentine announced Monday that the Confederate Statespresident's statue, displayed at the Richmond museum for over three years, is headed to the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art on Aug. 17. Then on Tuesday, the Black History Museum in Jackson Ward said it's also loaning the LA exhibit Confederate-era monuments that the city took down in 2020. These include the "Vindicatrix" sculpture known as "Miss Confederacy" that sat atop the Davis monument, the Matthew Fontaine Maury statue and globe, and granite slabs from different Confederate monument bases. The pieces will be "recontextualized" in the exhibit to "foster critical dialogue about their historical significance and the ideologies they represent," the museum said in a news release. Zoom out: The exhibit, which runs from October to April, starts months after the Trump administration ordered a federal review of the statues toppled in the wake of George Floyd's murder. The city owns the land where the Confederate monuments in Richmond, the former capital of the Confederacy, once stood. And most of the taken-down monuments remain in the city's wastewater treatment plant. What's next: The Valentine is closing its survey about people's feelings regarding the monuments' removal, and where they should be moved, on Aug. 18. Results will be shared by the end of October.
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
The ‘Art of the Deal' author keeps getting out-negotiated by Putin and Xi
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me over and over? I might as well surrender. Back in the day, even before he took office for the first time in 2017, President-elect Trump sent a clear message to Communist China and the world that he was not one to be hindered by convention or well-established protocols that no longer made sense — at least to him. Thus, when he received a congratulatory telephone call from Taiwan's then-president Tsai Ing-wen, herself only in office for eight months, he accepted it routinely and graciously, like any of the other good wishes received from world leaders. He dismissed the cautions from his advisers that, ever since President Jimmy Carter broke off diplomatic relations in 1979 with the Republic of China (Taiwan's official name), high-ranking American officials simply do not have direct contact with Taiwanese counterparts. He brusquely told those with the raised eyebrows that he would speak with anyone he chose to. His refreshing message of defiance gave hope to Taiwanese and their supporters in the U.S. and around the world. The new sheriff in town, it seemed, would do a lot less diplomatic pussyfooting regarding Beijing's supposed sensitivities about all things Taiwan. For the next four years, Trump was supported in his more direct approach — toward both Taiwan and China — by a superb national security team of truth-telling China 'hawks.' These included Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, successive National Security Advisors John Bolton and Robert O'Brien, their deputy Matt Pottinger, Assistant Secretary Randy Shriver, and a range of other mid-level foreign policy and national security officials who shared clear-eyed views about the manifold threats posed by the regime of the Chinese Communist Party. After his second election, the new incoming Trump administration did not announce a congratulatory phone call from Taiwan's new president, William Lai Ching-te — either because Lai had been advised by U.S. officials not to initiate one and thereby irritate China, or because (less likely) the call occurred but was not publicized. A less ambiguous explanation pertains to the Trump team's decision not to allow Lai to make a New York stopover during his planned trip to South America, now canceled by the embarrassed Taiwanese president. Trump's rejection of Lai's brief pass-though visit breaks several years of U.S. tradition, a favorite Trump practice. But this disruption, instead of advancing Taiwan's short-term advantage and America's long-term interest, represents a significant step backward in the U.S.-Taiwan relationship. It was clearly taken to set the stage for Trump-Xi trade talks and Trump's hoped-for visit to Beijing. There may be an even more sinister explanation for cancellation of Lai's travel. Purely conjectural at this point is the possibility that intelligence sources detected a Chinese threat against Lai and recommended a prudent cancellation of his travel, with public reports from both the U.S. and Taiwan sides providing a convenient cover story. Even the most innocent explanation of Lai's aborted stopover is an inauspicious indication of how Trump will calculate his balancing of U.S. interests between China and Taiwan. It may also reflect the role of Trump's undersecretary of policy at the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, who long opposed the Biden administration's flow of arms to Ukraine as a diversion of resources Taiwan needs to deter or defend against Chinese aggression. At his confirmation hearing, Colby said that Taiwan is 'important' to U.S. interests, but 'not existential.' It is a new and cramped understanding of U.S. interests which depend heavily on the international perception of U.S. credibility and its incalculable value in reassuring allies and deterring adversaries. The danger of diminished credibility was demonstrated with Biden's disastrous abandonment of Afghanistan, which was followed within months by Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine. The harm to America's reputation was only partially undone by Trump's dramatic strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities last month. But doubts about U.S. credibility remain because the Iran operation, while hardly a pinprick like so many prior military strikes, may have been a one-off, not to be repeated, and Iran defiantly continues restoring and advancing its nuclear program. The dangerous Taiwan analogue would be, for example, a Chinese seizure of Quemoy or some other Taiwanese island, or a Chinese blockade, followed by a largely symbolic U.S. military strike that fails to convince Beijing to back off. Washington's dilemma then would be whether to escalate the kinetics and risk derailing the trade talks and Trump's Beijing visit, or to accept the new status quo. It illustrates the increased leverage Trump has foolishly granted Xi and the erosion of diplomatic standing he has gratuitously inflicted on Taiwan. China has its own cards to play, of course, including withholding rare-earth minerals critically-needed by the U.S. defense industry. The U.S. cannot afford to buckle under those pressures without further eroding overall security credibility. Trump only recently acknowledged that he was frequently taken in by Putin's empty promises about ending the war in Ukraine — just as he strongly implied in 2019 that Xi had deceived him about the nature and origins of COVID. Yet, in both cases, he returned time and again to placing his trust in the dictators' words and relying on their nonexistent good faith. Worse, the converse of his credulity with America's authoritarian adversaries is reflected in his apparent contempt for our democratic friends and allies in Ukraine and Taiwan. While Trump's recent comments indicate he may have finally seen the light on Putin, his pursuit of a trade deal and quest for a China invitation suggest another double-win for China. China has managed to achieve these so-called win-wins during every U.S. presidential trip since Richard Nixon's. In exchange for allowing a Trump visit this time, Beijing will extract added U.S. concessions during the trade talks–beyond, e.g., Trump's 'flexibility on Tik-Tok, at the same time it benefits from U.S. deference to China on Taiwan. To borrow Trump's assessment of most of his predecessors, this is the way to Make America 'Stupid' Again. The only way Trump can restore America's lost credibility and deter a tragic miscalculation by China is to declare clearly and publicly that he will commit all the military force necessary to defend Taiwan. Joseph A. Bosco served as China country director in the office of the secretary of defense,2005-2006. He is a member of the advisory board of the Vandenberg Coalition and the Global Taiwan Institute.
UPI
20 minutes ago
- UPI
Gallup Poll says U.S.-born Pope Leo XIV is world's most popular figure
1 of 9 | Data released Tuesday by the Washington-based Gallup suggested American-born Pope Leo XIV (pictured May 18 in St Peter's Square at the Vatican) had a 57% favorability rating and 11% unfavorable in a +46 net-favorable score. File Photo by Stefano Spaziani/UPI | License Photo Aug. 5 (UPI) -- A new Gallup survey shows that Pope Leo XIV is the most popular global figure among 14 names in its poll with a "strongly negative" skew for Elon Musk and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The data released Tuesday by the Washington-based firm suggested the pope had a 57% favorability rating and 11% unfavorable in a +46 net-favorable score. "That's unheard of in today's political climate," Christopher Hale, a Democratic Party figure and nonprofit leader, commented on social media. It showed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in second at 52% favorability but far below the Roman Catholic Church leader with a 34% unfavorable rate. Vermont's Independent-affiliated Sen. Bernie Sanders was third at a 49% favorable viewpoint in the Gallup Poll but with a 38% negative rating, too. "The direction of the American people's sentiments bends towards Bernie," Faiz Shakir, a Sanders adviser and nonprofit newsroom chief, posted Tuesday morning on X. A large number of survey participants left no opinion of French President Emmanuel Macron and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. AOC's 34% favorable rating was matched with a 38% unfavorable with Macron's own 30% favorability and downside of 31%. Meanwhile, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sat near the middle of the survey resutls at 42% favorable, a 47% unfavorable but 3% of poll participants with no opinion of him. At the bottom rung of the 14-name poll was ex-White House DOGE adviser Elon Musk with a 33% favorable but 61% negative unfavorable rating. Musk was below Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at number 13 with only 29% of those in the survey having a favorable opinion of the far-right leader as the Gaza war continues with Hamas on top of a worsening humanitarian crisis among Palestinians. The Gallup favorability rating poll indicated that newsmakers viewed more negative than positive included U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio with a -16 unfavorable rating, followed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at -12%. But tied at an 11% unfavorably were rumored Democratic presidential candidate and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Vice President JD Vance and ex-U.S. President Joe Biden. Media figure Bill Kristol, director of Defending Democracy Together, suggested the survey means Americans "haven't entirely lost our minds."
