Tenancy Tribunal orders landlord Jake Sim to pay tenant $3500 for unlawful entries, breaching his peace
Photo:
123rf
A man leaving his home for work at 6.30am went to jump into his work van but unexpectedly found his landlord sitting in it, drinking a handle of beer.
The incidents were a part of a bigger tenancy issue in which Sim turned up at the property intoxicated and banging on the doors, and on other occasions, unlawfully let himself in.
According to a recently released decision, the concerned tenant began setting "traps" to catch Sim in the act and also changed the locks, which, legally, he was not allowed to do.
Eventually, because of Sim's "behaviour", the tenant, who can not be named, gave notice to end the tenancy late last year.
Even moving out was an issue as the pair disagreed on what day the tenancy ended.
The tenant said it was 17 November, while Sim said it was the 15th.
Sim broke into the house on the 15th and was then blamed by the tenant for the alleged theft of $3000 and two rings after his gun safe was allegedly forced open.
The tenant later complained to the Tenancy Tribunal, claiming compensation and exemplary damages for alleged unlawful entries by Sim and breaches of his right to quiet enjoyment of the premises.
A recently released decision stated the tenancy started on 4 April 2022, and while the tenant paid rent from that date, he was in the process of selling his own home and did not completely move into the rental until around June 2022.
The tenant told the tribunal that on 23 April that year, he went to the rental, the location of which was redacted from the decision, and found a treadmill set up and a TV mounted on a wall.
A half-empty handle of an alcoholic drink had been left beside the treadmill.
The tenant questioned Sim, and his reply was to the effect of "I can do what I like, I own the property".
The tenant reiterated that he was paying rent and Sim could not enter whenever he liked.
But sometime during the following week, the items were removed, again, without notice being given to enter the property.
According to the decision, Sim, who lived near the rental, had not been invited over and the tenant, who took a photo of Sim in the van to use as evidence, did not expect him to be sitting in his vehicle.
The tenant's partner told the tribunal that on other occasions, Sim turned up, often intoxicated, banging on the door and calling out to her.
"She said that she stopped answering the door to him. She also gave evidence of the nature of his comments and conversation; she described it as inappropriate and made her feel uncomfortable."
The tribunal accepted her evidence and found it was consistent with the tone of Sim's messaging.
The decision stated that the tenant began "setting traps" when he was going away to see whether someone was entering the property.
While the decision didn't detail the traps, it said that when the tenant found a closed bathroom door open on his return in April 2024, he approached Sim.
He said Sim admitted to taking "a sneaky look at the bathroom".
While Sim did not turn up to the tribunal hearing, he did provide written submissions in which he said he went into the house on that occasion to look at the shower drain, though there was no evidence of it being an emergency.
Around mid-2024, the tenant changed the locks to the house.
He acknowledged it was a breach of his obligations as a tenant but said he felt he had no other option.
The tribunal ruled it would not order him to pay exemplary damages, given the context in which the locks were changed.
As the tenancy came to an end and the tenant was in the process of moving out, Sim indicated he knew the locks had been changed.
He texted the tenant saying, "I can always get in".
Sim then said he had used a lock-picking kit to let himself in on November 14. Then, on November 15, when he believed the tenancy had ended, he climbed through a window.
The tenant claimed that when he returned to the premises on November 16 to finish moving, his gun safe had been opened and $3000 in cash and two rings were gone.
Messages from Sim showed that he denied opening the safe but said he had left the house unlocked.
"I will admit to breaking in but you are not allowed to change the locks without informing the owner," he texted the tenant.
"Can you give me an indication of what was taken and I'll personally pay it back."
While the tenant sought to recover the cash from Sim, the tribunal was not satisfied there was enough evidence to prove the money and rings were removed from the safe.
But it did find that the tenancy end date was 17 November and that Sim had entered the rental unlawfully on November 15 and four other occasions.
He also "displayed a persistent, cavalier attitude to the tenant's right to quiet enjoyment of the premises", the tribunal ruled.
He was ordered to pay the tenant, who was awarded name suppression, $2000 compensation and $1500 in damages.
-This story originally appeared in the
New Zealand Herald
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Kiwi dad Dane Moule's desperate bid to see son in Aussie lands him in court
By Tracy Neal, Open Justice reporter of Dane Moule was sentenced in the Nelson District Court on charges linked to him forging two passports and travelling in and out of New Zealand for three years. Photo: Open Justice/Tracy Neal A man with a "chequered past", including a conviction list spanning 12 pages, was aggrieved when his partner left and took their infant son to Australia. It was the catalyst for Dane Antony Moule to forge two passports so he could travel between New Zealand, Australia and Fiji for three years using the false travel documents, clearing Customs and Immigration each time. Moule told police he "used a fake passport to travel" because he knew he wouldn't be allowed into Australia, where his son was living. Judge Tony Snell noted Moule's extensive criminal past included 83 previous convictions for drug matters, including importing heroin, violence, dishonesty, fraud, sexual offending and driving matters. The 61-year-old today narrowly avoided prison, partly because of health problems he suffered, and was instead sentenced to 12 months of home detention on two representative charges laid under the Passport Act for false representations and using forged and false New Zealand travel documents. The charges carried a maximum of 10 years and five years in prison, respectively. Moule's guilty pleas followed an amendment to what was initially eight separate charges. His lawyer, Mark Dollimore, said in the Nelson District Court that Moule had formed a relationship in the early 2000s and his son was born, but then his partner left with the child for Australia. "He knew he couldn't get to Australia because of his conviction history and he wanted to see his son, and try to re-bond with him," Dollimore said. "This is what fuelled him to do this." According to the police summary of facts, Moule asked an associate to complete the first of two passport applications in May 2015. The New Zealand passport was processed and issued by the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) in his associate's name, but with Moule's photograph. The following month, Moule travelled from Auckland to the Gold Coast, clearing Customs with the passport, knowing it was false, police said. Moule used the same passport to fly back to New Zealand, arriving in Christchurch a few weeks later. He booked another trip to Australia in January 2016, using the same passport to travel from Auckland to Brisbane, returning eight days later. There was then a hiatus in Moule's travels until February 2018, when he travelled to Fiji, using a different, falsely obtained passport. He acquired this second passport in 2016, using the same associate to complete the application in his name but again using Moule's photo. In February 2018, Moule took off for Nadi, having cleared Customs using the forged passport before travelling back to Auckland nine days later. He was eventually caught by the facial recognition technology now used in passports. The Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) issued passports that were then checked by immigration systems when people left or entered New Zealand. At the border, New Zealand Customs used eGates to match the picture of someone's face in their ePassport with the picture it took of them at the gate. Visual inspections were also used, acting group manager of border operations Paul Williams told NZME before sentencing. He said that in circumstances where a passport was genuinely issued, but fraudulently obtained, it would not be easily identified by an eGate or a Customs officer. The DIA began issuing New Zealand biometric passports in 2005, but dozens of false passports were discovered during security checks before a new online passport renewal system was introduced in late 2012. DIA general manager of operations Russell Burnard told NZME that "falsely obtained genuine passports" were rare with none discovered since July 2024. He said Moule's actions were detected as part of a data-matching security project undertaken in late 2020 after an update of its facial recognition algorithm. In May 2021, Moule's image from his original passport in his own identity was matched against the images from his two falsely obtained passports, and the police were notified. Judge Snell said it was essential the integrity of the New Zealand passport system was protected. He said in Moule's case, aggravating features were the level of sophistication and premeditation. "The level of deception was high," Judge Snell said. From a sentencing starting point of two years and nine months in prison, Moule was awarded discounts for his guilty pleas and health status, which whittled the endpoint to two years. The sentence of 12 months of home detention was to be followed by six months of post-release conditions. Immigration New Zealand border director Geoff Scott told NZME that providing false, misleading or withheld information was a serious offence that increased risks for New Zealanders. He said false and misleading information was an issue immigration authorities across the world sought to eliminate, and INZ worked closely with its domestic and international partners to achieve this. The DIA said it was continually reviewing its manual procedures to minimise the risk of human error. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Police seek public's help after spate of suspicious fires in Northland
Photo: 123RF Police are investigating a spate of suspicious fires in Northland, with the latest involving road cones being set alight. Emergency services were called to a fire on Pataua North Road, Whareora on the morning of 20 May. "At around 7am, about 15 T8 Traffic Control cones were taken from a stretch of road under maintenance, stacked in the middle of the road, covered in diesel and set alight," Detective Sergeant Paul Overton said. "A second set of stacked cones were set alight further up the road." Detective Sergeant Overton said over the past seven months, police have received several reports of suspicious bush and scrub fires in the Matapouri, Tutukaka, Ngunguru and Pataua areas. "We encourage anyone who was in these areas or has any information about any of these fires to get in touch," he said. Anyone with information that could help police's enquiries, are urged to update police online or call 105. Please use the reference number 250520/3428. Information can also be provided anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Khandallah murder trial: Blood 'wiped' onto walls to stage scene
Julia DeLuney is on trial for the murder of her mother Helen Gregory. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii A forensic scientist has told the jury in the Khandallah murder trial that, in her opinion, the blood on the hallway walls was staged. Julia DeLuney is accused of murdering her 79-year-old mother, Helen Gregory, who was killed at her Wellington home in January last year. The jury has already seen photos of blood smeared on the walls in the hallway, in and around the utility cupboard which houses the entrance to the attic. DeLuney's defence is that her mother was injured falling from the attic, and she put her in the bedroom on the floor while she drove to get help. In that time, the defence said, someone else caused those fatal injuries. But Knight gave evidence that the blood smears on the hallway walls looked like it had been applied to the wall with fabric. Defence lawyer Quentin Duff asked whether it could have been applied by someone staggering around the house - to which she replied that she doubted it. "I've never seen it in my experience." Knight said in her opinion, the most likely scenario was that blood was wiped onto the walls. She explained that the horizontal bloodstains along the wall curved upward and downward, making it unlikely they were made by the leaning shoulder of either an injured person - or an attacker covered in blood. She told the court an orange fake nail, broken off beside Gregory's body, was found sitting on a pool of blood, and was also covered in tiny blood spatters. Knight said it was possible it had been kicked onto the area of pooled blood, but in her opinion, it had been present and lying face up on the carpet while blood was flying around. DNA testing had shown there was "extremely strong scientific support" for at least some of the DNA on the nail coming from DeLuney. But the defence has argued throughout that the investigation suffered from tunnel vision from the very beginning. Duff pointed to an online exchange between Knight and her peer reviewer. He challenged her on her likely scenario, asking her to present an alternative explanation, and instead Knight doubled down, offering information she gained from police about what they think happened that night by way of explanation. She pointed out a number of things she understood DeLuney had done that night, which she said she was told by the police, to lend weight to her likely scenario. For example, she told her reviewer that DeLuney supposedly changed her clothes, took a shower, and chased a rubbish truck down the street to dispose of some clothing. It is not yet clear from the proceedings of the trial so far whether all of those things did happen. The defence said it caused the reviewer to change his own conclusion - but Knight said she thought of it more as a lightbulb coming on for him during the course of the conversation, and by the end of it, he came around to her way of thinking. Friday would mark the final day of the trial's second week, and it was set down for at least a further two weeks after that. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
