U.S. rejects appeal to fund peacekeeping operations in crisis-hit East African nation
The United States has rejected a United Nations proposal to help finance the African Union's new peacekeeping mission in Somalia.
The U.S. has declined to support a UN proposal to finance the African Union's new peacekeeping mission in Somalia.
The rejection impacts the transition from the African Union's current mission ATMIS to the restructured AUSSOM initiative.
Persistent unrest due to Al-Shabaab insurgents complicates stability and peace efforts in Somalia.
The Trump-led administration has rejected an African Union appeal to fund its new Somalia peace mission, citing operational concerns and poor burden-sharing.
A senior AU delegation visited Washington recently in a final push to secure backing for AUSSOM, which is set to replace ATMIS (African Union Transition Mission in Somalia) in July.
ATMIS is an AU-authorized peacekeeping mission that replaced the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) and aims to support the Somali Security Forces in combating al-Shabaab and securing the country.
The U.S. decision has dealt a major blow to international efforts aimed at stabilizing the country as it transitions from ATMIS to the African Union Support and Stabilization Mission (AUSSOM).
Despite nearly two decades of military presence by the African Union in Somalia, the Islamist insurgent group Al-Shabaab remains deeply entrenched and increasingly emboldened.
While initial AU deployments helped reclaim key areas from militant control, recent offensives by Al-Shabaab have reversed many of those gains.
AU's financial burden
ATMIS, the outgoing African Union mission, faces a severe financial crisis, with nearly $100 million in unpaid salaries and mounting debts, undermining peacekeeper morale and raising concerns about a potential security vacuum in Somalia.
According to a report by the Security Council Report, the US has expressed consistent opposition to the use of the 2719 framework for Somalia.
The framework was adopted in December 2023 and marks a significant development in the financing of African Union (AU)-led peace support operations (PSOs), allowing, for the first time, the use of UN-assessed contributions to fund such missions on a case-by-case basis
' The US has maintained that Somalia is not an appropriate context for the application of the 2719 framework and has opposed the hybrid implementation model, arguing that it does not reflect the spirit or intent of resolution 2719. The US has suggested exploring alternative financing options that extend beyond the traditional donor base.' the report noted
To address this, the UN and AU have agreed to cut $124.9 million from the AUSSOM budget by reducing peacekeeper pay, removing insurance costs, and cutting back on flights and equipment.
As a result, the revised AUSSOM budget is now $166.5 million, down from the projected $190.2 million.
They also hope to fund mine-clearing work through donations instead of the main budget. The UN says these cuts were tough decisions but necessary to keep the mission going without asking member countries to pay more.
Several Security Council members, including EU countries, have stressed the need for diversified funding and cost-sharing for Somalia's peace mission, while China has urged traditional donors to maintain strong financial support.
In contrast, the US has consistently opposed using the 2719 framework for Somalia.
On 2 May, US senators introduced the " AUSSOM Funding Restriction Act of 2025," aiming to block US contributions to AUSSOM under resolution 2719. The US argues that Somalia is unsuitable for the hybrid model and calls for exploring alternative funding options outside traditional donors
The ongoing crisis in Somalia has led to widespread suffering, with millions facing food insecurity and displacement due to conflict between Somali forces and Al-Shabaab. Political instability and clan divisions have further weakened the government's authority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
Iran open to nuclear talks if US rules out further attacks, official says
Iran's deputy foreign minister told the BBC on Monday that Tehran's leaders would be willing to resume diplomatic talks over the country's nuclear program if the U.S. agrees it will not launch any additional military strikes. 'We are hearing from Washington, telling us that they want to talk,' Iranian diplomat Majid Takht-Ravanchi said in an interview with the outlet. 'Right now, we are seeking an answer to this question: Are we going to see a repetition of an act of aggression while we are engaging in dialog?' 'They have not made their position clear yet,' he added. The U.S. launched strikes on three key nuclear facilities in Iran on June 21 as Tehran and Israel traded airstrikes, which paused ongoing U.S.-Iranian negotiations on a new nuclear agreement meant to prohibit Iran from obtaining a massive weapon. President Trump and his allies have touted the U.S. military operation as a success that will set back Iran's nuclear capabilities by years and repeatedly pushed back on a leaked initial assessment that questioned the scope of the damage. Trump on Monday denied that he had been in talks with representatives from Iran. 'I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike [former President] Obama, who paid them $Billions under the stupid 'road to a Nuclear Weapon JCPOA (which would now be expired!),' he wrote in a post on Truth Social, adding 'nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities.' Trump upended the Obama-era Iranian nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), during his first term. The U.S. and Iran had been in ongoing negotiations on a new agreement before Israel launched a surprise attack on Tehran's military and nuclear sites June 13. Takht-Ravanchi told the BBC that Iran would 'insist' on being able to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, which leaders there claimed they were doing before the attacks on their program. 'The capacity can be discussed but to say that you should not have enrichment, you should have zero enrichment and if you do not agree with bomb you? That is the law of the jungle,' Takht-Ravanchi said.
Politico
38 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump administration says Harvard risks ‘loss of all federal resources' due to alleged campus antisemitism
The Trump administration formally accused Harvard University of violating federal civil rights laws and failing to mount an appropriate response to alleged campus antisemitism. Monday's notice marked a stark and renewed threat to Harvard's federal funding amid quiet negotiations between the elite school and government authorities that have otherwise been replete with court fights, threats to Harvard's research funding and foreign student enrollment — and the recent possibility of a detente raised by President Donald Trump. 'Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government,' administration officials, including Justice Department civil rights chief Harmeet K. Dhillon, wrote in a letter to Harvard President Alan Garber. 'Harvard may of course continue to operate free of federal privileges, and perhaps such an opportunity will spur a commitment to excellence that will help Harvard thrive once again,' the officials said. Harvard did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The institution could also lose federal student aid — one of the most severe consequences a university can face — if it doesn't agree to a resolution. About a fifth of Harvard's undergraduate students rely on a federal grant reserved for low-income students. The notice from the Justice Department's antisemitism task force marked the completion of a civil rights investigation into the university pursued by the Department of Health and Human Services, which, according to the administration, has awarded Harvard more than $794 million in federal financial assistance since the 2023 fiscal year. The government concluded Harvard has been 'in some cases deliberately indifferent, and in others has been a willful participant in anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, faculty, and staff' since the Israel-Hamas war began Oct. 7, 2023. A 57-page HHS report that accompanied Monday's notice, obtained by POLITICO, detailed what the government said was a 'pattern of unlawful and unchecked discrimination' that included student-on-student harassment, exclusion from campus spaces and institutional-level acceptance of antisemitism. Authorities also acknowledged an effort 'to secure compliance by voluntary means' through extended discussions with Harvard. HHS' civil rights division 'will make additional efforts to persuade Harvard to take appropriate corrective action, including through submission of a voluntary resolution agreement,' the report said. Authorities told Harvard they would refer the matter to the Justice Department 'as soon as possible after the mailing of this Notice absent voluntary compliance.' The Wall Street Journal first reported news of the government findings. The government's latest Harvard threat signals a shift in the administration's tone from just 10 days ago, when Trump declared a 'historic' deal between his administration and Harvard could soon be on the table. 'We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social, the social media site he owns. One administration official expressed cautious optimism about talks last week, saying there was 'a level of trust that Harvard wants to resolve the conflict and we can see a resolution by the end of the month.' Now, that administration official said, Harvard 'hasn't lived up to its end of the bargain.' 'Talk is cheap, and the president isn't in the business of agreeing to deals in name only or falling for empty promises,' the administration official told POLITICO. 'He and his administration remain committed to working with Harvard, but it's a two-way street.' Bianca Quilantan contributed to this report.
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' clears key Senate hurdle; ‘vote-a-rama' begins
Amber Duke and Steven Olikara discuss the latest on President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' that passed a key Senate hurdle on Saturday as two Republican senators voted against it. #DebtCeiling #RandPaul #Trump
