logo
What to know about buying electric vehicles after the federal tax incentives end

What to know about buying electric vehicles after the federal tax incentives end

Independent15 hours ago
The massive tax and spending cut bill that Congress passed Thursday ends federal tax incentives for electric vehicles.
Buyers have until Sept. 30 to qualify for the federal tax credits on EVs before they are terminated. But experts say there are still strong financial reasons to consider buying the vehicles even without those incentives.
Before the bill passed, new electric vehicles came with a $7,500 federal tax credit, and used EVs included up to $4,000. Those incentives were originally designed to help make the vehicles more affordable. According to the latest data from Kelley Blue Book, the average purchase price of a new EV is roughly $9,000 higher in the United States than the average new gas-powered car. Used EVs on average cost $2,000 more than comparable gas cars.
Those credits, paired with other incentives in many states, helped bridge that price gap. Without them, Senior Policy Director Ingrid Malmgren of the nonprofit advocacy group Plug In America said they will become unaffordable to many lower- and middle-income Americans.
'That's really disappointing because ... they're just a really great way to reduce transportation energy cost burden," Malmgren said.
The up-front cost of an electric vehicle might be higher, but for those who can afford to consider the lifetime fuel and maintenance savings, Malmgren said the EV is still a good financial and environmental move in every state.
EVs are typically still cheaper to own long-term
That is because electric vehicles might not be cheaper to buy, but they are cheaper to drive. Malmgren said that even without the federal tax credits, an electric vehicle owner would still come out ahead.
'Quickly you'll end up paying less than a gas car because it costs much less to fuel, and it needs almost nothing for maintenance,' Malmgren said.
Malmgren said the point at which an EV driver's savings on fuel and maintenance outweigh the higher initial price varies. It depends on the kind of car and how often they are driven, as well as the cost of gasoline and electricity in an area. She said EV owners pay less in upkeep because the cars typically have fewer moving parts to maintain and require less frequent servicing. There are multiplecalculators online that pinpoint that moment based on some of those criteria.
A 2020 study in the academic journal Joule found that the average EV in the U.S. charged with a typical mix of public and private chargers saves the driver $7,700 in fuel costs over a 15-year life span, compared to filling a car with gas. Savings vary by state. The study found that someone charging a car at home during off-peak hours, deemed as a best-case scenario, could save more than $14,000 over 15 years in Washington, where electricity is relatively affordable. The study said that an EV driver in any state exhibiting typical driving and charging behavior would save money on fuel costs. The study did not account for the car's purchase price, its maintenance cost or associated tax credits.
EVs are still cleaner, even when they charge on coal power
Manufacturing an electric vehicle typically creates more pollution than making a traditional gas-powered one. But experts say that driving an EV over the long-term is still less polluting than a gas car.
Once they both drive about 15,000 miles (24,000 km) — slightly more than the average American drives in a year — the total pollution that has gone into making and driving each type of car has evened out, said Peter Slowik, U.S. Passenger Vehicles Lead for the International Council on Clean Transportation. Every mile after that widens the gap between the cleaner electric car and the more pollutive gas car. By the end of the car's life, emissions caused by the average EV are roughly half the average gas car, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.
So unless you buy a new car each year, the EV is the cleaner choice, he said.
'They are a no-brainer,' Slowik said. 'Electric vehicles are already inherently so much more efficient.'
A 2023 analysis by Yale Climate Connections found that electric vehicles are responsible for less carbon dioxide pollution even in areas where the electricity used to charge them comes from coal. An EV in West Virginia, which is one of the most coal-reliant states, still pollutes 31% less than an equivalent gas-powered car, according to the analysis.
Slowik said that is because electric cars are better at translating energy into forward motion. For example, the most popular EVs in the US, the Tesla Model Y and the Tesla Model 3, can drive more than 100 miles (161 km) on energy equivalent to what is provided by a gallon of gasoline.
'If you compare that to a 25-mpg gasoline vehicle, that's already four to five times more efficient,' Slowik said.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's intense EV rivalry tests Thailand's local production goals
China's intense EV rivalry tests Thailand's local production goals

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

China's intense EV rivalry tests Thailand's local production goals

BANGKOK, July 4 (Reuters) - Hyper-competition in China's electric vehicle sector is spilling over to its biggest market in Asia, Thailand, as smaller players struggle to compete with dominant BYD ( opens new tab, putting ambitious local production plans at risk. Neta, among the earliest Chinese EV brands to enter Thailand in 2022, is an example of a struggling automaker finding it difficult to meet the requirements of a demanding government incentive programme meant to boost Thai EV production. Under the scheme, carmakers are exempt from import duties, but were obligated to match import volumes with domestic production in 2024. Citing slowing sales and tightening credit conditions, carmakers asked the government to adjust the scheme and the 2024 production shortfall was rolled over into this year. Neta has said that it cannot produce the required number of cars locally and the government has withheld some payments to the EV maker, said Excise Department official Panupong Sriket, who received a complaint filed last month by 18 Neta dealers in Thailand seeking to recover over 200 million baht ($6.17 million) of allegedly unpaid debt. The complaint, a copy of which was reviewed by Reuters, also detailed missed payments by Neta related to promised support for building showrooms and after-sales service. "I stopped ordering more cars in September because I sensed something was wrong," said Neta dealership owner Saravut Khunpitiluck. "I'm currently suing them." Neta's parent company, Zhejiang Hozon New Energy Automobile, entered bankruptcy proceedings in China last month, according to state media. Neta and its Chinese parent did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Neta's share of Thailand's EV market peaked at around 12% of EV sales in 2023 when the industry was growing, according to Counterpoint Research data, with BYD having a 49% share that year. In Thailand, a regional auto production and export hub, Chinese brands dominate the EV market with a combined share of more than 70%. The number of Chinese EV brands has doubled in the last year to 18, placing pressure on those that lack the reach of BYD, which has taken over from Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab as the world's biggest EV maker. In the first five months of this year, new registration of Neta cars - a proxy for sales - slumped 48.5% from the prior year and its share of EV registrations was down to 4%, according to government data. "Neta's downturn in Thailand reflects the fragility of second-tier Chinese EV brands both at home and abroad," said Abhik Mukherjee, an automotive analyst at Counterpoint Research. "Intense price competition and the scale advantages of dominant players have made survival increasingly difficult for smaller companies, particularly in export markets, where margins are slim and robust after-sales support is essential." In Thailand, Neta's biggest international market, it sells three models, with the cheapest Neta V-II Lite priced at 549,000 baht ($16,924) before discounts, compared to market leader BYD's entry-level Dolphin model that is priced at 569,900 baht. Thailand's domestic auto market has become increasingly competitive amid a sluggish economy. "Some Chinese brands have slashed prices by more than 20%,' said Rujipun Assarut, assistant managing director of KResearch, a unit of Thai lender Kasikornbank. "Pricing has become the main strategy to stimulate buying." China's EV overcapacity and price war have pushed automakers to expand abroad, but markets like Thailand are now mirroring the same hyper-competitive pressures, exposing smaller firms to similar risks. Three years ago, Thailand unveiled an ambitious plan to transform its car industry, long dominated by Japanese majors like Toyota (7203.T), opens new tab and Honda (7267.T), opens new tab, to ensure at least 30% of its total auto production was EVs by 2030. The country, which exports about half of its auto output, has drawn more than $3 billion in investments from a clutch of Chinese EV makers, including Neta, who were partly lured to Southeast Asia's second-largest economy by the government incentive scheme. "Neta's case should give the Thai policymakers pause," said Ben Kiatkwankul, partner at Bangkok-based government affairs advisory firm, Maverick Consulting Group. Last December, after a sharp sales contraction, Thailand's Board of Investment gave EV makers an extension to the initial local production timeline to avoid oversupply and a worsening price war. Under the original scheme, local EV production in 2024 was required to match each vehicle imported between February 2022 to December 2023 or the automaker would incur hefty fines. Car manufacturers avoided those fines with the extension carrying over unmet production into this year, but at a higher ratio of 1.5 times imports. Thailand's Board of Investment did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. Siamnat Panassorn, vice president of the Electric Vehicle Association of Thailand, said Neta's issues were company-specific and did not reflect flaws in Thai policies or the market. But external shocks, including geopolitical tensions and the spectre of higher tariffs, have added to the pressure felt by the sector, he said. For Thai Neta dealers like Chatdanai Komrutai, the crisis is deepening. The brand's car owners have taken to social media in droves to share maintenance issues and limited after-sales support and a consumer watchdog agency is inspecting some of those complaints. "Selling cars is difficult right now," Chatdanai said. "There's no confidence." ($1 = 32.4100 baht)

Homeowners will be able to build WIND FARMS in their back garden under new green energy government plans
Homeowners will be able to build WIND FARMS in their back garden under new green energy government plans

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Homeowners will be able to build WIND FARMS in their back garden under new green energy government plans

HOMEOWNERS may be able to build wind farms in their back garden under new green energy government plans. Energy secretary Ed Miliband has revealed plans to launch a consultation on shaking up rules for building wind farms on personal property. 2 It could mean wind turbines on rooftops and in people's gardens could be easier to build. Wind farms can help to reduce energy bills, because it can be a cheaper way of generating electricity. A consultation will be launched at the end of the year. The shake-up was set out as part of the government's big push on doubling onshore wind farms across England by 2030. Other plans include building up a skilled workforce to build farms and creating 45,000 jobs by the end of the decade and repowering old turbines. The government said local communities who agree to have wind farms built in the area could get extra money for new facilities like football pitches and libraries. Households could even get cheaper energy bills through discount schemes. The government estimated that £70 million of community funding will be unlocked under its plans. Mr Miliband said: "The reality is that every turbine we build helps protect families, businesses and the public finances from future fossil fuel shocks.' However, the Conservatives pushed back against the strategy, accusing the energy secretary of making the country's energy 'unreliable and expensive' through his 'obsession with climate targets'. This is the latest push from the government to boost wind power so that the UK does not rely on other countries - especially Russia - for gas supply. Families were told that they could save £45 on their energy bills every year under plans to build wind and solar farms near energy-guzzling towns and cities. However, the push on wind farms have been slammed by local residents with turbines planned near them. Locals said they were considering moving out of the area because of plans for a wind farm project at Cabrach. What else can you do to lower bills If you live near a wind farm, you could benefit from cheaper energy bills. But there are other ways to save money if you don't live near one. If you are struggling with your energy bills, get in touch with your local council to enquire about the Household Support Fund. The programme is designed to help struggling families with rising food and energy costs. The amount you can get varies from council to council. No matter how happy you are with your current energy supplier, they may not be providing you with the best deals, especially if you've let a fixed-rate contract expire without arranging a new one. If you haven't browsed any alternative tariffs lately, then you may not be aware that there are better options out there. Little tricks like defrosting your freezer to help it run more efficiently and cutting your shower time can also add up to big savings over the year. 4 ways to keep your energy bills low Laura Court-Jones, Small Business Editor at Bionic shared her tips. 1. Turn your heating down by one degree You probably won't even notice this tiny temperature difference, but what you will notice is a saving on your energy bills as a result. Just taking your thermostat down a notch is a quick way to start saving fast. This one small action only takes seconds to carry out and could potentially slash your heating bills by £171.70. 2. Switch appliances and lights off It sounds simple, but fully turning off appliances and lights that are not in use can reduce your energy bills, especially in winter. Turning off lights and appliances when they are not in use, can save you up to £20 a year on your energy bills 3. Install a smart meter Smart meters are a great way to keep control over your energy use, largely because they allow you to see where and when your gas and electricity is being used. 4. Consider switching energy supplier No matter how happy you are with your current energy supplier, they may not be providing you with the best deals, especially if you've let a fixed-rate contract expire without arranging a new one. If you haven't browsed any alternative tariffs lately, then you may not be aware that there are better options out there.

Kyrgyzstan's hydro-powered 'crypto' mining: A low-cost solution
Kyrgyzstan's hydro-powered 'crypto' mining: A low-cost solution

Coin Geek

timean hour ago

  • Coin Geek

Kyrgyzstan's hydro-powered 'crypto' mining: A low-cost solution

Homepage > News > Tech > Kyrgyzstan's hydro-powered 'crypto' mining: A low-cost solution Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... Norway and France have implemented tight laws on the mining community these past few weeks. In their eye, it simply isn't efficient. But in a race where low-cost energy and operational efficiency dictate hash rate dominance and profitability, Kyrgyzstan emerges as a beacon for sustainable, cost-effective mining. Leveraging its abundant hydroelectric resources, the country offers miners ultra-low opex through renewable energy, positioning it as a prime destination for publicly traded giants like MARA Holdings (NASDAQ: MARA), Riot Platforms (NASDAQ: RIOT), and CleanSpark (NASDAQ: CLSK). With block reward mining consuming just 0.51% of Kyrgyzstan's electricity in 2024, its hydro-powered operations deliver minimal carbon emissions, aligning with global sustainability demands. As miners grapple with post-halving economics and a network difficulty of 126.4 trillion, Kyrgyzstan's low-cost, green energy model could reshape global hash rate distribution, offering a compelling alternative to regions facing regulatory or energy constraints. Kyrgyzstan's hydroelectric advantage stems from its vast water resources, generating over 90% of its electricity through dams like those on the Naryn River. In 2024, crypto miners used 92.5 million kWh, a fraction of the country's 18 billion kWh annual capacity, with power costs dipping below 3 cents per kWh—far below the $70,000+ per BTC mining cost in the U.S. This low-opex model mirrors strategies of MARA Holdings, which achieved 23 joules per terahash (J/TH) efficiency in Q1 2025 while holding 49,179 BTC in reserves, leveraging low-cost energy to fund fleet upgrades. CleanSpark, targeting 32 EH/s (exahashes per second) by year-end, has prioritized sustainable power to optimize margins, making Kyrgyzstan's hydro model a natural fit. The country's renewable focus also aligns with Bitdeer's (NASDAQ: BTDR) 11.4 EH/s operations, emphasizing energy efficiency to maintain uptime in a post-halving market where block rewards are 3.125 Bitcoin. The environmental edge of Kyrgyzstan's hydro-powered mining is a game-changer. Unlike fossil fuel-reliant operations, its near-zero-emission profile addresses global scrutiny on crypto mining's carbon footprint, as seen in Norway's recent ban on new mining data centers. For Riot Platforms, securing sub-4-cent-per-kWh power contracts in the U.S., Kyrgyzstan offers a blueprint for sustainable scaling, potentially reducing opex while meeting investor demands for green practices. The country's low energy consumption by miners—equivalent to powering a small town—ensures scalability without straining the grid, unlike Russia's crackdown on illegal miners siphoning power. This stability positions Kyrgyzstan as a haven for miners seeking to deploy next-generation ASICs, like MicroBT's WhatsMiner M60 series, targeting sub-20 J/TH efficiency. Kyrgyzstan's rise has broader implications for global miners. With the U.S. holding 31.6% of global hash rate, rising energy costs and potential tariff hikes on Chinese rigs (up to 145%) are pushing miners to explore alternatives. Kyrgyzstan's hydro resources rival those of Paraguay, where HIVE Digital Technologies (TSXV: HIVE | OTCQX: HVBTF | FSE: HBF) expanded to 11.4 EH/s with a 100MW facility and offered a counterpoint to Pakistan's solar-powered mining push. However, Kyrgyzstan's stable regulatory environment—lacking the punitive measures seen in Russia, where 70% of miners face fines for non-registration—makes it more attractive. By diversifying into high-performance computing (HPC) to offset post-halving volatility, Core Scientific could view Kyrgyzstan as a model for low-cost, renewable-powered operations, reducing reliance on volatile U.S. energy markets. Despite its promise, challenges persist. Kyrgyzstan's mining sector requires significant capex for infrastructure, including data center construction and rig deployment, to scale beyond its current niche. Political and economic instability, a historical concern in the region, could deter large-scale investment, though recent reforms have bolstered investor confidence. Grid reliability, while strong, faces seasonal fluctuations due to water availability, potentially impacting uptime for miners like Hut 8 (NASDAQ: HUT), which thrives on Canada's sub-3-cent-per-kWh power stability. Additionally, competition for hydro resources from other industries, such as aluminum production, could limit expansion, requiring miners to secure long-term power contracts. Kyrgyzstan's model offers lessons for publicly traded miners in leveraging renewables to cut costs and enhance sustainability. Its low energy footprint could inspire innovations like immersion cooling or AI-driven hash rate optimization, as seen in platforms like HashFly. As MARA's CEO Fred Thiel emphasized, 'Stable, low-cost energy is the backbone of our growth strategy.' Kyrgyzstan's hydro advantage could draw miners displaced by regulatory bans elsewhere, but scaling requires navigating logistical and geopolitical risks. Compared to Russia's gas-powered Crypto Factory fund or Norway's restrictive policies, Kyrgyzstan strikes a balance, offering a green, cost-effective haven. In conclusion, Kyrgyzstan's hydro-powered block reward mining positions it as a low-cost, sustainable frontier in a hyper-competitive market. Its minimal energy consumption and renewable focus offer miners a path to optimize opex while meeting environmental goals. For publicly traded miners, Kyrgyzstan's model underscores the need for strategic site selection and energy innovation to thrive amid rising costs and regulatory pressures. As global hash rate competition intensifies, Kyrgyzstan could redefine the economics of Bitcoin mining. Watch | Mining Disrupt 2025 Highlights: Profitable trends every miner should know title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen>

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store