
"We Will Take It Away": Owners of 'Irritating' Dukes Ball, At The Centre Of Controversy In India vs England Series, Gives In
"We will take it away, inspect and then start talking to the tanner, talking about all of the raw materials - everything," Dilip Jajodia, owner of British Cricket Balls Ltd, who make the Dukes, told BBC Sport.
"Everything we do will be reviewed and then if we think some changes need to be made or tightened up, we will."
In Test cricket a new ball is given after 80 overs into an innings but in the England series, the ball, as old as ten overs, has been changed due to its shape.
"The fundamental thing about cricket balls is that the raw materials are raw materials," Jajodia said as quoted by Wisden. "They are natural, right? It is cow hide, it is cork, it is rubber, it is wool, winding thread, all that stuff. It's a completely natural, almost alive product."
While Dukes has said that every ball is made to the highest standard, they have less control over the material. In 2022, during COVID-19, an issue with leather production and it being treated with wrong chemicals and wrong amount of time, owing to the pandemic, led to a batch of poor quality Dukes balls. Dukes have stayed committed to reviewing everything finely, from materials to production.
This issue of ball change has slowed down the pace of the game. The ball can be made harder, Jajodia says. "I can put a rock in there, a really, really hard centre, and that will solve the problem. But you won't have a good game of cricket. That would break bats and break fingers".
Just a couple of overs into the second day of play on Friday at Lord's, India complained about the Dukes ball, which was around 10 overs old. The umpire tried to put the ball through the hoop, but it did not go through. India captain Shubman Gill was seen having an animated chat with the umpire, possibly expressing his discontent with the replacement ball. Even in the drinks break, Gill appeared to be livid during his conversation with the umpire.
Speaking after the second day of play in the third Lord's Test, England batter Joe Root called for implementation of a rule where the fielding team can be given a number of times which they can ask for ball's condition to be checked by umpires.
"I personally think that if you want to keep getting the ball changed then each team gets three challenges every 80 overs and that's it," said Root as quoted by Wisden. "But the rings have to be the right size, not too big. That would be a nice way of compromising and saying it is not all on the manufacturer. Sometimes these things happen, but you cannot just keep asking and wasting time and slowing the game down at the same time," he added.
The persistent issue with the ball continued when, 48 deliveries later, the ball required changing yet again. Even before the third contest, the ball-change trend was evident during the first two Tests.
The Dukes' balls continued to be at the centre of attention yet again on day three. The process to identify the replacement began moments after the drinks break ended in the first session. Former England cricketer Ian Ward gave his take on the "ridiculous" ball change which caused an unprecedented delay in the first session of Day 3.
Ward fumed at the umpire's decision not to change the ball during the drinks break, but after it, which led to a seven-plus minute break."They have decided to change the ball again, it's quite frankly ridiculous because if they've decided to change the ball, why was that not decided at the start of the drinks break?" Ward said on Sky Sports.
"We waited for the entirety of the drinks break; they should be playing again now, and now the umpires have decided to change it and go through the procedure," he added.
Former England pacer Stuart Broad believes that the constant change of the ball due to the loss of shape indicates that the Dukes "have a problem".
"The cricket ball should be like a fine wicketkeeper. Barely noticed. We are having to talk about the ball too much because it is such an issue, & being changed virtually every innings. Unacceptable. Feels like it's been 5 years now. Dukes have a problem. They need to fix it. A ball should last 80 overs. Not 10," Broad wrote on X.
Ahead of the third Test at Lord's, Indian vice-captain Rishabh Pant had said about the ball going out of shape being "not good for cricket".
"I feel the gauge should be the same (to determine if the ball has gone out of shape, irrespective of the ball brand), but if it is a little smaller, it will be better. Definitely, I feel it is a big problem because the ball is getting out of shape. But at the same time, it is not up to us. Because visually, when you see the ball, you can see it's de-shaped."
"The ball is getting de-shaped too much. That has never happened like this. It is definitely irritating for the players because every ball plays in a different way. Because when it becomes softer, sometimes it does not do too much. But as soon as ball is changed, it starts to do enough. So as a batsman, you have to keep adjusting to it...I feel it is not good for cricket eventually," he added.
According to ESPNCricinfo, England skipper Ben Stokes had said whenever we have touring teams visiting, there is an issue with the balls going soft and completely out of shape.
"I do not even think the rings that we use are Dukes rings. It is not ideal. But you have to deal with it," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Should Test cricket allow injury substitutions? Here's what players think
In the modern era of cricket, the issue of injury replacements has been a subject of much debate. While the implementation of concussion substitutes has received widespread support, the discussion around injury substitutes continues to divide opinions. This was evident when England captain Ben Stokes and India head coach Gautam Gambhir shared contrasting views on the issue, following Rishabh Pant's injury in the ongoing Test series between India and England. The Current Rule on Injury Substitutes Under the current International Cricket Council (ICC) regulations, teams can only replace a player in the playing XI under specific circumstances, such as concussion or a positive COVID-19 test. The rule does not provide for injury substitutes, even if a player is physically unable to perform his role in the team. For example, Rishabh Pant's broken foot during the Manchester Test led to India having to make do without their regular wicketkeeper, with Dhruv Jurel stepping in as a substitute behind the stumps. Despite Pant's courageous batting display in the first innings, his inability to keep wickets left India at a disadvantage. Ben Stokes' Strong Opinion: The 'Ridiculous' Debate Ben Stokes, England's captain, was quick to dismiss the debate surrounding injury replacements, labeling it as "absolutely ridiculous." He argued that such a provision would open the door for numerous loopholes, making it difficult to maintain fairness in the game. In an interview, Stokes explained, 'You pick your eleven for a game; injuries are part of it. I completely understand the concussion replacement; player welfare, and player safety. But I think the conversation should just honestly stop around injury replacements.' Stokes' criticism stems from concerns that teams could exploit the rule to gain unfair advantages. He emphasized that a player could easily be sent for an MRI scan, and even a slight injury could lead to a substitute being called in, which could disrupt the balance of the game. According to Stokes, introducing injury substitutes would "open too many loopholes," and the debate should be concluded. Gautam Gambhir's Support for Injury Substitutes On the other hand, India's head coach Gautam Gambhir supported the idea of introducing injury substitutes, particularly in cases where an injury is visible and prevents a player from fulfilling their role on the field. Gambhir referred to the introduction of concussion substitutes after the tragic death of Australian cricketer Phil Hughes in 2014 and suggested that a similar provision for serious injuries would be beneficial. 'I'm all for it, if the umpires and match referee see and feel that there's a major injury. It's important to have this rule, where you can get a substitute,' Gambhir said. He pointed out the unfairness of playing with 10 men in a crucial match, highlighting that teams should not be penalized for a player's injury. In a closely contested series like the one between India and England, Gambhir argued, such a rule could level the playing field. The debate over injury replacements remains unresolved. While Stokes' concerns about potential misuse are valid, Gambhir's argument for fairness in case of genuine injuries also carries weight. As cricket evolves, the ICC may have to re-evaluate its stance on injury substitutes to ensure that the game remains competitive and equitable, especially in longer formats like Test cricket, where injuries can have a significant impact on a team's performance.


Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Make that call': R Ashwin urges Shubman Gill to take bold selection call for Oval decider
NEW DLEHI: has urged Indian skipper to rethink his bowling choices ahead of the series-deciding fifth Test against England at The Oval, stating firmly that 'Test matches are not won by batting depth; they are drawn by it. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now ' Following India's spirited draw at Old Trafford, Ashwin lauded Gill's gritty hundred but warned that tactical missteps could cost India the series. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. Ashwin, speaking on his YouTube show Ash ki Baat, highlighted Gill's resilience and maturity with the bat, especially under pressure. 'What a fabulous hundred by Shubman Gill. He has once again proved himself. He did not have a great match as captain — the way he brought late was a huge tactical mistake. But that happens. He is a young captain and will only learn by making mistakes, and I hope he learns faster.' Poll Do you think Shubman Gill should change his bowling strategy for the final Test? Yes, he needs to be bold. No, his current strategy is fine. After slumping to 0/2 in the second innings, India fought back thanks to a 188-run stand between KL Rahul and Gill. While Rahul fell for 90, Gill's composed 103 helped India stay alive in the series. Ashwin called it a 'leader's emergence knock.' India stay alive, England frustrated after draw; handshake drama at Old Trafford and more 'Gill kept all things aside and came out as a batter and played a leader's knock. He scored at Birmingham, Headingley, and now here. We lost at Lord's and a lot of people raised questions about his batting. When everything was down, he walked out to the middle in complete control and batted beautifully,' Ashwin added. Ashwin, however, stressed that India's tactical execution had been 'pretty ordinary' in the series and said it's time for bold decisions. 'Improve now, and please make that call,' he said. 'You can still lose after that decision, but make it. Pick bowlers who have the knack for taking wickets. That's how you win Tests.' Gautam Gambhir fiery press conference: Slams critics, big update on Jasprit Bumrah, Karun vs Sai Gill has amassed 722 runs in the series so far at an average of 90.25, including four centuries. With the series at 2-1 in England's favour, the final Test begins on July 31 at The Oval.


NDTV
19 minutes ago
- NDTV
"We Had A Test Team": Virat Kohli's Brother Takes Sharp Dig At India's Bowling Unit
The Indian bowlers struggled against England during the fourth Test at Old Trafford, Manchester. The hosts put up a good bowling show to bowl out India for 358 runs. When India came in to bowl, they failed to replicate the performance of their opponents and struggled on the field. England made the most of the batting-friendly conditions and went on to post a mammoth total of 669 runs, taking a massive first-innings lead of 311 runs. Virat Kohli's brother Vikas took a dig at the India bowlers' struggle before the batters' valiant effort secured a draw for the Indian team. "Not long ago. We had a Test team, where our bowlers used to take 20 wickets," he wrote on Threads, probably referring to the Indian team under Virat Kohli's captaincy. "Not long ago. We had a Test team, where our bowlers use to take 20 wickets," he wrote on Threads, probably referring to the Indian team under Virat Kohli's captaincy. England resumed Day 4 in command at 544 for 7 on after Joe Root had become the second-highest run-scorer in Test history during his majestic 150 on Friday. Stokes, 77 not out overnight, delighted Saturday's large crowd with yet more thrilling stroke-play before completing a 164-ball hundred with a leg-glanced four off Jasprit Bumrah. It was Stokes' first Test century in more than two years following a whirlwind 155 against Australia at Lord's in June 2023. India looked down and out after losing two wickets for a score of zero in the second innings. Both Yashasvi Jaiswal and B Sai Sudharsan departed without opening their account. The team looked to be staring at another defeat before Skipper Shubman Gill and KL Rahul pulled the handbreak. Gill and Rahul, together with all-rounders Ravindra Jaddeja, as well as Washington Sundar produced a great fightback with the bat to help the team secure a draw that keeps the tourists alive in the series.