
Cuba is in crisis — the US has a chance to act
In the midst of likely the most severe economic crisis to affect the island, on May 1, the Cuban government pressured its citizens to attend the annual gathering. It's been reported that some 600,000 were present in Havana, with millions attending similar ceremonies across Cuba. But participation in such rallies is hardly voluntary — it is the price one pays for access to state benefits, including employment, housing, education, food rations and other necessities.
Despite drastic shortages of water, food, medicine and fuel that have crippled Cuba in recent years, on this day, all assets of the government were used to facilitate attendance at the Revolutionary Square event. And that's because this gathering, like others, was intended to serve as an act of political will, meant to convey a public message of support for the ailing Cuban government.
Although Cuba's leadership changed in name in 2019 to Miguel Diaz-Canel, Raúl Castro is still believed to be in charge behind the scenes. Despite turning 94 last month, he appears to remain the center of power, wielding significant influence over political, economic and military matters.
Under his guidance, social control measures remain all-encompassing, beginning at the community level with the neighborhood Committees in Defense of the Revolution, the Brigades of Rapid Response, the National Revolutionary Police, the Revolutionary Armed Forces, and the Grupo de Administración Empresarial S.A., which facilitates the Cuban military's control over the economy. All of these government structures, reminiscent in some cases of George Orwell's writings, have ensured the continuation of Cuba's one-party system for the last 66 years.
Today, the greatest concerns of the Cuban government are the incessant electricity outages. Once largely restricted to Cuba's outlying provinces, the blackouts are now also frequent in the capital. They are the direct result of government incompetence that has led to fuel shortages and aging infrastructure; without a doubt, they make daily life extremely challenging.
In March 2025, following a major failure at a substation, much of the country was without power, leading to vast work and school closures. This was the fourth such national outage in six months. For a country already suffering from abysmally low monthly incomes, no functioning economy, and decaying living standards, it's no surprise that the population has grown increasingly discouraged.
Although the Cuban government continues to blame the nation's challenges on the U.S. economic embargo, the aftereffects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and changes to U.S. travel policy, each day it appears fewer and fewer Cubans accept these excuses. In the last several years, an estimated 1 million Cubans have emigrated, representing a loss of roughly 10 percent of Cuba's population.
And protests, once extremely rare, have become a relatively more common occurrence.
In early June, students at the University of Havana began protesting a sharp hike in internet and cell phone service fees set by the government-run telecommunications company. This entity, largely owned by Cuba's military, is said to be well financed by Cuban exiles who purchase cellphone packages for their families on the island and represents an important revenue source for the Cuban government.
For Cuba's leadership, these price hikes are also likely intended to curtail internet usage — an important strategy for a government that aims to control all access to information.
Another government concern is the lack of access to foreign and hard currency reserves to facilitate trade, specifically for the import of much needed food and medicine. Once the recipient of financial support from the former Soviet Union during the Cold War, followed by Venezuela under President Hugo Chávez, today Cuba is without an economic benefactor.
Although Cuba still benefits from political support from Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and others, these allies cannot (or will not) effectively assist Cuba economically. Add to that Cuba's foreign debt, which is said to be extremely high, leaving the country severely constrained when it comes to trade.
Against this background, the new Trump administration has made changes to U.S.-Cuba policy. As part of his sweeping cuts to USAID, President Trump cancelled Radio and TV Martí, two longtime stalwarts in the U.S. soft assault against Cuban communism.
Since taking office, the Trump administration has also moved to redesignate Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism, and approved the re-creation of the Cuba Restricted List, which prohibits transactions with companies associated with the Cuban government. In late January, the administration also announced that it had opened the door via Title III of the LIBERTAD Act, to 'bring private rights of action involving trafficked property confiscated by the Cuban regime.'
More recently, following record-setting outward migration from Cuba, the Trump administration moved to end the 'humanitarian parole' program that had allowed a designated number of Cubans to enter the U.S. under temporary legal status. On June 4, the U.S. announced a partial travel ban on Cubans wishing to enter without an existing visa. And Trump's 'big beautiful bill' includes a tax on remittances, affecting Cuba's largest source of foreign revenue.
Today, Cuba is facing a devastating moment. Over six decades of revolution have taken their toll. Cuba's leadership remains unwilling to enact the commonsense democratic reforms necessary to alleviate suffering and return dignity to its people. As Cuban citizens continue to find small, but meaningful ways to express their discontent, it is time for the international community to raise awareness of Cuba's desperate reality — and to demand change from its leadership.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Scott Jensen announces run for MN governor in 2026
The Brief Dr. Scott Jensen is announcing another run for Minnesota governor in 2026. Dr. Jensen was defeated by 7.7 points in 2022 by Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. Gov. Walz has not yet announced if he is running for another term as governor. ST. PAUL, Minn. (FOX 9) - Dr. Scott Jensen announced another run for governor of Minnesota. Dr. Scott Jensen running for governor again Big picture view Dr. Jensen spoke about the rising cost of living in Minnesota and said he aims to lower prices while promoting law and order in a campaign announcement video posted Thursday morning, Gov. Walz beat Dr. Jensen by about 193,000 votes, 7.7 points, in 2022. Jensen served a single term in the Minnesota Senate before he ran for governor. Jensen on the issues Dig deeper The campaign website shows Dr. Jensen's "priorities reflect a commitment to law and order, patient-centered healthcare, and a future where families and communities thrive." Dr. Jensen's previous campaign also focused on rising crime rates, inflation and education. He previously said he planned to appoint judges who hand down longer sentences to stop the "catch and release" of violent criminals. In his campaign announcement video, Dr. Jensen said he is running for Governor "to bring our Minnesota back." "Two decades of liberal policies have made Minnesota too expensive, too dangerous, and thrown our culture out of whack," Dr. Jensen said in the campaign announcement video. "Tim Walz made it worse. A leader must take responsibility. Tim Walz didn't." After losing the 2022 race, Dr. Jensen, said the GOP must "change its stance" on the abortion issue in order to win Minnesota statewide elections. Speaking to FOX 9 from his family medical practice in Watertown, Dr. Jensen said, "The hardline position on abortion isn't going to win. So, if that's where a group of people say that's where we have to stay, and we have to do everything we can to ban abortions legally, completely, I think that there's no way we win." While trying to win the GOP endorsement, Jensen said he would try to ban abortion. He later shifted his stance, but Democrats spent millions of dollars on television attack ads using his previous comments. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Jensen was widely criticized for comparing lockdowns and vaccine restrictions to the rise of Hitler. He was also investigated by the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice over claims of spreading misinformation about COVID-19. The other side There are three other GOP candidates who announced they are running for governor: Kendall Qualls, Brad Kohler and Phillip Parrish. Gov. Walz has not yet announced if he will run again. The Source This story uses information from a video announcement shared by Dr. Scott Jensen and past FOX 9 reporting.


Buzz Feed
7 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
17 Liberals And Conservatives Share Controversial Political Opinions
Hi. My name is Michaela, and last year, during one of the most dramatic election years in US history, I started a series called BuzzFeed's Political Diaries, where I asked readers from all over the country who they were planning to vote for and what political issues mattered most to them. Over the course of a year, I received hundreds of fascinating political takes from people of different races, genders, age groups, and locations, and was able to show what voters were really thinking. Now, as our country seems to be more divided than ever under a second Trump administration, I'm asking BuzzFeeders to share a political opinion they hold that would shock those in their own party. Take a look at these 17 fascinating responses: "I'm an independent, and I don't think that Black or Indigenous Americans should have to work a day in their lives. Everything should be free for them because EVERYTHING was stolen from their ancestors and we need to pay it back, with INTEREST!" "Radical leftists are just as bad as radical right-wingers. Both groups of people take their parties' beliefs to an unhealthy and extreme level. They both make their own parties look bad." "I'm a hardcore liberal, but as a parent, especially of tweens, I feel the media and schools are going overboard with the LGBTQ+ topic." "Our kids are the generation who was affected the most by COVID shutdowns during their kindergarten and first-grade years, they need to focus on catching up in their academics, not worry about issues they really should be thinking about when they are adults."—radhouse8424 "I'm extremely far left, but I do believe that the death penalty should still be allowed. Only for murderers or rapists who have been proven guilty without a shadow of a doubt, though." "I believe the 'assassination attempt' where his ear was supposedly hit was staged and fake. If it was real, how did his ear recover so quickly, and why was there basically no coverage or investigation into it? I'm kind of angry that I have to feel like a conspiracy theorist to voice this opinion. It seems so obvious to me." —Anonymous The FBI reported that Donald Trump was shot in the ear in Butler, Pennsylvania, during a campaign rally. "If trans people want to receive gender reassignment, I completely support it, but you all are yelling louder than everybody else. We need to focus on basic healthcare provisions for everybody, not slamming healthcare systems because their trans care isn't adequate to your standards." "I'm a Democrat, and I 100% agree that any government assistance, especially housing aid, should have a time limit and work or schooling requirements attached." "I think we should have planned euthanasia for all people at 75. Everyone I say this to acts like I'm Satan himself, but in two generations people would say, 'I can't believe US medicine used to FORCE people to stay alive so long!'" "People's quality of life would improve, housing and resources wouldn't be as scarce, and there would be no concern about living past your wealth or whatever."—Anonymous "I'm a pro-life liberal. I believe we need a universal healthcare system and an expanded social safety net. I would be glad to pay higher taxes if that money went to improving poorly funded public schools (I work at one), childcare, libraries, etc. I support paid family leave. Looking out for the most vulnerable in society includes protecting all humans from being unjustly killed. I'm pro-life because I used to be an embryo, and so did you." "I think all drugs should be legalized, and recovery should be promoted more. Lots of addicts would pick recovery over drugs if they didn't have the stress of illegally obtaining drugs and had other options available." —ninawentzell "I'm a Democrat, and I have two hot takes that alienate my Democrat and Republican family. For my Democrat family: 2nd Amendment. Especially the formation of militias. I believe the left needs more militias like the right. For my Republican family: I'm all for tax breaks and cuts for the wealthy. HOWEVER, they need to earn them in some way. They need to show they're creating jobs, improving the environment, or helping veterans. And these tax cuts can be revoked at any time." "I'm a Democrat, and I think the entire state of Florida should be turned into a nature preserve." "The Everglades is one of the most special ecosystems in the world, but building all these big cities is causing the land to sink and putting native wildlife at risk. With all of the rapid development after COVID, Florida is becoming one of the least sustainable places to live."—Anonymous "I am a Democrat, but really a moderate. I agree with a lot of the societal and cultural positions aligned with the Democratic Party. However, I do think that sometimes, you do have to steamroll and say screw bipartisanship." "I believe that married couples should have the exact same last name. I don't believe that women marrying men should have to take their husband's last name, though, more men should be willing to take their wife's last name." "As an independent, 'my body my choice' applies across the board: abortions, reproductive care, vaccines, everything. But if you make whatever choice you make, you should be prepared for the consequences that come with it." —Anonymous "I believe that a lot of people are not as far-reaching as we think they are. I live in OK. I know a bunch of reds that go on and on about how we should not give money away, and people should work for their own, but I do not know anyone that said no to the stimulus checks." And finally... "I'm not the biggest fan of unions. Don't get me wrong, they played a HUGE role in achieving so many worker protections that we have today, and I am insanely grateful. But unfortunately, like anything else, things fester over time, and we have too many unions that care more about making the union and those who run it look amazing while offering little for their members." What are your thoughts? If you have a political opinion that would make you the black sheep of your party, share it in the comments below. You could be featured in an upcoming post! If you'd prefer to remain anonymous, fill out this Google form below:


Chicago Tribune
8 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Maurice Scholten: The RTA has more money to work with than it realizes. State lawmakers need to know this.
Public transportation is a critical government service contributing billions of dollars to Illinois' economy and a better quality of life for all Midwestern residents. Efficiently moving people throughout our region has made Illinois a vibrant place. Allowing that to deteriorate in the wake of post-COVID-19 ridership changes would be a catastrophic misstep. How northern Illinois public transportation systems should receive the funding that would reportedly avert fiscal cliff-driven service cuts in 2026 is still under discussion, but an oft-overlooked aspect is a tax law change state lawmakers approved last year. A vast coalition of public transportation advocates, including the Regional Transportation Authority, has referenced since 2022 projections showing an original budget deficit of $730 million that is now calculated to be $771 million as emergency federal funding recedes and operating costs reportedly rise. The coalition hopes state lawmakers return to Springfield and approve a package of new revenues and governance reforms to head off service cuts at the CTA, Metra and Pace. By continuing to cite the $771 million figure, it is apparent the well-meaning coalition is not considering an Illinois sales tax law change that took effect Jan. 1. The new law says retailers in Illinois shipping goods to a customer from outside the state must collect the sales taxes in effect at the delivery address. This means more sales are now subject to the RTA's 0.75% sales tax in the collar counties and the 1% sales tax in Cook County. Here is an example of how the difference benefits Illinois local governments, including the RTA: Imagine someone ordered a shirt in December from an online retailer and had it delivered to their home in Evanston. The retailer has stores in Illinois, but it ships the shirt from an out-of-state warehouse to the customer's address and collects 6.25% in sales tax — the statewide rate on general merchandise. If the same order were placed today, it would be subject to a total sales tax rate in effect at the customer's home in Evanston, which is 10.25%. The local governments imposing a portion of sales tax at the delivery address — the city of Evanston (1.25%), Cook County (1.75%) and the RTA (1%) — would receive the additional tax. Inspired in large part by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., this law change is expected to generate hundreds of millions of dollars for Illinois local governments, including public transit systems. An analysis of Illinois Department of Revenue data suggests the RTA alone received an additional $94 million from sales taxes and the corresponding 30% match provided by the state of Illinois from retail transactions in the first four months of 2025 than it did in the same time frame in 2024. This represents 14.1% over-the-year growth at a time when the RTA expected sales tax receipts to grow by 3%. Subjecting deliveries from out of state to local sales taxes was introduced in the Illinois Senate in February 2024, and so the RTA could not have built these new revenues into its operating budgets and deficit projections. It would have also had difficulty foreseeing how this law would affect its tax collections when it announced in December a forthcoming $771 million deficit, as evidenced by its more modest sales tax growth forecast. But the RTA has now been aware of the bill since it became law in August 2024, and there are four months worth of tax data reflecting the law change. Cook County even cited this law change for its higher-than-anticipated sales tax collections. Nevertheless, the public transportation coalition continues using the out-of-date $771 million fiscal cliff projections only months before 40% service reductions become real. Using those four months of data, it is reasonable to expect the RTA will finish 2025 with at least $150 million in additional sales tax and matching state revenues that have not been included in the fiscal cliff projections. If economic and buying trends hold steady, then this change should generate more than $225 million in additional revenue in 2026. The RTA should be applying these non-forecasted revenues toward its fiscal cliff budget deficit, thereby leaving lawmakers and public transportation advocates with a smaller hole to fill. The rippling consequences of public transportation service cuts in northern Illinois are too great to simply ignore fiscal realities that have transpired over the past 18 months. Absent other unreported budget gaps that offset the revenues the bill is delivering, continuing to rely on clearly outdated information does not build good intergovernmental faith nor public trust in this vital, regional economic engine. State lawmakers need to know precisely what the system needs to sustain itself, especially if they are expected to justify new taxes and fees to their constituents concerned about other financial pressures. My organization therefore urges the RTA to present new budget projections before lawmakers return to Springfield to take up public transportation reform.