Why I Played the Kennedy Center
Though my band, Guster, has more than 2,000 performances behind us, this one is a real humdinger. Tonight we will be accompanied by the 60-member National Symphony Orchestra, which, on its own, is emotional and exhilarating; very few moments compare to fronting a world-class orchestra and, together, playing songs that are a part of you. There's also the venue itself, the historic Kennedy Center, which has served as a national cultural hub for more than half a century. But momentous events from beyond the stage hovered, too: In February, well after all 5,000 tickets had been sold for our two-night stand, Donald Trump dismissed multiple members of the Kennedy Center board and installed himself as the institution's chairman. The president, who said he wants programming to be less 'wokey,' gleefully promised a 'Golden Age in Arts and Culture' under his leadership.
[Read: America's cultural revolution]
In the weeks that followed, everything was chaos. Long-serving staff resigned, artists canceled their appearances in protest—including the actor Issa Rae and the rock band Low Cut Connie—and every ticket buyer had a new question to answer, a fresh moral quandary. Our band, too, found ourselves on a prickly path to one of the most revered venues in the country. We asked ourselves: What was the best way to use our voices in defiance of an administration that doesn't share our values? How could we support our fans, who have sustained us for decades, and many of whom were now deeply conflicted about being in a building that was at the center of a culture war?
It was a mess. Immediately after Trump's announcement, direct messages from fans began to stream in, and comment sections on our Facebook and Instagram pages swelled. Some had practical questions (were we going to cancel the performances?) while others discussed the ethics of simply attending a show at Kennedy Center in light of its freshly altered mission. Three factions coalesced: those who thought we should cancel in solidarity with other protesting artists; those saying we should save our protest for the stage; and a small but vocal 'shut up and dribble' contingent proclaiming that a new administration was a non-event. Not everything has to be about politics, the latter noted.
Thankfully, the four of us in the band are mostly aligned politically, which is a gift when our individual personalities are often reduced to a single, public entity. We immediately huddled and, though we all had our individual opinions, agreed that our voice as a band would be loudest from the Kennedy Center stage. That space was given to us by the venue's previous curators, and we were united in our desire to own it. We wanted to support the staff at the Kennedy Center who were caught in this political crossfire; the fans who had bought tickets, flights, and hotel rooms; and the musicians we would be performing with. Our challenge, beyond putting on an indelible show, was to find a way to make our dissension clear, with dignity and creativity. No one in the band was interested in hosting a rally on F Street, but neither could we just shut up and dribble this time. We had been given a microphone and we intended to use it.
Getting this messaging right was crucial for Guster. Touring bands that play three-and-a-half-minute pop songs don't find themselves in their fourth decade without an incredibly strong connection to their fans. We have never had a hit song on pop radio or been fawned over by the music press. The major engine in our career—and the reason it continues to thrive—is the relationship of our four personalities with the people who listen to our music. Certainly for some, we're the guys who played their college campus in the '90s or sang that 'Satellite' song. But many of our current fans have seen us dozens, if not hundreds, of times. They refer to other fans as their 'Guster Fam' and organize meetups before shows. Our annual festival in Portland, Maine, brings 4,000 people into a community that rivals the depth of Phish fans and Deadheads. Fans have tattoos with Guster lyrics, they name their pets after characters in our songs, and use our music at weddings and funerals. As we move through artistic and personal milestones, we do so alongside many of them, our evolving albums a soundtrack for our fans' evolving lives. It's a position we hold with deep honor and gratitude.
[Read: I performed a career-highlight show. Then Delta hit.]
Initially by circumstance and now by design, in the Guster universe, there is very little space between art and artist. The implication here is that many of our fans want to know that we have their backs, and we demonstrate these alliances on occasion. My bandmate Adam Gardner co-founded the environmental nonprofit Reverb, which aims to reduce concert and tour footprints. And we dipped a toe into wry activism when I wore a dress onstage in Ponte Vedra, Florida, coinciding with the state's anti-drag law in 2023. But in an ever more polarized world, solidarity becomes a more difficult assignment. As algorithms and politics herd us into narrower and narrower silos, the pressure increases on artists (as well as comedians, actors, and even brands) to mirror their fans' core beliefs. For some, every consumption choice is a reflection of their values. There is opportunity here, to strengthen the bond we already have with our fans; but there is also significant risk in alienating those with whom we may disagree. We must also be judicious and know when to speak and when to let the music speak on our behalf.
We had a test run straight into this volatility earlier this year. Following the presidential inauguration, we launched a three-week tour across the United States, including several shows in red states such as Iowa, Nebraska, and Utah. Initially, there was some unease: How would it feel to play these venues, which would almost certainly bring out audiences who were diverse in their politics? During that tour, just as now, America was raw and explosive, a powder keg. But these evenings proved transformative. Songs are time machines that, at their best, reduce and expose us. And this level of safely shared vulnerability, in a room of thousands, can verge on the spiritual. The knowledge that our fans could catch a glance of one another and think, Oh, we're actually all in this together offered us some assurance that our performances, even if just for a moment, actually mattered.
As our Kennedy Center dates approached, the headlines stayed tumultuous. The juggernaut musical Hamilton announced that it was canceling its 2026 run at the venue. Others remained steadfast. Conan O'Brien received the Mark Twain Prize at the Kennedy Center and gave a moving speech that toed the line of defiance, humor, and poignance. 'Twain hated bullies,' he said, 'and he deeply, deeply empathized with the weak.' The comic W. Kamau Bell, who performed at the venue shortly after Trump announced his takeover, wrote about the experience, noting that it was his job to 'speak truth to power.' And like Bell, my bandmates and I understood why other artists were continuing to cancel their performances. But he, O'Brien, and others demonstrated that there is more than one way to stand up for what you believe.
On Friday night, the first of the two shows, we played an incredibly moving set, flanked by the National Symphony Orchestra. The arrangements soared; the dynamics were rich and powerful. Lyrics that would normally slip through me on autopilot were now barbed and heavy. I choked up on our new song, 'Maybe We're Alright,' the words 'the lies we tell ourselves just to fall asleep' landing like a gut punch. As the evening continued, I could sense something expectant in the room; our fans, many wearing rainbow attire, Pride pins, and T-shirts with anti-facist slogans, were waiting for a declaration of some kind.
Near the end of the show, we invited some surprise guests to the stage. 'My friend Michael wrote the songs for a musical called Finn,' I said, reading from a statement. 'In the before times, they were booked to play here, but as you all know, things happened, and the show is no longer being presented by the Kennedy Center.' The musical, whose planned tour had been canceled, told a story of self-discovery, as a young shark realizes that he may, in fact, be a fish; its creators have said it can be read as reflective of the queer experience. We, as a band, have always felt connected to our queer fans, and our bond has deepened in this moment when diversity is under attack. The world we want to live in needs all kinds of fish.
'As the new administration has made abundantly clear, Finn's themes of inclusivity, love, and self-acceptance aren't going to be welcome in this building while they are in control,' I continued. 'So tonight our band is here to say 'Our stage is your stage. We are your allies, we stand with the LGBTQ community, and we want you to sing with us.' Please welcome the cast of Finn and composer Michael Kooman. They belong here.'
Michael and the five cast members of Finn joined us onstage to what I am certain will be among the loudest and longest ovations of our career. They accompanied us on our song 'Hard Times': 'I'm breathing in / the oxygen / I'm holding it / through hard times.' There were tears onstage and off.
Tonight, our final night, we once again invite Michael and the Finn cast to sing—and, this time, to say a few words. He takes a deep breath, waits for silence, and addresses the audience with confidence and heart: Finn is 'a show about growing up, feeling like you don't fit in. It's a show about finding your chosen family. And, most importantly, it's a show about being yourself and standing up for what you believe in, even if it's really scary. The message itself is more important now than whenever we began to write the show.'
As the last notes of our encore disappear into the theater, we collectively applaud the National Symphony Orchestra and our conductor, Enrico Lopez-Yañez. We turn toward the audience, huddle for a final bow, and look out at thousands of beaming faces. This is our chosen family, sharks and fishes—multicolored, vibrant, and most assuredly not welcome back to the Kennedy Center anytime soon.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US, EU trade talks boosted by Trump's agreement with Japan
By Philip Blenkinsop and Trevor Hunnicutt BRUSSELS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The European Union and the U.S. are heading for a potential trade deal that includes a 15% U.S. baseline tariff on EU goods and possible exemptions, two European diplomats said on Wednesday, potentially moving President Donald Trump closer to securing another major trade agreement hours after he unveiled one with Japan. European negotiators were hoping to reach an agreement to dodge the 30% tariff rate Trump has said he would impose on imports from the 27-nation bloc on August 1. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the U.S. has struck with Japan, which Trump announced late on Tuesday. The deal could include exemptions for some EU goods, the diplomats said. As talks continued, the European Commission said it would press on with potential counter-measures in case a deal was not reached. EU member states were set to vote on 93 billion euros of counter-tariffs on U.S. goods on Thursday, European diplomats said. A broad majority of members support using anti-coercion instruments if there is no deal, they said. Trump was hoping for a boost from the complicated deal reached with Japan, the largest foreign investor in the U.S., which included a $550 investment and loan pledges from Japan and its commitment to buy 100 Boeing airplanes and boost purchases of U.S. agricultural products. Tariffs on Japan's auto sector will drop from 27.5% to 15% as part of the agreement, reviving hopes for a similar deal for EU cars. Asian and European stock markets rallied as investors cheered that agreement, but U.S. stocks showed a more modest rise and earnings reports were gloomy. U.S. businesses making everything from chips to steel reported downbeat results on Wednesday, revealing how the Trump administration's chaotic trade policy has hurt profits, added to costs, upended supply chains and weighed on consumer confidence. Trump said late on Tuesday that other countries would be coming for talks this week and governments were scrambling to close trade deals before next week's deadline that the White House has repeatedly pushed back under pressure from markets and intense lobbying by industry. AUTO TARIFFS Automobile stocks led the climb of European shares after the Japan deal spurred hopes that the U.S. was budging over tariffs on EU cars. EU officials have previously said Washington has shown little sign of doing so. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg Television that Japan received the 15% rate on auto tariffs "because they were willing to provide this innovative financing mechanism" that he did not think other countries could replicate. Trump, however, has appeared open to a range of options as the U.S. negotiates trade deals. "I will only lower tariffs if a country agrees to open its market," Trump wrote in a social media post on Wednesday. In addition to talks in Washington, the European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic planned to speak with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Wednesday from Brussels. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten

Miami Herald
10 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
White House unveils AI policy vision to spur US development
The Trump administration called for boosting artificial intelligence development in the U.S. by loosening regulations and expanding energy supply for data centers under new guidelines that also urged withholding funds from states that put burdensome rules on the emerging technology. The so-called AI Action Plan, released by the White House on Wednesday, recommends revamping the permitting process and streamlining environmental standards to speed AI-related infrastructure projects. The blueprint also seeks to make American technology the foundation for AI worldwide while enacting security measures to keep adversaries like China from gaining an edge. "It is a national security imperative for the United States to achieve and maintain unquestioned and unchallenged global technological dominance," President Donald Trump said in the report. "To secure our future, we must harness the full power of American innovation." Mandated by Trump shortly after taking office in January, the 23-page plan marks the administration's most significant policy directive on a technology that promises to reshape the global economy. The president is scheduled later Wednesday to speak at an AI event hosted by the All-In Podcast and a consortium of tech leaders and lawmakers known as the Hill and Valley Forum. Trump plans to sign a handful of executive orders Wednesday to set in motion elements of his AI plan. The expected directives include a plan to use the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation and the Export-Import Bank to support global deployment of American technology. Another would call for all large language models procured by the government to be neutral and unbiased. The blueprint represents the culmination of Trump's campaign promise to position America as the world leader in AI, while dismantling what he characterized as a rules-heavy approach under President Joe Biden. Trump rescinded a 2023 order from Biden that had set extensive safety testing requirements and mandated transparency reports from major AI developers. In its place, Trump demanded a new path on AI policy and set a six-month deadline for White House AI czar David Sacks to create it. Sacks, a venture capitalist who has emerged as one of the administration's most influential voices on tech policy, was joined in shaping the new policy approach by senior AI adviser Sriram Krishnan and tech policy chief Michael Kratsios. Together, they spent months cultivating detailed input from key AI companies and other industry leaders. Regulatory rollback Under the recommendations, the federal government would ask businesses and the public about existing regulations that hinder AI adoption, with an eye toward rolling back those rules. The White House's budget office would also work with federal agencies that have oversee AI-related funding to consider putting limts on those awards "if the state's AI regulatory regimes may hinder the effectiveness of that funding." The guidelines also call on the federal government to only contract with developers whose AI models are deemed "free from top-down ideological bias" and strip references to misinformation, diversity and equity language, and climate change from risk-management frameworks. "To win the AI race, the U.S. must lead in innovation, infrastructure, and global partnerships," Sacks said in a statement. "At the same time, we must center American workers and avoid Orwellian uses of AI." The White House, signaling concern that AI could reshape the labor market, also asks the Education and Labor departments to prioritize skill development and training to assist U.S. workers. It also proposes prioritizing investment in theoretical, computational, and experimental research - a request that comes even as the administration has slashed grants to top-tier research universities. Race with China The blueprint suggests countering Chinese AI development by strengthening export controls, including by putting new location verification features in advanced AI chips. The administration also wants to establish a new effort under the Commerce Department to collaborate with the intelligence community to monitor AI developments and chip export control enforcement. The plan also envisions the Commerce Department gathering proposals from the industry on full-stack AI export packages that would allow approved allies to purchase hardware, software, models and applications together. Approved deals would be facilitated by the U.S. Trade and Development Agency, the Export-Import Bank, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, among others. The guidelines were released a little more than a week after the administration moved to ease restrictions it had imposed in April barring Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. from selling some AI chips to customers in China. The export curbs were relaxed as part of the trade understanding reached with China in June in exchange for Beijing resuming shipments of rare earths to American buyers. Sacks and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have defended the move, saying that letting Nvidia restart shipments of its H20 chips would position the U.S. to compete more effectively abroad and blunt efforts by Chinese tech giant Huawei Technologies Co. to gain a bigger slice of the global market. "These clear-cut policy goals set expectations for the Federal Government to ensure America sets the technological gold standard worldwide, and that the world continues to run on American technology," said Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a statement. Energy components Trump and other administration officials have also stressed the importance of meeting another tech industry priority: ensuring the U.S. has enough power to run energy-hungry AI data centers. In their view, adequate electricity supply is intertwined with national security, essential to keeping the U.S. ahead of global competitors in the race to dominate artificial intelligence. The plan recommends working to stabilize the existing energy grid and implementing strategies to enhance the performance of the transmission systems. The document also suggests prioritizing the interconnection of reliable, detachable power sources that could see nuclear and enhanced geothermal plants deployed to help manage a surge in demand. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dem in ultra-competitive House race bases campaign in DC, three hours outside district
A Democrat fighting to unseat a Republican House lawmaker in Virginia is facing questions about how much time he's actually spending in the district he wants to represent. James Osyf, 40, an executive at Lockheed Martin, is the most prominent of three Democratic candidates competing against two-term incumbent Jen Kiggans (R-Va.). While the competitive 2nd Congressional District is based on the southeastern Virginia coast, Osyf is listed as the owner of a $1.7 million Washington, DC home and has registered his campaign at a capital city address, some 200 miles away from the people he wishes to serve in Congress. 5 James Osyf launched his campaign earlier this month in a bid to flip a vulnerable Republican seat. Facebook / James Osyf In addition, a review of publicly available records indicates Osyf does not live anywhere in the district. 'While it's constitutionally legal to run for a House seat from outside the district, it's a rare occurrence, and rarely successful,' Dante Scala, a professor of political science at the University of New Hampshire who has studied political campaigns for decades, told The Post. 'Voters expect, rationally enough, that they are better represented by someone who resides in their district, all other things being equal. Political opponents quickly jump on this,' he added. 'It certainly doesn't look good,' agreed Todd Belt, the director of the Political Management program at George Washington University, 'which is why candidates often fake a residence in a district in order to run there.' Kiggans, who unseated Democratic Rep. Elaine Luria in 2022 and was re-elected last year, registered her campaign in Virginia Beach, in the heart of the district. 5 James Osyf registered his campaign in Washington, DC, three hours away from Virginia's 2nd Congressional District. FEC registrations can be amended, so it is possible for Osyf to change his base of operations and his residence as the drive for votes revs up. However, GOP operatives keen on holding the toss-up seat have already taken notice. 'James Osyf is a DC resident and political opportunist who has no business representing Virginians,' National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) spokesperson Maureen O'Toole alleged to The Post. 'Voters don't want him in Hampton Roads, and they'll reject him next year.' 5 Rep. Jen Kiggans holds one of a handful of House seats that Democrats are carefully eyeing heading into the 2026 cycle. Earlier this month, Osyf sat for an interview with a local news outlet, The Virginian-Pilot, which claimed he 'lives in Virginia Beach.' However, property records give no indication that the candidate owns a home in the city, though that does not preclude the possibility of him renting a house or apartment. DC property records, on the other hand, show that Osyf purchased a lavish three-story home in DC's Eckington neighborhood back in 2023. 5 The Navy reservist has made standing up for veterans a key focus of his campaign. Facebook / James Osyf Real estate firm Redfin estimates the late-19th century townhome is now worth $1.86 million and describes it as a 'Commanding Victorian Brownstone' and a 'masterpiece renovation.' Osyf's campaign did not respond to repeated requests to clarify the candidate's living situation. Osyf does have at least one known connection to southeast Virginia: His LinkedIn profile indicates that he has served as a reserve officer in the Navy's Second Fleet since 2023. That fleet is based in nearby Norfolk, which is covered by a different congressional district. 5 House Republicans are facing historical headwinds heading into the 2026 midterm elections. Getty Images Osyf appears to have spent the bulk of the last decade in and around DC. His LinkedIn profile lists his current job as director of policy and program operations at Lockheed Martin in suburban Bethesda, Md., in addition to stints in the Navy Reserve in DC, San Diego and Virginia Beach. Osyf attended Georgetown University Law Center between 2015 and 2019, before being admitted to the DC Bar in January 2020, according to the DC Bar Association. Virginia law requires candidates to be residents of the commonwealth for at least one year immediately before the election in order to qualify to hold office.