Trail hunting a ‘smokescreen' for illegal fox hunts, MP says in jail terms plea
Trail hunting is being used as a 'smokescreen' for illegal fox hunting, a Labour MP has warned as he called for jail terms if organisers flout the rules.
Perran Moon called for a ban on the practice, when hunt organisers lay a trail using animal urine or a carcass for hounds and their followers to track.
Environment minister Daniel Zeichner said the Government would launch a consultation on banning trail hunting later this year, in line with Labour's 2024 manifesto.
'I strongly believe it is time for us to come together and close this loophole once and for all,' Mr Moon told the Commons.
He said: 'Banning trail hunting would be a positive step in safeguarding the UK's wildlife and habitats.
'We need to strengthen the Hunting Act 2004 to make sure it delivers the protection animals need, that means banning trail hunting, removing exemptions that enable illegal hunting, and introducing custodial sentences for those who break the law.'
The MP for Camborne and Redruth later added: 'We must extend the time available for charge in illegal hunting cases, reverse the burden of proof of compliance with exemptions, and make hunting a notifiable offence (counted in crime statistics)'.
He said these measures would 'make it easier to enforce the law and ensure that those who break it face the consequences', in response to Labour MP for Poole Neil Duncan- Jordan, who warned that 'effective reform must go beyond symbolic bans and address the entire framework enabling illegal hunting to carry on'.
Mr Duncan-Jordan said: 'Whilst a pledge to ban trail hunting is welcome, I fear it could be insufficient.
'If legislation focuses solely on this term alone, hunts may adopt new euphemisms to exploit existing loopholes to continue their activities.'
Earlier in the debate, Mr Moon said 'trail hunting has been used as a defence' when hunts and their organisers land in the criminal justice system, accused of hunting a wild mammal with a dog, as he described a 'disturbing reality – trail hunting is providing a smokescreen for illegal fox hunting'.
Sir Julian Lewis, the Conservative MP for New Forest East, intervened in Mr Moon's speech and asked: 'Would it not then be possible for drag hunting to be used in some way as a cover once again for illegal fox hunting?'
Mr Moon replied that he has 'no issue with drag hunting', when hunt organisers lay trails using artificial scents.
He said 'the likelihood that there will be wild animals included in drag hunting is much, much smaller', because it does not use real animal urine or carcasses.
Mr Zeichner told MPs that a consultation is due later this year, but he could not say when a ban would come into effect.
'I want to assure members that we are working to move this forward, and we will deliver a thorough consultation later this year to ensure that legislation brought forward is effective in practice and we understand its impact,' he said at the despatch box.
The minister quoted figures from the League Against Cruel Sports, who found from November 2023 to March 2024, there were 526 reports of incidents of suspected illegal hunting, and 870 incidents of 'hunt havoc'.
He added: 'We have heard that there are people in this house who will not welcome a change in the law, and I want to reassure members here today the Government recognises the contribution made to the rural economy by supporting professions such as farriers, vets and feed merchants, we will of course look closely at the impact any changes may make.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
33 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Palestine Action to legally challenge proscription under anti-terror law
An urgent hearing was held in the High Court on Monday related to an application for judicial review on behalf of one of the founders of the direct action group, Huda Ammori. A further hearing will be held on Friday to decide whether the Government can temporarily be blocked from banning the group, pending a hearing to decide whether Palestine Action can bring the legal challenge. A decision on whether the group will be given the green light to bring the legal challenge will be given at a further hearing expected to be held in the week of July 21. Supporting statements have also been submitted by Amnesty International, Liberty and European Legal Support Centre over concerns of unlawful misuse of anti-terror measures to criminalise dissent, a spokesperson said. It comes as a draft order was laid before Parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation, making membership and support for the direct action group illegal. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper unveiled the intention to ban the group on June 23 (James Manning/PA) Commenting on the hearing, Ms Ammori said: 'I have been left with no choice but to request this urgent hearing and to seek either an injunction or other form of interim relief because of the Home Secretary's decision to try to steamroll this through Parliament immediately, without proper opportunity for MPs and Peers to debate and scrutinise the proposal, or for legal and human rights experts and civil society organisations to make representations, or for those of us who would be denied fundamental rights as a result and criminalised as 'terrorists' overnight, including the many thousands of people who support Palestine Action.' The Government's move comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Five people have since been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence in relation to the incident. Unveiling the intention to ban the group following the incident on June 23, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. The group has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising US President Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire. Its website states the group uses disruptive tactics to target 'corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex' and seeks to make it 'impossible for these companies to profit from the oppression of Palestinians'. Ms Ammori added that causing disruption 'is not terrorism', while Ms Cooper has said proscribing the group is a 'legitimate response to the threat posed' by Palestine Action. The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is 'concerned in terrorism'. Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al-Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group.
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's watered down welfare reforms will push 150,000 into poverty, modelling shows
LONDON, June 30 (Reuters) - New British welfare reforms are still expected to push 150,000 people into poverty despite Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government watering down the measures, according to fresh modelling ahead of a key parliamentary vote. Seeking to quell a rebellion threatened last week, Starmer revised his planned welfare cuts in an attempt to win over more than 100 lawmakers from his own party who had threatened to revolt over the issue in a vote on Tuesday. He amended the bill so that changes to make it tougher to collect some disability and sickness benefits would now apply only to new applicants, while the millions of people who already rely on benefits would no longer be affected. Publishing analysis of the updated policy, the government on Monday estimated that an extra 150,000 people will be pushed into relative poverty in 2030, 40% fewer than the 250,000 forecast to be affected before the changes. A spokesperson for Starmer told reporters that the analysis was not an impact assessment but poverty modelling. "What it doesn't reflect is the wider action we are taking to lift people out of poverty and raise living standards," they said. The government has said it is investing 1 billion pounds ($1.4 billion) a year to help people with disability and long-term health conditions into jobs, as part of broader employment support across the parliamentary term. Lawmakers opposed to the welfare cuts will now have to assess whether the changes Starmer has made are enough to convince them to back the bill. Starmer has argued that Britain's disability benefits system is too costly to sustain, and makes it too difficult for people who can work to do so, by penalising them for their earnings. Those who oppose the welfare cuts say the changes mean too many people will still be harmed and argue that a two-tier system will be created. ($1 = 0.7304 pounds)
Daily Record
36 minutes ago
- Daily Record
DWP benefit cuts to push 150,000 people into poverty despite partial U-turn
The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been left in relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Around 150,000 people will be pushed into poverty by 2030 as a result of the Government's welfare cuts despite Keir Starmer being forced into a partial U-turn. The figure is down from the 250,000 extra people estimated to have been left in relative poverty after housing costs under the original proposals. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced last week that changes to the personal independence payment (Pip) will only apply to new claimants from November 2026. Ministers also rowed back on plans to cut the health-related element of Universal Credit. It comes after after 126 Labour MPs - 12 of them Scottish - signed an amendment that would have blocked the Government's Bill. Kendall will update MPs on the changes later on Monday, with the Labour leadership still braced for a substantial revolt. A No 10 spokesman said: 'The broken welfare system we inherited is failing people every single day. 'It traps millions, it tells them the only way to get help is to declare they'll never work again and then abandons them. 'No help, no opportunity, no dignity and we can't accept that. 'For too long, meaningful reform to a failing system has been ducked.' Government whips are expected to continue talking to would-be rebels in the lead-up to Tuesday's vote. This is when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill faces its first Commons test. The No 10 spokesman said the poverty modelling was 'subject to uncertainty' and showed 'the effect of these measures on poverty in isolation in 2029-30, it doesn't reflect the full picture'. He added: 'You have to look at the record levels of investment in the health and care system, £29 billion more day-to-day funding in real terms, than in 2023-24, to help people get the treatment they need on time to return to work.' Several Scottish Labour MPs have told the Record today that they are undecided on whether they will back the bill.
