logo
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle's royal exit caused ‘unforgivable' pain in Queen Elizabeth's final years: expert

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle's royal exit caused ‘unforgivable' pain in Queen Elizabeth's final years: expert

Fox News4 days ago
Queen Elizabeth II's final years were reportedly marked by sorrow after Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made their exit – and for the royals, this has been "unforgivable."
The claim was made by British royals expert Hilary Fordwich, who alleged that the monarch had already been disheartened leading up to the couple's 2018 wedding.
"It is unforgivable that Harry was the cause of much heartbreak for Queen Elizabeth II," Fordwich alleged.
"All those around her knew of her sorrow and deep concern," she claimed "… This is the root of the massive rift between Harry and Meghan and the rest of the royal family. The pain they caused in the queen's waning years can't ever be repaired… The family nor the nation will never forget it."
Fordwich's claims came shortly after Katie Nicholl, Vanity Fair's royal correspondent and author, recently wrote about her conversations with Lady Elizabeth Anson, a first cousin and close confidante of the late queen. Anson died in 2020 at age 79.
Fox News Digital reached out to Buckingham Palace and Archewell, which handles the offices of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, for comment. It's understood that the claims being made cannot be verified.
"Lady Elizabeth told me that the queen felt her once-close relationship with her grandson would never be the same again," Nicholl wrote. "'She couldn't understand how Harry, who had loved his military career and been devoted to duty, could change the way he did,' Lady Elizabeth told me back in 2020. 'It's so sad that at her age, having managed the most amazing reign, it has been sullied. He has hurt her beyond belief.'"
According to Nicholl, Anson told her that the queen was allegedly "deeply disappointed and hurt" after Harry and Meghan made the decision to leave the U.K. The couple's final royal engagement was Commonwealth Day in March 2020, shortly before they left for California with their firstborn, Prince Archie.
WATCH: PRINCE WILLIAM STRUGGLED WITH PRINCE HARRY'S EXIT, AUTHOR CLAIMS: 'A LOT OF ANGER AND HURT ON BOTH SIDES'
"The queen had hoped that they would bring Archie over. She was very disappointed they didn't,'" Lady Elizabeth told me at the time," wrote Nicholl. "She was hurt when they left Britain, and how they left so suddenly."
As a wedding present for the couple, the queen gave them Frogmore Cottage on the grounds of Windsor Castle to reside in. The property led to a garden where the monarch found "solitude and privacy." The queen reportedly told her cousin, "I hope they'll respect it."
Fordwich claimed to Fox News Digital that for many close to the queen, the couple's royal exit, or "Megxit" as it was called by the press, was "one of the very darkest periods of her reign regarding family matters."
"It has been said that she verbalized it was a 'complete catastrophe,'" Fordwich claimed.
"She grew up under the shadow of her uncle's abdication and was hoping that, like his exile, the Sussexes would go on with their lives quietly. Her hopes were dashed. The queen expressed in letters logistical concerns [about] Harry. She saw it as 'paramount' that he was safe, expressing her belief that their security should remain a priority. But the final decision was out of her hands."
According to Nicholl, problems between the queen and the Sussexes reportedly first came to light during the planning of the couple's wedding. Nicholl pointed out in her book, "The New Royals," that the queen was allegedly "surprised" that Meghan had chosen to wear white because she was a divorcée marrying for the second time. She claimed that the queen didn't think Meghan should have worn a veil.
"… I was also told that the queen was upset during the planning of their wedding," Nicholl alleged. "Harry and Meghan were intent on doing things their way, even if it came to breaking with traditions."
Anson told Nicholl that the queen had enlisted her to assist with the wedding plans. However, after meeting Meghan, Anson was allegedly told "her services were not required." Nicholl claimed that there were "many tears and tantrums behind the scenes," including the well-documented dispute surrounding how Meghan reportedly wanted to wear a certain tiara for her special day.
Harry reportedly told the queen's dresser, Angela Kelly, that "what Meghan wants, Meghan gets." Nicholl noted that while Harry himself described tensions with Kelly in his 2023 memoir "Spare," he denied making that comment.
Still, "the upset continued after the wedding," wrote Nicholl.
"The deterioration of the queen and Harry's relationship, which was once distinctive due to their shared sense of humor, began just after Harry's engagement to Meghan Markle," Fordwich claimed.
"While the queen made many concessions, she was astounded by their breaches of protocol. Those around her saw her become more guarded around Harry and Meghan."
"I think one of the gravest charges that can be leveled at Harry and Meghan is that they made the queen's last years so difficult," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. "A variety of recent reports have indicated that there were strong differences between the queen and the duo over a variety of issues, especially those involving their wedding."
"Queen Elizabeth would undoubtedly have been hurt by the change in Harry's behavior," said Fitzwilliams. "Having known him for so long, she would have expected him to be loyal to her. Her reported surprise over Meghan wearing white and disapproval that she wore a veil at her wedding would not have endeared her to the couple who wanted to do things their way."
"After they stepped down from royal duties, they were careful never to criticize Queen Elizabeth personally, but trashed the institution she headed, knowing it was next to impossible for [the palace] to answer their charges directly," Fitzwilliams continued. "The irony is that the queen's dignified comment, 'some recollections may vary,' is what is best remembered."
In April 2020, shortly before Anson's death that year, the noblewoman told Nicholl that the queen was said to be "sad" that she had only seen Archie "once or twice."
"She was quite surprised to hear from Harry on Zoom," Anson told Nicholl. "It was all new to her, but it was the only way for her to see her great-grandson. She told me that Archie has red hair."
British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard claimed to Fox News Digital that the queen was said to be "devastated" by the couple's departure from the House of Windsor. But despite her personal feelings, the queen, who adored Harry, was reportedly worried about her grandson's future.
"I understand that a few things would have been hurtful," said Chard. "… Queen Elizabeth was very fond of her grandson Harry. They shared fun times and laughter. She was also aware of his vulnerabilities and simply wanted the best for him.
"She… would have been well-aware of Meghan's influence over Harry. Initially, Queen Elizabeth felt Meghan was a breath of fresh air. However, her views changed very quickly when she realized that Meghan wasn't willing to play ball," Chard alleged.
"I imagine this played on her mind hugely as she worked hard all her life to serve as monarch and preserve the monarchy," Chard said. "I can imagine she was heartbroken to see how much damage Meghan, along with Harry, were causing the British royal family."
Nicholl wasn't the only author to get insight from Anson.
Best-selling royal author Sally Bedell Smith, who was friends with Anson, previously made similar claims based on their past conversations on her Substack, Royals Extra. People magazine reported that a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's office declined to comment.
Bedell Smith, author of "Elizabeth the Queen," claimed on her platform that the monarch was reportedly concerned about how Meghan, Prince William and Kate Middleton, "were not working well."
"That is what the queen said, particularly about the two girls," Anson reportedly told Bedell Smith. Anson also remarked, "… The wedge between the brothers is really too bad," referencing the tensions between William and Harry.
The Duke and Duchess stepped back as senior royals, citing the unbearable intrusions of the British press and a lack of support from the palace. They moved to the wealthy, coastal city of Montecito. The queen, England's longest-reigning monarch, died in 2022 at age 96.
Following their exit, the couple aired their grievances in interviews and documentaries. Harry's explosive memoir "Spare" worsened his relationship with the royal family. In May of this year, Harry told the BBC that his father wouldn't speak to him. Royal experts previously told Fox News Digital that Harry and William aren't on speaking terms.
"I would love reconciliation with my family," Harry told the BBC. "There's no point in continuing to fight anymore."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Acting royalty Helen Mirren at 80 - 'Don't ever tell me to grow old gracefully!'
Acting royalty Helen Mirren at 80 - 'Don't ever tell me to grow old gracefully!'

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Acting royalty Helen Mirren at 80 - 'Don't ever tell me to grow old gracefully!'

Dame Helen Mirren is as fearless, feisty and adventurous as ever. And as she celebrates her 80th birthday today, 26 July, she can certainly rest in the knowledge that she remains one of Britain's most ageless actors - one who has always pushed tirelessly against the idea of how long a woman can remain 'relevant' - particularly on-screen. The national treasure, who has played a whole host of iconic roles, from Detective Jane Tennison in the television series Prime Suspect to her Oscar-winning turn as Queen Elizabeth II in 2006 film The Queen reveals the secrets to her 40-year relationship with husband director Taylor Hackford. She also reveals she never plans a thing when it comes to the future - and why, as she prepares to celebrate her milestone birthday, the last thing she wants to hear is that she looks 'good for her age' or worse, that she's 'ageing gracefully'... How is your approach to ageing gracefully helping you with turning 80? I am not ageing gracefully at all! I hate that term - it sounds like you have to be elegant and accepting, and, no, I am not. I am ageing with fun, with commitment but not gracefully. Who cares about graceful? We just do grow older, there's no way you can escape that. You have to grow up with your own body, your own face and the way it changes. It's not always easy but it is inevitable. You have to learn to accept it. How do you feel when someone says you look good for your age? Insulted (laughs). You look good for your age is patronising. I hate that kind of comment. Be prepared, if you use that phrase, to be dissed in a major way! You've often credited the 1950s Canadian Air Force program for keeping you looking so fit and healthy... That's true. I have to admit, I don't do it so much now, and I should get back into it. It is a great way to get fit. You just do what they tell you to do. You start very low and you think, 'Oh, this is just much too easy.' And if it is, then you start making it more difficult for yourself. Then you go, 'Oh my God, no, this is really difficult.' It can be quite challenging, but it works. It's great.' What are your top tips to keep looking and feeling good? It's as important to make the inside of you, as healthy as the outside of you. I always go everywhere with my vitamins. That is probably the most important thing in my beauty bag, actually. What you eat, what you drink, what you don't smoke, really makes a massive difference to your skin, especially as you progress through life. It's incredibly important to feed the inside of your skin, as much as the outside of your skin.' How has your relationship with beauty and image changed over the years? The majority of us are not beautiful. There are beautiful people who walk on this planet, and we can all see them and appreciate them, but the majority of us are not beautiful like that. But, we can put on style, we can put on swagger, we can put on confidence, we can put on wit and charm, and lots of other things that are just as attractive as sheer beauty. So, I think in a way, that word - beauty - it alienates people. It did for me, for many years, I have to say. Is there anything you've learned about beauty that you wish you'd known when you were younger? Yes, to let go of the concept of beauty. Think of confidence. Think swagger. Enjoy beauty where you see it, absolutely, but let go of it for yourself. Don't let it influence your thinking in any way. I remember being in my thirties and being told, if I used this cream, I could look like I was a teenager again, with absolutely no marks of any living whatsoever. That annoyed me. Luckily, we have gone way beyond that. Where does your own confidence and swagger come from? It took a while and I'm still working on it. I was very, very insecure as a young person. My body was the wrong shape. I was very insecure around people. The most important thing is to remember that probably everybody feels the same.' You play many strong, ferocious characters on-screen. Are you anything like them in real-life? I wouldn't say I'm ferocious. I'm a total wimp. I'm not a confrontational person at all. I can be argumentative sometimes - more so when I was younger. I would defend positions that I thought were correct. I have always been a feminist, and argumentative but, I don't think I am ferocious. Maybe people would have a different idea of me, I don't know. How do you look back on your career up to now? Yes, well, you know, I think I was brave. I have to say, as a young actress, I think I was courageous. I was. And keen to break down attitudes that I thought were old-fashioned, or retrograde, or just wrong, you know. So, I relished having roles. That is the great thing about drama, is that it can do that, without being lecturing because it is entertaining at the same time. It can really change people's attitudes about things.' Have you always been at ease with being in the spotlight? No, not at all. A lot of actors become actors because they are shy, in a way. They find being themselves quite difficult, so it is much easier to become someone else. I think that was the case with me, to a certain extent, certainly when I started.' Your next film is The Thursday Murder Club. What can you tell us about that? It's based on the extremely successful Thursday books. It's with a some beloved fellow British actors and it's a very British subject. I'm really excited about it. Do you still feel British - though you're a big Hollywood star, live in America and have an American husband? I do. I'm very proud to be British and it's funny because even in America I seem to be surrounded by Brits. It's full of them! The world has become so much smaller. You and your husband have been together for 40 years and married for more almost 30. What's your secret? I think it helps that we're both in the same business. We understand what we each go through and the demands on your time. But the main thing is trust. As long as you trust and respect each other, and are not jealous of each other, then it works. We came into the relationship already very grown-up, so all of that crap was out of the way. And it's not such a bad thing to be separated for two or three weeks from time to time. That's fine, as long as you trust each other and really look forward to seeing each other again. Finally, what are your plans for this next chapter of your life? I have no idea. You know, when I was 20, I didn't know what my twenties would be like. I didn't know what my thirties would be like... I still have no idea and that's the adventure. Life is an adventure. I don't plan anything. I don't expect anything. I will just allow life to come and hit me, the way it always has. READ MORE: Dermalogica's four-piece anti-ageing skincare bundle is now £31 for a limited time

Famous birthdays for July 26: Helen Mirren, Jeremy Piven
Famous birthdays for July 26: Helen Mirren, Jeremy Piven

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Famous birthdays for July 26: Helen Mirren, Jeremy Piven

July 26 (UPI) -- Those born on this date are under the sign of Leo. They include: -- Writer George Bernard Shaw in 1856 -- Psychologist Carl Jung in 1875 -- Writer Aldous Huxley in 1894 -- Actor Vivian Vance in 1909 -- Baseball Hall of Fame member Hoyt Wilhelm in 1922 -- Writer Jan Berenstain in 1923 -- Filmmaker Stanley Kubrick in 1928 -- Musician Darlene Love (Blossoms/Bob B. Soxx & the Blue Jeans) in 1941 (age 84) -- Musician Mick Jagger (Rolling Stones) in 1943 (age 82) -- Actor Helen Mirren in 1945 (age 80) -- Musician Roger Taylor (Queen) in 1949 (76) -- Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari in 1955 (age 70) -- U.S./World Figure Skating Hall of Fame member Dorothy Hamill in 1956 (age 69) -- Actor Kevin Spacey in 1959 (age 66) -- Musician Gary Cherone (Van Halen/Extreme) in 1961 (age 64) -- Actor Sandra Bullock in 1964 (age 61) -- Actor Danny Woodburn in 1964 (age 61) -- Actor Jeremy Piven in 1965 (age 60) -- Actor Jason Statham in 1967 (age 58) -- TV host Chris Harrison in 1971 (age 54) -- Actor Kate Beckinsale in 1973 (age 52) -- Musician Dan Konopka (OK Go) in 1974 (age 51) -- Actor Eve Myles in 1978 (age 47) -- Actor Juliet Rylance in 1979 (age 46) -- Actor Monica Raymund in 1986 (age 39) -- Actor Francia Raisa in 1988 (age 37) -- Actor Bianca Santos in 1990 (age 35) -- Singer/musician Taylor Momsen (Pretty Reckless) in 1993 (age 32) -- Actor Thomasin McKenzie in 2000 (age 25)

Not To Brag, But I've Finally Found A Toy That Keeps My Kid Busy For 20+ Minutes
Not To Brag, But I've Finally Found A Toy That Keeps My Kid Busy For 20+ Minutes

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Not To Brag, But I've Finally Found A Toy That Keeps My Kid Busy For 20+ Minutes

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI ― prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication. As a working mum of two young kids, the most important quality I look for in toys is the ability to keep my child occupied for chunks of time so I can get things done – whether that's cooking dinner, tidying up, or sending a few work emails. While it's all too easy to stick the TV on, I've definitely noticed that my eldest child's behaviour can rapidly go downhill afterwards – so screen-free time is much preferred. When she turned two, we bought her a Toniebox after hearing friends rave about it. It felt like an expensive purchase at the time – but we've certainly got our money's worth. Let me explain why... What's a Toniebox? The Toniebox is essentially a durable audio player for kids. You can buy little figures (Tonies) for it which sit on the top of the player and tell stories and sing songs. There are also other accessories that go with it like night lights (we have the sheep one), headphones and cases for transporting the characters around. The figures, while not cheap at £14.99 each, double up as toys – my daughter spends 20+ minute chunks playing games with them, while also sitting and listening to the stories and songs when she puts one on top of her Toniebox. In fact, every bedtime we sit and play 'nursery' with all the characters, where I'm the teacher and have to read them all some stories. After we've done that, we'll say goodnight – which includes a fairly lengthy process of me saying goodbye to each individual Tonie and us having a chat about her day. Then she'll lie in bed and listen to one (or two, as we discovered during the heatwave) of the Tonies before going to sleep. She recently got the Anna and ElsaTonies for her third birthday which went down an absolute storm (she's listened to them every night since). She's also a huge fan of Peppa Pig's Bedtime Stories, as well as the Julia Donaldson characters, like the Snail and the Whale, and – of course – the Gruffalo. Listening to a Tonie before bed has become a bit of a ritual that enables me to go and clean the kitchen or take the bins out, while she winds down. If you find bedtime drags out for a thousand years, a Toniebox might just be your saviour. The other perk is that kids can listen to it while travelling – ours get car sick, especially if looking at books or watching something on a tablet, but they don't have this problem listening to the Toniebox. We also take it on holiday with us for moments when our eldest needs a bit of quiet time, and to stick to our bedtime routine as much as possible. The squishy (and therefore, drop-proof) box is £79.95 and comes in a range of colours – red, blue, green, pink, purple and grey. It's suitable for kids aged three and up, and there are over 250 Tonies to choose from. Is it more expensive than most 'toys'? Yes. But a moment's peace is priceless when you're a parent – so boy is it worth the Well, This List Of The 'Top 100 Toys Of All Time' Has Sent Me Down Memory Lane Don't Throw Old Toys Away. Here's What To Do Instead Kids Keep Saying 'Chat' And It's (Probably) Not What You Think It Means

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store