logo
The Whoop MG is the best fitness tracker I've reviewed

The Whoop MG is the best fitness tracker I've reviewed

Stuff.tv4 days ago

Stuff Verdict
The Whoop MG packs medical-grade ECG and daily blood-pressure tracking into a sleek, screenless band. But the hefty subscription and auto-tracking blind spots let it down
Pros Medical-grade measurements for a wide range of metrics
Insights that actually teach you about your body
Slick, intuitive app with seamless integrations
Cons Requires a pricey annual subscription to use
Only one specific band allows ECG and Heart Screener features
Auto workout, step and VO2 Max readings aren't always reliable
Introduction
After a month spent wearing the Whoop MG day and night, I'm convinced this is the best fitness tracker I've used – with one major asterisk. You see, this thing is more like a pocket-sized clinic you strap to your wrist.
With the MG, Whoop has taken its signature screenless design and sprinkled in medical-grade ECG and daily blood pressure estimates. These features transform what was once a simple exercise recovery tool into what feels like the most advanced tracker you can buy. Yet all its smarts come at a price – every month.
There's a certain thrill in waking up to a fresh batch of numbers that genuinely matter, rather than just another simple sleep-stage chart. Still, between certain strap restrictions, occasional tracking blind spots, and the hefty subscription, it's far from perfect.
How we test wearables
Every smartwatch and fitness tracker reviewed on Stuff is worn 24/7 throughout the testing process. We use our own years of experience to judge general performance, battery life, display, and health monitoring. Manufacturers have no visibility on reviews before they appear online, and we never accept payment to feature products.
Find out more about how we test and rate products.
Design & build: Slim Jim
At first glance, the Whoop MG is virtually indistinguishable from its sibling, the Whoop 5.0. The only differences are the slightly chunkier conductive clasp and an LED status light.
The most standout design choice here is the lack of a screen. Unlike almost every other fitness tracker available, you can only see your readings in the companion app. Ordinarily, I'd want to see metrics on my wrist. But in Whoop's case, I think the lack of a screen is a worthwhile feature.
Weighing a mere 27g, it's light enough that I mostly forgot it was there, even under shirtsleeves. That said, it did take me about a week to get used the wearable on my non-watch wearing wrist. But that's down to my own preferences rather than the Whoop. Its IP68 rating (up to 10m) means it shrugged off showers, hand-washing, and swims in hotel pools.
Like with a traditional smartwatch, you can swap out the straps to find something more stylish. Whoop even offers ankle straps, bicep bands, and underwear (that idea makes me squirm) that holds the Whoop sensor in body locations where it can get a reading. That's ideal if you want to conceal the device when you need to dress up smart – something I cannot say about the Apple Watch. Personally I stuck with the wrist, but it's good to know that I have options should I need it.
But there's a problem. Only the included SuperKnit Luxe band lets you use ECG and Heart Screener functions. If you swap to a cheaper fabric or bicep band and you're back to basic PPG tracking. This is down to how you take the readings, so it's not exactly Whoop's fault. But it doesn't seem right that if you wear it elsewhere you only get half the functionality.
Fit and finish are spot-on. The smooth aluminium shell feels premium against skin, and the adjustable clasp snaps shut with a reassuring click. However, this shell is quite flimsy – I managed to accidentally bend it while taking the strap off. Speaking of, I found myself adjusting the strap tightness a lot in the first few days. Too loose and ECG readings failed, too tight and my wrist ached by afternoon. Once dialled in, comfort was exceptional throughout daily life and any activity.
Health & fitness: A lean, mean tracking machine
The Whoop MG really can track just about everything under the sun. That includes metrics like exercise strain and recovery to ECG readings, blood-pressure estimates, sleep stages, skin temperature and more. It combines optical PPG sensors, electrical ECG electrodes, and software algorithms to deliver daily health snapshots, on-demand heart screening, and predictive pressure models. You can view all of these readings in the app at any time.
Strain tracking remains the bread and butter of the Whoop ecosystem. It's Whoop's proprietary metric for quantifying your total exertion each day, on a scale from 0 to 21. It combines cardiovascular load (time spent in different heart-rate zones) with all your other movement movement. So walking around the shops counts, even though it's not a workout.
Recovery is Whoop's measure of how ready your body and mind are to tackle that strain again, calculated each morning as a percentage. It blends four pillars: heart-rate variability (HRV), resting heart rate (RHR), sleep performance, and respiratory rate – then benchmarks them against your personal baseline. I've seen my Recovery scores adjust wildly, being affected by sleep, travel, and alcohol. You can see which specific reading is causing a dip, and use the Whoop Coach to explain more thoroughly.
Where Whoop really shines is the dialogue between strain and recovery. Based on yesterday's strain and today's recovery, the app recommends an Optimal Strain target. So if you've done a heavy workout the day before, Whoop might tell you to take it easy the next day, or to do some light activity to boost recovery. I've found these personalised insights remarkably hard to argue with. Working hard on a red day always felt like a mistake, and on green days the extra oomph usually translated into better workouts.
Then we come to my biggest complaint about the Whoop MG: auto-detection. Let's start with the easy stuff. It managed to detect long runs or walks I went on pretty reliably, but shorter bursts under fifteen minutes often slipped through the net. But that's about it. Most of my other activity involves strength training, which Whoop really struggled to detect.
To avoid manual logging (so my workouts counted), I continued to wear my Apple Watch. The Whoop app syncs with Apple Health, so automatically grabs your workouts. It doesn't grab any of the data, mind, so that's all down to Whoop. For strength training, there's an extra step you can take in the Whoop app to add your sets so it can calculate your muscle strain. It sounds great, in theory, but I seldom found myself using it thanks to the manual inputting required.
But just how reliable was the Whoop MG? For the most part, I found that its heart rate readings were almost identical to that of my Apple Watch, confirmed with a chest strap. This means your calorie and strain calculations are going to use some pretty accurate data. But, I got some mixed results in two key areas.
My step reading was an area that seemed slightly fishy. Counting to 1000 steps (yes, I really counted), my Apple Watch Ultra almost nailed it with a reading of 1006, but the Whoop struggled to count them all at around 950. I guess that underestimating is better than overestimating, but it's a not insignificant amount. And since I'm hot on step tracking, it was particularly annoying for me.
The other area was the VO2 Max estimation. Whoop's reading was wildly higher than my Apple Watch Ultra's – almost a difference of 15ml/kg/min. To try and work out which was more reliable, I used the Cooper Run test. This showed that the Whoop was overestimating my VO2 Max (slightly high) while the Apple Watch was underestimating it – with the true reading somewhere in between.
Other fitness features: What can't it do?
Whoop's Healthspan feature took about three weeks to settle on a reliable 'Whoop Age.' Mine was a surprisingly encouraging 3 years younger than my actual age, once my routine normalised. If you've used a Garmin watch, this feature is similar to the Fitness Age – though I'd argue Whoop's visualisation of longevity metrics feels more intuitive. It tells you exactly which factors are affecting your Healthspan, and shows you what you can do about it. I found it to be a very motivating way of presenting data and insights.
ECG readings are delightfully straightforward. You just touch both electrodes on the SuperKnit clasp, count down 30 seconds, and the app confirms whether your ticker is behaving or if it spotted any irregularities. It's an almost identical process to holding down the crown on my Apple Watch Ultra. It's FDA-cleared and impressively robust, but utterly manual. This is no different to any other fitness tracker, but I found myself rarely using the feature. Regular prompts might be a helpful addition here.
The blood-pressure estimates impressed me most of all, as someone that suffers from high blood pressure. Thanks, genetics. After three cuff-based calibrations (I used my Withings BPM Connect), the Whoop MG began tracking (it's more like estimating, really) my blood pressure. It only does this overnight, so you'll have to wait until each morning to check your readings. Consistently, I found that the algorithm tracked my blood pressure within 3 mmHg of my manual readings.
It's not a replacement for a proper machine, but as far as wellness features go, having a ballpark figure without an inflatable cuff is ideal. I'm led to believe that every time you upload additional manual readings it improves what the algorithm spits out. Just bear in mind that errant calibration or wildly fluctuating pressure could send your metrics haywire.
Interface: Home-page hero
The Whoop companion app is one of the best designed and most intuitive apps out of all the fitness trackers I've used. The home screen gives you readings for Sleep, Strain, and Recovery – with access to their dashboards just a tap away. Integration with Apple HealthKit and Google Health Connect means runs logged in on your smartwatch or Strava appear in Whoop's strain tally – no manual imports required.
Daily Outlook, powered by GPT-4, was a much more useful feature than I first thought. It delivers a morning briefing of yesterday's key takeaways, the weather forecast, and personalised activity suggestions. I found it works particularly well when you combine it with the Journal feature that asks you questions about your day (like your caffeine intake, etc). I've loaded my Journal up with plenty of questions to get some thorough insights. There are over 160 lifestyle inputs to pick from!
It's a truly clever feature – spotting that my HRV (and therefore Recovery score) was low after drinking a pint the night before, for example. Advice can feel generic at times ('consider a light session') rather than pinpointed suggestions based on my activity history. But for the most part, I really like this feature. I just wish it automatically sent these outlooks rather than firing up a painfully slow chatbot page.
My biggest complaint about Whoop's companion app is the lack of a simple search bar. Finding specific data points can feel like sifting through a haystack at times. For example, all your regular heart metrics are on the home page if you scroll down, but you need to head to the Health page to see the blood pressure readings. It was definitely somewhat confusing at first.
Battery life & charging: It just keeps going
Credit to Whoop: the MG delivers a rock-solid two weeks of battery life, even with occasional ECG readings and round-the-clock PPG monitoring. In just over a month of testing, I only had to charge the Whoop twice from the 82% it was delivered on. I'm truly impressed by this thing's reluctance to die.
Charging remains delightfully painless. The wireless charger clips on without you even noticing, and a full charge takes just under two hours. A single hour on the pad nets you about seven days of use, which is plenty if your routine includes nightly top-ups on your bedside table. You juice up the charger via a USB-C port, and the switch to a braided USB-C cable was appreciated.
Whoop MG verdict
The Whoop MG is a polished evolution of Whoop's screenless fitness tracker. It's been elevated into quasi-medical territory with ECG and algorithmic blood-pressure tracking, and I love all the metrics it spits out. The hardware is understated yet feels robust; the app remains a triumph of clarity over clutter.
But the cost of admission is hard to swallow: $359/£349 per year for Whoop Life. Before the Whoop 5.0 and MG were released earlier in 2025, the previous 4.0 model came out in 2021. So you might end up using this thing for around four years – which is most $1500/£1400 in total. Other manual quirks, like strap restrictions and questionable auto-tracking, also temper the experience.
If you live and breathe fitness metrics, crave distraction-free data, and your bank balance can handle a luxury subscription, the MG is as good as it gets. For everyone else, the Whoop 5.0 on the Peak plan likely delivers 90 per cent of the value at a fraction of the cost. The one condition attached to awarding this thing the crown of best fitness tracker I've used? The fact I've still got to wear my Apple Watch for activity tracking.
Stuff Says…
Score: 4/5
The Whoop MG packs medical-grade ECG and daily blood-pressure tracking into a sleek, screenless band. But the hefty subscription and occasional auto-tracking blind spots mean it's a luxury rather than a no-brainer.
Pros
Medical-grade measurements for a wide range of metrics
Insights that actually teach you about your body
Slick, intuitive app with seamless integrations
Cons
Requires a pricey annual subscription to use
Only one specific band allows ECG and Heart Screener features
Auto workout, step and VO2 Max readings aren't always reliable
Whoop MG technical specifications
Sensors PPG heart rate, ECG electrodes, accelerometer, skin-temperature sensor Compatibility iOS and Android (via Bluetooth LE) Durability IP68 (up to 10m) Battery life Approx. 14 days Subscription Whoop Life membership required ($359/£349 per annum) Dimensions 35x24x10mm, 27.3g

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Best electronic instruments in 2025, including MIDI keyboards, drum pads and samplers
Best electronic instruments in 2025, including MIDI keyboards, drum pads and samplers

Stuff.tv

timea day ago

  • Stuff.tv

Best electronic instruments in 2025, including MIDI keyboards, drum pads and samplers

Electronic instruments have come a long way since New Order sequenced Blue Monday using binary code. Now it's all quantised beats, USB-C, and expensive noise-cancelling headphones. And if you're in the market for modern melodies, these are the machines you need. From MIDI keyboards to beat pads, below you'll find an orchestra of tools for making electronic music. Whether you're tinkering with your first track or ready to lay down another lo-fi banger, the kit listed here will help you sample, sequence and synthesise your way to a smash hit. Or at least something worth sharing on SoundCloud. Don't know your MIDI DIN from your MIDI in? We've also broken down some electronic lingo to help you out. Give it a read, and you'll know your controllers better than Jean-Michel Jarre knows his laser harp. Why you can trust Stuff: Our team of experts rigorously test each product and provide honest, unbiased reviews to help you make informed decisions. For more details, read how we test and rate products. The best electronic instruments you can buy today: The rhythm rig 1. Native Instruments Maschine Mikro Amadeus never needed drum pads. Then again, Wolfgang didn't do trip-hop beats. If your unfinished symphony is more Massive Attack than Mozart, try this groovebox. Colour-coded pads help you compose percussion parts with targeted taps, while a Smart Strip lets you mix up your kicks with Perform FX. Plus, the Maschine software has more instruments than an orchestra. The groovy grid 2. Novation Launchpad X You need light and sound for a desktop disco. Luckily, this rainbow grid does both. Like a dancefloor for your fingers, the 64-pad plinth lets you paint your tunes with RGB pixels. Designed for Ableton Live, it also functions as a fully mappable MIDI controller. Tap out patterns on the velocity-sensitive squares, and the capture mode will ensure you never miss a beat. The stealthy stepper 3. Arturia BeatStep Sometimes the biggest beats start with something small. Don't let its stature fool you: this compact controller can do it all. Use its pressure-sensitive pads for finger drumming or switch to sequencer mode to create 16-step patterns. Matching pitch knobs give you granular command of every note, while iPad connectivity means your rhythm isn't tied to a desk. The sound snatcher 4. Teenage Engineering EP 133 K.O. II The music man might be able to play the piano, but can he record a dog's bark and sequence it into a drum and bass banger? Probably not, but this distinctive sampler can. Styled like a Lego answering machine and just as fun to play with, battery power and a built-in mic mean it's made for going walkabout. Punch-in effects let you mangle samples on the fly, too. The standalone studio 5. Yamaha SEQTRAK You could build a studio in your shed. Or for a portable production setup, try this Yamaha hybrid. Part sampler, part sequencer, part synth – plus a sound effects section: the SEQTRAK is a self-contained station for crafting electronic jams. Lightweight but heavy on features, it includes a library of 2000 presets. There's even an integrated speaker for impromptu gigs. The rugged recorder 6. Roland SP-404MKII It might look like a hardcore calculator, but this button box is actually built for crunching notes, not numbers. Tough enough for any beat battle, its hands-on interface and signature sounds have made the SP a cult hit with DIY musicians. An OLED display makes it easier to layer loops, stack effects and slice samples in real time, which is a lot more fun than solving equations. The mini maestro 7. Akai Professional MPK Mini MK3 The Swiss Army doesn't need a MIDI controller. If it did, this would be the one. A fun-sized performer you can play several ways, it's a versatile utensil for tinkering with tunes. The 25 mini keys keep your fingers busy, along with eight pads, a pitch stick and a built-in arpeggiator. Assignable knobs complete the ensemble. The only thing missing is a bottle opener. The tactile tinkler 8. Roli Seaboard M When is a mini keyboard not a keyboard? When it's a haptic slab of sonic expression. Swapping regular keys for a responsive playing surface, the smallest Seaboard lets you glide, slide and press your way to organic sounds that a pitch wheel could only dream of – from swelling synths to string vibrato. Need more range? Magnetic connectors let you attach additional boards for extra octaves. Buy Now The portable performer 9. Korg nanoKEY Fold Even composers need a summer break. Pack this travel-sized MIDI keyboard for tunes wherever your next tour takes you. Lightweight at just 126g, the flat-pack piano folds in half without sacrificing features. 25 silent membrane keys mean you can rehearse without disturbing fellow passengers, while a pair of touch sliders let you perfect your melodies, whether you're taking them to Malibu or Ibiza. How to choose the best electronic instrument Looking to buy the best electronic instrument but don't know where to start? Here are some things to consider: Pads: Want to finger drum like Fred Again? Pick a tool with percussive pads. Some are velocity-sensitive for responsive beats, while others have RGB backlighting for better visual feedback when you're deep in the groove. Want to finger drum like Fred Again? Pick a tool with percussive pads. Some are velocity-sensitive for responsive beats, while others have RGB backlighting for better visual feedback when you're deep in the groove. Keys: MIDI keys come in different renditions, from plasticky plonkers to pressure-sensitive sets. If you play piano, you'll want ivories with proper travel. If you just need to trigger chords, a lighter touch will do. MIDI keys come in different renditions, from plasticky plonkers to pressure-sensitive sets. If you play piano, you'll want ivories with proper travel. If you just need to trigger chords, a lighter touch will do. Connectivity: USB-C, MIDI DIN, CV/GATE: connectivity can make or break your setup. Check what language your gear speaks before shelling out. Some instruments double as audio interfaces, with input ports for mics and other sources. USB-C, MIDI DIN, CV/GATE: connectivity can make or break your setup. Check what language your gear speaks before shelling out. Some instruments double as audio interfaces, with input ports for mics and other sources. Software: Not all tools are plug-and-play. Some need a digital audio workstation (DAW) to function. If you prefer jamming to programming, pick one with built-in brains so you can noodle without a laptop. Now check out Stuff's guide to the best creative control panels.

Why HDMI 2.2 is equal parts overkill and the future of TV and gaming
Why HDMI 2.2 is equal parts overkill and the future of TV and gaming

Stuff.tv

time2 days ago

  • Stuff.tv

Why HDMI 2.2 is equal parts overkill and the future of TV and gaming

Version 2.2 of the HDMI Specification is here, because we weren't blazing ahead into eyeball-dazzling televisual overkill enough already. The new spec ramps up maximum bandwidth from 48Gbps to 96Gbps, and supports resolutions up to a whopping 16K resolution at 60Hz. That's 15,360x8640px. You could tile 16 4K images – or 64 1080p images – within the same space, if you were very bored and didn't have anything better to do. But come on: do we really need 16K? According to our team here at Stuff, no. And also, yes. 16K? Pfft. Just buy 16 4K TVs and a big tube of glue instead. Or something. Why I don't need 16K in my life Craig Grannell, regular Stuff contributor and irregular grumpy old person Maybe it's my age. OK, definitely my age. But as new specs whoosh past my face, there comes a point where I think: enough. Like with 16K. I come from a pre-HD world. Games with pixels so chunky you could cut yourself on them. Video so fuzzy that, when watching it today, you'd swear your internet was broken. So I'm not anti-upgrade. The leap from SD to HD was huge. 4K? Not so much, unless your TV covers an entire wall. So most upgrades have felt like diminishing returns, alongside diminishing bank accounts while trying to keep up. Or maybe it's my diminishing eyesight. But do eyes even support 16K? I'm reminded of audiophiles raving about remastered albums with audio ranges you'd need to be part bat, part elephant to appreciate. Can you really see 16K? 'Aha!' say some folks. 'It's not about size – it's about sharpness!' TVs and monitors as crisp as a phone's display, for pin-sharp footage when your nose is pressed up against the glass. Or a future of face-mounted gadgets for people who consider the vaguest hint of a visible pixel a crime against technology, humanity and reality. Fine. Maybe this is my own (wrongly attributed) Bill Gates quote. But rather than saying 640k is enough for everyone, I'm arguing for 4K. Or definitely 8K. Because it's not like we're drowning in 4K content, let alone 8K. 'But the future', you might cry, as your closing move. Sure. Good luck flinging 16K footage around without melting broadband and blowing up budgets. Still, if I'm wrong, feel free to dig up this column a decade from now while watching Captain Spider-Panther and the Miracle of Merch (Because We're Not Even pretending Now) in glorious 16K. Why I'm 16K all the way Tom Morgan-Freelander, Stuff deputy editor and irritatingly optimistic youngling If my glasses prescription is any indication, you really don't need 20/20 vision to spot the difference between HD and 4K – so imagine how much detail will be on show once Netflix starts streaming Is it Cake in glorious 16K. You'll almost be able to taste the frosting! OK, it'll take a lot more than a new HDMI spec before that happens. We need cameras with big enough sensors to film the content in the first place. The file sizes will be astronomical. And no commercially available screen has that many pixels. Sony would allegedly sell you one as early as 2019, if you had a cool $5 million – and space for a display 17 meters wide. The tech has come a long way since then, but 8K is still where most TV brands draw the line. HDMI 2.1 took two years to arrive, so the upgrade isn't going to appear overnight. Still, we've got to start somewhere, right? Black Magic, Red, Sony and Canon are almost certainly hard at work on the camera hardware; people far smarter than I are figuring out the algorithms to keep those file sizes in check; and ever-faster broadband speeds are laying the groundwork for 16K video at more than a frame per second. Having all those extra pixels to push in games might make the likes of Nvidia sweat a bit, but if that stops them obsessing over AI for even a moment then I'm all for it. It's not just resolution that has me excited about HDMI 2.2, either. Doubling the bandwidth means higher refresh rate gaming, so in theory the PlayStation 6 could spit out 4K images at 240Hz – or double what the PS5 can handle today. HDMI 2.1 goodies such as variable refresh rate (VRR) and auto low latency mode (ALLM) aren't going anywhere, and backwards compatibility is a given, so we're not having to give anything up in exchange. As noted philosopher Frasier Crane once said: 'if less is more, just imagine how much more more would be.'

I reviewed the Roborock robot vac with an arm – it would be brilliant, if only it cleaned better
I reviewed the Roborock robot vac with an arm – it would be brilliant, if only it cleaned better

Stuff.tv

time3 days ago

  • Stuff.tv

I reviewed the Roborock robot vac with an arm – it would be brilliant, if only it cleaned better

Stuff Verdict The Roborock Saros Z70 is a wildly ambitious robot vacuum that adds a robotic arm into the mix. While its cleaning, navigation and app experience are mostly top-notch, the mechanical arm tech isn't qu Pros Robotic arm tech is a first and genuinely innovative Excellent vacuuming and mopping for the most part Dock easily takes care of most maintenance Remote control via app is surprisingly useful Cons Automated arm functionality is unreliable Rattling noise while cleaning which seems concerning Struggles with cleaning hard floors Very expensive Introduction Roborock has always pushed boundaries in the world of robot vacuums, but the Saros Z70 might be its most ambitious effort yet. It promises to do something no other robot vacuum can: pick up stray objects from your floor before cleaning. This is thanks to a five-axis mechanical arm, which can grab things like socks, slippers, and tissues, and move them out of the way before resuming cleaning. In theory it's the closest we've come to an actual robotic assistant, and I feel the arm makes this vacuum cooler than it usually would be (don't look at me like that). But as excited as I was, in practice the Roborock Saros Z70 is still somewhat of a work in progress. It excelled at cleaning carpets, but performance on hard floors is inconsistent – and there are clear limitations around the arm's autonomous capabilities. There is serious promise here, but early adopters will need patience. How we test kitchen and cleaning tech Every vacuum cleaner, coffee machine and kitchen/cleaning gadget reviewed on Stuff is put through a battery of tests before we give our final verdict and star rating. We use our own years of experience to judge general performance, battery life, ease of use and value for money. Manufacturers have no visibility on reviews before they appear online, and we never accept payment to feature products. Find out more about how we test and rate products. Read more: Best cordless vacuum cleaners in 2025 for tackling every mess Design & build: Svelte and subtle At first glance, the Saros Z70 doesn't look drastically different to other premium robot vacuums. There's no obvious arm sticking out, no dramatic redesign. That's because the OmniGrip arm folds away entirely under a tinted panel, keeping the top of the unit completely flush. Combined with the puck-free navigation system, it means this robot is under 8cm tall and can easily get under most furniture. The dock is a large, modular unit that handles everything from emptying the dustbin to hot water mop washing and drying. I'll commend Roborock on the fact this isn't quite as tall as other docking stations I've stuck in my living room, but I'd say that it's just as wide. This thing is as sleek as a docking station can be, if slightly industrial-looking, and thankfully easy to maintain. Water tanks are accessible from the top, and the dust bag pulls out from behind a panel at the bottom. There's even a detergent tank for automatically refilling the bot. I'm a bit miffed Roborock didn't include this detergent like every other robot vacuum I've ever tested, but here we are. I'll also note that this water tank seemed to drain fairly quickly for the amount I used it. Flip the Z70 over and you'll find a rubber roller brush, a lifting mop pad system with dual spinning heads (one of which kicks out for edge cleaning), and Roborock's usual anti-tangle setup. The OmniGrip arm itself uses a pincer-style grabber and comes with a secondary camera on the arm to assist with positioning. Overall, it's an incredibly thoughtful and clever design, even if the arm's real-world performance is limited. Features: Everything but the kitchen sink So what can the arm actually do? It's strong enough to lift light objects (up to 300g) like socks, slippers, and sandals, then move them to designated areas. Or, it can just pick them up to clean underneath and put them back again. The app lets you choose what objects to pick up and where to put them. The problem is, it only works well under very specific conditions. After experiencing a few problems, Roborock told me that the object (and robot vac) must be on a hard floor, properly oriented, well lit, and not near a wall. That's a big asterisk for a headlining feature. You can manually control the arm through the app, but it has the same limitations. I will say that the arm performs brilliantly, when it works. There were times I caught it lifting up slippers to clean underneath them, so everywhere was free from dust. But that was when it worked. There were plenty of times when it didn't. Sometimes it would misidentify objects. Other times, it would struggle with grabbing or placing items correctly. On one occasion, it picked up an object only to drop it on itself and trigger an error. Controlled remotely, it worked reliably and was genuinely satisfying to use – when you met its stringent rules for operation. Still, the potential is obvious. If Roborock can improve the AI to recognise more object types, allow the arm to operate more freely, and make autonomous pickup more reliable, it could change how we think about robot vacuums entirely. But we're not quite there just yet. Play Beyond the arm, the Saros Z70 is loaded with features. 22,000Pa of suction makes it one of the most powerful cleaners available. But I'm not sure that the raw numbers translate into real-life success here. Dual mop pads apply consistent downward pressure and lift when needed to avoid wetting carpets. I actually found that by using Roborock's smart navigation, it detached the mop pads, cleaned carpeted rooms first, then came back to pick up the mop pads and fill up with water. Genius! The mop system can detect when pads are dirty and wash them at the dock using 80°C water, before drying them with warm air. Navigation works without a LiDAR tower, which contributes to the vacuum's low profile. It proved very reliable in my home, even in tricky layouts. The chassis is able to navigate thresholds up to 4cm. There's definitely something satisfying about watching this robot vac give itself a little leg up. Performance: Mixed results As a cleaning device, the Z70 excels more the most part. Suction on carpets is excellent, edge mopping is surprisingly thorough, and general navigation is precise. I particularly enjoyed the 3D mapping in the Roborock app where the navigation system can identify obstacles and items of furniture. In day-to-day use, it picked up almost everything with Turbo mode switched on for all rooms, but a noticeable amount less in Max mode. Where this robot vac struggled was on hard floors – particularly in the kitchen. It just could not seem to reliably pick up crumbs of varying size. At first, I thought this was because it was mopping and sucking at the same time, but switching the mop off had no effect. This is a little concerning in Turbo mode, as the lower modes wouldn't have had a chance. Speaking of mopping, the dual mops cover large areas quickly and leave no streaks, and the auto-lift feature reliably prevents wet carpets. However my unit made a persistent rattling noise while cleaning, which I suspect came from the arm or its housing. It didn't affect performance, but was irritating over long sessions. Yes, I could hear the noise even when the vacuum was in its Turbo mode. The dock is a workhorse, handling emptying, mopping, cleaning and drying with minimal fuss. It's a bit noisy during operation, but not excessively so. I'd actually say that its quieter than other robot vacs I've reviewed, including the Eufy Omni S1 Pro. Charging is fast, and battery life is strong – easily enough to clean a medium-sized home in one go on the lower modes. But on Turbo mode, it'd have to come home and recharge about 70% of the way through a clean. In fairness, the app does warn you of this when you set it to Turbo mode. Interface: One of the best apps Roborock's companion app is one of the best in the game. It's intuitive, packed with features, and makes the Z70 easy to control. The arm functions are well integrated into the app, with simple toggles to enable or disable object pickup, custom zones, and sorting bins. There's a handy remote view mode with camera switching, and you can manually control the arm's pitch and angle if needed. You can use this remote viewing mode without the arm too, in case you want a mobile security bot while you're on holiday. Elsewhere, the SmartPlan mode I mentioned analyses your home and cleaning habits to adjust settings automatically. Or you can get hands-on and tweak suction, water flow, cleaning patterns and more. You can even talk to the vacuum by saying 'Hello Rocky,' though I found this more of a novelty than a useful feature. It also wasn't particularly accurate, which is becoming a bit of a trend with this vacuum. As expected, Alexa and Google Assistant integration is also included. Roborock still says that Matter support is coming later via an update, but I managed to add my Saros Z70 to the Apple Home app – so it appears to have arrived at least in part. Roborock Saros Z70 verdict The Roborock Saros Z70 is one of the most ambitious robot vacuums I've ever tested. The built-in mechanical arm takes it beyond simple home-cleaning and firmly into the realm of home assistance. And while the arm isn't perfect just yet, the fact it exists at all is still a technical marvel. There's something genuinely exciting about watching a robot vacuum pick up a slipper, clean underneath it, put it back, and then carry on like nothing happened. The app is superb, and manually controlling the robotic arm feels more like playing a futuristic game than household chores. That said, the arm's autonomous smarts aren't quite ready for prime time. The list of objects it can recognise is limited, the conditions have to be perfect, and in testing it failed more often than it succeeded when left to its own devices. While the Z70 is also one of the most powerful vacuums Roborock has made, performance is a mixed bag. It vacuums brilliantly for the most part, mops effectively, and gets under low furniture that rivals can't reach. But it seemed to struggle on hard floors. There's clear promise here – and Roborock says updates are coming – but for now, it's a feature you'll mainly use manually or as a party trick. Add in a very high price, and it becomes a little harder to recommend to anyone other than early adopters. Stuff Says… Score: 3/5 The Roborock Saros Z70 is a wildly ambitious robot vacuum that adds a robotic arm into the mix. While its cleaning, navigation and app experience are mostly top-notch, the mechanical arm tech isn't quite ready for prime time. Pros Robotic arm tech is a first and genuinely innovative Excellent vacuuming and mopping for the most part Dock easily takes care of most maintenance Remote control via app is surprisingly useful Cons Automated arm functionality is unreliable Rattling noise while cleaning which seems concerning Struggles with cleaning hard floors Very expensive Roborock Saros Z70 technical specifications Functions Vacuum, mop, robotic arm pick-up Controls App, Alexa, Google Assistant, built-in voice, Matter Run time 180 minutes Dimensions 350x353x79mm, 12.4kg (robot) 381x475x488mm, 4.9kg (dock)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store