Texas banned abortions - and then sepsis rates started to soar
ProPublica analyzed seven years of Texas hospitals' discharge data — from 2017 through 2023 — and found that since 2021, when the southern state's initial abortion ban went into effect, the rate of sepsis surged by more than 50 percent for women hospitalized when they experienced miscarriages in the second trimester.
Sepsis is a medical emergency that occurs when a patient's body improperly reacts to an infection. It can lead to organ failure or death if not treated quickly enough.
In September 2021, the state banned most abortions after a fetal heartbeat was detected. Then, in August 2022 following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade, Texas's 'trigger law' took effect, criminalizing abortion. Doctors who perform abortions could face life in prison and fines of up to $100,000. Now, abortions are banned in all cases except if the mother's health or life is at risk — a definition that the state's supreme court has refused to clarify.
The rate of sepsis among patients experiencing second-trimester pregnancy loss remained pretty steady until the state added criminal penalties for abortion providers, the analysis shows.
In 2021, before they were introduced, 67 patients who miscarried in the second trimester were diagnosed with sepsis but after, in 2022, that figure increased to 90. That number increased again to 99 in 2023.
ProPublica believe those figures could be 'conservative.'
Treating miscarriages has also become complicated as a result of these laws. Medical professionals are constrained by either having to wait for the mother's life to be in jeopardy or having to wait for the fetus' heart to stop beating.
For example, three days after the fetal heartbeat law took effect, on September 3, 2021, Josseli Barnica went to a Houston hospital at 17 weeks pregnant to discover she was battling a deadly infection as a result of a miscarriage. But doctors were restricted in how they could treat her, since her fetus still had a heartbeat. After 40 hours in pain from the infection, Barnica delivered the fetus after there was no longer a detectable heartbeat. Three days after being treated and discharged, she died from sepsis. Medical experts who reviewed her case told ProPublica that they believed her death was 'preventable.'
Another patient cited in the study, Nevaeh Crain, died after doctors waited for her fetus' heart to stop beating as her organs failed. Before rushing the teenager to the operating theter, they conducted another test to confirm her fetus had expired, the outlet reported.
The data also underscores the confusion around miscarriage treatment. The rate of sepsis was less severe for pregnant patients who were admitted to the hospital without a fetal heartbeat. The rate moved from 2.1 percent in 2017 to 3.1 percent in 2023 for those admitted with fetal death, and from 3.7 percent to 6.9 percent for those without fetal death.
'What this says to me is that once a fetal death is diagnosed, doctors can appropriately take care of someone to prevent sepsis, but if the fetus still has a heartbeat, then they aren't able to act and the risk for maternal sepsis goes way up,' Dr. Kristina Adams Waldorf, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at UW Medicine, told the outlet. 'This is needlessly putting a woman's life in danger.'
Other indicators suggest pregnancy in Texas has become more dangerous. Since 2021, dozens more pregnant and postpartum women have died in Texas hospitals than had before the Covid-19 pandemic — despite a drop in maternal mortality rates at a national level in the same period.
There were 79 maternal hospital deaths in 2018 and 2019 compared to 2022 and 2023 when there were 120. Despite this alarming uptick, the Texas Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Review Committee opted not to review pregnancy-related deaths in 2022 and 2023.
'The fact that Texas is not reviewing those years does a disservice to the 120 individuals you identified who died inpatient and were pregnant,' said Dr. Jonas Swartz, an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Duke University. 'And that is an underestimation of the number of people who died.'
The laws in place appear to be interfering with patient care, one doctor suggested.
'We have the ability to intervene before these patients get sick,' Dr. Sarah Prager, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Washington, told the outlet. 'This is evidence that we aren't doing that.'
Even though the Texas Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit asking for clarification over who qualifies for an abortion in the state, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick called on the state legislature to clear up the language of the law. 'I do think we need to clarify any language so that doctors are not in fear of being penalized if they think the life of the mother is at risk,' he said last month.
Gov. Greg Abbott, however, doesn't seem to be convinced that any clarification is necessary. 'There have been hundreds of abortions that have been provided under this law, so there are plenty of doctors and plenty of mothers that have been able to get an abortion that saved their lives and protect their health and safety,' he told the Houston Chronicle this week before ProPublica's report was released. 'So I know as the law as it currently exists can work if it is properly applied.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Planned Parenthood wins partial victory in legal battle with Trump admin over defunding efforts
BOSTON — Planned Parenthood won a partial victory Monday in a legal fight with President Donald Trump's administration over efforts to defund the organization in his signature tax legislation. A provision in that bill ends Medicaid payments for one year to abortion providers that received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023, even to those like Planned Parenthood that also offer things like contraception, pregnancy tests and STD testing. But U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston granted a preliminary injunction Monday that, for now, blocks the government from cutting Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood member organizations that either don't provide abortion care or didn't meet a threshold of at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in a given year. Advertisement 5 Planned Parenthood has won a partial victory Monday in a legal fight with the Trump's administration's efforts to cut funding. Getty Images 5 Protestors holding a 'I fight for Planned Parenthood' banner in front of the Supreme Court. REUTERS It wasn't immediately clear how many Planned Parenthood organizations and clinics would continue to get Medicaid reimbursements under that decision and how many might not. Planned Parenthood said in a statement after the injunction that it's thankful the court recognized 'the harm' caused by the bill. Advertisement But it said it's disappointed that some of its members will lose this funding, 'risking chaos, confusion, and harm for patients who could now be turned away when seeking lifesaving reproductive health care.' 'The court has not yet ruled on whether it will grant preliminary injunctive relief to other members,' the statement added. 'We remain hopeful that the court will grant this relief. There will be nothing short of a public health crisis if Planned Parenthood members are allowed to be 'defunded.'' The lawsuit was filed earlier this month against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its member organizations in Massachusetts and Utah. Advertisement Planned Parenthood argued that allowing the provision to take effect would have devastating consequences nationwide, including increased rates of undiagnosed and untreated sexually transmitted diseases and cancer. 5 U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani granted a preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks the government from cutting Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood member organizations. Getty Images 'With no reason other than plain animus, the law will prevent Planned Parenthood Members from providing vital — indeed, lifesaving — care to more than one million patients,' they wrote. 'This statute is unconstitutional and will inflict irreparable harm on Planned Parenthood Members and their patients.' Lawyers for the government argued in court documents that the bill 'stops federal subsidies for Big Abortion.' Advertisement 'All three democratically elected components of the Federal Government collaborated to enact that provision consistent with their electoral mandates from the American people as to how they want their hard-earned taxpayer dollars spent,' the government wrote in its opposition to the motion. 5 Planned Parenthood filed the lawsuit earlier this month against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Getty Images 5 It wasn't immediately clear how many Planned Parenthood organizations and clinics would continue to get Medicaid reimbursements under that decision and how many might not. Getty Images The government added that the plaintiffs 'now want this Court to reject that judgment and supplant duly enacted legislation with their own policy preferences. … That request is legally groundless.' Hours after the lawsuit was filed, Talwani issued a temporary restraining order that prevented the government from enforcing the cuts. That order had been set to expire Monday.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Federal health agency finalizes mass layoffs after Supreme Court lifts pause
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is moving forward with mass layoffs after the Supreme Court lifted a pause on the Trump administration's sweeping efforts to cut the workforce at federal agencies. The administration began a wave of terminations at HHS on April 1, part of a plan to cut 10,000 jobs at the department and many more across the federal government. U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco halted the layoffs, ruling on May 22 that approximately 20 affected agencies, including HHS, wouldn't be able to function as Congress intended. The Supreme Court, in a July 8 ruling, allowed the job cuts to proceed. An HHS spokesperson said July 15 that employees originally targeted for layoffs have now been terminated, with some exceptions. Combined with earlier job cuts and people who accepted early retirement offers, the total Health and Human Services workforce is expected to drop from 82,000 to 62,000 people. President Donald Trump has been pushing big cuts at federal agencies through the Department of Government Efficiency. The HHS cuts affect a vast array of programs, including the HIV prevention division in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and tobacco prevention efforts at the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration. Word of the cuts prompted concern from leading health experts when they were announced in April. 'The randomness of today's actions is reckless and will harm Americans rather than make them healthy,' Dr. Colleen Kelley, chair of the HIV Medicine Association, said at the time. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in March when the department announced plans for big cuts that the move would reduce "bureaucratic sprawl" and realign his agency "with its core mission and our new priorities." Contributing: Maureen Groppe, Sarah D. Wire, Josh Meyer, Bart Jansen, Ken Alltucker, Cybele Mayes-Osterman, Eduardo Cuevas, Sudiksha Kochi, Adrianna Rodriguez, Terry Collins This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump's administration finalizes mass layoff of health workers


Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
Florida among most restrictive states for birth control access
Florida is among states with the most restrictive access to contraception, a new scorecard from the Population Reference Bureau shows. Why it matters: Contraception access has become a political flashpoint since the Supreme Court ended Roe v. Wade, with Democrats unsuccessfully pressing to codify contraceptive access nationwide and some patients concerned that conservative state legislatures could enact new curbs. The court's decision also paved the way for Florida's six-week abortion ban, which has forced more patients to seek care out of state. Zoom in: While Florida expanded Medicaid coverage for family-planning services, the state hasn't enacted a broader expansion of the health insurance program for low-income residents. That leaves gaps in coverage for men and people younger than 19, the report notes. The state has no laws requiring insurers to cover birth control and only allows minors to consent to contraceptive services if they're married, pregnant or parenting, or if withholding care poses a health risk. Florida also doesn't require sex education in schools, per the report. The latest: Last year, state education officials told districts to stop teaching about contraception and focus sex education lessons on abstinence. The big picture: Nearly 35% of Americans, or 121 million people, currently live in a state that actively restricts access. Of the 16 states the group identified in that cohort, the most restrictive included Florida, Kansas, Mississippi, Alabama and Wyoming. The most protective included California, Washington, Connecticut, New York, New Mexico, Maryland and Oregon. Another 18 states were considered a mix between the two. "Reproductive health care access depends on where you live," said Cathryn Streifel, senior program director at PRB and co-author of the scorecard.