Complaint filed against Amul for ‘promoting' its newly launched ‘Infant Formula', violates ‘IMS Act' says BPNI
The Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI), an organisation working to "protect, promote and support breastfeeding practices, has filed a complaint with the Union government against Amul for allegedly promoting its newly launched liquid ready-to-feed infant formula, which is listed on their website. It said the diary giant violated Infant Milk Substitutes, 1992.
Dr. Arun Gupta, MD, FIAP (Ped), coordinator at BPNI took to X to flag it, stating, 'BPNI makes a formal complaint to concerned authorities requesting for actions to protect children's health @MoHFW_INDIA @fssaiindia @NCPCR_ @MinistryWCD. Violations of IMS Act undermine breastfeeding. This time its @Amul_Coop.' He further questioned, 'Why it is so difficult to abide by the law?'
In a complaint to Ministry of Health, Ministry of Women and Child Development, FSSAI, NCPCR, for a quicker action and compliance, the BPNI stated, 'The promotion of infant formula by @Amul_Coop, as reported is in direct contravention of Section 9 of the IMS Act, 1992, which prohibits all forms of advertising and promotion of infant milk substitutes. The use of a teddy bear image further violates Section 6(2) of the Act.' The first page of the complaint filed by BPNI (Image: @moveribfan/X)
It cited Section 2(g) of the IMS Act which defines "infant milk substitute" as any food marketed or represented as a replacement for mother's milk for infants up to two years of age, Section 2(i) that defines promotion as encouraging any person to purchase or use an infant milk substitute and Section 6 prohibiting the use of graphics or phrases that enhance the saleability of infant milk substitutes.
It further alleges that Amul issued a press release about its 'India's first liquid ready-to-feed infant formula', promoting it as 'ideal to carry' and 'good for working mothers,' which BPNI claims is promotional in nature, adding Amul allegedly used a teddy bear image in its product label, which BPNI says is not a neutral symbol and is used to emotionally appeal and increase saleability, violating Section 6(2) of the Act. The second page of the complaint filed by BPNI. (Image: @moveribfan/X)
Calling for a 'thorough investigation' into the alleged violation and "cognisable offence", the BPNI has asked to cease all promotional activities related to infant milk substitutes, withdraw the teddy bear graphic from the label, set up a monitoring mechanism for IMS Act compliance and advise media outlets to vet press releases for legal compliance before publication.
'Amulspray is one of India's oldest and most trusted infant milk food brands and is in complete compliance of the IMS Act. The link mentioned by you in your post is not active. We remain committed to all the guidelines of BPNI regarding promotion of infant food in India,' Amul's customer care stated on X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Sassoon Hospital urges NIV to return land amid healthcare expansion plans
The BJ Medical College (BJMC) and Sassoon General Hospital (SGH) have formally urged authorities not to renew the lease on a prime land parcel currently occupied by the National Institute of Virology (NIV) on Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Road. SGH has requested that the land, measuring approximately 8,311 square meters, be returned to the hospital once the current lease expires in June 2026, according to hospital officials. SGH has requested that the land, measuring approximately 8,311 square meters, be returned to the hospital once the current lease expires in June 2026, according to hospital officials. (HT) This issue was discussed during a review meeting with the Minister of State (MoS) for medical education, Madhuri Misal, on Friday. SGH officials have sent several letters to the State medical education department and the Pune district administration, requesting that the land be returned in accordance with the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955, and its revised regulations from 2007. According to SGH officials, the NIV initially leased the land from SGH for 99 years. However, the lease expired in 2001, yet NIV continues to occupy the premises. Although NIV has its own campus in Pashan, the property on Ambedkar Road, which is owned by SGH, remains occupied. SGH officials emphasised this point in a letter to the Pune District Administration, a copy of which has been obtained by Hindustan Times. Furthermore, since the original 99-year lease is set to expire in June 2026, SGH has requested that the land not be re-leased for another term. Following the meeting, Misal confirmed the discussion, stating, 'During Friday's review meeting, SGH and BJMC officials raised the issue of land currently occupied by NIV. I have asked them to submit a detailed proposal for consideration. Once we receive the proposal, we will take an appropriate decision.' SGH officials highlighted a severe space crunch, which has been hindering their ability to meet the rising demand for healthcare services. The hospital has outlined plans to utilise the land for key infrastructure developments, including a physiotherapy college, a dental college, a super-speciality hospital, hostels for postgraduate students and a Dharmashala (rest house) for the families of patients. Dr Ekanth Pawar, dean of BJMC, emphasised the strategic importance of the land's location. 'The site is ideal for a super-speciality hospital, and we have already submitted a proposal to the government. This facility will help us cater for the large number of patients who currently rely on private hospitals for specialised care. Additionally, we are seeking approval for a dental college and a physiotherapy college,' he said. Dr Pawar also noted, 'We were informed about the lease's expiration through a letter from the district administration. Given the significant growth in patient numbers and SGH being the only tertiary care government hospital in the region, there is an urgent need for more space to expand.' SGH is one of the largest government hospitals in the region, treating thousands of patients daily, many from rural and economically disadvantaged areas. The hospital serves patients from Pune, Solapur, Satara, Kolhapur, Sangli, and Ahilya Nagar. The administration has warned that without additional space, SGH's ability to efficiently serve the public could be severely impacted. Despite repeated attempts to contact them, officials from NIV were unavailable for comment.
The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
Fisher village battles illness, inaction over illegal shrimp farm
Recurring stomach pain, skin rashes, and kidney ailments have become alarmingly common among children in Kottaimedu, a tsunami-rehabilitation fishing hamlet in Sirkazhi taluk of Mayiladuthurai district. Villagers attribute these health issues to the saline and contaminated groundwater, which they rely on for daily use. They allege that untreated chemical discharge and waste from a shrimp farm operating just 50 metres from their homes — violating the Coastal Aquaculture Authority (CAA) Act, 2005 — is polluting the nearby canal and groundwater sources. Despite a clear directive from the CAA on June 3 instructing local authorities to cancel the farm's license, no enforcement action has been taken. The village, part of Thandavankulam panchayat, comprises around 300 families who were relocated here following the 2004 tsunami. Permanent housing, a government primary school, and an anganwadi centre were provided as part of the resettlement effort. 'Initially, there was only one shrimp farm near our village,' said Kannaiyan A., a community leader. 'In past decade several have emerged, with one operating just 50 metres away—well within the prohibited buffer zone of 300 metres from human settlements.' With piped drinking water from Kollidam available only three days a week, villagers rely heavily on groundwater — which they say has become unusable. 'The groundwater has been contaminated by the nearby shrimp farm, and our village is suffering as a result. Officials show no concern for our health or livelihood,' said Pakkirisamy C., a senior resident. 'We have raised this issue with many government departments including the district administration over the past decade, but nothing has changed.' Rajakumari T., whose 12-year-old son has been under treatment for kidney-related issues since he was nine, said doctors have attributed his condition to high salt levels in his system. 'We spend ₹5,000 every month on his treatment,' she said. Another resident, Chandrakala L, reported similar problems with her child. T. Sathya and B. Vetriselvi, president and vice-president of the School Management Committee, said that while the school sources drinking water externally, tap water is occasionally used for cooking—often followed by complaints of stomach pain from students. A majority of students from the primary school, whom The Hindu spoke to, reported experiencing skin-related issues. Following a case filed in the Madras High Court, the court directed the Coastal Aquaculture Authority (CAA) to review the matter in consultation with stakeholders. Based on its findings, the CAA issued an official order on June 3, signed by its Secretary Neetu Kumari Prasad, directing the cancellation of the shrimp farm's license. The Hindu has accessed the order, which identifies a 1.15-hectare shrimp farm located in an ecologically sensitive buffer zone near Kottaimedu village, in clear violation of the Coastal Aquaculture Authority Act, 2005. The order was sent to the District Collector, Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) of Sirkazhi, the Tahsildar, and the Fisheries Department. However, no action has been initiated so far. When contacted by The Hindu, officials from various departments acknowledged awareness of the issue but cited procedural delays. An authority from the local government primary school said, 'We have reported the drinking water issue to the panchayat. The water we provide at school is sourced directly from the village, and we are unable to ensure separate treatment.' Nathiya, the Village Health Nurse of Thandavankulam panchayat, said she had not yet received any complaints regarding skin allergies or stomach ailments. 'I will ask the Health Inspector to collect water samples. If required, we will coordinate with the nearby Primary Health Centre to organise a medical camp,' she said. Murugan, the Village Administrative Officer, stated that he assumed charge only in March this year. 'I have heard about an order to halt shrimp operations, but I have not received any official communication or documentation,' he said. Mohan Kumar, Assistant Director of the Fisheries Department, confirmed receipt of the CAA's directive. 'We have been instructed to cancel the shrimp farm's licence. However, the farm operator has made significant investments and is close to harvest. No action has been taken yet,' he admitted.
The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
Kerala HC upholds single judge's directive for re-look at age limits under ART Act
A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court has observed that that Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare is required to take a just and proper decision on a single judge's order to take a re-look for increasing the upper age limit of women and men prescribed for undergoing assisted reproductive procedure in the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) [ART] Act, 2021. The Bench comprising Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. made the observation recently while dismissing an appeal filed by the Centre against the single judge's verdict. The single judge had directed the National Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Board to alert the Union government about the need for having a re-look at the upper age limit of 55 for men and 50 for women prescribed under Section 21(g) of the Act. The single judge passed the directive while allowing writ petitions filed by a few couples seeking to undergo ART procedure. They approached the court challenging the refusal of the hospital authorities to permit them to undergo the procedure as the husbands had crossed 55 , the upper age limit. The single judge had observed that the impact of the prescription of upper age limit on the liberty of individuals is a matter which the national board should bring to the notice of the Union government so as to effectuate a detailed discussion on the subject and pave the way for necessary amendments.
