
OPINION: Sport federations must learn to stand up against parliament
If parliament is a circus, its portfolio committee on sport, arts and culture is a modern day Colosseum.
One difference, however, between battles held in ancient Rome and those being held in Cape Town is that the people who were forced to fight in the Colosseum made an effort to hit back.
Watching Netball South Africa being grilled by the parliamentary committee this week was like watching school kids being scolded by teachers.
Some of the issues raised by the portfolio committee were valid, most notably the delays in releasing audited financial statements (which government deservedly wanted to see after providing R90 million in funding for the 2023 Netball World Cup) and the recent suspension of Netball SA president Cecilia Molokwane by World Netball.
However, some of the questions asked were completely ridiculous, and the NSA leadership seemed terrified to stand up for themselves, which they had every right to do.
Proteas coach
They were dragged over the coals for appointing Jenny van Dyk as the Proteas head coach last year ahead of black coaches who applied for the post.
Anyone who understands netball in this country will be aware that Van Dyk was the best person for the job, having proved herself across multiple levels of the sport for the last decade.
When they were interrupted in their responses, the NSA leadership shut down and looked ready to accept the criticism, rather than hitting back at the politicians on the other side of the room who clearly know next to nothing about the sport.
When answering questions about financial statements, NSA should have been able to provide more details about expenditure, but even when they did, they got shot down, and they buckled too quickly.
It is of course important that the people running sports federations are able to account for expenditure, but aside from the World Cup, netball relies far more on corporate sponsors for its funding than it does on the government.
Showboating and grandstanding
It is good that the committee exposed some problems with NSA's corporate governance, but let's be honest, politicians of all people have very little right to be criticising others for wasteful expenditure. An independent panel of individuals who understand both administration and operations in sport would be far better suited to do the grilling.
The arrogance and showboating of some of the members of the portfolio committee indicates that they're more interested in grandstanding for the public watching the live stream than they are in actually getting to the bottom of real issues.
And that's fine. It's parliament. What else can we expect?
But when sports federations appear in front of members of parliament and they're asked ridiculous questions that don't even make sense, it would at least be more entertaining if they fought back.
Even in ancient Rome, prisoners forced into battle made an attempt to defend themselves. Sports administrators need to do the same.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Nomusa Dube-Ncube's remarkable return to the national Cabinet as deputy minister
Former KwaZulu-Natal premier Dr Nomusa Dube-Ncube's political career has been revived following her appointment to the national Cabinet on Monday. Image: Supplied Former KwaZulu-Natal premier Dr Nomusa Dube-Ncube's political career appears to be on the rise again following her appointment to the national Cabinet as Higher Education and Training deputy minister. After dismissing Dr Nobuhle Nkabane, the troubled minister of Higher Education and Training, on Monday, President Cyril Ramaphosa once again looked outside the National Assembly for a replacement. Buti Manamela, who had been the deputy minister for the same department for years, was promoted to the full ministerial portfolio for the first time in his life and was announced alongside Dube-Ncube. She was also appointed to chair one of the Sector Education and Training Authority boards; however, after revelations that Nkabane had lied about the independence of the panel, her name and other ANC members were withdrawn. Dube-Ncube, with her vast governance experience, was almost written off politically when the ANC, under Siboniso Duma and Bheki Mtolo as chairperson and secretary, respectively, placed her at number 31 on the party's members list to the provincial legislature last year. This meant that if she made it back to the legislature, she would have moved from the front row to the back seat of the chamber, let alone not even getting a Cabinet position. Although not guaranteed, MEC positions are usually allocated to the top 10 list members. The first-ever woman premier of the province was also not on the province's national list, which would have taken her to Parliament at least as a backbencher. With ANC getting only 14 seats after last year's general elections, Dube-Ncube went into political wilderness until the national party leadership reconfigured the provincial executive committee, removing both Mtolo and Duma from their positions of power. She was appointed to the provincial task team's top five, taking the deputy coordinator's position, which is equivalent to the deputy secretary's. Dube-Ncube, who had served in several departments as an MEC, was appointed to the premiership after Sihle Zikalala resigned following his political defeat by Duma in a chairmanship contest in 2022; however, rumours of her ill-treatment emerged. There have been rumours of a rift between her and ANC KZN chairperson Duma, and people have been accusing the ANC chairperson of being a shadow premier of the province. The big outcry, which saw the ANC Women's League intervene, was during the World Cup tour in Durban when the Springboks' Eben Etzebeth lifted the Webb Ellis Cup with Duma, instead of the premier, as the programme director had announced. In a hard-hitting statement issued then, the Women's League lambasted Duma, calling on the leaders to uphold the values of non-sexism and gender equality. The league said gender equality was not an ideal but a fundamental principle that the ANC identifies with, saying the actions of Duma demonstrated a regrettable departure from this essential value. [email protected].

TimesLIVE
3 days ago
- TimesLIVE
US threatens Mexican flights over cargo, competition issues
The transportation department alleges Mexico has violated a bilateral air agreement by slashing slots for passenger flights and forcing all-cargo carriers to relocate operations. Then-president Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador defended the decisions, arguing the capital's main airport was too crowded and the new, farther-away Felipe Angeles International Airport (AIFA) could handle the extra traffic. Officials are rushing to renovate the ageing Benito Juarez International Airport (MEX) ahead of next year's World Cup, for which Mexico is a host country. 'By restricting slots and mandating that all-cargo operations move out of MEX, Mexico has broken its promise, disrupted the market and left American businesses holding the bag for millions in increased costs,' the transportation department said. The AIFA is at full capacity for cargo handling and needs to be expanded. For passenger flights, it lags far behind MEX as transportation to and from the city remains spotty. 'The move not only disrupted critical air cargo operations and set a dangerous precedent for how all-cargo carriers may be treated in global markets, it also created uncertainty about how potential safety emergencies could be handled,' said the Cargo Airline Association, which represents major US cargo carriers. Mexico's transportation ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The transportation department issued orders requiring Mexican airlines to file schedules with the department for all their US operations by a late-July deadline while requiring prior US approval for large charter flights to or from the US. Airlines set to be affected by the measures, including Volaris and Viva Aerobus, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. If the US rescinds antitrust approval for Delta and Aeromexico, they would be required to end their co-operation on pricing, capacity and revenue sharing. Delta would be able to retain its equity stake in Aeromexico and continue other aspects of its partnership. The transportation department also said it could take action against European countries over limitations at airports.


Daily Maverick
6 days ago
- Daily Maverick
ARTsolar throws in towel in ‘gagging' case against ‘whistle-blowers' and journalist
The solar panel company had wanted to stop three 'whistle-blowers' and a journalist from reporting that it was importing and not locally manufacturing its solar panels. Solar panel manufacturer ARTsolar has thrown in the towel in its controversial battle against three 'whistle-blowers' and a journalist. The company had successfully gagged them by court order from making or reporting on 'defamatory' allegations that ARTsolar was importing and not locally manufacturing its solar panels. The interim gagging order was granted in March by Durban High Court acting Judge Perlene Bramdhew against businessman Brett Latimer, two former employees of ARTsolar and journalist Bongani Hans. The date to determine whether the order should be confirmed or discharged was set for 29 July. But this week, ARTsolar withdrew the application and tendered to pay the costs of Latimer, Hans and former employees Kandace Singh and Shalendra Hansraj. It also tendered to pay the costs of the Industrial Development Corporation, which entered the legal fray because it had provided R90-million funding to ARTsolar to set up its 'proudly South African' factory in New Germany. The IDC wanted to interview Latimer about his claims. The initial court order specifically barred Latimer from communicating with the IDC. The IDC launched its own urgent court application, successfully arguing that it should have been joined in the proceedings, and that the order was stifling an investigation into the matter on the instruction of Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition Parks Tau. The order was amended to exclude reference to the IDC. The shift in ARTsolar's stance came after it appointed new attorneys last month. Mohamed Mota, partner at Cox Yeats, confirmed the withdrawal. He said his client had no comment 'at this stage'. Media freedom Because the case had implications for freedom of expression, the amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism had applied to be admitted as an amicus curiae. Managing partner Sam Sole said the withdrawal was a 'bittersweet victory'. 'The facts of the case make it clear the order should never have been granted and amaBhungane was looking forward to urging the court to give decisive direction to other presiding officers about the very narrow and limited circumstances which could justify such pre-publication censorship,' he said. 'We had also intended to remind the court that an effective press is a 'public sentinel' and is a conduit for the public's right to receive and impart information, meaning curbs on the media effectively limit the rights of the general public. 'This places a duty on the courts to be exceptionally vigilant in ensuring adherence to the legal safeguards of press freedom, especially where the public have no voice in the proceedings – as in this case, where the media house did not initially come to court.' Sole said there were various reasons that a journalist may fail to effectively oppose such an application, especially an extremely urgent one, such as a lack of timely access to adequate (or any) legal representation. 'We hope the publicity engendered by this case will discourage other parties from running to court and will also encourage presiding officers to exercise due care and caution when faced with similar cases,' Sole said. ARTsolar's urgent application was sparked by Hans sending questions, based on Latimer's allegations, to the company. Latimer, a former client of ARTsolar, alleged that he had been duped into believing that the panels were locally manufactured when they were in fact imported from China. He was backed up by Singh and Hansraj, who previously worked for the company. On the back of the gagging order, Latimer obtained a subpoena against Turners Shipping and, in a supplementary affidavit, he said the shipping documents (bills of lading) showed that the company imported 99% of its panels. Latimer's attorney MS Omar said: 'The interim gagging order was a drastic and draconian violation of my client's fundamental rights of freedom of expression as enshrined in section 16 of the Constitution. The overbroad interim order plainly prohibits permissible statements, based on truth and public interest, and failed to take account of the high threshold for a defamation interdict.' The application will be formally withdrawn in court on 29 July. DM