Keir Starmer suggests he didn't check 'island of strangers' speech
Starmer was widely compared to Enoch Powell after he said Britain risked becoming an "island of strangers" if measures were not implemented to curb migration.
It was criticised for echoing Powell's 1968 declaration that Brits had "found themselves made strangers in their own country".
The CEO of Scottish Care, Donald MacAskill, told The National the speech had "echoes of Powell at his worst".
Starmer said he "deeply regrets" using the phrase, telling the paper that he was not "in the best state to make a big speech" after his family home had been targeted in a firebomb attack days before.
'It's fair to say I wasn't in the best state to make a big speech,' he said.
READ MORE: Scotland reacts as Labour announce 'two-tier' benefits U-turn
'I was really, really worried. I almost said: 'I won't do the bloody press conference.' Vic [Starmer's wife] was really shaken up as, in truth, was I.
"It was just a case of reading the words out and getting through it somehow."
He went on: "I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of Powell.
'I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either.
"I'll give you the honest truth: I deeply regret using it.'
He then said he should have read through the speech properly and 'held it up to the light a bit more'.
The Prime Minister also admitted there were 'problems with the language' in his foreword to the policy document that said the record high numbers of immigrants entering the UK under the last government had done 'incalculable damage' to the country.
At the time of the speech, Starmer said he "completely rejected" any comparison to Powell.
READ MORE: Question Time called out as Reform councillor on St Andrews panel
Powell (below) was sacked from the Conservative frontbench as a result of making his 1968 speech and it outraged his senior colleagues at the time.
In the speech, Starmer also said the Labour Government would 'take back control of our borders' and close the book on a 'squalid chapter' for politics and the economy.
The UK Government is set to close the care worker visa route as part of new restrictions which aim to cut the number of low-skilled foreign workers by about 50,000 this year.
Under white paper proposals, migrants will have to spend 10 years in the UK before being able to apply for citizenship, but so-called 'high-contributing' individuals such as doctors and nurses could be fast-tracked through the system.
Language requirements will be increased for all immigration routes to ensure a higher level of English.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Live
3 hours ago
- North Wales Live
Protestors demonstrate against 'shocking' solar farm proposals which could 'rip out' countryside
More than 100 protestors demonstrated against proposed, vast solar energy farms on Anglesey today. They are concerned about two plans - the Alaw Môn projects - which would reportedly produce 160MW of energy - and Maen Hir - which could produce over 350MW. The proposals by Enso Energy and Lightsource BP on Anglesey, could cover up to 3,700 acres of mostly farmland on about two per cent of the island. It is understood that Lightsource BP, who are responsible for the Maen Hir scheme, say they are still consulting with local communities, and that they appreciate the feedback they have received so far. North Wales Live has asked Enso Energy - the developers of the Alaw Môn scheme - for a statement. Today one resident Sarah Pye, a mother-of-two from Rhos-Goch in the north of the island, addressed the demonstrators in Llangefni in Welsh and English. She told them: "We live in the area of the Lightsource BP solar development known as Maen Hir. "Not only will our view be turned from green to black but they want to rip out our land and put a cable through it. My partner and I have spent the last four years rewilding our land and planting over 4,000 trees to create a mini-forest in Rhos-Goch. "Additionally, we have put all of our life savings into creating a tourism business to make our dream of living in a smallholding a reality. (But) out of the blue we received letters from Lightsource BP wanting to survey our land. "They decided that they may want to use our land for a solar development. You can imagine what a shock that was to us. We had no idea that four years ago this was a development plan not just for Rhos-Goch but for Anglesey too." Ms Pye also warned that if proposals are approved tourists could stay away, "Would you go on holiday to an island covered in black solar panels?" she asked. Ms Pye said she learned through Plaid Cymru members and others that in fact two solar farms were proposed which was a "shock". But she met some amazing people and formed the "No More Solar Farms Ynys Mon Group". Also today Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth said he is worried about the plans to "exploit" Anglesey. "We are very concerned here on Anglesey about the exploitation that is being planned by companies that are going to make a profit of millions of pounds from stealing our fertile agricultural land," said Mr Iorwerth, who is also MS for Ynys Mon. "There are other more innovative ways of producing solar energy - on our terms here in Anglesey. There is a recent example of using a solar cover in the county council car park, for example." Others to address the protestors today included Plaid Cymru MP for Ynys Mon Llinos Medi and Gareth Winston Roberts, who lives near the proposed site of the Maen Hir scheme. He said he wasn't against solar energy but added: "We are losing our young people from Anglesey, and so we want to secure work in Anglesey - we are talking about Dryweryn here on the Anglesey of Mother Wales." Get the best island stories from our Anglesey newsletter - sent every Friday On the Alaw Mon proposal, Enso Energy claim on their website the park would power 33,935 homes and create 160MW of solar generation, providing renewable electricity for distribution to the National Grid. An underground cable would connect the solar farm and battery energy storage facility to the substation at Wylfa Power Station. Enso Energy has said: "We will use existing farm access points at Nantanog, Chwaen Gach, Chwaen Bach and Tan Rallt to access the site during construction, which we anticipate will take 12 months, and operation." According to Enso Energy, the 160MW plan would produce enough electricity to meet the needs of all the homes on the island. Lightsource BP's intention is to erect the solar panels across three sites, which would produce enough green energy to support over 130,000 homes. The Maen Hir development would reportedly be almost five times larger than the largest active solar farm in the UK.
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Glasgow 'mass deportation' march met with counterprotest
Hundreds of anti-racists, trade unionists, faith leaders and community campaigners took to the streets on Saturday in response to the march being permitted to proceed. Ukip, a party with no electoral foothold in Glasgow, failed to field a single candidate in the city during last year's General Election. READ MORE: 'Not in our name': Hundreds gather in Scottish cities to protest Donald Trump Its latest leader, Tenconi, has launched what he describes as a 'mass deportations tour,' targeting major cities across the UK, including Nottingham, Liverpool, Newcastle, and London. In a widely condemned social media video, he claims: 'Illegal immigration is one of the greatest threats to the British people.' He advocates sending 'teams of men' to France to 'intercept and destroy the boats,' and calls for 'English patriots' to donate 'English pounds' to 'support my mission". The rally prompted Stand Up To Racism to mobilise a counter-demonstration against what they describe as a group aligned with far-right agitator Tommy Robinson. READ MORE: 'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech Approximately 150 UKIP supporters marched through Glasgow under a heavy police presence, with Tenconi himself in attendance. Stand Up To Racism Scotland said: "Fascist Nick Tenconi and his thugs are bringing their 'mass deportations' tour to Glasgow. "Glasgow City Council are not challenging a march through the city centre led by fascists, but antiracists and anti-fascists will. "This will be a safely stewarded coming together of all those who say refugees and migrants are welcome in Glasgow, but fascists are not."
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
British recognition for Palestine is to play a valuable card and get nothing for it
On Thursday night, Hamas was busy writing a statement of praise for President Macron. The French President declared that France would officially recognise a Palestinian state, much to the delight of the Islamist terrorist group. In the UK context, some voices are calling for Prime Minister Starmer to follow Macron's Napoleonic cosplaying. Were the UK to actually recognise a Palestinian state, such a decision would have exceptionally dangerous repercussions not only for Israelis but for the West as a whole. Chief among them would be that Palestinian recognition would be a reward for hostage-taking, for rape, for murder, for burning innocent people alive. Recognising a Palestinian state in a post-October 7 reality would be nothing less than a reward for terrorism. Few would argue that this impetus for unilateral Palestinian recognition has stemmed from the atrocious acts that Hamas committed on October 7 – the deadliest day for Jewish people since the Holocaust. Remember, this push for recognition was not on the table on October 6. Be in no doubt, Islamist extremists are watching closely, terrorists are watching intently and the signal that they are receiving is that their violent tactics yield positive results for them in the UK and the West. They say it themselves: Hamas has welcomed multiple statements coming from London. I am sure similar praise from Hamas would come again were the UK to recognise a Palestinian state, in the same way that the terror group gleefully congratulated Macron. Recognition would be utter folly – terrorism should be eliminated, not encouraged. You may ask, what concessions are those who call for recognition asking for from the Palestinians in return? Nothing. Our 50 hostages, still languishing in the torturous terror dungeons of Gaza will not be released. Hamas will continue to be the governing authority in Gaza. It really would be a masterclass in futile diplomacy. The tragic reality is that Israel does not have, and never has had, a genuine Palestinian partner for peace. Indeed, the history of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process reads as a timeline of missed opportunities for a Palestinian statehood due to the phenomenon of Palestinian rejectionism and the refusal to accept the existence of a Jewish state within any borders. And yet, we are repeatedly told that Yasser Arafat's successor, Mahmoud Abbas, is a credible partner in that respect. How ridiculous. It was less than a year ago that Abbas praised the October 7 massacre. Furthermore, if Abbas is so pro-democracy, why is he half-way through the 21st year of his four-year term? Mahmoud Abbas has a history of Holocaust denial, having blamed the Jews for the Holocaust on multiple occasions, including in September 2023 when he said: 'Hitler Fought the European Jews Because of Their Usury, Money Dealings, It Was Not about Anti-semitism.' Most worrying of all, Abbas currently has a policy in place in which the 'moderate' Palestinian Authority literally pays salaries to the families of terrorists who murder Israelis. The more Jews murdered, the more money they receive. The PA's 'Pay for Slay' policy tragically ensures that Palestinian terrorism remains a profitable industry. For Western governments to recognise a Palestinian state, would be a de facto acceptance of Pay for Slay, which crucially would take us further away from peace and encourage more murders of Israelis and Jewish people. I have been asking myself what impact would result from such a decision, other than the aforementioned encouragement for terror? There would be no positive impact as far as the Middle East is concerned, with recognition only serving as an act of grandstanding and virtue-signalling. Positive progress can only come through bilateral discussions. Unhelpful, unilateral steps seeking to bypass Israel will achieve absolutely nothing as the reality on the ground would remain the same. And that reality is that there can be no progress or positive impact in the Israeli-Palestinian context as long as our hostages remain in captivity and Hamas remains in power. In recognising a Palestinian state, the UK would be playing a major card which could gain concessions from the Palestinians towards peace for absolutely nothing. It would also signal a significant departure from the policy of the US administration. As US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, remarked following Macron's announcement of recognition: 'This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7.' Ultimately, we have to move beyond empty words and virtue-signalling and look into the practical implications of what people are saying. When people call for recognising a Palestinian state, who would they be recognising as the Palestinian leadership? Who would they wish to govern? Presumably not the elected, genocidal terrorist group, Hamas? So, would it then be Mahmoud Abbas and his terror-supporting Palestinian Authority? Amid such global instability, the last thing the world would need is another failed state like that of Yemen, Iraq, Lebanon, or Libya. We have too many of them in our region. Corruption, jihadi extremists, power vacuums, radicalism, Iranian interference, a plethora of armed terrorist groups – a Palestinian state would have all the ingredients of a would-be failed state. Why would a Palestinian state be any different to the others? What would an education system overseen by a Holocaust denier look like? In the post-October 7 reality that Israelis are living in, what security guarantees are being given to us for our legitimate concerns? I have yet to hear a viable answer to any of those questions.
