Cuomo announces uphill general election bid for New York City mayor
The former governor made the announcement in a social media post that showed images of him speaking with people on city streets — a seeming echo of Mamdani's popular short-form videos interacting with New Yorkers.
In his announcement, Cuomo framed the race as a two-man contest with the 33-year-old democratic socialist, ignoring incumbent Eric Adams, Republican Curtis Sliwa and independent Jim Walden.
'The general election is in November and I am in it to win it,' Cuomo said. 'My opponent Mr. Mamdani offers slick slogans, but no real solutions.'
Cuomo is moving forward with a bid on an independent line after Mamdani soundly defeated him by 12 points in the June primary's final round of ranked-choice voting.
The video released by Cuomo's campaign signaled a reset for a candidate who was criticized for running a low-energy bid during the primary. The 67-year-old former governor rarely spoke with reporters and avoided the typical glad handing that comes with a municipal campaign. The strategy was all the more glaring after his loss to Mamdani, who placed an emphasis on voter interaction and walked the length of Manhattan the night before the primary.
In his video, Cuomo thanked his supporters and apologized that he 'let you down.' He also placed an emphasis on affordability — an issue that Mamdani hammered successfully.
'We need a city with lower rents, safer streets, where buying your first home is once again possible, where child care won't bankrupt you,' Cuomo said in the video. 'That's the New York City we know.'
He pledged to meet voters where they are 'on the streets.'
The medium itself was in stark contrast to Cuomo's March announcement when he entered the primary. Wearing a suit and looking directly into the camera, Cuomo rolled out his bid in a 17-minute video. His video Monday signaling a general election restart featured the ex-governor in shirtsleeves and ran a comparatively zippy 94 seconds.
In an email to supporters, Cuomo pledged to 'run a very different kind of campaign' that will include a new team and field operation. The former governor was criticized for not focusing on voter turnout during the primary.
Cuomo will have to sell this refurbished version of himself to voters and donors after the rejection in the primary. The former governor leaned on his decades of governmental experience while framing Mamdani as too inexperienced to lead City Hall.
Mamdani is betting voters won't buy it.
"I welcome everyone to this race, and I am as confident as I've been since three weeks ago on primary night when we faced Andrew Cuomo then, and won that race by more than 12 points, with the most votes of any democratic nominee in New York City primary history,' Mamdani said. 'And we did so because of the fact that while Andrew Cuomo and Eric Adams trip over themselves to make deals in back rooms with billionaires, we are focused on fighting for working New Yorkers.'
Cuomo, though, faces an uphill climb in a deep blue city that is accustomed to electing Democrats. He will mount the independent run without much of the institutional backing he enjoyed during the primary after his team stoked the perception the nomination was inevitable.
Crucial labor unions that backed Cuomo's primary bid endorsed Mamdani days after his victory. And key supporters are yet to take a side.
'I want to see what he has to say,' said former state Comptroller Carl McCall, who Cuomo ran against during a disastrous 2002 gubernatorial primary, in a brief interview. McCall endorsed Cuomo in his mayoral primary bid.
The former governor is attempting a rarely successful maneuver, banking on voters to alter their decision making in a general election in a city with an electorate that's overwhelmingly Democratic.
Recent polling has shown Cuomo running a strong second to Mamdani. The former governor has embraced a pledge proposed by Walden for the field to coalesce around the strongest candidate to defeat Mamdani.
Cuomo's opponents have signaled no intention to do that. Adams, the city's second Black mayor, has decried Cuomo's effort to remain in the race. The mayor has met with donors who supported a super PAC allied with the ex-governor during the primary.
Adams and Cuomo share a base of blue collar voters of color, who are considered more moderate, and Jewish New Yorkers. Mamdani in recent weeks has moved to bolster his support among these voters.
Adams, who skipped the Democratic primary after his cozy relationship with President Donald Trump became untenable for voters, has accused Cuomo of trying to force 'a Black elected official out of office.'
'This kind of political double-dealing is exactly why so many New Yorkers have lost trust in him,' Adams said in a statement released Sunday as Cuomo prepared a general election bid. 'The people spoke loudly — he lost.'
Cuomo's primary supporters acknowledge both men remaining in the race will aid Mamdani.
'Both of them in the race makes them problematic,' Democratic Assemblymember David Weprin said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fancy Farm returns to west Kentucky with barbecue, political zingers. See updates
Grab some pork and popcorn. Kentucky's annual Fancy Farm Picnic is back, with several high-profile Senate candidates ready to lob shots at their competitors before a rowdy crowd. The event has become known for its fiery political speeches, laced with zingers. And while event organizers typically limit speakers to those holding state office or running in a general election, they've extended invitations to primary candidates running in 2026. That includes Andy Barr, Daniel Cameron and Nate Morris, who've all accepted slots as candidates campaigning to take U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell's seat. Thousands of pounds of barbecue will also be served through the hot summer day. And The Courier Journal will be there to see it all. Here's are the highlights. Stay in the know: Sign up for our On Kentucky Politics newsletter Prominent Democrats join dinner, skip Fancy Farm Picnic Democrats joined the 28th annual Mike Miller Memorial Bean Dinner on Aug. 1 in Marshall County ahead of 145th Fancy Farm Picnic. The event, held at the Kentucky Dam Village Convention Center, featured prominent speakers including Lt. Gov. Jacqueline Coleman and Kentucky Democratic Party Chairman Colmon Elridge. During her speech, Coleman touted how she and the Beshear administration broke "historic tourism records in the last three years" and have created new jobs for Kentuckians. 'We created 65,000 new jobs and $35 million worth of private sector investments,' Coleman said. 'We secured raises for law enforcement, for state employees, for social workers, but ironically, the one group of people that the Republicans in the General Assembly don't think deserve a raise is our educators.' Coleman previously confirmed she would not participate in the political speaking portion of the picnic, saying she believes that time should be reserved for candidates on the ballot. She touched on her absence during her speech, saying she will not be at the event 'partly because there are so many obvious jokes, but not much worth laughing about at this moment.' '… Although I do hear of some races, like in 2027, that might bring me back to the Fancy Farm stage,' Coleman said, potentially alluding to the upcoming gubernatorial election. John 'Drew' Williams, who announced he plans to run against Republican U.S. Rep. James Comer in 2026, will be the lone Democrat speaking at Fancy Farm. When asked how it feels to be the only Democrat on stage, Williams told The Courier Journal, 'I don't mind it at all.' 'It's become a hate fest in a lot of ways, the picnic,' Williams said. 'We should treat it like a church picnic. Quips are fine. Jokes are fine. But we're getting really hateful in the way we talk about each other.' Williams added he feels 'pretty confident' about his first time speaking at Fancy Farm and is 'ready to be in front of (his) community." 'Even if there are hecklers there, all they're doing is getting me prepared to go up there and get heckled and yelled at in Congress,' Williams said. Who's speaking at Fancy Farm 2025? The speaking order for the event, with allotted times, is as follows: Fancy Farm Political Chairman Steven Elder, welcome Bishop William Medley, invocation Campbellsville University President Joseph Hopkins, national anthem Emily and Austin Lamb, "My Old Kentucky Home" Kentucky Chamber of Commerce President Ashli Watts, emcee, 5 minutes State Rep. Kim Holloway (R), 4 minutes State Sen. Jason Howell (R), 4 minutes U.S. Rep. James Comer (R), 6 minutes Congressional candidate John "Drew Williams (D), 6 minutes U.S. Senate candidate Daniel Cameron (R), 6 minutes U.S. Senate candidate Andy Barr (R), 6 minutes U.S. Senate candidate Nate Morris (R), 6 minutes Attorney General Russell Coleman (R), 5 minutes Agriculture Commissioner Jonathan Shell (R), 5 minutes State Treasurer Mark Metcalf (R), 5 minutes U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell is listed as pending on the most recent speaker list. How to watch political speeches at Fancy Farm Political speaking will begin at 3 p.m. ET/2 p.m. CT. KET will begin live coverage of the event at 2:30 p.m. ET/1:30 p.m. CT. Host Renee Shaw and political commentators Trey Grayson and Bob Babbage will provide pre-event analysis. Watch the coverage at Fancy Farm 2025 schedule Barbecue by the pound goes on sale bright and early at 8 a.m. But the picnic's official kickoff doesn't start until a little later. Here's the schedule for the day. 10 a.m. CT: Official picnic start time 10:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.: Music by Harold Daniels 11 a.m. - 7 p.m.: Meals served in parish hall 1:30 p.m.: Pioneer Award presentation at political stand 2 p.m.: Political speaking 4:30 - 5:30 p.m.: Music by Louisville Orchestra 7 - 10 p.m.: Music by Seeing Red band 10 p.m.: Raffle drawing This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Fancy Farm picnic 2025: Updates from Kentucky's annual political event Solve the daily Crossword


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
The Trump administration takes a very Orwellian turn
Back in March, President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeted at the Smithsonian Institution that began as follows: 'Over the past decade, Americans have witnessed a concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation's history, replacing objective facts with a distorted narrative driven by ideology rather than truth.' Despite the high-minded rhetoric, many worried the order was instead a thinly veiled effort to rewrite history more to Trump's liking. The order, for example, cited a desire to remove 'improper ideology' – an ominous phrase, if there ever was one – from properties like the Smithsonian. Those concerns were certainly bolstered this week. We learned that some historical information that recently vanished from the Smithsonian just so happens to have been objective history that Trump really dislikes: a reference to his two impeachments. The Smithsonian said that a board containing the information was removed from the National Museum of American History last month after a review of the museum's 'legacy content.' The board had been placed in front of an existing impeachment exhibit in September 2021. Just to drive this home: The exhibit itself is about 'Limits of Presidential Power.' And suddenly examples of the biggest efforts by Congress to limit Trump's were gone. It wasn't immediately clear that the board was removed pursuant to Trump's executive order. The Washington Post, which broke the news, reported that a source said the content review came after pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director. In other words, we don't know all the details of precisely how this went down – including whether the removal was specifically requested, or whether museum officials decided it might be a good way to placate Trump amid pressure. The Smithsonian says an updated version of the exhibit will ultimately mention all impeachment efforts, including Trump's. But it's all pretty Orwellian. And it's not the only example. Trump has always been rather blatant about his efforts to rewrite history with self-serving falsehoods and rather shameless in applying pressure on the people who would serve as impartial referees of the current narrative. But this week has taken things to another level. On Friday, Trump fired the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This came just hours after that agency delivered Trump some very bad news: the worst non-Covid three-month jobs numbers since 2010. Some Trump allies have attempted to put a good face on this, arguing that Dr. Erika McEntarfer's removal was warranted because large revisions in the job numbers betrayed shoddy work. But as he did with the firing of then-FBI Director James B. Comey eight years ago, Trump quickly undermined all that. He told Newsmax that 'we fired her because we didn't believe the numbers today.' To the extent Trump did lay out an actual evidence-based case for firing McEntarfer, that evidence was conspiratorial and wrong, as CNN's Daniel Dale documented Friday. And even some Republican senators acknowledged this might be precisely as draconian and self-serving as it looked. Sen. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, for one, called it 'kind of impetuous' to fire the BLS head before finding out whether the new numbers were actually wrong. 'It's not the statistician's fault if the numbers are accurate and that they're not what the president had hoped for,' said Lummis, who is not often a Trump critic. Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina added that if Trump 'just did it because they didn't like the numbers, they ought to grow up.' Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska both worried that Trump's move would make it so people can't trust the data the administration is putting out. And that's the real problem here. It's not so much that Trump appears to be firing someone as retaliation; it's the message it sends to everyone else in a similar position. The message is that you might want that data and those conclusions to be to Trump's liking, or else. It's a recipe for getting plenty of unreliable data and conclusions. And even to the extent that information is solid, it will seed suspicions about the books having been cooked – both among regular Americans and, crucially, among those making key decisions that impact the economy. What happens if the next jobs report is great? Will the markets believe it? We've certainly seen plenty of rather blunt Trump efforts to control such narratives and rewrite history before. A sampling: He engaged in a yearslong effort to make Jan. 6 defendants who attacked the Capitol in his name out to be sympathetic patriots, even calling them 'hostages,' before pardoning them. His administration's efforts to weed out diversity, equity and inclusion from the government often ensnared things that merely celebrated Black people and women. He and his administration have at times taken rather dim views of the free speech rights of those who disagree with them, including talking about mere protests – i.e. not necessarily violence – as being 'illegal.' A loyalist US attorney at one point threatened to pursue people who criticized then-Trump ally Elon Musk even for non-criminal behavior. Trump has repeatedly suggested criticism of judges he likes should be illegal, despite regularly attacking judges he doesn't like. His term began with the portraits of military leaders who clashed with him being removed from the Pentagon. It also began with a massive purge of independent inspectors general charged with holding the administration to account. All of it reinforces the idea that Trump is trying to consolidate power by pursuing rather heavy-handed and blatant tactics. But if there's a week that really drove home how blunt these efforts can be, it might be this one.


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
DOJ cracking down on noncitizen voters
UC Berkeley Law professor John Yoo joins 'Fox News Live' to discuss the Justice Department's investigation into voter rolls as it seeks to identify noncitizen voters.