Man charged in Connecticut mall shooting that wounded 5 as lawyer claims self-defense
Tajuan Washington, who was free on $20,000 bail on unrelated motor vehicle charges, drove to police headquarters while officers were surveilling him and surrendered following Tuesday's shooting at the Brass Mill Center in Waterbury, city Police Chief Fernando Spagnolo said during a news conference.
The injuries were not life-threatening, officials said.
The shooting shortly after 4:30 p.m. sent mall patrons scrambling for safety. Dozens of law enforcement officers responded and searched the mall for hours. Police identified Washington on security video, seeing him leave the mall and drive away, then surveilled his home, Spagnolo said.
Washington was ordered detained on $2 million bond as he was arraigned in court Wednesday on charges including first-degree assault, criminal use of a weapon, illegal discharge of a firearm and risk of injury to children.
His lawyer, public defender Justin Chan, said he believed Washington was defending himself and added Washington had been traumatized by losing a relative to gun violence. Chan also said there were no convictions on Washington's record.
Lawrence Adler, a lawyer for Washington on the motor vehicle charges that include interfering with police, said Washington denies those allegations and called the case insignificant. He said he did not know much about the mall shooting.
'There's nothing about his past to lead anyone to say this kid's on a path to hurting people,' Adler said.
Waterbury Mayor Paul Pernerewski Jr. said three people have been discharged from the hospital and two were still being treated. The person most seriously injured, a woman who was shot in the spine, had regained some feeling in her extremities, and officials were hoping she isn't permanently paralyzed, he said.
Washington and a man who was with four young women got into a dispute, and Washington pulled a pistol, Pernerewski said.
'It was in effect two young men who knew each other, had a history and a past,' the mayor said.
The city was shaken but not broken, Pernerewski said.
'This is a strong city, and we are very much standing together in times of crisis," he said. "We support and we care for one another.'
Spagnolo did not release details of the dispute, saying it was not entirely clear but police had some idea what it was about.
Spagnolo said evidence indicated the shooter used a .40-caliber handgun, which had not been found. Police with a search warrant seized two rifles and found ammunition at Washington's home that matched ammunition at the mall, Spagnolo said.
Police surveilling Washington's home followed him as he drove to police headquarters to report he had been involved in the dispute, Spagnolo said.
It was shocking that a dispute that might have just been a fistfight became a shooting instead, Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont said at the news conference.
'Someone pulls out a semiautomatic and shoots seven rounds and badly wounds five people like that — just like that,' Lamont said.
Police and witnesses described the chaos of people crying and running, others locking themselves inside areas of the mall, and swarms of police searching for the shooter.
Jayvon Turner told WFSB-TV that one of the victims was bleeding heavily. 'It was crazy, and I tried to tell everybody to get out of there," he said.
Court records show Washington was accepted into a probation program earlier this year for another set of charges, which have been sealed from public view under the state law for that program, which is generally for first-time offenders.
In October, local media reported that Washington was arrested by state police on allegations of driving more than 100 mph (160 kph) on Interstate 84 in Southington. State police said Washington sped away from a trooper who tried to pull him over, and the trooper ended the pursuit for safety reasons. He was later arrested when police traced the speeding car's registration to his home, troopers said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bondi moves forward on Justice Department investigation into origins of Trump-Russia probe
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed that the Justice Department move forward with a probe into the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation following the recent release of documents aimed at undermining the legitimacy of the inquiry that established that Moscow interfered on the Republican's behalf in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Bondi has directed a prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury after referrals from the Trump administration's top intelligence official, a person familiar with the matter said Monday. That person was not authorized to discuss it by name and spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press. Fox News first reported the development. It was not clear which former officials might be the target of any grand jury activity, where the grand jury that might ultimately hear evidence will be located or which prosecutors — whether career employees or political appointees — might be involved in pursuing the investigation. It was also not clear what precise claims of misconduct Trump administration officials believe could form the basis of criminal charges, which a grand jury would have to sign off on for an indictment to be issued. The development is likely to heighten concerns that the Justice Department is being used to achieve political ends, given longstanding grievances over the Russia investigation voiced by President Donald Trump, who has called for the jailing of perceived political adversaries. Any criminal investigation would revisit one of the most dissected chapters of modern American political history. It is also surfacing at a time when the Trump administration is being buffeted by criticism over its handling of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The investigation into Russian election interference resulted in the appointment of a special counsel, Robert Mueller, who secured multiple convictions against Trump aides and allies but did not establish proof of a criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the Trump campaign. The inquiry shadowed much of Trump's first term and he has long focused his ire on senior officials from the intelligence and law enforcement community, including former FBI Director James Comey, whom he fired in May 2017, and former CIA Director John Brennan. The Justice Department appeared to confirm an investigation into both men in an unusual statement last month but offered no details. Multiple special counsels, congressional committees and the Justice Department's own inspector general have studied and documented a multi-pronged effort by Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election on Trump's behalf, including through a hack-and-leak dump of Democratic emails and a covert social media operation aimed at sowing discord and swaying public opinion. But that conclusion has been aggressively challenged in recent weeks as Trump's director of national intelligence and other allies have released previously classified records that they hope will cast doubt on the extent of Russian interference and establish an Obama administration effort to falsely link Trump to Russia. In one batch of documents released last month, Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, disclosed emails showing that senior Obama administration officials were aware in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate the votes in Trump's favor. But President Barack Obama's administration never alleged that votes were tampered with and instead detailed other forms of election interference and foreign influence. A new outcry surfaced last week when Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a set of documents that FBI Director Kash Patel claimed on social media proved that the 'Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax.' The documents were part of a classified annex of a report issued in 2023 by John Durham, the special counsel who was appointed during the first Trump administration to hunt for any government misconduct during the Russia investigation. Durham did identify significant flaws in the investigation but uncovered no bombshells to disprove the existence of Russian election interference. His sprawling probe produced three criminal cases; two resulted in acquittals and the third was a guilty plea from a little-known FBI lawyer to a charge of making a false statement. Republicans seized on a July 27, 2016, email in Durham's newly declassified annex that purported to say that Hillary Clinton, then the Democratic candidate for president, had approved a plan during the heat of the campaign to link Trump with Russia. But the purported author of the email, a senior official at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, told Durham's team he had never sent the email and the alleged recipient said she never called receiving it. Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and said the best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails" the Russians had obtained from hacking — raising the likelihood of Russian disinformation. The FBI's Russia investigation was opened on July 31, 2016, following a tip that a Trump campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos, had told a Russian diplomat that Russia was in possession of dirt on Clinton.
USA Today
37 minutes ago
- USA Today
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott orders arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled over redistricting
Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott ordered the arrest of dozens of state Democratic lawmakers who fled to block a Republican redistricting plan to flip Democratic seats in the U.S. House. Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott has ordered Texas law enforcement to arrest Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to block a vote on redistricting that could give Republicans several more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. 'Texas House Democrats abandoned their duty to Texans,' Abbott said in a press release announcing the move. 'By fleeing the state, Texas House Democrats are holding hostage critical legislation to aid flood victims and advance property tax relief. There are consequences for dereliction of duty." It's unclear whether and how Texas law enforcement will be able to work with out-of-state law enforcement to execute the arrest order, which Abbott said is designed to ensure the missing Democrats comply with civil arrest warrants issued by state Republicans earlier in the day. Those warrants only apply within state lines. More than 50 state Democratic lawmakers fled Aug. 3 in the political power struggle. Many went to the Chicago area in Illinois, where Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker greeted them. Others went to Boston, Massachusetts and Albany, New York. At the urging of President Donald Trump, Texas Republicans have proposed changing congressional districts to give their party an assist in next year's midterm elections. The revamped map could allow Republicans to flip as many as five Democratic congressional seats. The Democrats are already facing a $500 fine for each day they are out of the state. The penalty was created after state Democrats in 2021 made a similar move to protest new voting restrictions. However, supporters such as Pritzker, a billionaire, and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, a star Democratic fundraiser from Texas, have offered to help the fleeing Democrats. Abbott said that his arrest order, which called on the Texas Department Of Public Safety to take action, will remain in place until every missing Democratic member has been brought to the Texas Capitol. Contributing: Savannah Kuchar – USA TODAY
Newsweek
38 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's DOJ Moves to Revive Grand Jury Inquiry into Russia Probe Origins
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Attorney General Pam Bondi has ordered the Justice Department to move forward with a probe into the origins of the Donald Trump‑Russia investigation, following the release of documents aimed at casting doubt on the legitimacy of the inquiry that determined Moscow interfered in the 2016 election to help the Republican nominee. Bondi has directed a prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury after referrals from the Trump administration's top intelligence official, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. Fox News first reported the development. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks at a press briefing with and U.S. President Donald Trump U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the White House in... U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks at a press briefing with and U.S. President Donald Trump U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the White House in Washington, DC on Friday, June 27, 2025. More Associated Press It remains unclear which former officials could be the focus of any grand jury proceedings, where such a panel might convene, or which prosecutors — career attorneys or political appointees — would handle the case. Also uncertain is what specific misconduct Trump administration officials believe could justify criminal charges, which would require grand jury approval for an indictment. The move is likely to fuel concerns that the Justice Department is being wielded for political purposes, reviving one of the most examined episodes in recent political history. Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly railed against the Russia probe, calling for the jailing of political opponents. The development comes as the Trump administration faces criticism over its handling of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking investigation. The Russia investigation led to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller, whose work produced multiple convictions of Trump aides and allies but did not establish evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. The inquiry loomed over much of Trump's first term, and he has directed sustained anger at senior intelligence and law enforcement figures, including former FBI Director James Comey, whom he fired in May 2017, and former CIA Director John Brennan. Last month, the Justice Department acknowledged — in an unusual public statement — that both men were under investigation, without providing details. Multiple special counsels, congressional inquiries, and the Justice Department's inspector general have documented Russia's multi‑pronged effort to sway the 2016 election in Trump's favor — from hacking and leaking Democratic emails to running a covert social media influence campaign. In recent weeks, however, Trump allies have worked to challenge those findings. The president's director of national intelligence and other supporters have released previously classified records they hope will cast doubt on the scope of Russian interference and suggest that the Obama administration sought to falsely link Trump to Russia. Among those records, released last month, were emails disclosed by Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, showing that senior Obama officials knew in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to alter vote tallies for Trump. The Obama administration had never claimed votes were changed, focusing instead on other interference and influence operations. A fresh controversy erupted last week when Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, a Republican, released documents that FBI Director Kash Patel claimed on social media showed the "Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax." These documents were part of a classified annex to a 2023 report by special counsel John Durham, who was appointed during Trump's first term to investigate possible government misconduct in the Russia probe. Durham found serious flaws in the investigation but no conclusive evidence to disprove Russian interference. His investigation produced three criminal cases: two ended in acquittals, and one led to a guilty plea from an FBI lawyer who admitted making a false statement. Republicans have seized on a newly declassified July 27, 2016, email in Durham's annex, which purportedly said Hillary Clinton had approved a plan during the campaign to link Trump with Russia. But the alleged author, a senior official at a philanthropic group founded by billionaire George Soros, told Durham's team he never sent such an email. The purported recipient also denied ever receiving it. Durham's report stressed investigators could not authenticate the message and assessed it was "a composites of several emails" obtained through Russian hacking — suggesting it was likely disinformation. The FBI launched its Russia investigation on July 31, 2016, after learning that Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos had told a Russian diplomat that Moscow had damaging information on Clinton. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.
