logo
Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,226

Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,226

Al Jazeera18 hours ago
Here is how things stand on Friday, July 4:
Fighting
Russia launched a record 539 drones, 11 ballistic and cruise missiles at Ukraine overnight, according to Ukraine's air force.
The military said its air defences shot down 270 drones while 208 more were redirected by the army or were drone simulators lacking warheads.
The attacks on Kyiv injured at least 23 people, damaging railway infrastructure and setting buildings and cars on fire, authorities said.
The latest overnight attack was one of the largest yet, and Russia will not stop its strikes without large-scale pressure, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.
Russia's air defence units destroyed 48 Ukrainian drones overnight, Russia's TASS news agency reported.
Ukraine launched a drone attack on the Sergiyev Posad district near Moscow, injuring one person and leaving parts of the religiously significant centre without power, the head of the district said.
Ukraine's drone attack on Russia's Rostov region killed at least one woman and forced the evacuation of dozens of people from their homes, the acting governor said.
Weapons
Zelenskyy said he hoped to speak with his United States counterpart, Donald Trump, about the supply of US weapons to Ukraine.
In a phone call on Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump did not discuss the US decision to halt some shipments of critical weapons to Ukraine, Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said.
Politics and diplomacy
Trump said he made no progress during his phone call with Putin, who reportedly reiterated he would stop his invasion only if the conflict's 'root causes' were tackled.
Trump also said he was planning to discuss the conflict with Ukraine's Zelenskyy on Friday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Donald Trump's spending bill could kick US deportations into overdrive
How Donald Trump's spending bill could kick US deportations into overdrive

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

How Donald Trump's spending bill could kick US deportations into overdrive

Immigrant advocates have warned that the tax and spending bill championed by United States President Donald Trump will send the administration's controversial deportation campaign into overdrive. The bill — called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' among its supporters — is slated to be signed into law on Friday, ushering in an influx of funds for Trump's immigration crackdown. That comes as experts say the Trump administration has already taken drastic measures to increase its immigration arrests and expulsions. Those arrests have cut deep into communities across the country, prompting protests and other forms of public outcry. In a statement following the passage of the bill, Vanessa Cardenas, the executive director of the immigration reform group America's Voice, took aim at White House adviser Stephen Miller. He is widely seen as the architect of Trump's hardline immigration policies across his first and second administrations. 'His dreams are America's nightmare,' Cardenas said. 'His mass deportation crusade already is imperiling our industries, spreading fear in American communities, and ripping American families apart and would become all the worse if the big ugly bill becomes law.' Here's how the bill could be transformative. Historic deportation funding All told, the bill passed by the House and Senate earmarks about $170bn for immigration and border enforcement funding. That, according to the American Immigration Council (AIC), represents the 'largest investment in detention and deportation in US history'. Of that money, $45bn will go to new immigration detention centres for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), a branch of the Department of Homeland Security that oversees immigration arrests and the detention of individuals already in the country. That's a whopping 265-percent increase from ICE's fiscal year 2024 detention budget, at a time when advocates have continued to raise concerns about the conditions and oversight of immigration detention centres. Those funds are projected to expand the capacity of the country's detention centres from about 56,000 beds to more than 100,000, according to an analysis from the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan policy institute. Much of that money is likely to go to private companies, the Brennan Center added. Private firms already oversee about 90 percent of detention centre capacity and will 'reap major financial benefits' from the new bill, the analysis said. 'The plan to put hundreds of thousands more people in ICE detention facilities comes at a time when DHS is blocking oversight of those facilities,' Brennan Center analyst Lauren-Brook Eisen wrote. 'And there have been growing reports of unsanitary, harsh, and unsafe conditions. At least 10 people have died in immigration detention so far this year, a rate nearly three times the number of deaths over the past four years.' The bill's language has also sparked concerns that it could override legal restraints over how long immigration authorities can detain children, as established in the 1997 Flores settlement. The American Civil Liberties Union has said the legislation is 'opening the door to prolonged detention of children and families'. Growing immigration 'dragnet' The legislation also allocates nearly $29.9bn for ICE's deportation and enforcement operations, a threefold increase compared to the fiscal year 2024 budget, according to the American Immigration Council. Immigrant advocates say the agency has already begun to employ increasingly severe tactics to surge its arrest numbers to fulfil Trump's campaign promise of mass deportation. In May, immigration officials reportedly set a daily arrest target of 3,000 per day, three times the previously reported goal. But immigration agents averaged only about 778 arrests per day during Trump's first months in office, according to government data from January 26 to May 3. Speaking during a news conference in June, Cardenas warned that the pressure campaign was already creating a 'situation on the ground where ICE is literally just trying to go after anybody that they can catch'. That included raids on workplaces and locations like hardware store parking lots, where immigrants are known to gather for informal construction gigs. Undocumented individuals brought to the US as children, known as 'Dreamers', have also been caught up in the arrest sweeps. Cardenas described the strategy as a 'dragnet' that touched 'long-established, deeply rooted Dreamers and other folks that have been in the United States for a long time'. To increase their arrest numbers, immigration officials have instructed ICE agents to 'get creative', according to a June report from The Guardian newspaper. They encouraged agents to remain vigilant for undocumented individuals whom they may encounter by chance, referred to as 'collaterals' in internal emails. The Trump administration has also sought to expand its cooperation with local law enforcement. The Tennessee Highway Patrol and ICE, for example, collaborated on a series of traffic stops in May that local immigrant advocates decried as blatant racial profiling. The new legislation includes $3.5bn to reimburse states for immigration enforcement and cooperation. 'We are becoming a police state,' said Gaby Pacheco, the president of which helps undocumented students pursue higher education and careers. During a June news conference, Pacheco warned of increased cooperation between local law enforcement and immigration officials. 'It's difficult to see that those individuals in our community that we have always cherished, like police officers and campus safety, are now acting to the detriment of our communities and going after immigrants,' she said. Rounding out the immigration funding in the bill is $46.6bn for border wall construction and $4.1bn to hire and train more border patrol agents. Will the funding 'make America safe'? Trump has, for years, pushed the premise that mass deportations are the only way to repair a country beset by dangerous foreign criminals. Studies, however, show that undocumented people commit crimes at lower rates than US-born citizens. After Trump's bill was passed by the House on Thursday, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote on social media that the legislation is 'a win for law and order and the safety and security of the American people'. She added it will 'further deliver on President Trump's mandate to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens and MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN'. But new data has continued to cast doubt on the administration's claims. On Thursday, The Washington Post published an analysis that found that, while the number of immigration arrests has risen in recent months, the proportion of those arrested with criminal convictions has fallen. In January, about 46 percent of immigration detainees had been convicted of a crime, according to the report, which relied on statistics obtained by the Deportation Data Project and the UCLA Center for Immigration Law and Policy. By June, that proportion had dropped to 30 percent. The report noted that the details of the charges, and their severity, were not available. Meanwhile, 61 percent of the 93,818 people deported from the country since Trump took office had no criminal convictions, according to the Post. Entering the US without documentation is a civil, not criminal, offence. Another data analysis, from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), offered similar findings. Out of the 56,397 people held in immigration detention as of June 15, about 71 percent did not have criminal convictions, though 25 percent did have pending charges. Hector Sanchez Barba, president of Mi Familia Vota, a Hispanic voters advocacy group, was among those decrying Trump's bill as it passed in the House on Thursday. In a statement, he pointed to the estimated $3.3 trillion the bill is expected to add to the national debt, as well as the cuts to the programmes for low-income individuals, like Medicaid, used to offset the spending. 'Our children and grandchildren will have to pay for its massive debt,' he said, 'while obscene amounts of money will go to ICE policies that punish families and the essential workers our economy needs for their hard work and tax dollars.'

Russia becomes first country to recognise Taliban government
Russia becomes first country to recognise Taliban government

Al Jazeera

time5 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Russia becomes first country to recognise Taliban government

Russia becomes first country to recognise Taliban government NewsFeed Russia has become the first country to formally recognise the Taliban government in Afghanistan since the group took power in 2021. The Kremlin said the move would 'pave the way for bilateral cooperation', while the Taliban hailed it as a 'courageous step'. Video Duration 02 minutes 59 seconds 02:59 Video Duration 01 minutes 20 seconds 01:20 Video Duration 02 minutes 30 seconds 02:30 Video Duration 00 minutes 54 seconds 00:54 Video Duration 01 minutes 25 seconds 01:25 Video Duration 02 minutes 18 seconds 02:18 Video Duration 02 minutes 40 seconds 02:40

‘I've never heard that': Trump denies knowingly using anti-Semitic term
‘I've never heard that': Trump denies knowingly using anti-Semitic term

Al Jazeera

time7 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

‘I've never heard that': Trump denies knowingly using anti-Semitic term

United States President Donald Trump has professed ignorance about a term he used that is widely considered anti-Semitic, explaining that he did not know it had that meaning. In the early morning hours of Friday, the Republican leader addressed the controversy around the term 'Shylock', which he used to describe unscrupulous bankers hours earlier. The term, however, originates from the 16th-century play The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare, which includes a depiction of a Jewish moneylender that some consider to be deeply anti-Semitic. The character's name, Shylock, has been adopted as a pejorative for loan sharks, particularly those of Jewish faith. 'No, I've never heard it that way. To be Shylock is somebody that, say, a money lender at high rates,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One, the presidential plane. 'I've never heard it that way. You view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' Trump used the term while visiting Iowa on Thursday for the kickoff of his 'America250' celebration series, a string of events that will culminate in the 250th anniversary of the US in 2026. While addressing a crowd at the Iowa State Fairgrounds, Trump played up his success earlier in the day with the passage of his signature budget mega-bill, which he refers to as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. The House of Representatives had passed a revised version of the bill in a final, party-line vote of 218 to 214, over objections that it would raise the national deficit and slash social safety-net programmes like Medicaid. Trump, however, had played up the fact that the mega-bill would allow his 2017 tax cuts to continue, while also raising exemptions under the estate tax — the tax on property transferred upon the death of a loved one. 'Think of that: no death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker and, in some cases, Shylocks and bad people,' Trump told the Iowa crowd. The Anti-Defamation League, a group established to fight anti-Semitism, denounced Trump's use of the term on Friday, pointing to its long history as a slur. 'The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible,' the group wrote in a statement. 'It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.' Thursday's speech was not the first time Trump and his associates have faced accusations of anti-Semitism. On the first day of Trump's second term as president, then-ally Elon Musk gave a speech at a rally at the Capital One Arena that culminated with him slapping his chest and then extending his arm outwards with a flattened palm — a gesture that many people interpreted as a Nazi-style salute. Trump himself has faced scrutiny for hosting a dinner at his Mar-a-Lago estate with white nationalist Nick Fuentes and the rapper Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, both of whom have been accused of spreading anti-Semitism. The president was also criticised for downplaying the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, where white supremacist participants chanted, 'Jews will not replace us.' Trump described the rally and its counterprotest by saying there were 'very fine people on both sides'. Trump, however, has made combatting anti-Semitism a central theme in his campaigns against Harvard University and other academic institutions where pro-Palestinian protests unfolded. Critics have described Trump's attacks as efforts to dampen free speech and academic freedom. The Republican leader, however, is not the first president in recent years to use the word 'Shylock' — and face a backlash. His Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, who served from 2021 to early 2025, once used the term to describe bankers pursuing foreclosures against military members deployed overseas. 'People would come to him and talk about what was happening at home, in terms of foreclosures, in terms of bad loans that were being — these Shylocks that took advantage of these women and men while overseas,' Biden said in 2022. In the days that followed, however, Biden apologised: 'It was a poor choice of words.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store