logo
Trump to meet NATO secretary general as plan takes shape for Ukraine weapons sales

Trump to meet NATO secretary general as plan takes shape for Ukraine weapons sales

CTV News11 hours ago
U.S. President Donald J. Trump speaks at a roundtable discussion at the Community Emergency Operations Center in Kerrville, Texas, Friday, July 11, 2025. (Ricardo B. Brazziell/Austin American-Statesman via AP)
BRIDGEWATER, NJ — NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is set to meet U.S. President Donald Trump this week on the heels of the U.S. leader announcing plans to sell NATO allies weaponry that it can then pass on to Ukraine.
NATO announced on Sunday that Rutte will be in Washington on Monday and Tuesday and would hold talks with Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as well as members of Congress. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the visit.
A top ally of Trump, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said Sunday that the conflict is nearing an inflection point as Trump shows growing interest in helping Ukraine fight back Russia. It's a cause that Trump, who during his campaign made quickly ending the war a top priority, had previously dismissed as being a waste of U.S. taxpayer money.
'In the coming days, you'll see weapons flowing at a record level to help Ukraine defend themselves,' Graham said on CBS' 'Face the Nation. He added, 'One of the biggest miscalculations Putin has made is to play Trump. And you just watch, in the coming days and weeks, there's going to be a massive effort to get Putin to the table.'
The Rutte visit comes as Trump last week teased that he would make a 'major statement' on Russia on Monday and as Ukraine struggles to repel massive and complex air assaults launched by Russian forces.
Graham and Democrat Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, who appeared with South Carolina lawmaker on CBS, said there is also growing consensus on Capitol Hill and among European officials about tapping some of the $300 billion in Russian assets frozen by Group of Seven countries early in the war to help Ukraine.
'It's time to do it,' Blumenthal said.
Rubio said Friday that some of the U.S.-made weapons that Ukraine is seeking are deployed with NATO allies in Europe. Those weapons could be transferred to Ukraine, with European countries buying replacements from the U.S., he said.
'It's a lot faster to move something, for example, from Germany to Ukraine than it is to order it from a (U.S.) factory and get it there,' Rubio told reporters last week during visit to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
French Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu in an interview published Sunday in La Tribune Dimanche said that European officials have been making the case to the Trump administration to bolster air defense capabilities with any coming packages.
He added that France is in a 'capacity hole' and will have to wait until next year before being able to provide Ukraine new ground-air missiles.
Trump is also facing calls from Republicans and Democrats as well as European allies to support legislation in the Senate that aims to cripple Russia's oil industry and hit Moscow with U.S. sanctions for its ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
The legislation, in part, calls for a 500 per cent tariff on goods imported from countries that continue to buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. It would have an enormous impact on the economies of Brazil, China and India, which account for the vast majority of Russia's energy trade.
'The big offender here is China, India and Brazil,' Graham said. 'My goal is to end this war. And the only way you are going to end this war is to get people who prop up Putin-- make them choose between the American economy and helping Putin.'
That revenue is critical in helping keep the Russian war machine humming as the U.S. and Europe have imposed significant import and export bans on a wide range of goods to and from Russia, affecting sectors like finance, energy, transport, technology, and defense.
Trump for months had threatened, but held off on, imposing new sanctions against Russia's oil industry.
But the Republican leader has become increasingly exasperated with Putin in recent days and has laid into the Russian leader for prolonging the war.
'We get a lot of bull---- thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' Trump said last week in an exchange with reporters. 'He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.'
Congress has been prepared to act on the legislation, sponsored by Graham and Blumenthal, for some time.
The bill has overwhelming support in the Senate, but Republican leadership has been waiting for Trump to give the green light before moving ahead with it.
The White House had expressed some reservations about the legislation. Trump made clear he wants full authority over the waiver process to lift the sanctions, tariffs or other penalties, without having to cede control to Congress.
Under the initial bill, the president 'may terminate' the penalties under certain circumstances, but immediately reimpose them if the violations resume. Graham has said the president would be allowed to waive the sanctions, for 180 days, and could also renew a waiver.
Some Democratic lawmakers have expressed concerns about the waivers. But Blumenthal downplayed the differences and said the legislation would give Trump a 'sledgehammer' to utilize on Putin.
'The waiver language we will have in this bill is very much like the provisions have existed in past similar measures,' Blumenthal said. He added: 'What I think is most important right now is our unity.'
Aamer Madhani, The Associated Press
Associated Press writer Angela Charlton in Paris contributed reporting.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

East Asia Faces Uneasy Alignments Amid Trump's Pressure
East Asia Faces Uneasy Alignments Amid Trump's Pressure

Japan Forward

time5 hours ago

  • Japan Forward

East Asia Faces Uneasy Alignments Amid Trump's Pressure

Facing a deteriorating security environment in East Asia, Japan, the United States, and South Korea are working to strengthen trilateral cooperation. That commitment was on display at two high-level gatherings on July 11. One in Kuala Lumpur during the ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meetings, and the other in Seoul among top military officials. At both venues, representatives from the three countries reaffirmed their resolve to confront shared regional threats. Yet even as they recommit to regional security, renewed US tariff threats and looming defense burden-sharing talks risk complicating those efforts and rekindling doubts over long-term alignment. In Kuala Lumpur, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya met with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and South Korean First Vice Foreign Minister Park Yoonjoo. The senior officials expressed concern about North Korea's advancing nuclear and missile capabilities and reiterated their commitment to Northeast Asia's stability. They also pledged closer coordination on a range of security challenges, including the deepening Russia–North Korea ties and Pyongyang's cyber activities, particularly cryptocurrency thefts that help fund its weapons programs. Japan's Chief of Staff Gen. Yoshihide Yoshida (right), South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Kim Myung-soo (center), and US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Daniel Caine pose for a photo during the trilateral defense chiefs' meeting at JCS headquarters in Seoul, on July 11. (©ROK JCS) That same day in Seoul, military chiefs gathered for the 22nd Trilateral Chiefs of Defense meeting. Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine commented that both North Korea and China were undergoing an "unprecedented military buildup" with "a clear and unambiguous intent to move forward with their own agendas." He stressed that wider integration was necessary to restore regional deterrence. "We need to be able to demonstrate resolve, to be entrepreneurial and proactive in our partnerships," General Caine said. In recent years, Washington has pushed to expand the US–Japan–South Korea security partnership beyond North Korea to address growing Indo-Pacific risks, especially from China. But this strategic vision is unfolding at an awkward moment. Four days before the public show of unity, President Donald Trump revealed plans to impose a 25% tariff on all imports from Japan and South Korea. This comes on top of a baseline 10% rate and sector-specific tariffs already imposed on two of Washington's closest allies. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba meets with US President Donald Trump in Kananaskis, western Canada, on June 16. (©Cabinet Public Relations Office) The reaction in Tokyo was swift. Speaking during a campaign stop on Wednesday, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba made a rare show of defiance. "Do not look down on us," he said. "We will protect what must be protected" in negotiations over the tariffs. It's uncommon for a Japanese leader to address frictions with Washington in such strong language, even ahead of a critical domestic election. South Korea's First Vice Foreign Minister Park Yoonjoo speaks with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the ASEAN+3 Summit in Malaysia on July 11. (©ROK MOFA) Meanwhile, in South Korea, there is growing speculation that officials may be considering their own leverage. While National Security Adviser Wi Sung-rak recently denied the reports, some believe Seoul's left-wing government is weighing the return of wartime operational control (OPCON) as a potential bargaining chip. The idea is to link an increased defense burden with greater military autonomy and, in turn, leverage that position in pursuit of tariff relief. Signs of divergence in strategic priorities are already beginning to show. The joint statement issued after the Seoul defense summit omitted any mention of China, despite early talks of identifying it as a rising security threat. According to diplomatic sources, the exclusion was likely made to reflect Seoul's desire to avoid antagonizing Beijing directly. That same hesitancy is also playing out in the domestic arena. On July 3, South Korea's National Assembly passed a resolution condemning China's installation of steel structures in the West Sea, within Korea's Exclusive Economic Zone. Though it passed 252 to 0, seven lawmakers, including three from Lee's ruling party, abstained. Japanese PM Ishiba meets President Xi of China on the sidelines of APEC in Peru. (©Cabinet Office of the Prime Minister) Japan, too, is moving cautiously. Though Ishiba has reiterated his support for the US alliance, his tone on China has been noticeably softer than his conservative predecessors. In June, when a China Coast Guard vessel and helicopter violated Japanese territorial waters and airspace near the disputed Senkaku Islands, Ishiba refrained from issuing a formal condemnation. A similar trend has been evident as Chinese aircraft have been maneuvering increasingly recklessly around Japanese planes. All of this comes as the US is pressing its two closest regional allies to expand their roles in collective security. Experts argue that as Trump's economic pressure and defense cost-sharing disputes reignite tensions, the window for stronger tripartite cooperation could narrow, potentially pushing Seoul and Tokyo closer to Beijing's orbit. With North Korea accelerating its weapons program, China's expanding maritime assertiveness, and Moscow's deepening ties with Pyongyang, the Indo-Pacific faces heightening volatility, exactly when harmony among US allies is most needed. Author: Kenji Yoshida

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store