From Māngere To Medicine: Pacific Migrant Dreams Big
The scarcity of Pacific professionals in medicine empowers her, and she says visibility matters.
Māngere teen Selina Camillo, 18, migrated from Fiji to Māngere just a few years ago, but she's already making academic waves as she works towards becoming a heart surgeon.
Since setting foot in Aotearoa for the first time in December 2022, Camillo has topped her class, served as head girl at Southern Cross Campus, and is now studying at the University of Auckland – the first of her family to do so.
Studying a Bachelor of Biomedical Science, she is one of only 16 students awarded a Milford Foundation Scholarship this year, which provides up to $10,000 annually. She also received a University of Auckland Top Achiever Scholarship.
The funding has helped ease the cost pressure of studying, as she didn't want to be a financial burden for her parents, who secured permanent residency in January this year.
'I was always worried about how am I going to pay for my tuition fees,' she says.
'It really made me feel that it will bring me closer to achieving my dream of becoming a doctor.'
Her interest in the human heart stems back to a young age in Fiji and is what motivated her to specialise in cardiology.
'That was the first organ that I was taught in year 7 back home,' she says.
Camillo grew up seeing heart disease impact her family and other Pacific households, a pattern that school later confirmed was part of a global trend as one of the leading causes of death.
'So I was very interested in just being able to get into that field as a Pacifica to be able to help our people not only to treat the disease but also to help promote healthy lifestyle and bring a reduction to lives being affected by heart disease.'
Through her academic success, Camillo is proud to highlight her culture.
The scarcity of Pacific professionals in medicine empowers her, and she says visibility matters:
'So far I don't know any Rotuman doctor here nor my family, but there's only one Tuvaluan doctor I know who's based in Wellington,' she says.
'[Representation] is very important, especially coming from very small islands, Tuvalu and Rotuma. Most people don't even know where Rotuma is at all.'
Still, Camillo remains undeterred, her motivation is clear. 'I just want to be able to represent my island, my culture.'
Only 981 people in New Zealand identified as Rotuman and 4653 as Tuvaluan, according to the 2018 Census,
With small numbers, these groups are often lumped into the broader 'Other Pacific Peoples' category in education and government data, limiting their visibility and access to targeted resources.
Most assume she is Samoan, but she has to correct them by saying she's Rotuman or Tuvaluan – a culture many are unfamiliar with, she says.
'It helps people to know more about my people, my culture. So sometimes I feel proud of being able to put my culture somewhere that's good for others to see and also learn something new.'
She says her cultural upbringing shaped her values and her drive.
'Tuvaluan is my first language, mother tongue,' she says.
'Growing up with my grandparents and mum in Tuvalu, I learned a lot about my culture … we were just dependent on fishing and plantation.'
Also raised in Fiji, she learned to read using a Bible.
'My first book was the Bible because we couldn't really afford books. And by the end of Year 2, I also topped Year 2 in Fiji.'
She credits her grandparents' values – respect, humility, and discipline – with guiding her academic journey.
'I just wanted to be a role model to my siblings as I wanted to make a change in my family to make my parents proud in performing well in school.'
Milford Foundation CEO Bryce Marsden says the scholarship is about more than financial support.
'We've seen fantastic results from our first two cohorts. We look forward to the 2025 group joining them as future leaders and visionaries.'
This year, the Foundation has committed nearly $460,000 across three cohorts.
Camillo says her family is her 'why' and hopes to inspire others.
'Do not let your circumstances make you feel doubt about yourself or limit you from reaching your goals,' she says. 'Just grab every opportunity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Strong evidence to act': Calls grow for social media age limit
File photo: Getty Images A University of Auckland senior research fellow is calling for social media platforms to introduce enforced age limits, to help protect young people from harm. A briefing from the Public Health Communication Centre has outlined growing evidence social media use is linked to a range of mental and physical health problems. It highlights policy options for addressing these harms, including restricting access to social media for those under 16. Currently, the age limit to join the majority of platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat is 13, but it is not enforced. "Introducing an age restriction is the only comprehensive measure that addresses the full range of social media-related harms to young people," said author Dr Samantha Marsh. "It also empowers parents to set boundaries and shift social norms in a positive direction." Marsh said while social media may offer some benefits for some young people, such as helping connect with peers and find support, she warned these must be weighed carefully against mounting evidence of harm. "There's a huge imbalance. The weight of evidence showing that these platforms can negatively affect youth mental health has become too great to ignore," she said. "We now have years of consistent findings: young people who spend more time on social media are more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and disrupted sleep. "These findings come not only from surveys, but also from longitudinal studies, randomised trials, and robust systematic reviews." Marsh said any changes to social media access should be accompanied by a coordinated effort to provide on and offline support for vulnerable youth, as well as empowering communication campaigns. The briefing's release coincides with the government's inquiry into online harms experienced by young people, which is currently open for public consultation, with submissions closing on 30 July. Marsh said the inquiry was a vital opportunity to build healthier digital environments. "Political decision-makers now have a strong enough evidence base to act. Delaying access to social media and supporting youth and whānau through a coordinated public health response is the path forward."
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Waikato med school business case beats Auckland and Otago
Option 2 was a specialist medical training programme focused on rural health run by those two universities and was estimated to cost $10.2b, while option 3, the new medical school at Waikato, was estimated to cost $9.1b, making it the cheapest overall – although the University of Auckland has criticised the assumptions behind this costing. Director-General of Health Dr Diana Sarfati and University of Waikato vice-chancellor Professor Neil Quigley, watched by Health Minister at the time, Shane Reti, and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, signing the Memorandum of Understanding for a third medical school in 2024. Photo / Mark Mitchell The Waikato medical school was also estimated to deliver greater benefits, leading to a benefit-cost ratio of 1.99, meaning each dollar spent on the school produced $1.99 in benefit. Option 1 and 2 had a ratio of 1.5 and 1.8 – placing them only narrowly behind Waikato. Health Minister Simeon Brown told the Herald the school was a 'game-changer for the long-term growth of our medical workforce in New Zealand'. 'Cabinet agreed to this proposal following the Ministry of Health undertaking a business case and a cost-benefit analysis which demonstrated this proposal would be the most effective at building this critical health workforce for New Zealand,' he said. The University of Auckland's Dean of Medical and Health Sciences Professor Warwick Bagg told the Herald he was 'deeply concerned' by the business case, which seemed to have a predetermined outcome: to favour the Waikato medical school the National Party took to the last election. He said the assumptions of the report were flawed. The capital cost for the new school at Waikato of $232 million was far greater than the other two options, which had costs of $49m and $81.5m respectively. The ongoing operational costs racked up over the years 2026 to 2042 were higher for the first two options, at $513.6m and $508m compared with $361.6m at Waikato. Bagg said this modelling made unfair and inaccurate assumptions about the existing two medical schools that put them at a disadvantage. For example, the business case said that it is 'more certain that Option 3, the Waikato school, has a lower operating cost … simply due to it being a shorter programme'. While it is correct that the Waikato Medical School is a shorter programme, tailored to just graduates, the students admitted the school will still have to offer an undergraduate programme somewhere, probably in New Zealand, which the Government will have to subsidise. Bagg said the cost of turning Waikato's students into graduates who can be admitted into the school isn't reflected in the business case. Lifting those costs out of the business case made Waikato look better overall. 'They are focused on the four-year graduate programme … they haven't focused on the three years that they'll have to do to get into that medical school,' he said. He said another way the high capital costs for Waikato have been 'offset' is the business case has found 'more benefits for the Waikato medical school'. The business case is particularly reliant on the assumption that far more Waikato graduates will go on to be GPs – and GPs who work rurally – than graduates of other schools. The business case found increasing capacity at the existing medical schools would result in just 23% of those graduates staying on to become GPs, while the joint rural training programme would result in 33% of its graduates becoming GPs. In the Waikato medical school's case, 38% of its graduates would become GPs. The business case notes that having a higher number of GPs in the community increases people's health. The fact the Waikato school provides the greatest number of GPs therefore weighs heavily in its favour. Benefits and costs of the three options analysed. Table / Ministry of Health Bagg said Sapere, who provided cost-benefit analysis for the business case, 'haven't used the data we provided them' to calculate the GP figure for the option of increasing capacity at Auckland And Otago. He said 'about 35%' of graduates from Auckland and Otago medical schools are working as GPs eight years after graduating – a far higher figure than the 23% quoted in the business case. He said this lower figure came from a survey of graduates' intentions when they graduated, not what they actually ended up doing. 'We told Sapere this assumption was incorrect,' he said. The assumptions for the number of GPs graduating from Waikato were based on figures from Australia's University of Wollongong Graduate School of Medicine, which will be a model for the Waikato school. Brown defended the modelling behind the business case. He said the school will 'offer a post-graduate medical qualification based on similar successful programmes in Australia'. 'These programmes include a year-long primary care placement and encourage students to work in primary care settings following graduation. The selection criteria of students alongside their long-term placements in primary care will both support a higher degree of these medical students to work in primary care after graduation,' he said. No expectation of ratepayer funding for med school – Brown Brown poured cold water on concerns councils could be asked to stump up for the new school. Brown's Cabinet paper suggested territorial authorities – local councils – are being lined up for a contribution to the school. A paragraph from the Cabinet paper progressing the school, which will be joint-funded by the Crown, the university and philanthropists, noted, '[t]he University of Waikato has identified $151.859 million which they will ... contribute towards the new medical school costs'. 'This contribution shows significant support for a new medical school from a range of stakeholders from private trusts and foundations, individuals, and territorial authorities'. But Brown told the Herald, 'as Minister of Health, I have no expectation that councils will financially contribute to the new Waikato Medical School'. University of Waikato vice-chancellor Neil Quigley told the Herald earlier this week about half of the university's $150m share of the school could come from donations. 'At the moment, we're well on the way to the 50% of donations just with a relatively small number of large trusts and very wealthy individuals so we don't see that as particularly challenging,' he said. Brown defends information release Labour's health spokeswoman Ayesha Verrall called for the business case to be published on Monday to show the assumptions underlying Cabinet's decision to proceed with the school. 'Treasury has raised concerns about this project. Decisions about the future of NZ's medical workforce are critical and must be transparent. The Government needs to release the costings quickly,' Verrall said. The business case was published by the Ministry of Health about 6pm on Friday, a time often associated with the Government trying to bury information because people are enjoying their weekend. Brown defended the timing of the release, saying: 'Cabinet made the decision to progress with the third medical school on Monday with officials tasked with preparing material for proactive release following this decision. 'Normally Cabinet decisions and supporting information are required to be proactively released 30 days following a decision, however due to the significant interest in this decision, this was sped up to ensure the information could be made available as quickly as possible.'
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Social media age restriction needed to protect young people from harm
ABC social media graphic. Photo: Supplied/ABC A University of Auckland senior research fellow is calling for social media platforms to introduce enforced age limits, to help protect young people from harm. A briefing from the Public Health Communication Centre has outlined growing evidence social media use is linked to a range of mental and physical health problems. It highlights policy options for addressing these harms, including restricting access to social media for those under 16. Currently, the age limit to join the majority of platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat is 13, but it is not enforced. "Introducing an age restriction is the only comprehensive measure that addresses the full range of social media-related harms to young people," said author Dr Samantha Marsh. "It also empowers parents to set boundaries and shift social norms in a positive direction." Marsh said while social media may offer some benefits for some young people, such as helping connect with peers and find support, she warned these must be weighed carefully against mounting evidence of harm. "There's a huge imbalance. The weight of evidence showing that these platforms can negatively affect youth mental health has become too great to ignore," she said. "We now have years of consistent findings: young people who spend more time on social media are more likely to experience depression, anxiety, and disrupted sleep. "These findings come not only from surveys, but also from longitudinal studies, randomised trials, and robust systematic reviews." Marsh said any changes to social media access should be accompanied by a coordinated effort to provide on and offline support for vulnerable youth, as well as empowering communication campaigns. The briefing's release coincides with the government's inquiry into online harms experienced by young people, which is currently open for public consultation, with submissions closing on 30 July . Marsh said the inquiry was a vital opportunity to build healthier digital environments. "Political decision-makers now have a strong enough evidence base to act. Delaying access to social media and supporting youth and whānau through a coordinated public health response is the path forward."
