Kim Jong Un Cries For Fallen North Korean Soldiers, But Plans To Send 6,000 More To Russia
Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India says no to trade deal under deadline pressure; Trinidad & Tobago backs Delhi for UNSC; Gaza ceasefire soon
India abstains from signing trade deal with the US under 'deadline pressure', says open for a mutually beneficial deal; during PM Modi's visits to Trinidad and Tobago, the two sides reaffirm the need for reforms in the UN; US President Trump voices frustration over Russian President Vladimir Putin's failure to end the fighting; Hamas says it is ready to start talks 'immediately' on a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire – here is weekly roundup of key global news. Notwithstanding the July 9 deadline for the reciprocal tariff pause, India abstains from signing a trade deal with the US under 'deadline pressure' reiterating that 'all possibilities are open' for a mutually beneficial deal. India has been negotiating with the US to eliminate the 26 per cent reciprocal tariff imposed on April 2. As Indian trade negotiators returned from the US on Friday, a government official described sustained access for labour-intensive goods (such as textiles and footwear), auto component exports, and steel as key interests in the India-US negotiations. In addition, agriculture and dairy sectors, where India has drawn 'very big red lines', emerged as sticking points, with the US demanding access to the Indian market for genetically modified (GM) products. What are the other points of difference that averted a trade deal, and what are the future prospects? Let's explore. India has drawn 'red lines' around politically sensitive agriculture and dairy sectors and has imposed both tariff and non-tariff restrictions on certain goods, including corn, ethanol, and soybeans. It has managed to shield its dairy sector because of at least two major reasons: one, the sector employs more than 80 million people, many of whom are smallholders; and two, there are concerns that foreign dairy products intended for food may be derived from animals fed with internal blood meal, a high-protein feed made from animal blood. As far as soyabean and corn are concerned, it is argued that imports are unlikely to suit India's soybean industry, which has a strong foundation in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. Similarly, millers are not too pleased about importing genetically modified corn as a feedstock for fuel ethanol. In addition, labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and footwear are among India's top demands in trade negotiations. It has sought lower tariffs in the textile trade in the US, similar to those offered to other FTA partners. India has also sought zero tariffs on electronic items exports, even as US President Donald Trump warned Apple of a 25 per cent tariff if it sold in the US iPhones built in India or anywhere else. Apple currently produces nearly 15 per cent of all iPhones in India, and plans to increase that to a quarter. India also aims to remove the US's additional duties on goods such as steel, aluminium, and auto components. In addition to the elimination of reciprocal tariffs, it has sought guarantees of no future tariffs. Moreover, New Delhi is seeking that the Trump Administration maintain a 'steady tariff differential' of 10-20 per cent between US tariffs on China and India, which is also a key reason to clinch the deal. This gives Indian traders an advantage over Chinese competitors and mitigates some of India's structural downsides, including infrastructural bottlenecks, logistics woes, and high interest costs. However, it may be noted here that this would hinge on how China leverages its dominance in rare earths to influence US tariff decisions. The growing concerns over Beijing's dominance in resources vital to new technologies were underscored at the recent Quad Foreign Ministers' meeting, where the grouping announced a Critical Minerals Initiative to 'collaborate on securing and diversifying' supply chains. The US has pushed hard for a broad-based opening of Indian sectors, from automobiles and whisky to agricultural items such as apples, corn and soya among others, as well as dairy. It has demanded the removal of a crucial regulation regarding dairy to sell its genetically modified (GM) products, resulting in tense discussions and even triggering protests from voices back home. The US eyes the Indian market amid a recent report by the US Department of Agriculture, which suggests that India's consumption of animal products (milk, eggs, fish, and meat) is likely to increase with population growth and rising per capita GDP. This could, in turn, boost demand for feed and create opportunities for US exports of these commodities (corn and soybeans) by the early 2030s, the report says. Moreover, the US sees India as a large market for its corn, soyabean and cotton amid the decline in exports of these products to China, which was its largest corn importer at $5.2 billion in 2022. Although India has said that the trade deal with the US will be signed when it is mutually beneficial, the two countries remain committed to more than double their bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. India is said to focus on areas where it has a competitive edge. Indian officials have indicated that diversifying oil and defence procurement is in the country's strategic interest, and that sourcing more from the US could significantly help bridge the goods trade gap. India's oil imports from the US have already jumped over 270 per cent year-on-year in the first four months of 2025. Moreover, in recent years, New Delhi and Washington have forged closer defence, technology, and diplomatic ties in a shared front against China. There is greater receptiveness now within India's policy circles to cut tariffs on some industrial goods, including automobiles, and some agricultural products of interest to Americans such as apples, almonds, walnuts, avocados and spirits. There is also more openness on the GM foods issue too. The NITI Aayog, in its Working Paper, has proposed that India import GM maize and soybeans, with the former as a feedstock for ethanol production, and the latter to extract oil for domestic consumption. In both cases, it calls for the export of their byproducts in their entirety – distiller's dried grains with solubles (maize) and de-oiled cakes and meals (soybean). It also called for concessions on agricultural products from the US such as edible oils and nuts where domestic supply gaps exist, and duty concessions to boost high-performing exports such as shrimp, fish, spices, rice, tea, coffee, and rubber. Additionally, the chances of India becoming the biggest market for the US are, perhaps, higher in cotton than in soyabean or corn. And it may be argued that duty-free imports of raw cotton can boost India's textile and apparel exports to the US itself, which stood at $10.8 billion in 2024. Notably, India-US trade negotiations have wrapped up for now, even as New Delhi strengthens its global diplomatic footprint. Support for India's permanent membership in the expanded United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and a shared commitment to fight terrorism are among the announcements made during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Trinidad and Tobago, the first by an Indian Prime Minister since 1999. The two countries inked six agreements to boost cooperation in several sectors, including infrastructure and pharmaceuticals, following talks between Prime Minister Modi and his counterpart from Trinidad and Tobago, Kamla Persad-Bissessar. The two leaders also delved into pressing global issues and reaffirmed the need for comprehensive reforms in the United Nations, including expansion of the UN Security Council, to better reflect current realities. The Caribbean nation also extended support to India's membership in the expanded UNSC. Modi and Bissessar called for dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward amid rising geopolitical tensions and global conflicts, and underlined the need for greater cooperation to deal with contemporary challenges such as climate change, disaster management, and cybersecurity. Prime Minister Modi also lauded the contribution of Indian-origin people to Trinidad and Tobago's development journey, and announced a decision to issue Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) cards up to the sixth generation of the Indian diaspora in the country, where over 40 per cent of the population is of Indian origin. Earlier on Friday, the Prime Minister addressed the parliament of the Caribbean nation and spoke about the cricket connection between the two countries. He also reiterated his offer to train aspiring young women cricketers from Trinidad and Tobago in India. PM Modi expressed appreciation for Trinidad and Tobago's strong support and solidarity to the people of India in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack, as the two leaders reaffirmed their commitment to fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. Modi is currently on a five-nation tour, which began with his visit to Ghana where he was honoured with Ghana's national award, 'The Officer of the Order of the Star of Ghana,' in recognition of his 'distinguished statesmanship and influential global leadership'. Four Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) were signed, including in the areas of cultural exchange and traditional music. In his joint press statement following talks with John Mahama, the President of Ghana, Prime Minister Modi announced that they have decided to give India-Ghana ties the form of a Comprehensive Partnership. After Trinidad and Tobago, PM Modi has reached Argentina for the next leg of his tour. Later, he will attend the BRICS Summit in Brazil, and visit Namibia on his return. Russia launched the largest aerial assault on Ukraine in the over three-year long war amid reports that Moscow has been using banned chemical weapons in Kyiv, while US President Donald Trump voiced frustration over Russian President Vladimir Putin's failure to end the fighting. Russian forces have used increasing numbers of drones to target Ukrainian cities, with a record total of 539 drones and 11 missiles deployed against Kyiv on July 4, Reuters reported, citing the Ukrainian air force. Russia also downed dozens of Ukrainian drones in widely dispersed parts of the country, including two near the second-largest city of St Petersburg. Meanwhile, Dutch and German intelligence agencies said Russia's use of chemical weapons in this war is 'becoming more normalised, standardised, and widespread', with Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans calling for tougher sanctions against Moscow, reported Reuters. The US first accused Russia of using chloropicrin, a chemical compound more toxic than riot control agents and first used by Germany during World War I, in May last year. Ukraine also alleges thousands of instances of Russian chemical weapons use. Hours after Thursday's attack by Russia, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had a phone call with Trump, following which the US President said Ukraine would need Patriot missiles for its defence, Reuters reported. Commenting on the prospect of a ceasefire, Trump said, 'It's a very tough situation… I was very unhappy with my call with President Putin. He wants to go all the way, just keep killing people – it's no good.' Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, claiming it was needed to protect Russian-speaking civilians in eastern Ukraine and prevent the country from joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Notably, Trump has ruled out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO and even halted shipments of weapons and military aid to it. Since 2022, every NATO summit has committed to aiding Ukraine in its war against Russia. Most NATO countries view Russia as a direct and immediate threat. All the while, Israel continues to kill starving Palestinians as Hamas said it is ready to start talks 'immediately' on a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire, prompting US President Trump to say there could be a deal by next week. At least 50 Palestinians were killed in Gaza as Israeli forces again target people waiting for food, Al Jazeera reported, while the UN said on July 5 that it had recorded at least 613 killings both at aid points run by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and near humanitarian convoys run by other relief groups, including the UN. The United Nations has criticised the GHF, which began distributing aid at the end of May following a three-month Israeli blockade on Gaza, for bypassing the UN-led system and violating humanitarian impartiality rules. Meanwhile, Hamas responded in 'a positive spirit' to the Gaza ceasefire proposal, brokered by the US and mediated by Egypt and Qatar. Trump had earlier said that Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalise' the ceasefire, which envisages a release of hostages and negotiations on ending the conflict. According to Gaza's Health Ministry, at least 57,268 people have been killed and 135,625 wounded in Israel's devastating war on Gaza since October 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, killing over 1,100 people and taking 251 hostage. In the meantime, the West Bank, occupied by Israel since the Six-Day War in 1967, has become a 'big prison' as Israel fences it in, Reuters reported. Walls and checkpoints erected by Israeli forces have long been a part of day-to-day life for the nearly 3 million Palestinian residents of the West Bank. But many now say that a dramatic increase in such barriers since the start of the war in Gaza has put towns and villages in a state of permanent siege. Experts like Talmiz Ahmad, a former ambassador to Oman, the UAE and Saudi Arabia, had underlined a number of provocations in the run up to the October 7 attack by Hamas, which included the surge in attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank. Send your feedback and ideas to
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Russia is paying teenage girls to have babies: Why cash incentives alone won't reverse the global fertility crisis
Russia is paying schoolgirls to have babies in a bid to boost its plummeting birth rate, but experts say cash incentives alone can't reverse the global fertility crisis. Here's why pronatalist policies may be more ideological than effective. read more Russia's President Vladimir Putin meets with patients as he visits the new children's clinical centre named after Leonid Roshal outside Moscow, Russia, August 21, 2024. File Image/Sputnik via Reuters In a move that has sparked both alarm and applause, certain regions in Russia have begun offering schoolgirls over 100,000 roubles (around £900) to have children and raise them. This initiative, recently expanded to ten regions, a shift in Russia's pronatalist policy- one that initially targeted only adult women earlier in 2025. The program is part of President Vladimir Putin's broader strategy to address a critical demographic downturn. Russia's fertility rate stood at just 1.41 births per woman in 2023, well below the replacement rate of 2.05 needed to maintain a stable population. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The decision to incentivise teenage childbirth has proven divisive. A national poll by the Russian Public Opinion Research Centre found 43% of citizens in support of the policy, while 40% disapproved. Yet the very existence of such a measure underscores how urgently the Russian state views the population crisis. Putin has long equated population size with geopolitical strength, seeing a growing citizen base as a symbol of national power on par with military might and territorial dominance. Ironically, though, the war in Ukraine, a campaign launched in part to expand Russian territory has further deepened the demographic crisis. An estimated 250,000 Russian soldiers have died, and the conflict has triggered the mass departure of hundreds of thousands of young, educated Russians, many of whom could have been future parents. Paradoxically, though, his efforts to increase the physical size of Russia by attacking Ukraine and illegally annexing its territory have also been disastrous in terms of shrinking Russia's population. The number of Russian soldiers killed in the war has reached 250,000 by some estimates, while the war sparked an exodus of hundreds of thousands of some of the most highly educated Russians. Many of them are young men fleeing military service who could have been fathers to the next generation of Russian citizens. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But while Russia's demographic situation is extreme, declining birth rates are now a global trend. It is estimated that by 2050 more than three quarters of the world's countries will have such low fertility rates that they will not be able to sustain their populations. It's not only Russia Putin is not the only world leader to introduce policies designed to encourage women to have more babies. Viktor Orban's government in Hungary is offering a range of incentives, such as generous tax breaks and subsidised mortgages, to those who have three or more children. Poland makes a monthly payment of 500 złoty (£101) per child to families with two or more children. But there's some evidence this has not prompted higher-income Polish women to have more children, as they might have to sacrifice higher earnings and career advancement to have another child. In the United States, Donald Trump is proposing to pay women US$5,000 (£3,682) to have a baby, tied to a wider Maga movement push, supported by Elon Musk and others, to encourage women to have larger families. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Experts said that reversing demographic decline is inherently complex, largely because the decision to have children is influenced by a wide range of factors. These include personal goals, financial stability, confidence in one's ability to raise a child as well as broader societal, cultural and religious norms. As a result, the effectiveness of pronatalist policies has been mixed globally, with no country yet finding a simple or universally successful solution to falling birth rates. One country seeking to address population decline with policies, other than encouraging women to have more babies is Spain, which now allows an easier pathway to citizenship for migrants, including those who entered the country illegally. Madrid's embrace of immigrants is being credited for its current economic boom. Looking for particular types of families But governments that adopt pronatalist policies tend to be concerned, not simply with increasing the total number of people living and working in their countries, but with encouraging certain kinds of people to reproduce. In other words, there is often an ideological dimension to these practices. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Incentives for pregnancy, childbirth and large families are typically targeted at those whom the state regards as its most desirable citizens. These people may be desirable citizens due to their race, ethnicity, language, religion, sexual orientation or some other identity or combination of identities. For instance, the Spanish bid to increase the population by increasing immigration offers mostly Spanish speakers from Catholic countries in Latin America jobs while opportunities to remain in, or move to, the country does appear to be extended to migrants from Africa. Meanwhile, Hungary's incentives to families are only available to heterosexual couples who earn high incomes. The emphasis on increasing the proportion of the most desirable citizens is why the Trump administration sees no contradiction in calling for more babies to be born in the US. While ordering the arrest and deportation of hundreds of alleged illegal migrants, attempting to reverse the constitutional guarantee of US citizenship for anyone born in the country and even attempting to withdraw citizenship from some Americans. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Which mothers do they want? The success or failure of governments and societies that promote pronatalism hinges on their ability to persuade people – and especially women – to embrace parenthood. Along with financial incentives and other tangible rewards for having babies, some states offer praise and recognition for the mothers of large families. Putin's reintroduction of the Stalin-era motherhood medal for women with ten or more children is one example. Sometimes the recognition comes from society, such as the current American fascination with 'trad wives' – women who become social media influencers by turning their backs on careers in favour of raising large numbers of children and living socially conservative lifestyles. The mirror image of this celebration of motherhood is the implicit or explicit criticism of women who delay childbirth or reject it altogether. Russia's parliament passed a law in 2024 to ban the promotion of childlessness, or 'child-free propaganda'. This legislation joins other measures such as restrictions on abortions in private clinics, together with public condemnation of women who choose to study at university and pursue careers rather than prioritise marriage and child-rearing. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The world's most prosperous states would be embracing immigration if pronatalist policies were driven solely by the need to ensure a sufficient workforce to support the economy and society. Instead, these attempts are often bound up with efforts to restrict or dictate the choices that citizens – and especially women – make about their personal lives, and to create a population dominated by the types of the people they favour. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
NATO Nation Dumps Ukraine; Romania's Big Decision Rattles Zelensky Amid Putin's Chilling Onslaught
'Pakistan Doesn't Know Where Masood Azhar Is': Bilawal Bhutto's Stunning Claim, Asks India For Help In a bombshell interview with Al Jazeera, former Pakistan Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari claimed that Pakistan has no idea where UN-designated terrorist and Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar is suggesting he may be in Afghanistan. Bhutto challenged India to share concrete intelligence if Azhar is on Pakistani soil. He also claimed that Pakistan cannot capture Azhar if even NATO failed to do so in Afghanistan. The startling statement has reignited global scrutiny of Pakistan's counterterrorism stance, given Azhar's role in major terror attacks in India. Bhutto also defended Pakistan's handling of Hafiz Saeed, saying he is in custody, contrary to reports. As Pakistan deflects responsibility, India demands accountability. Is Pakistan sheltering terror masterminds? Or is it simply powerless? Watch the full report.#masoodazhar #bilawalbhutto #pakistanterror #jaishmohammad #hafizsaeed #terrorism #pakistan #operationsindoor #terroristan #pakafghanborder #unbannedterrorists #indiapakconflict #counterterrorismfail #toi #toibharat #bharat #trending #breakingnews #indianews 8.4K views | 21 hours ago
