&w=3840&q=100)
Trump calls Thailand-Cambodia truce easy, cites role in India-Pak talks
Speaking to reporters during his meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump reiterated his commitment to using economic pressure to end the ongoing border war between the two Southeast Asian nations.
"We're dealing with Thailand, and we do a lot of trade with Thailand and with Cambodia, and yet I'm reading that they're killing each other. You know, they're fighting. They're in a war. And I say this should be an easy one for me because I've settled with India and Pakistan and Serbia and Kosovo were going at it," Trump said.
As per Al Jazeera, Cambodia and Thailand, earlier in the day, accused each other of launching artillery attacks, just hours after Trump said both countries had agreed to hash out a ceasefire.
The attacks on Sunday came after both sides said they were willing to start talks to end the fighting over their border dispute after Trump spoke to their leaders late on Saturday.
Bangkok and Phnom Penh are engaged in a territorial dispute dating back over a century, when colonial-era France first demarcated the border between them, CNN reported.
He recounted calling the Prime Minister of Cambodia and the acting Prime Minister of Thailand, asserting, "I said we're not going to make a trade deal unless you settle the war... And I spoke to both of the Prime Ministers, and I think by the time I got off, they wanted to settle now."
Trump drew confidence from his mediation efforts, particularly citing the India-Pakistan conflict, which he claimed was "really getting ready to go at it."
Trump was referencing the recent India-Pakistan conflict in May, where he had claimed credit several times for brokering a ceasefire between the two nuclear nations, using trade as leverage.
The conflict erupted after 26 civilians were killed in the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, after which India retaliated through precision strikes under Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK).
However, according to Indian officials, it was Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) who contacted their Indian counterpart to request an end to hostilities, following which the ceasefire was then agreed upon.
"Getting those things settled if I can do it and if I can use trade to do that, it's my honour," he added, reflecting his belief in trade as a diplomatic tool.
Four days after the worst fighting in more than a decade broke out between the Southeast Asian neighbours, the death toll stood above 30, including 13 civilians in Thailand and eight in Cambodia.
Over 200,000 people have also been evacuated from border areas in the two countries, authorities said, as per Al Jazeera.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Amit Shah lashes out at Congress for being soft on terror, exonerating Pakistan
Union home minister Amit Shah on Tuesday attacked the Opposition for questioning the government for agreeing to a ceasefire with Pakistan in May and lashed out at the Congress for being soft on terror and exonerating Islamabad over it. He said that the Congress's tradition of having debates after every terror attack was over. Union home minister Amit Shah. (ANI) 'They [Opposition] asked why we agreed to a ceasefire when we were in such a good position? I want to ask then, in 1948, our soldiers had an upper hand in Kashmir, but [Prime Minister Jawaharlal] Nehru stopped the war. PoK [Pakistan-occupied Kashmir] was lost because of Nehru,' he said during the Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor launched against Pakistan in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack in April. Shah said Vallabhbhai Patel, Nehru's deputy, tried to go to the radio station to announce the 1947-48 war would continue, but its doors were shut. 'In the Indus Waters Treaty [suspended post-Pahalgam attack], 80% of Indian waters were given to Pakistan. In 1965, we controlled Haji Pir Pass [in Jammu and Kashmir]. But in 1966, Haji Pir was returned to Pakistan.' Shah said India captured 93,000 Pakistani prisoners of war in 1971 and occupied 15,000 square km of Pakistan. 'But as part of the Shimla agreement, PoK was forgotten and the territory was returned.' Shah said if Congress was exonerating Pakistan, then it had no right to ask questions. He added that Nehru gave away Aksai Chin, saying no grass grows there. Shah said Nehru was asked should he also be sent to China, as he did not have any hair on his head. 'Nehru opposed China's exclusion from the UN Security Council, saying it would spoil the India-China relationship. The Rajiv Gandhi Foundation had a Memorandum of Understanding with China during...[the 2017 China–India border standoff] at Doklam. Rahul Gandhi met the Chinese ambassador.' Shah took exception to former home minister P Chidambaram's alleged comment during an interview, questioning the assumption that the Pahalgam terrorists came from Pakistan. 'I thought both sides [government and Opposition] would be happy that the terrorists have died? Do not be sad, going by the religion of the terrorists,' said Shah, who announced that three Pakistani Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists involved in the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack were killed on Monday in Dachigam near Srinagar after a two-month operation. Shah recalled meeting the Pahalgam victims. 'I can never forget the face of a woman who had married six days ago [and lost her husband]. It is our responsibility [to punish terrorists]. But I want to ask, what happened during your time? I am sorry that Chidambaram sought proof that the terrorists came from Pakistan. And when did he raise it? When Parliament was set to debate. Whom did he want to save? What will you gain by saving Pakistan?' Shah asked. When Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader Kanimozhi Karunanidhi protested, saying they had not exonerated Pakistan, Shah said, 'But if you are sitting with them, then you have to share the burden.' Shah blamed Congress for Pakistan's creation. 'Congress opposed [Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002] and scrapped it. It is trying to save terrorists to save the vote bank. During our time, terror attacks have been limited to Jammu and Kashmir.' Shah referred to Congress leader Salman Khurshid's statement claiming Sonia Gandhi cried after the 2008 shoot out in Delhi's Batla House, which left police officer Mohan Chand Sharma dead. 'If you had to cry, you should have cried for the martyr [Sharma].'
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Congress chief's 'Vishwaguru's daawat' dig after Amit Shah attacks Gaurav Gogoi over Pakistan visit
Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, speaking during the monsoon session of Parliament, on Tuesday launched a veiled attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi over his visit to Pakistan and accused the Bharatiya Janata Party of hypocrisy in dealing with Pakistan and running a 'factory of lies'. Congress President and Rajya Sabha LoP, Mallikarjun Kharge, during the Monsoon Session, on Parliament premises in New Delhi.(ANI) Addressing the Upper House during a debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, Kharge said, 'We have always condemned Pakistan. But while we condemn them here, you attend their 'daawats' and hug them. You have a habit of going places uninvited. None of the members present in this House went there. But over there, a friend, a Guru, or perhaps a Vishwaguru showed up…' Also Follow | Parliament Monsoon Session live updates Without naming anyone directly, the Congress leader's remarks appeared to target PM Narendra Modi over his meeting with his then Pakistani counterpart, Nawaz Sharif, during a surprise visit to Lahore in 2015. Kharge's swipe comes shortly after Union home minister Amit Shah lashed out at Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi, claiming he visited Pakistan "many times", and urged the leader to visit the border as well to witness the plight of Indian soldiers. Also Read | 'Bharatiye the': Priyanka Gandhi shuts down Pahalgam victims 'Hindu' chorus Reacting to Amit Shah's attack, Gaurav Gogoi said he visited the neighbouring country before Modi went there "to eat biryani". Participating in the debate on Operation Sindoor in Lok Sabha, Amit Shah heaped praise on India's move, and also hailed the killing of three terrorists who were involved in the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Also Read | Voter IDs, chocolate wrappers were from Pakistan: Amit Shah on proof of Pahalgam terrorists' origin Kharge also underlined the Congress party's legacy in nation-building and contrasted it with what he described as the ruling party's focus on misinformation. 'We have a long and proud history, my party does. The contribution we have made in building this nation is unmatched. All you have done is set up a factory of lies,' he said.
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India set to become 2nd-best represented nation in Times Higher Education rankings
New Delhi, India is set to break new records and become the second-best represented nation in the world, behind only the US, in the 2026 edition of Times Higher Education ranking, according to Times Higher Education's Chief Global Affairs Officer Phil Baty. India set to become 2nd-best represented nation in Times Higher Education rankings The comments were made by Baty in a statement on the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the new National Education Policy . "In the 2026 edition of the world rankings, to be published at the World Academic Summit on 8 October this year, India will break new records to become the second best represented nation in the world, behind only the US. So the data is clear that India's universities are increasingly rubbing shoulders with the world's global research elite. "But based on an additional, very different set of performance metrics based on their social and economic impact, India's universities are also starting to really shine," he said. The Times Higher Education Impact Rankings assess universities' social and economic impact based on their contributions to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals . Universities are examined on their teaching, research, community outreach and the stewardship of their resources across hundreds of metrics based on all 17 of the UN SDGs. Baty noted that India's National Education Policy of 2020 was so pioneering and so bold that many said at its launch five years ago that it was simply too ambitious to succeed. "...but exactly five years since the NEP 2020 was formally launched, there is a growing body of independent evidence that, despite the dramatic disruption of the COVID pandemic, the bold vision is rapidly becoming a reality. "Certainly, regarding ambitions to improve higher education quality and to finally embrace the full internationalisation of Indian higher education, Times Higher Education's data is clear the plans are working," he said. In 2019, the year before NEP2020, India had 49 universities in the rankings – a share of around four per cent of all ranked universities. In the 2026 edition, India's representation will have almost tripled to 128 ranked universities, representing nearly six per cent of all ranked universities. "This remarkable achievement reflects a nation-wide commitment from Indian universities to collect better data, to step forward and subject themselves to global data benchmarking, to put themselves on the world stage alongside the top research universities worldwide and most importantly to be a visible and active part of the global academic community, where research collaboration and talent exchange can help them to thrive further. "And it is not just in representation where India is showing exceptional progress. There are improvements in quality too. So the data is clear that India's universities are increasingly rubbing shoulders with the world's global research elite. But based on an additional, very different set of performance metrics based on their social and economic impact, India's universities are also starting to really shine," he said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
