logo
Why Xi Jinping's abrupt absence has sparked global speculation

Why Xi Jinping's abrupt absence has sparked global speculation

India Today6 hours ago
For over a decade, president Xi Jinping has stood unchallenged at the pinnacle of Chinese power, his grip over the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the state likened to that of an emperor. Sweeping purges, restructured institutions and a cult of personality have cemented his position as the most powerful leader since Mao Zedong.Yet, an unusual silence now surrounds Xi, sparking intense speculation. His sudden and unexplained absence from major international events, including the recent BRICS summit, has triggered alarm globally. In tightly controlled authoritarian systems, such absences are rarely accidental, often signalling either deliberate strategy or deeper instability.advertisementXi's last confirmed public appearance was on June 24, when he met Singapore's prime minister Lawrence Wong at Beijing's Great Hall of the People. After that, he disappeared from public view for nearly two weeks.But on July 7, China's state-run Xinhua News finally released an image of Xi laying a wreath at a memorial for martyrs of the Anti-Japanese War in Shanxi province. The tightly framed photo, devoid of any broader context, was meant to quell rumours. But it only deepened the mystery.
Observers noted that Xi had also missed a major constitutional loyalty ceremony in June—an annual event attended by more than 50 top ministers and party leaders. In the carefully choreographed world of Chinese elite politics, such absences are rarely benign.China watchers claim the country could be heading for a political shake-up. Over the past year, several of Xi's closest allies in the military and government have been abruptly removed or have disappeared from view. Defence minister Li Shangfu and foreign minister Qin Gang vanished, only to be later dismissed without explanation.Military generals such as Wei Fenghe were removed. Others, such as Xu Qiliang, have died, and key figures like He Weidong have vanished from the scene. This purge of loyalists has not gone unnoticed. Some see it as a sign of Xi consolidating power even further. Others view it as a desperate attempt to quell rising discontent or perhaps a move by rival factions to isolate him. At the same time, reports of corruption in the People's Liberation Army, especially its Rocket Force, led to embarrassment for Xi in the past couple of years.Observers maintain that amidst the silence, talk of succession is beginning to surface. Several names are circulating among China watchers and within elite party circles. Wang Yang, a reformist technocrat once seen as sidelined by Xi, is rumoured to be re-emerging as a potential successor.General Zhang Youxia, the current vice-chairman of the Central Military Commission, has reportedly gained ground, particularly in the military ranks. The so-called Hu Chunhua faction, previously marginalised by Xi's rise, appears to be regaining strength. These developments come at a time when China's domestic challenges are multiplying—a stagnant real-estate sector, youth unemployment around 15 per cent, and persistent failures in high-tech industries such as semiconductors. Combined with ongoing trade tensions and Western sanctions, China's economy is facing its most serious headwinds in decades.advertisementMany senior observers dismissed these speculations as empty. A senior China analyst downplays the speculation, calling it part of an annual cycle of rumours and insisting that Xi is merely choosing to lie low as global attention focuses on crises elsewhere—from US president Donald Trump's tariff war to India-Pakistan tensions. 'It's a Chinese concept—lie low and move steadily towards your goal,' the expert said.That may be true. Xi has long believed in strategic patience, preferring silence over public confrontation. But history offers a cautionary tale. In the opaque world of the CCP, even supreme leaders have been quietly sidelined when they fall out of favour. Their removals are rarely announced. Instead, they fade from view—replaced, reimagined or erased.This same system that Xi has wielded with ruthless precision may now be turning against him. If the party believes he has become a liability, he could meet the same fate he reserved for others. The absence from key events, the quiet elimination of allies and the rise of rival figures all suggest a shift underway at the very top. For now, the CCP remains silent, as it always does in moments of transition. But behind the curtain, the balance of power may already be tilting.advertisementWhether Xi's absence stems from illness, isolation or being gradually sidelined by his own system, one thing is clear: China is entering a period of political uncertainty. The leader who once eliminated rivals may now be surrounded by them. As global attention focuses on Beijing, the growing silence speaks volumes. In China, such silence often precedes significant change.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tibetan political leader slams Chinese ambassador's remarks on Dalai Lama's reincarnation
Tibetan political leader slams Chinese ambassador's remarks on Dalai Lama's reincarnation

Hindustan Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Tibetan political leader slams Chinese ambassador's remarks on Dalai Lama's reincarnation

The political leader of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), Sikyong Penpa Tsering, has dismissed the recent remarks made by Chinese Ambassador to India, Xu Feihong, on the reincarnation of the 14th Dalai Lama, saying they reflect a complete ignorance of the concept of reincarnation. Sikyong Penpa Tsering (AFP) Taking to social media recently, the Chinese diplomat shared that the Dalai Lama has no authority to decide whether the reincarnation system will continue or not. This comes after the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader announced on July 2 that the 600-year-old institution of the Dalai Lama will continue and that Gaden Phodrang Trust has sole authority to recognise the future reincarnation. Sikyong Penpa Tsering said, 'The social media post by the ambassador is ignorant of the very concept of reincarnation, because the whole purpose of reincarnation is for a spiritually realised person to decide where he or she should be reborn to carry on the responsibilities or activities of the previous life or lives.' Sikyong said that the post, in fact, reflects complete ignorance of the very notion of reincarnation and the reason and objective behind it. 'For a government that does not believe in any religion, being responsible for recognition and forcing Lamas inside to be part of that decision-making process is pitiful,' Tsering said. Taking to X, ambassador Xu Feihong shared that in fact, as a unique succession method of Tibetan Buddhism, the practice of Living Buddha reincarnation has continued over 700 years. 'Currently, there are over 1,000 reincarnation systems of Living Buddhas in Xizang and Tibetan-inhabited prefectures/counties of Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu and Qinghai provinces. The 14th Dalai Lama is part of this long-standing historical tradition and religious succession, not otherwise. The reincarnation of Dalai Lamas neither began from him nor will end due to him. He has no authority to decide whether the reincarnation system shall continue or be abolished,' he added. In his July 2 statement, the Dalai Lama said his decision was influenced by numerous requests from Tibetan spiritual leaders, members of the Tibetan Parliament-in-exile, and the Buddhist diaspora in the Himalayas, Mongolia, the Russian Federation and Asia, including mainland China, that the institution should continue. The spiritual leader reiterated that the Gaden Phodrang Trust has sole authority to recognise the future reincarnation and no one else has any such authority to interfere in this matter. After this announcement, an irate Beijing, which describes the Dalai Lama as a 'separatist', countered that the spiritual leader's reincarnation 'must be approved by the central (Chinese) government'. The process of recognising the reincarnations of lamas in Tibetan Buddhism is solely and uniquely a Tibetan religious tradition. In contrast, China maintains that the process of selecting his successor must adhere to Chinese law, asserting its control over Tibetan Buddhism and rejecting any succession beyond its authority.

Brics rejects EU's unilateral carbon border tax proposal
Brics rejects EU's unilateral carbon border tax proposal

Time of India

time41 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Brics rejects EU's unilateral carbon border tax proposal

Brics Summit NEW DELHI: The Brics nations have rejected the European Union's proposed carbon border tax, or the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), calling it "unilateral, punitive and discriminatory protectionist measures", and said the move, being made "under the pretext of environmental concerns", would undermine their capacities to invest in just energy transitions and development priorities. India has long been opposed to such measures and even flagged its concerns during the recent free trade agreement talks with the EU. The concerns of the group of 11 nations, including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, over such trade barriers got reflected prominently in the 'Leaders' Framework Declaration on Climate Finance' adopted in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on Monday. The CBAM, to be implemented from next year, is a tool to impose border tax on carbon-intensive goods, such as iron & steel, aluminium and cement, that enter the 27 EU nations. Since it will impose a tariff burden on developing countries and impact their trade prospects, large exporters of such goods, including India and China, have consistently been opposing it. Condemning CBAM, the Brics nations declared that such measures are "not in line with international law", and said they oppose "unilateral protectionist measures which deliberately disrupt the global supply and production chains and distort competition". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Pieces of Clothing you should Ditch over 40 Learn More Undo Besides flagging the EU's trade barrier, the Brics nations expressed "serious concern" over pre-2020 mitigation gaps for developed countries and urged them to urgently bridge the gaps between what they promised and what they have achieved in terms of greenhouse gas emissions reduction. The group asked the rich nations to increase their 2030 climate action targets and achieve net-zero emissions significantly ahead of 2050, preferably by 2030. Referring to the critical issue of finance that is going to dominate the climate talks (CO) in Belem, Brazil, later this year, the Brics nations called upon developed countries to meet their earlier goal of jointly mobilising $100 billion per year through 2025 to address the needs of developing countries, and achieve the finance goal of $300 billion per year by 2035. "We note that substantial gaps remain in fulfilling the financing needs identified by developing countries," the declaration said. The developed countries were also urged to increase their collective provision of climate finance for adaptation, doubling the amount from 2019 levels by 2025 at the least.

Trump's Tariff Bombshell: Who's Hit, What's At Stake And How Nations Are Reacting
Trump's Tariff Bombshell: Who's Hit, What's At Stake And How Nations Are Reacting

India.com

timean hour ago

  • India.com

Trump's Tariff Bombshell: Who's Hit, What's At Stake And How Nations Are Reacting

Washington: U.S. President Donald Trump announced on July 7 a firm deadline. August 1 marks the end of the tariff pause he first introduced in April. Fourteen nations received letters warning of new American import taxes if they fail to strike deals by then. White House officials confirmed to Al-Jazeera that tariffs announced on April 2 were suspended on April 9 for 90 days. They now resume August 1 under an executive order signed by Trump. The countries facing these renewed duties include Japan and South Korea at 25 percent each, South Africa at 30 percent, Laos and Myanmar at 40 percent and others with rates ranging from 25 percent to 40 percent. Some rates, according to Reuters, like those for Kazakhstan and Bangladesh are lower than what was originally planned, while Malaysia and Japan saw slight increases. Trump posted the full letters on Truth Social. He raised concerns about trade imbalances and offered exemptions for companies that shift production to the United States. He warned that any retaliatory tariffs by those nations could trigger even steeper U.S. rates. He also emphasised flexibility, promising to adjust rates 'upward or downward' depending on each country's relationship with America. The United States also issued a separate warning to BRICS nations, threatening an additional 10 percent tariff on countries aligning with anti‑American positions during the group's summit in Brazil. Some partners have reacted. Japan's Trade Minister said Tokyo will negotiate, especially on automobiles, but will protect its agricultural interests, according to Reuters. South Korea, as reported by announced steps to address the trade shortfall with America. South Africa expressed strong objections, calling the 30 percent tariff unjustified and promising to pursue more diplomatic resolutions. Markets responded with mixed signals on Monday. U.S. equities dipped slightly – Dow down nearly 1 percent, S&P 500 off by 0.8 percent and Nasdaq down 0.9 percent. Asian markets remained relatively stable. The Indian rupee strengthened slightly after India was excluded from the tariff list, while other Asian currencies held steady, Reuters reported. Two interim trade deals have already materialised. In May, a U.S.-U.K. agreement fixed a 10 percent tariff on initial U.K. vehicle exports, rising later to 25 percent. Then in early July, the United States reached terms with Vietnam, setting a minimum 20 percent U.S. tariff and a 40 percent charge on rerouted goods, Al-Jazeera reported. The looming deadline carries high stakes. Trump called it 'firm' but allowed for negotiation if leaders reach out with new proposals, according to Politico. Experts warn the strategy reflects his aggressive blend of negotiation through pressure and brinkmanship. Some commentators refer to this approach as the 'TACO' trade – Trump Always Chickens Out – highlighting his pattern of issuing threats and then delaying. Key dates to watch: July 9 was the original deadline, now superseded. July 14 ends the EU's suspension of retaliatory tariffs. August 1 is the new trigger date for U.S. measures. Negotiators in Washington suggest possible deals with India and the European Union could still emerge before that. But partners remain cautious. Stock markets jitter at any sign of prolonged trade tension.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store