logo
College Sports Commission, House attorneys end standoff over policing collectives: Sources

College Sports Commission, House attorneys end standoff over policing collectives: Sources

New York Times22-07-2025
By Ralph D. Russo, Stewart Mandel and Justin Williams
The newly formed College Sports Commission and the plaintiffs' lawyers in the House v. NCAA settlement have reached a preliminary agreement to classify name, image and likeness collectives the same as other 'valid' businesses by the NIL Go clearinghouse, three people informed of the negotiations told The Athletic on Tuesday.
Advertisement
The deal settles a standoff that began on July 10, when the CSC issued a memo stating that 'an entity with a business purpose of providing payments or benefits to student-athletes or institutions, rather than providing goods or services to the general public for profit,' does not satisfy the new model's 'valid business purpose requirement.'
The language came as a warning shot to collectives that they should expect their NIL deals with athletes to be denied by the newly established clearinghouse, even if the athletes are being paid to promote merchandise or attend a for-profit event.
Jeffrey Kessler, the lead plaintiffs' attorney in the House settlement, sent a letter to CSC, the power conferences that oversee the new enforcement organization and the NCAA the next day, demanding the guidance be retracted, saying it violated the terms of the settlement. If not, he said, they would seek relief from the court-appointed magistrate overseeing the settlement.
Kessler declined comment when reached by The Athletic. 'Conversations with class counsel remain ongoing,' a spokesperson for the CSC told The Athletic. 'A formal statement will be issued when the issue has been resolved.'
The deal reached Tuesday avoids that step. Instead, a clarification of the guidance is expected to be handed down by the CSC that clarifies collectives can offer goods and services for profit in the form of NIL payments, and they can send those deals through the clearinghouse for approval.
'We're looking for more clarity on what's going to be allowed there, and until we get some of that clarity, it's going to be a little bit hard to move forward,' Ohio State coach Ryan Day said at Big Ten media days. 'We're going to make sure we're competitive with everybody else, but we have to make sure we're doing what's right.'
Advertisement
The change could be seen as a blow to conferences and schools, which have been banking on the CSC model to prevent members from going above the $20.5 million revenue-sharing cap to attract athletes. Allowing collectives to continue operating as they have in the past now opens the door to a 'soft cap' in the form of third-party deals with athletes.
The collectives' deals, as with all third-party businesses, will still be subject to a 'range of compensation' limit that will be evaluated through a service run by the accounting firm Deloitte.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Venus Williams receives wild card entry for US Open mixed doubles at 45 years old
Venus Williams receives wild card entry for US Open mixed doubles at 45 years old

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Venus Williams receives wild card entry for US Open mixed doubles at 45 years old

Venus Williams is 45 years old and about to play in a Grand Slam again. The longtime tennis star received a wild-card entry into the mixed doubles field of the US Open on Tuesday, the tournament announced, setting her up to play alongside partner Reilly Opelka at Flushing Meadows. She will be joined by several other stars in the field, including Jannik Sinner, Carlos Alcaraz and Iga Swiatek. When she takes the court, it will be Williams' first appearance at a Grand Slam in any field since the same tournament in 2023, where she entered the singles draw via another wild card and was eliminated in the first round by qualifier Greet Minnen. Since then, Williams has been mostly inactive while going through health issues, including a surgery to remove uterine fibroids. She made her return last week at the D.C. Open, where she won both a singles and doubles match for the first time in 2016. Williams surprised former NCAA champion Peyton Stearns, then ranked 35th in the world, in the first round of the singles draw before losing to fifth seed Magdalena Fręch in the second round. Opelka, Williams' doubles partner, is currently 74th on the ATP Tour's men's singles rankings. He is 27 years old and notably tied for the tour's tallest-ever player at 6-foot-11, which gives him one of the nastiest serves in tennis. Williams is a 23-time Grand Slam champion, with seven singles titles, 14 doubles titles and two mixed doubles titles. She played her first US Open in 1997, when she made the singles finals at 17 years old. She has nothing to prove at this stage, but raised some eyebrows last week when asked why she decided to return to tennis in her mid-40s. Venus Williams is doing this for the health insurance (sort of) At the end of her first-round post-match interview, Williams provided a small peak behind the curtain of how professional athletes go about healthcare, revealing that she was actually on COBRA, which allows employees to stay on their employer's health insurance after losing benefits. Here's what she said: 'I had to come back for the insurance, because they informed me earlier this year I'm on COBRA. So that's like, I got to get my benefits on ... You guys know what it's like. Let me tell you, I am always at the doctor, so I need this insurance.' To be clear, Williams was joking there. She said it all that with a smile and called it a "fun and funny moment" after her second match. However, many people and outlets took the statement quite seriously, with some of them using it as a jumping-off point to discuss broader healthcare issues. It is true that health insurance coverage is an issue for many retiring athletes. Active professional athletes get some of the best health insurance in the world for obvious reasons, and having to figure out coverage after retirement is a challenge for many people who just exited the most lucrative stage of their lives. While clarifying the tongue-in-cheek moment following the second match, Williams said in the same breath that it was a "serious issue" and one "that people are dealing with." With $42.7 million in career earnings from her WTA career and likely much more than that from her endorsements, Williams isn't one of those people (barring astonishing financial mismanagement). Given the choice, she will take the WTA's insurance because it gives her one less thing to worry about, but it's a stretch to say she is still playing because she needs the insurance.

"There's a lot of people who helped save this NBA, it didn't start with us" - Bird rejected the narrative that he and Magic saved the NBA
"There's a lot of people who helped save this NBA, it didn't start with us" - Bird rejected the narrative that he and Magic saved the NBA

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

"There's a lot of people who helped save this NBA, it didn't start with us" - Bird rejected the narrative that he and Magic saved the NBA

"There's a lot of people who helped save this NBA, it didn't start with us" - Bird rejected the narrative that he and Magic saved the NBA originally appeared on Basketball Network. Before 1979, the NBA stood on shaky legs. Television ratings hovered at historic lows. NBA Finals games were tape-delayed, pushed past late-night programming. League executives worried not just about marketability but about viability. Between drug scandals, low attendance and a disconnect with mainstream America, the NBA's national image had dimmed to a flicker. Yet something changed that year, when two college superstars, Larry Bird and Magic Johnson, entered the league, carrying with them not just talent, but magnetism. The NBA didn't transform overnight, but for the first time in years, the league had a spark. Changing the league Still, even with the mystique that swelled around their careers, Bird has never been one to bask in self-importance. He downplayed the now-common narrative that he and Magic single-handedly saved the NBA. "It's funny, all through my career they always say, 'You helped save the NBA.' But there's a lot of people who helped save the NBA. It didn't start with us," Larry said. "Maybe we helped in some way, as far as the competition we had in college and going against one another. But I do think we brought a different aspect to the game when we came in." Their rivalry began in the 1979 NCAA championship game, when Johnson's Michigan State team bested Bird's Indiana State squad. Their head to head dew more than 35 million viewers, the highest rating for a college basketball game in U.S. history to that point and it didn't end at the buzzer. The NBA leaned into the duos storyline almost instinctively. Their contrasting backgrounds, Bird, the silent assassin from blue-collar French Lick, Indiana and Johnson, the charismatic showman from Lansing, Michigan, created the kind of duality marketing departments dream about. When Bird joined the Boston Celtics and Johnson joined the Los Angeles Lakers, the rivalry exploded onto one of the most storied stages in American sports history. Their teams reshaped the league's visibility. Suddenly, NBA games weren't just sports events; they were cultural happenings. Fans tuned in not only to see the final score but also to witness an unfolding drama that carried athletic brilliance and emotional and Magic's image Larry's humility stands in contrast to the grandeur often associated with his legacy. He's always been that way, grounded in his Midwest roots, more attuned to doing the job than talking about it. His appreciation of the era's broader ecosystem shows an awareness that while he and Johnson became the league's faces, the foundation was laid by others before them, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Julius Erving, George Gervin and many more who kept the flame alive through the league's darker years. He doesn't dismiss the impact he and Johnson had. Instead, he clarified it, anchoring it in how they approached the game not as personal glory chasers, but as team-driven competitors who elevated those around them. "We both liked to pass the ball. We liked to try to make other guys better. And then we were winners, there was no question about that," Johnson said. "Not that there wasn't a lot of winners before us. But just how we played the game and approached the game, I think, made a big impact throughout the league as far as watching the game." Indeed, Bird and Johnson shared devotion to team basketball, reinvigorating a product that had become muddied with isolation play and ball-stopping habits. Their rivalry gave way to some of the most beautifully executed basketball the NBA had seen. The Showtime Lakers were a masterclass in transition offense, while Bird's Celtics perfected spacing, ball movement and grit. The two made passing fashionable again. More importantly, they made winning contagious. Their influence echoed across the league. Young players began modeling their games not just on individual flair, but on leadership and vision. The 1980s became a golden age of team-oriented play, filled with fast breaks, off-ball movement and precision cuts. The Finals were no longer buried at midnight. By 1984, ratings were surging and the NBA had become primetime entertainment. But Bird's reflection reminds us that the league's rise was not the product of two men alone. It was collective and layered. David Stern's vision, the emergence of cable TV, the influx of talent and the steady drumbeat of competition all helped turn things around. The two legends were pivotal, but they were also part of a larger story that unfolded over a decade. Even now, decades after retirement, Bird remains allergic to being labelled the focal point of the NBA's evolution. His legacy speaks for itself: three-time NBA champion, three-time MVP, Hall of Famer. Yet he continues to redirect the spotlight toward the game itself, the passing, the strategy and the team ethos that made basketball a global story was originally reported by Basketball Network on Jul 27, 2025, where it first appeared.

PFL's Logan Storley responds to critics of fighting style: 'I'm not going to change'
PFL's Logan Storley responds to critics of fighting style: 'I'm not going to change'

USA Today

time8 hours ago

  • USA Today

PFL's Logan Storley responds to critics of fighting style: 'I'm not going to change'

Logan Storley is sticking with what got him to the dance. Logan Storley's success in MMA has been accompanied by some criticism. Despite being a former Bellator interim titleholder and in championship contention for many years, Storley (18-3) has received some criticism from the fan base for his fighting style. Being a four-time NCAA All-American wrestler, Storley has used his strong grappling to control and dominate his opposition, which some fans don't find too appealing. Storley is aware of the critics, but pays them no mind, especially ahead of his PFL welterweight tournament final bout against Thad Jean in the main event of 2025 PFL World Tournament 8: Finals. The event takes place Friday at Jim Whelan Boardwalk Hall in Atlantic City, N.J.. "I'm 18-3. I won an interim belt against MVP (Michael Page). I beat (Joaquin) Buckley. I beat all these guys," Storley told MMA Junkie. "My three losses at the time I think, (Yarovslav) Amasov was 22-0, then 25-0 (in the rematch), and I think (Shamil) Musaev was 20-0. So it's like 60-0 were my three loses. I've been out there and done this against the best guys in the world. I'm not going to change who I am. A boxer who's been boxing since he was 5 years old at the highest level is not all of a sudden going to start wrestling. He's not going to get away from his game plan. So for me, I just have to be true to myself. I'm going to set a pace and if guys don't like it, they have to get out of those positions." Storley has only lost three times in MMA: Twice to then undefeated Bellator champion Yaroslav Amosov in 2020 and 2023, and once against undefeated PFL champion Shamil Musaev in 2024. His 18 wins include several notable names including Michael Page, Joaquin Buckley, Neiman Gracie, and others. Storley doesn't plan to change his essence or underutilize his skill set just because of fan opinion ahead of his PFL title fight. As he pointed out, it's his legacy and career and no one else's. "You're fighting for a title. By any means necessary, you have to go out there and get your hand raised," Storley said. "In big fights, you go back to what you're best at. This will be my 22nd fight, we can fight anywhere, but I'm going to go and win my positions where I'm the best at. That's to be true to myself." The 32-year-old Kill Cliff product is confident his wrestling will shine Friday, just as it has throughout the 2025 PFL welterweight tournament. Storley doesn't think Jean (10-0) will be able to deal with it over the course of 25 minutes. "No, I don't think he will," Storley explained. "Can he get up? Yeah, sure. But can he keep that pace for 25 minutes? Can he keep up with the scrambles? Can he keep up for the whole time? I don't think anybody can do that, so that's what my plan is, to go out there and set a high pace."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store