logo
Five years later: How the murder of George Floyd changed America

Five years later: How the murder of George Floyd changed America

Independent23-05-2025
The following episode of The Story Behind the AP Story contains sound and descriptions that some listeners may find graphic or violent. Listener discretion is advised.
Haya Panjwani, host: In the summer of 2020, as the world was just beginning to grasp the COVID-19 pandemic, a video surfaced that would spark a movement like no other.
Aaron Morrison, editor: So, on May 25, 2020, George Floyd, who was a Black man from Houston, Texas, was in Minneapolis where he'd moved to find job opportunities.
PANJWANI: Aaron Morrison, the AP's race and ethnicity editor.
MORRISON: And on this day, in particular, a store clerk reported that Floyd had allegedly used a counterfeit $20 bill. He was restrained by at least a few officers, one in particular named Derek Chauvin, who's a white police officer, knelt on George Floyd's neck and back for over nine minutes. Floyd was handcuffed to the ground, and while a crowd of people had assembled, essentially demanding that George Floyd be released from the hold because as a now viral and famous video of the, of the encounter shows, George Floyd repeatedly said that he could not breathe.
George Floyd, in a recorded video: I can't breathe! They gon' kill me, they gon' kill me, man.
MORRISON: Before he took his last, last breath right there on the street.
PANJWANI: I'm Haya Panjwani. On this episode of the Story Behind the AP Story we revisit the murder of George Floyd five years later. We'll hear from people who were on the ground in the days immediately after Floyd's death, the trial that followed and how that summer shaped sentiments around race.
Noreen Nasir is a video journalist who was in Minneapolis covering the city's reaction to the death of George Floyd.
Noreen Nasir, video journalist: Initially, I think there was a lot of anger, of course, and some of that anger then turned into, you know, the images of destruction that we then saw and then I think got a lot of focus and attention in the media.
Sound from protests in Minneapolis in 2020: He can't breathe, he can't breathe, he can't breathe...
NASIR: But I think what was also lost in some of that focus that was very palpable on the ground was a deep sense of like sadness that a lot of folks felt. There was a lot of grief, I remember, on the ground especially at the site of the memorial. Going there at various times in the days that followed, that memorial just sort of like grew and grew and grew. There were these you know reverberations around like what this meant for race and racism across the country, things that and themes that then I think people were really trying to point to in the days and months that followed.
There was one night, you know, we were there, things that one of those early nights where things got really sort of tense and there were buildings that were broken into, there was looting that was happening. And I spoke to some of the business owners. A lot of them are also, you know, they're immigrants. A lot them were Somali Americans. They had come to this country. And for them, you know, I could see the sort of like conflicted feelings that they were having just in their own emotions and the way that they themselves were processing this thing. For them, they were saying, you we are Black. We are perceived as Black in this country, we are Black. And then at the same time, they're saying, we're also these business owners. We are grieving, and also, we want to protect our businesses, this is our livelihood. You would see a lot of on the boarded-up businesses, signs that said minority owned, almost as a way to say, 'Hey, please don't target us, like we're in the same boat.'
PANJWANI: Amy Forliti was a crime and courts reporter during the time of George Floyd's killing in 2020.
Amy Forliti, editor: The centerpiece was definitely the bystander video of George Floyd's final moments. Prosecutors played that footage really early in the case. They did it the first time during their opening statement and the prosecutor then told jurors to believe your eyes and that idea of believing your eyes or believing what you see on the video right before you was a theme that prosecutors came back to throughout the trial.
The defense took a different approach with that whole idea of believing what you see, and said that everyone there had a different perspective and came from a different vantage point and interpreted the events of that day differently. And the defense said that Chauvin's perspective was one of a reasonable police officer.
Many of the people who did testify said that they just felt helpless, that they couldn't do anything, and they saw Floyd's life being basically snuffed out, and they couldn't do anything. The teenager who recorded that video said that it seemed Chauvin just didn't care, and she testified that she stayed up at night apologizing to George Floyd because she didn't do more to help him.
I also remember some very poignant words at closing arguments. When we talk about the cause of death, prosecutor Jerry Blackwell referred to how the defense was saying that this was a heart issue that killed Floyd and that he had an enlarged heart. And the prosecutor said, and I'm paraphrasing here, but he told jurors that George Floyd didn't die because his heart was too big, but because Derek Chauvin's heart was too small.
In the end, a jury of six white people and six Black or multiracial people convicted Chauvin of three counts, including unintentional second-degree murder, which was the most serious count against him. After that verdict was read, a crowd gathered in the street and started cheering and rejoicing over that. He went on to later plead guilty to a federal count of violating George Floyd's civil rights.
PANJWANI: Some right-wing politicians and social media personalities have called for Chauvin to be pardoned by President Donald Trump.
FORLITI: But if he does, it's really important to note that this won't impact Chauvin's state murder conviction at all. He will still have to serve out the remainder of his state sentence on the murder charge. So, he's not going to walk out of a Texas prison and be free. He would likely have to come back to Minnesota to serve the rest of his sentence.
MORRISON: Folks who maybe did not understand or support such a reckoning have increasingly dismissed everything that happened in 2020 as wokeness, so-called wokeness, gone or run amok. They are hoping and advocating for Derek Chauvin to be pardoned because, in their view, this wasn't true justice.
NASIR: This happened at a time where it was, of course, it was the middle of the pandemic, and we were all in lockdown and we were all just at home. And frustration, I think, in different ways had been building up for a while for a lot of people. And so when this happened, it really just touched a nerve and then it sort of lit it all on fire. Everyone was watching this because no one was going anywhere. There was nothing to distract anyone.
And a lot of people were joining protests for the first time. Particularly when it came to the issue of racism in the U.S. And then, of course, in the months also that followed his initial death, Black Lives Matter as a movement sort of really spread. And the movement itself had started years earlier after the death of Trayvon Martin, but in 2020, it really took off across the country in a way that I think we had not seen before. And then it took off around the world where then folks were looking at their own interactions with police in their countries and looking at the way that racism played out in policing interactions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The shrinking circle of support: Here are the few Republicans defending Trump and Bondi over Epstein
The shrinking circle of support: Here are the few Republicans defending Trump and Bondi over Epstein

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

The shrinking circle of support: Here are the few Republicans defending Trump and Bondi over Epstein

Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and death in prison have been central to the years-long, overlapping conspiracy theories that have put the world's most powerful people at the center of an alleged criminal network of traffickers and child predators. Epstein's case and the conspiracy theories surrounding it were welcomed by Donald Trump's campaigns, with supporters and prominent right-wing media figures demanding the president expose the alleged cabal fueling Epstein's criminal enterprise. But now the president dismisses Epstein's case as a 'hoax,' a 'scam,' and 'bull****', and even asked a room of reporters why anyone is 'still talking' about a sex offender 'nobody cares about.' His dismissive statements — and statements from Department of Justice and FBI officials affirming Epstein died by suicide and that no such 'client list' exists — have triggered a civil war among the president's supporters and a constellation of right-wing figures wondering whether Trump has something to hide. The White House handed over binders of previously disclosed Epstein-related documents to several far-right influencers earlier this year in an apparent effort to prove that the administration was listening to them. But the administration has since reversed course, and the people who once believed Trump would hold Epstein's network accountable are now blaming the president, administration officials or unseen government figures for failing them. Who is sticking with Trump? While Trump repeatedly tries to get his supporters to talk about anything else, top officials at the Justice Department and FBI aren't entertaining questions about ruptures in Trumpworld and criticisms over their handling of the case. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News that Epstein's client list was 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' She later clarified that she was broadly referencing the case files, and she has since brushed aside questions about the case and in-fighting among Trump's allies about their release. 'We're going to fight to keep America safe again and we're fighting together as a team. That's what's so important right now,' she told reporters this week. Trump has also told reporters that Bondi has 'handled that very well' and said she should release 'whatever she thinks is credible.' 'She's really done a very good job,' Trump said Tuesday. 'I think when you look at it, you'll understand that.' In a post on X, FBI director Kash Patel said 'the conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been.' 'It's an honor to serve the President of the United States … and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me,' he said. Last year, podcaster Dan Bongino — now Patel's deputy director — said he didn't trust 'any story they tell me about Jeffrey Epstein.' 'There is a reason this client list is hidden,' he said at the time. He was reportedly 'out of control furious' and threatened to quit over mounting frustrations with the case, but Trump has since called him 'a very good guy.' 'I like Dan,' Trump told reporters this week. Some prominent right-wing figures and influencers who made their names amplifying conspiracy theories to support the president's agenda appear satisfied with Trump's word. 'Even though there are unanswered questions about Epstein, it is in fact time to move on,' Dinesh D'Souza said on his podcast. Activist Charlie Kirk similarly said on Monday he's 'done talking about Epstein for the time being.' 'I'm going to trust my friends in the administration,' said Kirk, specifically naming Bondi, Bongino, Patel and deputy attorney general Todd Blache. 'I'm going to trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done, solve it, ball's in their hands.' House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan also said he has 'confidence in President Trump' and defended Blanche, Bondi, Bongino and Patel. He said he has 'total confidence' in the administration. Who wants accountability? But many other Republican members of Congress including Trump's staunchest allies aren't satisfied. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he is for 'full transparency' and suggested the Justice Department should 'put everything out there and let the people decide it.' Other prominent far-right lawmakers like Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Anna Paulina Luna and Nancy Mace, among others, are also demanding those documents. Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina was among representatives who voted with Democrats to try to forced the Justice Department to release more information on the case. 'I think that the American people need to see what's in there, and that's not hard to understand. Across the board, government's supposed to work for us,' Norman told CNN. 'If there's nothing there, show the blank sheet.' After saying he was 'done' with Epstein, Charlie Kirk later said his full remarks were taken out of context, and he has pushed for the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony Far-right influencers Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Mike Cernovich, Matt Walsh, Jack Posobiec and Benny Johnson have also remained skeptical of the administration's narrative, and Johnson said on X that 'powerful MAGA voices' should be credited with pressuring the administration to change its approach. Laura Loomer has called on Bondi to resign, warning that her handling of the Epstein case threatens to 'consume' Trump's presidency. Who blames Trump? Elon Musk dropped a bomb in the middle of his feud with the president over a megabill moving through Congress, stating on X that Trump is 'in the Epstein files.' 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' he wrote last month. Last week, he posted 'What's the time? Oh look, it's no-one-has-been-arrested-o'clock again,' with a graphic that read 'The Official Jeffrey Epstein Pedophile Arrest Counter' with several zeroes underneath it. This week, he mocked Trump's claim that the case is a 'hoax.' 'Wow, amazing that Epstein 'killed himself' and Ghislaine is in federal prison for a hoax,' said Musk, referencing Epstein's associate Ghislane Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison after she was found guilty of child sex trafficking and other offences. 'He should just release the files and point out which part is the hoax,' Musk added. Other Trump loyalists have wondered why the president is risking his presidency on his resistance his supporters' demands. 'Why is 47 making the worst moves of his tenure in the last 9 years?' Alex Jones asked on X. Far-right commentator Wayne Allyn Root also pleaded with Trump on X to 'just release' the files. 'Best 6 months for any president in history. Everything he's doing is fantastic. Why risk it all on this stupid file?' he wrote. And who blames the 'deep state' — or Democrats? While prominent voices on the right are demanding more from the Justice Department, they have also suggested that they believe the Trump administration is not solely to blame, reviving long-brewing conspiracy theories that Democratic officials and rogue prosecutors have destroyed evidence or otherwise interfered with the Epstein investigation. Trump himself claimed the case was somehow 'made up' by President Barack Obama and former FBI director James Comey. Epstein was arrested in 2019 during Trump's first administration, and he was found dead that same year in his jail cell. That day, Trump shared a social media post claiming Bill Clinton was involved. 'I want a full investigation, and that's what I absolutely am demanding,' Trump told reporters at the time. 'Was it suicide? Was he killed?' he told Axios in 2020. Longtime Republican operative and Trump ally Roger Stone said Patel is 'telling us the truth' and believes former FBI director Christopher Wray and the Joe Biden-era Justice Department 'destroyed' evidence. Former White House adviser Steve Bannon has gestured to the wider conspiracy theory environment surrounding the Epstein case and its links to QAnon and an alleged 'deep state' threatening Trump's agenda. 'In that arc of looking at how the deep state has tried to stop Trump and the MAGA movement, you can easily fit in,' Bannon told a crowd at a Turning Point US conference this week. 'Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things,' he said. 'Not just individuals, but also institutions. Intelligence institutions, foreign governments, and who was working with him on our intelligence apparatus and in our government.'

Homeland security officials defend immigration court arrests after being sued
Homeland security officials defend immigration court arrests after being sued

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Homeland security officials defend immigration court arrests after being sued

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Thursday defended its policy of having Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers arrest people at their immigration court hearings after a class-action lawsuit was filed that seeks to stop the practice. The lawsuit filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the agency and ICE says the arrests of thousands of people at court have stripped them of rights afforded to them under immigration law and the U.S. Constitution. Tricia McLaughlin, Homeland Security assistant secretary for public affairs, told The Associated Press on Thursday that arresting people at immigration court is safer for law enforcement officers because the immigrants have gone through security and were screened for weapons. It also conserves law enforcement resources 'because they already know where a target will be," she said. 'We aren't some medieval kingdom, there are no legal sanctuaries where you can hide and avoid the consequences for breaking the law,' McLaughlin said in an email. 'Nothing in the constitution prohibits arresting a lawbreaker where you find them.' The large-scale immigration court arrests that began in May have unleashed fear among asylum-seekers and immigrants. In what has become a familiar scene, a judge will grant a government lawyer's request to dismiss deportation proceedings against an immigrant while ICE officers wait in the hallway to take them into custody. They're then moved to an expedited removal process. Keren Zwick, director of the National Immigrant Justice Center, one of the organizations that filed the lawsuit, said the immigrants who are being arrested at courts are following the law by appearing at their required hearings. Instead, they face detention for abiding by the rules. If a person fails to show up for their court hearing, the judge will issue an order for them to be removed in absentia. The lawsuit represents 12 people who have been arrested at court hearings, along with the Immigrant Advocates Response Collaborative and American Gateways, which provide legal services to people who face potential arrest and deportation when attending court. The immigrants, identified in the lawsuit by their initials, came to the U.S. from Venezuela, the Chechen Republic, Cuba, Ecuador, Liberia and the Republic of Guinea. Many faced persecution, political retaliation, or were kidnapped and assaulted. They had sought asylum through the legal process, but their requests were quashed when the government lawyer dismissed their case and they were placed on expeditated removal. Homeland Security officials say if a person has a credible fear claim, they can continue their immigration proceedings in detention, but if the claim is found uncredible, they'll be subject to swift deportation. Edna Yang, co-executive director of American Gateways, said the lawsuit seeks to challenge the unconstitutional practice of arresting these immigrants and defend their right to be heard in a court of law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store