Wrongly jailed Malkinson hails benefits rule change, but will continue fighting
A change laid in a statutory instrument in Parliament on July 1, and coming into force on July 22, means that those who receive such compensation payments can continue to claim benefits.
Mr Malkinson outside the Royal Courts of Justice in 2023 after his conviction was quashed (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
Mr Malkinson said: 'When I was stuck behind my cell door I would never have believed that my case would lead to so many reforms – but I am determined to tear down the system that failed me for so long and is failing so many others.
'I am intensely relieved that thanks to this change to the law, I will still have access to benefits even though the state is starting to compensate me for my wrongful conviction.
'My compensation fund is supposed to pay for the support I need to help me heal, not just day to day life, and that sort of support is expensive, especially as I will need it for so many years to come.
'And this reform will be in place for those who come after me as well.'
Mr Malkinson was left living on benefits and using food banks after his release, having to wait two years to get his first interim compensation payment.
The 59-year-old has already successfully campaigned to stop prison lodging costs being deducted from payouts, and has spoken out against a £1 million cap on the compensation payments, and rules under which payments are only awarded to people who can prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Ministry of Justice data showed that 6.5% of people who had applied for compensation due to a miscarriage of justice between April 2016 and March 2024 were awarded payouts. Of 591 people who applied, 39 were granted compensation.
Mr Malkinson said: 'I remain determined to challenge the completely unfair cap on compensation for the wrongfully convicted – and the ridiculous requirement that a person in my position be required to prove their innocence a second time to get compensated.'
His solicitor Toby Wilton urged the government to lift the £1 million cap that was set in 2008.
The issue again came to the fore in a separate case in May, that saw Peter Sullivan freed from jail after serving 38 years for a murder he did not commit.
Mr Wilton said while the benefits change 'ends a stark injustice', further reforms are needed.
'Miscarriage of justice victims like Andy Malkinson will no longer lose their benefits or social housing on account of having received compensation under the statutory miscarriage of justice compensation scheme.
'They are free to use their compensation payments to try to rebuild their lives.
'But while Andy and other future applicants will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief, the truth is that this change tinkers around the edges of a miscarriage of justice compensation scheme which is not fit for purpose.
'Currently, compensation can only be paid to the very few applicants who can prove their innocence beyond a reasonable doubt – effectively forcing them to prove a negative.
'On top of this, the scheme arbitrarily disadvantages people like Andy who have suffered the most serious miscarriages of justice by capping compensation at £1 million.
'This cap was set in 2008 and would be worth nearly £2 million today, but while the Government has the power to change this cap or remove it, it has so far refused to do this.
'It must act now.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
5 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Starmer and Trump to ‘refine' trade deal, says president
The US president told American reporters on Tuesday that the pair will have a meeting 'probably in Aberdeen' during his private visit to Scotland. A trade deal struck between the UK and the US earlier this year reduced tariffs on car and aerospace imports, but questions remain over whether steel imports into America will face 50% tariffs. There is a baseline tariff of 10% for most other imports. The pair previously met at the White House (Carl Court/PA) Mr Trump's July 9 deadline for when he said he would start implementing tariffs on trade partners has been and gone. Mr Trump said: 'We're going to be meeting with the British Prime Minister, very respectful, and we are going to have a meeting with him, probably in Aberdeen, and we're going to do a lot of different things. 'We're going to also refine the trade deal that we've made. So we'll be meeting mostly […] at probably one of my properties, or maybe not, depending on what happens, but we'll be in Aberdeen, in Scotland, meeting with the Prime Minister.' Ahead of his visit to the UK, Mr Trump described Britain as a 'great place' which is a 'true ally' of the US. Speaking about Sir Keir, he told the BBC: 'I really like the Prime Minister a lot, even though he's a liberal.' He also described Aberdeen as the 'oil capital' and said 'they should get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil'. The president's private visit comes ahead of a state visit that will follow between September 17 and 19. He will be hosted by the King and Queen at Windsor Castle and accompanied by his wife, Melania Trump. It will be Mr Trump's second state visit to the UK, having previously been hosted during his first term in 2019. Downing Street has previously said that Sir Keir's meeting with Mr Trump later this month 'will not be a formal bilateral'. There are also plans for Scottish First Minister John Swinney to meet with Mr Trump during his trip.
Glasgow Times
9 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Starmer and Trump to ‘refine' trade deal, says president
The US president told American reporters on Tuesday that the pair will have a meeting 'probably in Aberdeen' during his private visit to Scotland. A trade deal struck between the UK and the US earlier this year reduced tariffs on car and aerospace imports, but questions remain over whether steel imports into America will face 50% tariffs. There is a baseline tariff of 10% for most other imports. The pair previously met at the White House (Carl Court/PA) Mr Trump's July 9 deadline for when he said he would start implementing tariffs on trade partners has been and gone. Mr Trump said: 'We're going to be meeting with the British Prime Minister, very respectful, and we are going to have a meeting with him, probably in Aberdeen, and we're going to do a lot of different things. 'We're going to also refine the trade deal that we've made. So we'll be meeting mostly […] at probably one of my properties, or maybe not, depending on what happens, but we'll be in Aberdeen, in Scotland, meeting with the Prime Minister.' Ahead of his visit to the UK, Mr Trump described Britain as a 'great place' which is a 'true ally' of the US. Speaking about Sir Keir, he told the BBC: 'I really like the Prime Minister a lot, even though he's a liberal.' He also described Aberdeen as the 'oil capital' and said 'they should get rid of the windmills and bring back the oil'. The president's private visit comes ahead of a state visit that will follow between September 17 and 19. He will be hosted by the King and Queen at Windsor Castle and accompanied by his wife, Melania Trump. It will be Mr Trump's second state visit to the UK, having previously been hosted during his first term in 2019. Downing Street has previously said that Sir Keir's meeting with Mr Trump later this month 'will not be a formal bilateral'. There are also plans for Scottish First Minister John Swinney to meet with Mr Trump during his trip.
Daily Record
11 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Housebuilders' £100m pay-off branded 'dodgy' in Parliament
The firms have said the offer of voluntary commitments does not mean they admit any wrongdoing. An agreement by seven of the UK's biggest housebuilders to pay a record £100 million to help fund affordable new homes after an investigation into concerns they shared commercially sensitive information "definitely looks dodgy", Parliament has been told. Critics at Westminster suggested the developers made the offer to stop the investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) 'into potentially illegal collusion … that could have inflated house prices'. They argued the Government should insist on the watchdog completing its probe. Assurances were also sought that the housebuilders at the centre of the inquiry would not be involved in building the affordable homes funded by the payout, which would see the firms 'simply get their money back'. The CMA announced last week that Barratt Redrow, Bellway, Berkeley Group, Bloor Homes, Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey and Vistry had offered the payment as part of a package of commitments to address concerns following the investigation, which was launched last year. The settlement, which is set to go into affordable housing programmes across the UK, would be the largest ever secured by the CMA through commitments from firms under investigation. The CMA will now consult on the commitments until July 24 and, if accepted, it will mean the regulator does not need to rule on whether the companies broke competition law. As well as the payment, the housebuilders have agreed legally binding commitments not to share commercially sensitive information with rivals, such as the prices that houses were sold for, except in 'limited circumstances', the CMA said. They also agreed to work with the Home Builders Federation and Homes for Scotland to develop industry-wide guidance on information sharing. The firms have said the offer of voluntary commitments does not mean they admit any wrongdoing. Speaking in the House of Lords, housing minister Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said: 'The £100 million additional funding proposed for affordable housing will mean more families can benefit from a safe and secure home.' But Liberal Democrat Baroness Thornhill, a vice president of the Local Government Association, said: 'There could be an alternative version to this – major housebuilders pay £100 million to halt the CMA's investigation into potential illegal collusion through the sharing of competitively sensitive information that could have inflated house prices. 'While this settlement might appear a pragmatic, cost-effective solution, would it not be more useful to have some evidence-led answers about whether the business models of the major developers are a significant factor in the slow delivery of housing? 'Therefore, should not the Government insist that the CMA actually completes its investigation, rather than allowing a financial settlement that obscures the fact and definitely looks dodgy?' Responding, Lady Taylor said: 'The CMA is continuing its work on this, and on July 9 it announced that it is consulting on its intention to accept commitments offered by the housebuilders in relation to the investigation. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. 'That consultation closes on July 25, and I have already set out some of the commitments that the seven companies have made. 'The £100 million payment, the largest secured through commitments from companies under investigation, will be split between affordable housing programmes across all our four nations. 'I hope that will make a significant contribution to delivering the affordable housing we all want to see.' Tory former housing minister Lord Young of Cookham said: 'If the Competition and Markets Authority confirms this £100 million payment for anti-competitive activity, can the minister give an assurance that none of the affordable homes to be built with that money will be built by the volume housebuilders responsible for this activity? Otherwise, they'll simply get their money back.' Lady Taylor said: 'I am sure that the Competition and Markets Authority, as part of its consultation, will be looking at the best way of distributing that money, so it is not just recycled to the people who caused the problem in the first place.' Liberal Democrat Lord Rennard said: 'The one-off payment of £100 million towards affordable housing is only about 3% of the operating profit of the five biggest housebuilders this year. Is this a relatively small penalty for them to pay for anti-competitive practices over many years?' Lady Taylor said: 'This is the biggest settlement ever achieved by the CMA.' She added: 'We have to consider what is appropriate in these circumstances. I am sure the CMA has done that.' A CMA spokesperson said: 'Our year-long study of the housing market found that the complex and unpredictable planning system, together with the limitations of speculative private development, was responsible for the persistent under-delivery of new homes in the UK. 'It was also clear that concerns about sharing of confidential information, while important, were not the main driver of the undersupply of housing. 'The £100 million payment we have secured for affordable housing would provide immediate benefits across the UK, without a lengthy further investigation. 'It is in line with fines levied in similar cases that have taken many years to conclude and comes alongside a set of commitments which fully addresses our competition concerns.' Bellway, which has agreed to pay £13.5 million, said: 'Bellway's offer of commitments does not constitute an admission of any wrongdoing, and the CMA has made no determination as to the existence of any infringement of competition law. 'Bellway welcomes the CMA's consultation on the voluntary commitments and will continue to work constructively with the CMA throughout the process.'
