Clarity sought on Helen Botes' position at Johannesburg Property Company
Image: File
The status of controversial Johannesburg Property Company (JPC) chief executive Helen Botes in the entity has again been questioned after allegations emerged on Wednesday that she was back in her position.
Botes' return was disputed by the JPC, with its spokesperson, Lucky Sindane, stating that Musah Makhunga was the company's acting chief executive.
The JPC board has not responded at the time of publication.
Botes had been the City of Johannesburg's acting chief operations officer (COO) until several temporary appointments could not be extended last month, including that of acting city manager Tshepo Makola, who returned to his permanent position of COO.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
This was after Gauteng Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Richard Mamabolo seconded Kiba Kekana as acting city manager.
According to DA shadow City of Johannesburg economic development MMC Bongani Nkomo, Botes' contract as JPC boss expired in September last year.
He stated that the JPC board has reinstated her months after her contract expired, and without any legal or procedural basis to do so.
'This alleged reinstatement, if true, constitutes a blatant violation of the Municipal Systems Act (MSA) and will be an insult to the principles of transparent, lawful governance,' Nkomo said.
He also said this could signal yet another example of ANC-led cadre deployment and backroom dealing, which has long undermined service delivery and accountability in the city.
'Botes' contract as CEO of JPC expired in September 2024. Since then, she has inexplicably continued to occupy a space in the city's administration under the ambiguous title of COO, despite no clarity on her legal appointment status,' added Nkomo.
He said with Kekana's recent secondment as acting city manager and Makola's return to his role as COO, questions were now mounting over Botes' official position, if any.
Nkomo expressed concerns that the JPC board may have acted unilaterally to reinstate Botes to the position of JPC chief executive without following due legal processes, as no council resolution has been tabled or adopted to approve her reinstatement.
Additionally, there is no confirmation that a fixed-term contract or performance agreement has been submitted as required under Section 57 of the MSA, and no formal extension of acting capacity has been granted beyond the legally permitted six months, contrary to what is prescribed under Section 54A.
The DA is demanding confirmation of any formal council or board resolution passed on Botes' return to the JPC, proof of Mamabolo's concurrence for any acting extension beyond the statutory limit, and a clear and legal explanation of what position she currently holds within the municipality or JPC, and on what authority.
'If this alleged reinstatement occurred outside of the prescribed legal framework, it is null and void,' Nkomo warned.
It has also threatened to escalate the matter to the Section 79 oversight committee and refer it to Mamabolo for urgent investigation.
loyiso.sidimba@inl.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
Communications Minister Solly Malatsi defends BEE reform plan as over 19,000 public submissions pour in
CAPE TOWN - Communications Minister Solly Malatsi said they've received more than 19000 public submissions on his regulations aimed at easing certain Black Economic Empowerment requirements for multinationals like Starlink. Malatsi also repeated calls for the need for the policy directive on equity equivalence, instead of companies offering a 30% stake to local investors, a requirement Starlink owner Elon Musk has slammed as being racially bias. But the African National Congress (ANC) has accused Malatsi of failing to build on the ANC's transformation agenda from the previous administration in transforming the digital sector. READ: EFF says won't allow Starlink in SA, calls company a security threat MPs were debating the department's R7.8 billion budget tabled by Malatsi on Friday. Solly Malatsi has for months been trying to convince members of the communications and digital technologies oversight committee on the need for a new policy direction. He said his regulations on equity equivalence and easing bee regulations have created a lot of interest from the public despite questions around Starlink. "This provides clarity and certainty while ensuring that global companies meet transformation obligations through a variety of intervention including skills development, SMME support and shared infrastructure investment. We have received more than 19,000 submissions in the public consultation process." But the ANC's Shaik Subrathie said his party's assessment reflects the current administration's 'troubling departure' from a pro-poor digital agenda and favouring companies like Starlink. "The minister's approach to Starlink reveals the fundamental disregard for the principle of equality before the law."
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
NEASA and Sakeliga file urgent court bid to halt employment equity quotas
The National Employers Association of South Africa (NEASA) and Sakeliga have filed an urgent application in the Gauteng High Court In a joint statement issued to the media late on Thursday, the two groups argued that the quotas were introduced without proper consultation and failed to comply with legal and constitutional requirements. IOL previously reported that the government plans to introduce new employment equity targets under the amended Employment Equity Act (EEAA). These targets apply to 18 key sectors and require certain employers, particularly in senior roles, to align their workforce with the country's racial and gender demographics. The National Employers Association of South Africa (NEASA) and Sakeliga have filed an urgent application in the Gauteng High Court seeking to interdict the implementation of the Employment Equity sectoral quotas. "The Minister did not act in accordance with the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA), as she failed to adhere to the prescriptions of Section 15A of the EEA prior to the setting and publishing of the 2025 sectoral numerical quotas. This renders her actions unlawful and invalid". Earlier this year IOL also reported Minister of Employment and Labour, Nkosazana Meth, defended the sectoral quotas and criticised opposition to the reforms. She also accused the Democratic Alliance (DA), which has also launched a court challenge against the quotas, of seeking to maintain the status quo. "The DA's challenge seeks to disrupt efforts aimed at achieving equitable representation and maintaining the inherently unfair status quo. By opposing these amendments, the DA is actively sabotaging the transformation goals that have been pursued since the end of the apartheid era". NEASA and Sakeliga further argued that the quotas were 'irrational and arbitrary,' failing to consider the diverse circumstances across sectors, including differences in skills availability and regional demographics. The two groups also pointed out that the final quotas 'differ drastically' from earlier drafts published in 2023 and 2024 but were never republished for renewed public comment as required by law. "The quotas disregard South Africa's constitutional stipulations on non-racialism, equality before the law, and administrative justice". IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
NEASA and Sakeliga file urgent court bid to halt employment equity quotas
The National Employers Association of South Africa (NEASA) and Sakeliga have filed an urgent application in the Gauteng High Court In a joint statement issued to the media late on Thursday, the two groups argued that the quotas were introduced without proper consultation and failed to comply with legal and constitutional requirements. IOL previously reported that the government plans to introduce new employment equity targets under the amended Employment Equity Act (EEAA). These targets apply to 18 key sectors and require certain employers, particularly in senior roles, to align their workforce with the country's racial and gender demographics. The National Employers Association of South Africa (NEASA) and Sakeliga have filed an urgent application in the Gauteng High Court seeking to interdict the implementation of the Employment Equity sectoral quotas. "The Minister did not act in accordance with the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA), as she failed to adhere to the prescriptions of Section 15A of the EEA prior to the setting and publishing of the 2025 sectoral numerical quotas. This renders her actions unlawful and invalid". Earlier this year IOL also reported Minister of Employment and Labour, Nkosazana Meth, defended the sectoral quotas and criticised opposition to the reforms. She also accused the Democratic Alliance (DA), which has also launched a court challenge against the quotas, of seeking to maintain the status quo. "The DA's challenge seeks to disrupt efforts aimed at achieving equitable representation and maintaining the inherently unfair status quo. By opposing these amendments, the DA is actively sabotaging the transformation goals that have been pursued since the end of the apartheid era". NEASA and Sakeliga further argued that the quotas were 'irrational and arbitrary,' failing to consider the diverse circumstances across sectors, including differences in skills availability and regional demographics. The two groups also pointed out that the final quotas 'differ drastically' from earlier drafts published in 2023 and 2024 but were never republished for renewed public comment as required by law. "The quotas disregard South Africa's constitutional stipulations on non-racialism, equality before the law, and administrative justice". IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
