US plans AI chip curbs on Malaysia, Thailand over China concerns
Nvidia
Corp. to Malaysia and Thailand, part of an effort to crack down on suspected
semiconductor smuggling
into China.
A draft rule from the Commerce Department seeks to prevent China — to which the US has effectively banned sales of Nvidia's advanced AI processors — from obtaining those components through intermediaries in the two Southeast Asian nations, according to people familiar with the matter. The rule is not yet finalised and could still change, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations.
Officials plan to pair the Malaysia and Thailand controls with a formal rescission of global curbs from the so-called AI diffusion rule, the people said. That framework from the end of President Joe Biden's term drew objections from US allies and tech companies, including Nvidia. Washington would maintain semiconductor restrictions targeting China — imposed in 2022 and ramped up several times since — as well as more than 40 other countries covered by a 2023 measure, which Biden officials designed to address smuggling concerns and increase visibility into key markets.
All told, the regulation would mark the first formal step in Trump's promised overhaul of his predecessor's AI diffusion approach — after the Commerce Department said in May that it would supplant that Biden rule with its own 'bold, inclusive strategy.' But the draft measure is far from a comprehensive replacement, the people said. It doesn't answer, for example, questions about security conditions for the use of US chips in overseas data centres — a debate with particularly high stakes for the Middle East. It's unclear whether Trump officials may ultimately regulate AI chip shipments to a wider swath of countries, beyond the Malaysia and Thailand additions.
The Commerce Department didn't respond to a request for comment. The agency has offered few specifics about its regulatory vision beyond what Secretary Howard Lutnick told lawmakers last month: The US will 'allow our allies to buy AI chips, provided they're run by an approved American data center operator, and the cloud that touches that data center is an approved American operator,' he said during congressional testimony.
Nvidia, the dominant maker of AI chips, declined to comment, while spokespeople for the Thai and Malaysian governments didn't respond. Nvidia Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang has previously said there's 'no evidence' of AI chip diversion, in general remarks that didn't touch on any particular country. In response to earlier Bloomberg queries about curbs focused on smuggling risks, Thailand said it's awaiting details, while Malaysia's Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry said clear and consistent policies are essential for the tech sector.
Washington officials for years have debated which countries should be able to import American AI chips — and under what conditions. On one hand, the world wants Nvidia hardware, and US policymakers want the world to build AI systems using American technology — before China can offer a compelling alternative. On the other, once those semiconductors leave American and allied shores, US officials worry the chips could somehow make their way to China, or that Chinese AI companies could benefit from remote access to data centres outside the Asian country.
Southeast Asia is a key focus. Companies including Oracle Corp. are investing aggressively in data centres in Malaysia, and trade data shows that chip shipments there have surged in recent months. Under pressure from Washington, Malaysian officials have pledged to closely scrutinise those imports, but the Commerce Department's draft rule indicates the US still has concerns.
Semiconductor sales to Malaysia also are a focal point of a court case in neighbouring Singapore, where prosecutors have charged three men with defrauding customers about the ultimate destination of AI servers — originally shipped from the island nation to Malaysia — that may have contained advanced Nvidia chips. (Nvidia is not the subject of Singapore's investigation and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.)
The export curbs on Malaysia and Thailand would include several measures to ease pressure on companies with significant business operations there, people familiar with the matter said. One provision would allow firms headquartered in the US and a few dozen friendly nations to continue shipping AI chips to both countries, without seeking a license, for a few months after the rule is published, people familiar with the matter said.
The license requirements also would still include certain exemptions to prevent supply chain disruptions, the people said. Many semiconductor companies rely on Southeast Asian facilities for crucial manufacturing steps like packaging, the process of encasing chips for use in devices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
How America's economy is dodging disaster
Economic doom beckoned after President Donald Trump announced his 'Liberation Day" tariffs on April 2nd. Stocks crashed; forecasters predicted a recession within the year. Three months on, the mood is rather more relaxed. Prices in shops are not noticeably higher, unemployment is flat and the S&P 500 index is resurgent, back at all-time highs. Mr Trump's 90-day pause for many of his tariffs, announced a week after Liberation Day to calm markets, will end on July 9th. Although he has threatened to send letters declaring talks over and tariffs back on, nobody seems too worried. What gives? Was the president right in thinking that tariffs were a smart way to squeeze money from foreigners? Were the doommongers overdoing it? For the moment, businesses, households and financial markets are locked in an elaborate game of wait-and-see. Companies stocked up heavily early in the year in anticipation of tariffs. Indeed, they did so by enough to drag measured GDP growth into the red in the first quarter, as a surge of imports distorted the numbers. These stockpiles will be run down. In many cases, they are already being depleted, meaning that businesses are turning again to imports. Last month customs duties were more than three times as high as the average in recent years (see chart 1). Companies that bring in goods from abroad now face an unpalatable choice: either they can eat the tariffs and accept lower profits, or they can pass the additional costs on to consumers. So far, they have mostly chosen the first option. Bosses are attempting to wait out the president. Why alienate customers with higher prices if Mr Trump might change his mind and render the exercise pointless? Even in the latest consumer-price data, which still shows inflation a little above the Federal Reserve's target of 2%, it is difficult to spot a tariff impact. In fact, doing so requires an economic microscope. Zooming in on the prices of affected categories at a few large retailers, Alberto Cavallo of Harvard Business School and co-authors do discern some slight price rises in both imported goods and their domestically produced competitors (see chart 2). However, such prices have risen by only a percent or two—a far smaller increase than that seen in tariffs. America's effective tariff rate is now at 12%, according to calculations by the Tax Foundation, a think-tank, its highest in nearly a century. Reverting to Mr Trump's initial Liberation Day offering would mean a significant step up. Oddly, though, tariffs may be pushing down prices via another mechanism—by taking a toll on the economy. The Liberation Day drama crushed consumer confidence, possibly softening demand. Until recently, this has been evident only in 'soft" data (surveys and the like). Now signs of it are starting to appear in 'hard" data, too. A recent release showed that household spending fell month-to-month in May. Employment figures for June were strong, but bolstered by government hiring, especially of teachers. Those for the private sector were lower than expected. A running estimate of GDP, produced by the Fed's Atlanta branch, suggests that its core components (private investment and consumption) have fallen from an annualised growth rate of 2-3% at the start of the second quarter to 1% now (see chart 3). Goldman Sachs, a bank, has compared the latest data to previous 'event driven" shocks that led to recessions, and found that today's slowdown is roughly in line with the historical norm. Whether this is the start of something more serious depends, in large part, on how punchy the president feels on July 9th. Without a deadline extension or similar, and especially if Mr Trump doubles down on tariffs, a further slowdown seems likely. As Britain discovered after Brexit—the most recent case of a rich country imposing large trade barriers on itself—elevated uncertainty can by itself be sufficient to suppress business investment for quite some time. And America is now an extremely uncertain country (see chart 4). All the same, a worse slowdown does not necessarily mean a recession. Tariffs are colliding with an economy that is, by any historical or international standard, extraordinarily dynamic. It has been growing at a consistent 2-3% a year since 2022. As a consequence, America is one of the few rich countries that might be able to shoulder even a big hit to growth and still dodge recession. The additional stimulus in Mr Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill" is also front-loaded, meaning that it will provide a boost this year and next, which could help obscure the impact of tariffs (even if it also creates an inflationary mess for the Fed to handle). All of this suggests a future in which economists endlessly debate the true impact of the tariffs, while the American public barely notices them, despite having been left poorer. Not a triumph for Mr Trump—but not a disaster either.
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
Musk launches ‘America Party'
Washinton: Techbillionaire Elon Musk has launched a new political party to the surprise of many Americans and consternation of some.'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party, and you shall have it!' he posted on X on Saturday and declared the result of the 24-hour poll he had conducted on the social media platform he owns. The poll showed that 64 per cent of the respondents favoured the formation of a new political party. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. The way we are going to crack the uniparty system is by using a variant of how Epaminondas shattered the myth of Spartan invincibility at Leuctra: Extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield,' he explained in a subsequent post. Epaminondas was a Greek statesman and military strategist in the 4th Century BC credited with breaking the military dominance of Sparta and disrupting the balance of power among Greek states. Musk had threatened to form a new political party if President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' was passed by the Congress. He had also threatened that every single member of the Congress who voted for the Bill did not deserve winning another term. In the event, barring three Republican Senators in the US Senate and two Republican Members of the House of Representatives voted in favour of the Bill, while every Democratic Member in the two Houses voted against. The MAGA (Make America Great Again) supporters of President Donals Trump reacted to the announcement with disappointment, dismay and even anger, believing that a third party will cut into Republican votes, divide Trump supporters and allow the Democratic Party to win the next election. However, some Republicans seemed to believe that the third party will destroy the Democratic Party by attracting opponents of Trump into what will be essentially another conservative and 'rightist' party. The poll that Musk conducted on X, however, was immediately contested. Some even claimed to have asked the AI tool created for X, Grok, about the party affiliation of the respondents. The reply received from Grok was claimed to be the following: 'X doesn't track or reveal voter nationalities in polls, so the exact number is unknown. However, with Elon's global audience (over 200M followers) and X's user base being only 17 per cent American, it's likely a significant portion—possibly over half—of the voters are non-American)." Response from Republican Party supporters were varied. 'A big mistake. A third political party would be Perot 2.0 and guarantee electing Democrats to the Oval Office and Congress. We have seen this show before. If you want to curb government spending, devote resources to elect more Republicans because the solution is not more Democrats in office,' responded one of them. Ross Perot was a businessman and industrialist from Texas who ran for the US presidency as an independent candidate in 1992 and 1996, losing both times to Bill Clinton. Perot passed away in 2019. Others were angry at Musk's seeming betrayal of President Trump. 'You turned out to be a real Trojan horse. There is nothing in you but a thirst for power and profit. Even a thousand lifetimes would not be enough to spend what you have now. Why want more? In history books, you will be described as a Judas who backstabbed the sitting president,' posted another. Others vented their outrage by asking, 'Does anyone remember the Leftist surge in attacks on Elon Musk and vandalisation of Tesla? Many large MAGA accounts and millions of other Trump supporters strongly, vocally expressed their support of Musk and Tesla - often stating they would buy stock and buy vehicles in support of Elon. Is he really mocking us now?' Many more respondents appeared convinced that the venture would never take off. Musk responded to them by reposting a supporter who reminded people that sceptics who believed that Tesla, the electric car with a driverless model, would never succeed, that Musk could never start a space company, that SpaceX could never re-use a rocket, that SpaceX would never occupy Mars, that Musk cannot do politics or run a social media have already been proved wrong. Sixteen hours after Musk's announcement of the America Party, Donald Trump was yet to dignify it with his response, choosing to ignore it. The US President, soaking in his moment under the Sun after getting the Congressional approval for his 860-page 'Big and Beautiful Bill', can afford to ignore the blip—at least for the time being.
Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
Australian shares steady ahead of RBA rate decision, Trump tariff deadline
July 7 - Australian shares were little changed on Monday, with losses in miners and gold stocks offsetting gains in healthcare stocks, as caution prevailed ahead of the local central bank's policy this week and U.S. President Donald Trump's July 9 tariff deadline. The S&P/ASX 200 index was flat at 8,601.3 points as of 0042 GMT. The benchmark had ended Friday 0.1% higher at 8,603 points, a record close. The U.S. will notify about a dozen countries of higher tariff rates starting Monday, Trump said last week, with the higher rates scheduled to take effect on August 1. "Expect plenty more headlines this week, both positive and negative, as countries negotiate," analysts at ANZ said. Australia faces a 10% duty on all goods entering the United States, matching Washington's baseline tariff on imports even as U.S. exports to Australia are tariff-free. Meanwhile, all eyes are on the Reserve Bank of Australia , which will announce its cash rate decision on Tuesday. Markets are pricing in a 99.7% chance of a 25-basis-points cut. On the local bourse, gold stocks shed 1.5% after losing 3.1% earlier in the session. Northern Star Resources slipped nearly 6% after the miner said gold sales at its Kalgoorlie project were lower than its revised outlook. Evolution Mining fell 1.4%. Energy stocks declined 0.2% as oil tumbled. Woodside Energy lost 0.5%. Miners dropped 0.2%, tracking a fall in copper prices, while rate-sensitive financials were down 0.3%. Bucking the trend, healthcare stocks rose 0.8%, with heavyweight CSL adding 1.3%. New Zealand's benchmark S&P/NZX 50 index fell 0.1% to 12,759.70. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand is expected to keep interest rates unchanged on July 9, according to a Reuters poll. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
