&w=3840&q=100)
History Today: When Louise Brown's birth marked the dawn of IVF
The world's first 'test tube baby' Britain's Louise Brown, faces the media holding 13 week old twins Antonia and Henry Veary, as Professor Robert Edwards (L) looks on, during 25th anniversary celebrations of the revolutionary fertility treatment 'In Vitro Fertilisation' (IVF) at Bourne Hall in Cambridgeshire, UK, July 26, 2003. File Image/Reuters
As part of Firstpost's _History Today series,_ some of July 25's milestones come across science, politics and space exploration.
In 1978, Louise Joy Brown became the world's first baby born through in vitro fertilisation — a transformative moment that reshaped reproductive medicine.
In 2007, Pratibha Patil was sworn in as the first woman President of India.
On July 25, 1917, dancer-turned-spy Mata Hari was sentenced to death by a French military court.
And in 1984, Soviet cosmonaut Svetlana Savitskaya became the first woman to walk in space.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
World's first 'test tube' baby born
On July 25, 1978, at 11:47 pm in Oldham General Hospital, Lancashire, England, Louise Joy Brown was born weighing 5 pounds, 12 ounces.
Her birth was unlike any other in human history.
Louise was the world's first baby conceived through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) — an extraordinary scientific breakthrough that not only revolutionised reproductive medicine but also profoundly reshaped cultural and ethical debates surrounding human conception.
This moment marked the culmination of years of pioneering medical research, social controversy, and a fundamental leap in our understanding of fertility science.
The team responsible for this landmark achievement comprised three key figures:
Dr. Patrick Steptoe , a British obstetrician and gynecologist;
Dr. Robert Edwards , a physiologist and embryologist;
And Jean Purdy, a nurse and embryology technician who played a vital, often under-acknowledged role in the daily handling and observation of embryos.
Their collaboration began in the 1960s.
Edwards had long been investigating fertilisation outside the body in laboratory settings, while Steptoe had been developing techniques in laparoscopy, a key method for retrieving eggs from a woman's ovaries.
Purdy meticulously documented and managed embryonic development procedures.
Between 1969 and 1978, the trio worked tirelessly, often facing medical and ethical opposition from peers, the press and political figures.
Over 80 IVF attempts were made during this period without a successful full-term pregnancy.
They also struggled with funding, relying partially on private backers and working in relative isolation from the mainstream medical establishment.
Their persistence paid off in late 1977, when Lesley and John Brown, a working-class couple from Bristol who had been trying to conceive for nine years, agreed to undergo the then-experimental procedure.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Lesley Brown suffered from blocked fallopian tubes, making natural conception virtually impossible. After reading about Steptoe and Edwards in a magazine, the Browns decided to take a chance.
On November 10, 1977, doctors retrieved a single mature egg from Lesley's ovaries via laparoscopy.
This egg was fertilised with John Brown's sperm in a laboratory petri dish at the Bourn Hall Clinic in Cambridge, then incubated and monitored for proper cell division.
After 2.5 days of development, the embryo was transferred into Lesley's uterus.
There was cautious optimism. The embryo implanted successfully, and for nine months the Browns' pregnancy proceeded normally.
On the night of July 25, a caesarean section was performed due to delivery complications.
Louise Brown was born — healthy, breathing, and utterly ordinary in every respect except for the way she was conceived.
News of Louise's birth generated headlines around the world. Many hailed it as a triumph of modern medicine and human ingenuity.
Others, including religious authorities and some bioethicists, raised serious concerns about the moral implications of creating life outside the womb.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Catholic Church, in particular, voiced strong opposition, warning that IVF could lead to the commodification of human life, embryo destruction and a slippery slope toward eugenics.
Others questioned whether children born through IVF would be psychologically or physically different.
Louise Brown herself would later reflect that she grew up 'just like any other kid,' with no physical or psychological differences attributable to her method of conception.
Her birth gradually helped erode stigma and normalise IVF for millions of families around the globe.
Nevertheless, her arrival also brought forward larger ethical questions still debated today: What defines parenthood? Should there be limits to embryo manipulation? What about the fate of unused embryos? And who has access to these expensive treatments?
Despite the controversy, the success of Louise's birth opened the floodgates for further development in assisted reproductive technologies.
By the mid-1980s, IVF clinics were emerging across Europe, the United States and Australia.
In 1981, Elizabeth Carr became the first IVF baby born in the United States.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Other nations followed rapidly. Techniques improved dramatically: egg retrieval became more precise, embryo freezing more reliable, and implantation methods less invasive.
IVF no longer required natural ovulation cycles; hormonal stimulation could increase the number of retrievable eggs.
By the 1990s, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was introduced, allowing even severely infertile men to father children by injecting a single sperm directly into an egg.
The cumulative effect was seismic. In the decades following Louise Brown's birth, over 12 million babies have been born worldwide through IVF and related technologies, according to the International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART).
IVF has become standard practice for treating infertility, enabling same-sex couples and single parents to have biological children.
Countries like Israel and Denmark now fund fertility treatments through public health insurance.
In contrast, access remains limited or prohibitively expensive in many other parts of the world, including parts of Asia, Africa and Latin America.
Despite their groundbreaking work, recognition for the IVF pioneers came slowly. Edwards was eventually awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2010, just three years before his death.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The world's first 'test tube baby' Britain's Louise Brown (R) listens as Professor Robert Edwards (L) addresses the media during 25th anniversary celebrations of the revolutionary fertility treatment ' In Vitro Fertilization' ( IVF) at Bourne Hall in Cambridgeshire, UK, July 26, 2003. File Image/Reuters
Steptoe passed away in 1988, before Nobel rules allowed posthumous recognition.
Purdy's contributions were marginalised for decades; her name was initially omitted from official plaques and commendations.
In recent years, efforts have been made to restore her role in history.
A commemorative plaque unveiled in 2015 at Bourn Hall Clinic, now a major fertility centre, included her name alongside Edwards and Steptoe.
As for Louise Brown, she has embraced her place in history, living a private life in Bristol, working in administrative roles, and raising two children conceived naturally.
'I was just a baby,' she has often said in interviews.
'It's the doctors who should be remembered.'
The birth of Louise Brown on July 25, 1978, stands as a watershed moment not only in medical science but in human culture. It proved that conception was no longer bound solely by natural fertility.
For millions of individuals and couples who once faced hopelessness, IVF opened new doors — and new definitions of family.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Pratibha Patil becomes first woman president of India
On July 25, 2007, Pratibha Devisingh Patil was sworn in as India's 12th President, becoming the first woman to hold the office.
A seasoned lawyer and politician, she served as Governor of Rajasthan and as a member of both legislative houses. Her inauguration symbolised a historic milestone for Indian democracy and gender equity.
During her five-year tenure, Patil championed women's education, empowerment and rural development.
India's outgoing President Pratibha Patil waves to photographers at India's presidential palace Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi, July 25, 2012. File Image/Reuters
She was a vocal advocate for marginalised communities, promoting inclusive policies and grass-roots engagement across India.
Her election set the stage for broader female political leadership and remains a touchstone in India's journey toward gender equality.
Mata Hari sentenced to death
On July 25, 1917, Margaretha Geertruida Zelle, better known by her stage name Mata Hari, was sentenced to death by a French military court in Paris.
Accused of spying for Germany during World War I, she was convicted in under an hour on flimsy evidence.
Born in the Netherlands, Mata Hari reinvented herself as an exotic dancer in Paris, charming powerful men.
Despite accusations of betrayal and alleged links to German officers, many historians believe she was a scapegoat to channel blame for military setbacks.
Her sensational trial and execution on October 15, 1917, paired with a legacy steeped in myth and mystery, etched her name into cultural history.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
She endures as the archetype of the seductive spy — her story explored in books, films, and historical debate.
Svetlana Savitskaya walks in space
On July 25, 1984, aboard the Salyut 7 space station, Soviet cosmonaut Svetlana Yevgenyevna Savitskaya became the first woman to walk in space, spending approximately 3 hours and 35 minutes outside the station during the Soyuz T-12 mission.
Born in Moscow in 1948, Savitskaya was a celebrated aviator before joining the esteemed ranks of cosmonauts.
Yevgenyevna became the first woman to perform a space walk on July 25, 1984. Image/Russian Space
Already the second woman in space after Valentina Tereshkova, this mission marked a historic leap forward in gender representation in the space programme.
Her EVA featured scientific experiments such as metal cutting and welding, underscoring women's capability in demanding technical roles and paving the way for future female astronauts.
Her achievement remains a milestone in space exploration and women's empowerment in STEM.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Chinas Premier Li proposes global AI cooperation organisation
SHANGHAI (Reuters) -Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Saturday proposed establishing an organisation to foster global cooperation on artificial intelligence, calling on countries to coordinate on the development and security of the fast-evolving technology. Speaking at the opening of the annual World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, Li called AI a new engine for growth, but adding that governance is fragmented and emphasising the need for more coordination between countries to form a globally recognised framework for AI. The three-day event brings together industry leaders and policymakers at a time of escalating technological competition between China and the United States - the world's two largest economies - with AI emerging as a key battleground. "Currently, overall global AI governance is still fragmented. Countries have great differences particularly in terms of areas such as regulatory concepts, institutional rules," Li said. "We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus as soon as possible," he said. Washington has imposed export restrictions on advanced technology to China, including the most high-end AI chips made by companies such as Nvidia and chipmaking equipment, citing concerns that the technology could enhance China's military capabilities. Despite these restrictions, China has continued making AI breakthroughs that have drawn close scrutiny from U.S. officials. Li did not name the United States in his speech, but he warned that AI could become an "exclusive game" for a few countries and companies, and said challenges included an insufficient supply of AI chips and restrictions on talent exchange. China wanted to share its development experience and products with other countries, especially those in the Global South, Li said. WAIC is an annual government-sponsored event in Shanghai that typically attracts major industry players, government officials, researchers and investors. Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who has in past years regularly appeared at the opening ceremony both in-person and via video, did not speak this year. Besides forums, the conference also features exhibitions where companies demonstrate their latest innovations. This year, more than 800 companies are participating, showcasing more than 3,000 high-tech products, 40 large language models, 50 AI-powered devices and 60 intelligent robots, according to organizers. The exhibition features predominantly Chinese companies, including tech giants Huawei and Alibaba and startups such as humanoid robot maker Unitree. Western participants include Tesla, Alphabet and Amazon.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
6 hours ago
- First Post
Gaza: Hunger deaths rise to 122, UN food aid says a third of Gazans starving for days
Warnings of starvation in Gaza have intensified this week. Nine more people died of malnutrition on Friday, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry - bringing the total such deaths since the war began to 122 read more Displaced Palestinian mother Samah Matar holds her malnourished son Youssef, who suffers from cerebral palsy, at a school where they shelter amid a hunger crisis, in Gaza City. Reuters Gaza is facing its worst humanitarian crisis, with the UN's World Food Programme saying, 'Malnutrition is surging with 90,000 women and children in urgent need of treatment.' Warnings of starvation in Gaza have intensified this week. Nine more people died of malnutrition on Friday, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry - bringing the total such deaths since the war began to 122. France and the UK have called on Israel to 'immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid' into the territory. In a joint statement, the two countries said, 'Withholding essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD UN Chief Antonio Guterres said he could not 'explain the level of indifference and inaction we see by too many in the international community - the lack of compassion, the lack of truth, the lack of humanity'. Trump asks Israel to 'finish the job' Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has called on Israel to escalate its military conflict to 'finish the job' against Hamas, days after withdrawing his Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, and other negotiators from ceasefire talks. 'I think they want to die, and it's very, very bad. It got to be to a point where you're gonna have to finish the job,' Trump said, referring to Hamas, as he embarked on his four-day private visit to Scotland. The president's comments signal a shift in his tone from negotiation to war mongering as ceasefire talks failed earlier this week. 'They're gonna have to fight and they're gonna have to clean it up. You're gonna have to get rid of 'em,' Trump told Israel. Gaza truce talks Indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas for a ceasefire have reached an impasse, more than two weeks after they began. A Hamas official on Friday accused US envoy Steve Witkoff of reneging on Washington's positions and distorting reality after he announced the United States' withdrawal from Gaza truce talks and accused the group of blocking a deal. 'The negative statements of the US envoy Witkoff run completely counter to the context in which the last negotiations were held, and he is perfectly aware of this, but they come to serve the Israeli position,' said Hamas political bureau member Bassem Naim in an interview with AFP. With inputs from agencies STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


India.com
8 hours ago
- India.com
What will happen if a nuclear war breaks out? Chilling findings from study reveals...
While the world is still grappling with the threat of nuclear war, a new study has raised new alarm bells. The study indicated that even a small nuclear war could be a dangerous threat to humanity. It could lead to a breakdown of global supply chains and a loss of crops, resulting in famine in many parts of the world. A study led by researchers at Penn State University, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, emphasized that whether a nuclear war is regional or global, its impacts would be significant enough to plunge the planet into darkness and create catastrophic famine. According to a report from Firstpost, this study is especially important at a time of rising geopolitical instability and nuclear weapons taking on new prominence in global geopolitics. The study provides a detailed model for how a nuclear war could impact global agriculture. The study explores how the expulsion of soot from a nuclear war would block sunlight on Earth, disrupting various climatic systems, which would then produce disastrous effects for food production across the world. At the core of this study is the assumption that nuclear firestorms, in particular, those started in burning cities and industrial areas, would inject enormous concentrations of soot into the atmosphere. The soot would spread throughout the atmosphere globally. Thus, it will be a major blocking layer (essentially a dark haze) at the upper bounds of the troposphere, preventing any sunlight from penetrating the Earth's surface. Such a blocking layer could persist for a number of years. This will lead to dropping temperatures. changing weather patterns, and potentially eliminating food security for a vast portion of the world. In the event of a large nuclear conflict, such as one between Russia and the United States, the amount of light hitting Earth's surface could decrease so drastically that worldwide corn production would drop by as much as 80 percent, according to Firstpost. Such a colossal collapse in agricultural output would destroy food security for much of the planet, leading to famine and instability on a global level. To assess what the potential impacts might be, the team used a model called the Cycles agroecosystem model, a sophisticated simulation of agriculture developed at Penn State University. This model integrates climate-specific daily weather, soil chemistry, crop growth, and the movement of nitrogen and carbon to predict how crops would react to different combinations of climate and agricultural practices. For this study, the model was calibrated specifically for nuclear winter – with a diminished sunlight exposure, lower global temperature, and increased exposure to harmful UV-B radiation from ozone layer depletion. When would agriculture begin to recover—if at all? 'Using maize (Zea maize L.) as a sentinel crop, we found that annual maize production could decline from 7% after a small-scale regional nuclear war with 5 Tg soot injection, to 80% after a global nuclear war with 150 Tg soot injection, with recovery taking from 7 to 12 years. UV-B damage would peak 6–8 years post-war and can further decrease annual maize production by 7%. Over the recovery period, adaptive selection of maize maturity types to track changing temperatures could increase production by 10% compared to a no-adaptation strategy,' reads the statement in the abstract section of the study. The researchers applied the model to follow the effects over ten years, specifically to witness how maize (corn), being one of the world's most important staple food crops, would respond to the extreme and stressful conditions. The researchers analyzed six hypothetical nuclear war scenarios, and one of the more horrifying findings was that recovery of global food systems could take longer than a decade after the conflict. In essence, once a nuclear war happens, the fallout from it will last for decades. The unequivocal conclusion from the study is that a nuclear war would involve far more than military or political disaster. It would cause an ecological and humanitarian collapse. A nuclear war of any scale would create a famine across the world, with consequences that could adversely affect the future of mankind for centuries to come. Researchers analyzed six possible nuclear war scenarios corresponding to the amount of soot injected into the atmosphere. The soot injections ranged from 5 teragrams (Tg) representing a regional conflict between India and Pakistan, to a full-scale nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia with soot injections of 150–165 Tg. What happens to crops if sunlight disappears? The differences are stark: the global war scenario would inject 30 to 33 times more soot than the regional one with far worse global cooling, extreme reductions in sunlight, and widespread crop failures of historic proportions. What is nuclear winter, and why is it dangerous? Probably the most astonishing aspect is how long the effects of nuclear winter would last. It is also important to note that it is not a normal incident or a transitory natural disaster in which agriculture might recover quickly. Recovery after a nuclear war will take almost a decade or longer to go back to productive agricultural conditions. The destruction occurs from the first years and after, and indeed there is still considerable and persistent damage at year 12. As such, food systems would not have time to stabilize or recover during this 'prolonged onslaught of destruction. This study shows that adaptation strategies like dynamic tailoring of maize maturity types can improve food production by 10% over a 13 year recovery period compared with static approaches under a global nuclear war scenario,' reads the statement in the conclusion section of the study.