Trump's proposed 100% foreign movie tariff 'misguided'
This time he is targeting the film and production industry. He announced a 100% tariff on foreign-made movies.
Trump says the tariffs are a drastic attempt to boost the US movie industry.
While this proposal has been stalled, it has ruffled the feathers of many film producers outside of the US.
Holocene Films CEO Weaam Williams says the plan could hurt South Africa's film industry, especially those companies that work with the US and which facilitate Hollywood production.
The proposal could also prove detrimental to those who distribute films to the US.
It's not yet clear how the tax would be implemented, and Williams says creatives have many un-answered questions.
'Trump's plans are very unclear, whether it implies to foreign films distributed inside the US or co-productions between the US and other countries,' she says.
Jack Devnarain, an actor and chairperson of the SA Guild of Actors, says the proposal is misguided and lacks forethought.
Brendan Smialowski / AFP
According to statistics from the Film Industry Visa Assistance programme and the Commercial Producers Association of South Africa (CPASA), the local film industry attracted R2.52 billion in foreign investment through international productions between November 2023 and June 2024.
During this time, foreign film crews booked over 59,000 hotel bed nights, generating R148 million for the hospitality sector.
Additional spending on transportation, dining and recreational activities further underscore the pivotal role of film production in bolstering business tourism.
The CPASA says the film industry has created 26,573 jobs for local freelance crew members and performers. The sector also supports small businesses, including catering and equipment rental services, extending its economic impact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
42 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump settlement triggers 'widespread distress' at CBS News
Paramount Global's settlement of the 60 Minutes lawsuit filed by US President Donald Trump provoked condemnation on Wednesday from CBS News current and former employees, press freedom advocates and legislators. Paramount's agreement to pay $16m (R280m) to resolve a civil suit over what Trump alleged was the network's deceptive editing of an interview with presidential candidate Kamala Harris sets a dangerous precedent that threatens the free press, journalism advocates warned. One 60 Minutes employee who spoke with Reuters said that during a call on Wednesday, newsroom staff expressed 'widespread distress' about the settlement and concerns about the future of the CBS News prime time news magazine and its hard-hitting brand of journalism. The staffer, who requested anonymity to speak publicly about his employer, said while CBS News avoided the worst outcome in its settlement with Trump — an apology — the agreement nonetheless sets a 'horrible precedent' in agreeing to make public transcripts of future interviews with presidential candidates. The settlement follows ABC News's decision in December to pay $15m (R262.7m) to settle a defamation lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos's on-air description of the president's conduct in the E. Jean Carroll case. 'With two major network owners bowing to the president in quick succession, the danger is clear: emboldened politicians and powerful actors will feel more free than ever to weaponise lawsuits and bring regulatory pressure to bear to silence and censor independent journalism,' said Tim Richardson, journalism and disinformation programme director at free-speech advocate PEN America. On Wednesday, US Senator Elizabeth Warren called for an investigation into the settlement, which will be paid to a fund supporting Trump's future presidential library, and said she will soon introduce legislation to 'rein in corruption through presidential library donations'.
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Thursday, 3 July 2025
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Thursday, 3 July 2025. The New York Times front page reported that the bill will test the strength of Trump's grip on his party. The Wall Street Journal front page reported that Republican infighting is delaying the bill. The Jerusalem Post's front page reported that the IDF's 504th Intelligence Unit busted an Iranian terror cell in Syria. China Daily's front page reported that consumption is set to continue its robust growth. The Daily Mail's front page reported on what or who caused the tears that sparked turmoil in the markets. The Guardian's front page reported tears and turmoil as the PM was forced to defend Reeves following the welfare fiasco. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Trump tax bill stalled by Republican rebellion in Congress
WASHINGTON - Donald Trump's signature tax and spending bill was in limbo early Thursday as Republican leaders in the US Congress scrambled to win over a group of rebels threatening to torpedo the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda. Trump is seeking final approval in the House of Representatives for his Senate-passed "One Big Beautiful Bill" -- but faces opposition on all sides of his fractious party over provisions set to balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net. As midnight (0400 GMT) struck, House Speaker Mike Johnson was still holding open a key procedural vote -- the bill's last hurdle before it can advance to be considered for final approval -- more than two hours after it was first called. With no clear sign of the stalemate breaking, his lieutenants huddled in tense meetings behind the scenes with the rebels who had either voted no or had yet to come to the House floor. "We're going to get there tonight. We're working on it and very, very positive about our progress," Johnson told reporters at the Capitol, according to Politico. Originally approved by the House in May, Trump's sprawling legislation squeezed through the Senate on Tuesday by a solitary vote but had to return to the lower chamber Wednesday for a rubber stamp of the Senate's revisions. The package honors many of Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing $4.5 trillion to extend his first-term tax relief. But it is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance program since its 1960s launch. While moderates in the House are anxious that the cuts will damage their prospects of reelection, fiscal hawks are chafing over savings that they say fall short of what they were promised by hundreds of billions of dollars. Johnson has to negotiate incredibly tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers among more than two dozen who have declared themselves open to rejecting Trump's bill. 'ABOMINATION' Republican leaders had been hoping to spend just a few hours on Wednesday afternoon green-lighting the package, although they have a cushion of two days before Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline. The 887-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed text further to the right. Republicans lost one conservative who was angry about adding to the country's $37 trillion debt burden and two moderates worried about almost $1 trillion in health care cuts. Some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their health insurance at 17 million, while scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Legislation in the House has to go through multiple "test" votes before it can come up for final approval, and a majority must wave it through at each of these stages. There were warning signs early in the day as the package stumbled at one of the first steps, with a straightforward vote that ought to have taken minutes remaining open for seven hours and 31 minutes -- making it the longest House vote in history. Johnson had made clear that he was banking on Trump leaning on waverers, as he has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure. The president has spent weeks cajoling Republicans torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath. Trump pressured House Republicans to get the bill over the line in a private White House meeting with several holdouts on Wednesday. "What are the Republicans waiting for?," he posted on his Truth Social platform just after midnight. "What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!" House Democrats have signaled that they plan to campaign on the bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to analyses showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest. "Shame on Senate Republicans for passing this disgusting abomination," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters.
