logo
Immigration rights groups, ACLU lawsuit alleges Alligator Alcatraz preventing detainees from having attorney access

Immigration rights groups, ACLU lawsuit alleges Alligator Alcatraz preventing detainees from having attorney access

CBS News17-07-2025
A class-action lawsuit filed Wednesday alleges that people held at the immigrant-detention center dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz" are being prevented from having access to lawyers and "effectively have no way to contest their detention."
"No protocols exist at this facility for providing standard means of confidential attorney-client communication, such as in-person attorney visitation and phone or video calls that are available at any other detention facility, jail or prison," the lawsuit, filed in the federal Southern District of Florida, said. "The only way that detained people can communicate with the outside world is via infrequent access to collect pay phone calls that are monitored and recorded, and last approximately five minutes."
The lawsuit also alleges that lawyers have been barred from entering the facility in the Everglades and that officials have "made it virtually impossible for detainees, or their counsel, to file documents required to contest their detention with the immigration court."
"No instruction exists as to which immigration courts have been designated for submission of motions for bond redetermination for people detained at Alligator Alcatraz," the lawsuit, filed by attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Immigrant Justice, said. "As a result, detainees held at Alligator Alcatraz effectively have no way to contest their detention."
The ACLU announced the lawsuit Wednesday evening.
The lawsuit names as plaintiffs four men who are detained at the facility, three law firms, a legal services organization and an attorney. It names as defendants federal and state officials and agencies, including U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Gov. Ron DeSantis.
The lawsuit, which alleges First Amendment and due-process violations, was the latest move in the controversy over the detention facility that the state built in recent weeks at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, a remote site used for flight training and surrounded by the Everglades and the Big Cypress National Preserve.
DeSantis and other state and federal officials have touted the facility as helping carry out President Donald Trump's mass deportation efforts for people who are in the country illegally. The project has drawn national attention, with the state Republican Party even selling Alligator Alcatraz merchandise.
But opponents have blasted conditions at the facility and argued it will harm the Everglades and the national preserve. Environmental groups last month filed a separate lawsuit that alleges violations of the National Environmental Policy Act, a federal law that requires evaluating potential environmental impacts before such a project can move forward.
State officials have said the federal government will reimburse Florida for costs related to the Everglades facility. They also announced last month plans to build a second detention facility at North Florida's Camp Blanding, a training site for the Florida National Guard.
DeSantis indicated Wednesday that plans for the Camp Blanding facility would move forward "once there's a demand" for bed space and more detainees are housed at the Everglades site.
"Once there's a demand, then we would be able to go for Camp Blanding. But what I don't want to do is set up Blanding if one is 60 percent full and then the other is 40 percent. I'd rather just channel everyone to Alligator (Alcatraz), since it's easier," DeSantis told reporters at an event in Tampa.
DeSantis said the Everglades facility can "easily" house 3,000 to 4,000 detainees.
"We have not … received that many illegal aliens there yet, but it has grown pretty quickly," the governor said.
Camp Blanding could house fewer detainees and become active "in a week or two," if needed, according to DeSantis.
"I don't want to be creating some structure that can hold 2,000 illegals and then we end up having, like,150 there after a week. And I don't think that's the trend," he said.
DeSantis administration officials did not respond Wednesday to a request for information about the number of detainees being held at the South Florida center.
Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity on June 27 filed the lawsuit about potential environmental impacts. The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida this week filed a motion seeking to join the case.
DeSantis has disputed that the facility threatens the environment, pointing, in part, to the decades-old airport at the site.
Also on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Jose Martinez recused himself from the environmental groups' lawsuit, which was reassigned to U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams. As is typical in such instances, Martinez did not give a reason for stepping aside.
Williams recently drew headlines when she held Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier in civil contempt in a lawsuit stemming from a law passed during a February special legislative session that created state crimes for undocumented immigrants who enter or re-enter Florida.
Williams in April blocked enforcement of the law, ruling that it likely was preempted by federal immigration-enforcement authority. The contempt ruling stemmed from a letter the Uthmeier sent to law enforcement agencies after she blocked the law.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Orthodox Synagogue in Orlando, FL Sues for Religious Discrimination
Orthodox Synagogue in Orlando, FL Sues for Religious Discrimination

Business Upturn

time30 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Orthodox Synagogue in Orlando, FL Sues for Religious Discrimination

Orlando, FL, July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Orlando Torah Center (OTC), an Orthodox synagogue in Orlando's Sand Lake Hills neighborhood, filed a federal lawsuit today against Orange County and its Board of County Commissioners after they unfairly denied the synagogue's application to expand. According to OTC's counsel, this case is about ensuring that minority faith institutions are not held to a different standard and that religious freedom is fully protected under the law. The Orlando Torah Center's lawsuit seeks to defend its rights under the First Amendment, the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), and Florida's Religious Freedom Restoration Act. 'Religious freedom is not optional; it is a constitutional guarantee,' said counsel Roman Storzer of Storzer and Associates, a leader in First Amendment and RLUIPA law. 'OTC has every legal and moral right to exist, expand, and serve its community without undue burden or discrimination.' The Orlando Torah Center, located along South Apopka Vineland Road in an area locally known as 'Church Row' for its concentration of more than a dozen churches, has served a walkable congregation since 2015. While numerous churches, a public school, and a daycare center have all received similar zoning approvals in similar zoning districts, OTC's request to expand for its religious use faced intense public opposition, including antisemitic remarks during public hearings, and was ultimately denied by the Board of County Commissioners on July 1, 2025, according to the legal complaint. 'Individuals of all faiths have a right to worship without outside interference,' said Mr. Storzer. 'OTC members have been part of their neighborhood for more than a decade. They have operated peacefully and built lasting relationships with families of all faiths. Disappointedly, they were denied the same rights routinely granted to others.' OTC seeks to expand its facility to accommodate increased attendance, children's programs, and enhanced safety measures—especially important given the rise in antisemitic attacks targeting Jewish institutions across the country. According to the lawsuit, OTC members face severe hardship due to lack of space, including families having to participate in religious activities outdoors in the Florida heat, children being unable to attend holiday programs, and attendees being exposed to safety risks due to the inability to secure the building. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Case No. 6:25-cv-014. To read the full complaint, please click here. For media inquiries, please contact [email protected]. About Orlando Torah Center Founded in 2011, the Orlando Torah Center (OTC) is an Orthodox synagogue committed to fostering a vibrant, welcoming community rooted in Torah learning, prayer, and acts of kindness. Serving a diverse and growing congregation, OTC offers educational programs, youth activities, and spiritual guidance for individuals and families at every stage of observance. As part of Orlando's thriving Torah infrastructure, OTC plays a central role in supporting Jewish life and continuity in the region. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash

Miami Can't Delay Mayoral Election Until 2026, Court Rules
Miami Can't Delay Mayoral Election Until 2026, Court Rules

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Miami Can't Delay Mayoral Election Until 2026, Court Rules

A Florida state appeals court upheld a previous ruling that the election to pick the next mayor of Miami must take place in November after a city commission tried to delay it by a year. The back-and-forth began last month when the five-person commission voted 3-to-2 to push the vote to Nov. 2026 to coincide with mid-term elections, arguing that it would cut costs and increase turnout. That decision drew the ire of Governor Ron DeSantis and a host of candidates who were preparing for the race.

The head of the FCC is now the (second) most dangerous man in America
The head of the FCC is now the (second) most dangerous man in America

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The head of the FCC is now the (second) most dangerous man in America

So much has been written and said about Paramount's settlement of a $20 billion lawsuit Donald Trump filed against "60 Minutes." I know this because I feel like I've written and said about half of it, and read whatever's left. You can break the whole ridiculous thing down to three words that start with C: coercion, capitulation and cowardice. You might as well throw in Colbert while you're at it. CBS announces the biggest coincidence a couple of weeks after the $16 million settlement: It was canceling "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," citing "purely financial" reasons. Maybe they just discovered those reasons all of a sudden, and the decision had nothing to do with Colbert being a frequent and vicious critic of Trump. It's all terrible, a real warning sign that Trump is trying to control not just the flow of information, but the information itself ― what actually gets covered. (Only things that put him in a positive light, naturally.) It's tinpot strongman stuff and if it doesn't scare you, it should. Does the head of the FCC believe in free speech? Does Trump? We know this. But what's really scary is what Brendan Carr, Trump's handpicked human rubber stamp of a Federal Communications Commission chairman, has been going around saying after the settlement. It's really ominous, at least if you believe free speech is a pillar of democracy. Which I do. Does Carr? You wouldn't know it by what he's been telling people after the FCC approved a merger between Paramount and Skydance, a media company. "Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly. It is time for a change," Carr said in a statement after the approval. "That is why I welcome Skydance's commitment to make significant changes at the once storied CBS broadcast network. In particular, Skydance has made written commitments to ensure that the new company's programming embodies a diversity of viewpoints from across the political and ideological spectrum." At least Anna Gomez is fighting back The problem is that Carr's idea, which, let's face it, is really Trump's idea, of what accurate and fair means is whatever is positive about Trump and negative about his perceived enemies. That's what is at the heart of the ridiculous lawsuit, which accused "60 Minutes" of editing one of Kamala Harris' answers in an interview before the election, a practice that is routine. Why settle? Because Paramount wanted the FCC approval. It's disturbing, but hardly unexpected. And Anna Gomez, the lone Democrat on the FCC board, certainly didn't back down. "Even more alarming, (the FCC) is now imposing never-before-seen controls over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment, in direct violation of the First Amendment and the law,' Gomez said in a statement after the approval. Maybe she's exaggerating? Maybe not. Skydance CEO David Ellison pledged to eliminate DEI programming, whatever that is ― I can guess who gets to decide ― and to create an ombudsman to handle complaints of bias. I wonder if the White House will have a direct line to make them? Or will CBS be so hobbled by fear it won't need one? It doesn't end there. On a recent appearance on Fox News ― everybody wants to party with their friends ― Bill Hemmer asked Carr if "The View," the liberal-leaning talk show on ABC, was "in the crosshairs of this administration." Now, in normal times, if you can remember those, this is the kind of question that would get a quick, "Of course not, we don't target anyone specifically, we just follow the FCC practice of responding to complaints." Nope. "Look, it's entirely possible that there's issues over there," Carr said. "And stepping back, this broader dynamic, once President Trump has exposed these media gatekeepers and smashed this facade, there's a lot of consequences. I think the consequences of that aren't quite finished." What is all this "exposed" and "smashed" garbage? What Trump has done is bully news operations into submission. It's not brave. It's not useful. It's scary. Of course there's more. Whining about accurate coverage isn't courage. It's sick "If you step back, what's happening here is, you know, I think President Trump is fundamentally reshaping the media landscape," Carr said in an interview on CNBC's "Squawk Box On the Street." And the way he's doing that is when he ran for election, he ran directly at these legacy broadcast media outlets, ABC, NBC, CBS." Yes, by whining about their accurate coverage to a base of supporters only too eager to hear it. "For years, you know, government officials just allowed those entities with execs sitting in Hollywood, in New York, to dictate the political narrative," Carr said. "And he has fundamentally changed the game. And you see that really having consequences that are just rushing all through the media." Yes, we do. And it is chilling. In what possible way does this constitute free speech? How does shaping the narrative to bolster your own interests and suppress those you disagree with fit that definition in any way? At that point it's propaganda. At any other time Brendan Carr would be the most dangerous person in America. Given the circumstances, however, he'll have to settle for second place. 'South Park' excoriated Trump: The White House comeback is just sad Reach Goodykoontz at Facebook: Media commentary with a side of snark? Sign up for The Watchlist newsletter with Bill Goodykoontz. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: How the head of the FCC is selling out free speech | Opinion

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store