
Saudi Aramco, IEA Chiefs Clash In Houston Over The Future Of Oil
The IEA maintained that even with peak demand, ongoing investments in oil and gas will be necessary due to natural field declines.
Aramco's ambitious plans to scale blue hydrogen and ammonia face high costs and weak market demand, particularly in Europe and Asia.
With the CERAWeek 2025 conference in Houston drawing to a close, C-Suite executives, ministers and top officials have weighed in on the trajectory of the global oil and gas sector with experts debating whether tariffs, trade, and competition will replace security, affordability, and sustainability in shaping energy markets and policy. However, one of the biggest highlights of the conference has been the showdown between Saudi Aramco's CEO Amin Nasser and IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol and their highly divergent views on the future of the global oil industry. Once again, the Aramco CEO was adamant that there were 'inherent flaws' in the energy transition away from conventional fuels, saying, ' So I pay little attention to forecasts claiming that next year will be peak this, or peak that ,' in a thinly-veiled dig at the IEA which has predicted a peak in oil demand by the end of the current decade.
In its defense, the IEA says an oil demand peak doesn't necessarily mean a rapid plunge in fossil fuel consumption is imminent, adding that it will probably be followed by ' an undulating plateau lasting for many years .' Indeed, Fatih Birol reiterated that position in his remarks to the Houston conference, where he said investments in existing oil and gas fields are still needed to counter steep natural declines. Whereas some analysts interpreted this as an about-face, designed to pander to Trump and his 'drill baby drill' agenda, in reality the IEA has never advocated for an end to investments in upstream oil and gas.
' Even as demand for fossil fuels falls, energy security challenges will remain since the process of adjustment to changing demand patterns will not necessarily be easy or smooth. For example, the peaks in demand we see based on today's policies do not remove the need for investment in oil and gas supply, given how steep the natural declines from existing fields often are ,' the IEA stated in its 2023 World Energy Outlook.
Republican lawmakers have threatened to reassess funding for the IEA, accusing it of becoming an 'energy transition cheerleader.'
With the global energy transition picking up steam, hundreds of companies have laid out plans to cut their greenhouse gas emissions with the more ambitious ones pledging to achieve net zero emissions. Given this backdrop, Big Oil companies are finding themselves in a dilemma whereby they are under pressure to join the fight against climate change at a time when demand for the energy commodities they produce remains high. Not surprisingly, many are coming up with innovative ways to clean up their act without giving up their legacy businesses.
Saudi Aramco is not any different. The world's biggest oil and gas company has unveiled plans to reach net-zero by 2050 without sacrificing oil and gas production.
During a rare two-day visit by Fortune last May, the world's largest fossil fuel company lifted the curtain on dozens of research projects underway at its headquarters in Dhahran, in eastern Saudi Arabia, which the company believes will help it tackle climate change, even while pumping a mammoth 9 million barrels or so of oil a day. Aramco claims its tech breakthroughs have the potential to cut carbon emissions from each barrel of oil it produces by 15% by 2035, equivalent to 51.1 million tons of carbon a year.
' We don't see any contradiction. Combating emissions from these conventional energy sources is a very viable option ,' says Ashraf Al-Ghazzawi, Aramco's executive vice president for strategy and corporate development.
' We need all sources of energy to meet the growth in demand, which is just tremendous in the developing world. The main pillar of our strategy and technology is efficiency and optimization of our existing production ,' he told Fortune.
According to Khowaiter, the company has tripled its research-and-development staff since 2010, and listed 1,033 patents with the U.S. patent office. Aramco now spends about $800 million a year on R&D, 60% of which is focused on 'sustainability'.
Carbon capture is one of the technologies Aramco has adopted to cut emissions.
At its Hawiyah gas plant, the company captures carbon emitted during oil and gas production; transports it 50 miles away then injects it into an oil well to boost the recovery of crude, as well as to store the carbon. Khowaiter revealed that the company aims to cut the cost of carbon capture by 50%, making it commercially viable. In December, Saudi Aramco signed a shareholders' agreement with Linde Plc (NYSE:LIN) and Schlumberger Limited (NYSE:SLB) for dthe evelopment of a 9mn t/y CCS hub at Jubail. Under the agreement, Aramco will hold 60%, with Linde and SLB each taking 20%. The 9mn t/y first-phase facility is due online by end-2027.
Aramco also aims to produce 11 million tonnes of blue ammonia from its Jafurah natural gas field by 2030. For over a decade, the company has explored potential technologies to produce lower-carbon hydrogen from hydrocarbons, including Thermo-Neutral Reforming (TNR) with a goal to produce 'blue' hydrogen from about two million tonnes of blue hydrogen–by capturing the CO2 emissions from the production. However, Aramco is likely to struggle to find a buyer for its blue ammonia, with CEO Amin Nasser revealing its blue hydrogen costs the equivalent of about $250 a barrel of oil– three times higher than the current Brent spot price.
' It is very difficult to identify any off-take agreement in Europe [for blue hydrogen]… and they explained it's because of the high cost. Even the customers in Japan and Korea [which are planning massive H 2 economies] are waiting for government incentives. Until they get these incentives, it'll be costly for them to pursue that blue hydrogen, ' Nasser told a call with analysts.
Figuring out which among the multiple lines of R&D will finally work could take years for Aramco to determine, with time not on its side. Still, the company has rejected any notion that it should cut fossil fuel output, ' We were never an either-or company. Aramco provides a great example where emissions can be dealt with, it can be managed, ' Ghazzawi, Aramco's strategy chief, has declared.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Tribune
8 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Trump hails new ‘Alligator Alcatraz' migrant detention center
TDT | Ochopee Trump hails new 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant detention center Ochopee, United States US President Donald Trump reveled in a new Florida migrant detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' Tuesday, joking that any escapees would be taught to run away from the reptiles to avoid being eaten. Critics of Trump's harsh immigration crackdown have called the site in the Everglades swamp inhumane, but the Republican embraced the controversy as he attended its official opening. 'A lot of cops in the form of alligators -- you don't have to pay them so much,' Trump told reporters in Ochopee, Florida. 'I wouldn't want to run through the Everglades for long. It will keep people where they're supposed to be.' The Florida detention center is part of the Trump administration's tough optics for its crackdown on undocumented migrants since the 78-year-old returned to power in January. The site on an abandoned airfield in the Everglades conservation area will cost an estimated $450 million and house 1,000 people, Florida authorities say. Florida's Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, who greeted Trump on the tarmac, said 'we want to cut through bureaucracy... to get the removal of these illegals done.' 'Run away' Trump, who has cracked down on undocumented migrants since returning to power, riffed on the idea of people running away from Florida wildlife as he left the White House earlier. 'I guess that's the concept,' Trump told reporters when asked if the idea behind the detention center was that people who escaped from it would get eaten by alligators or snakes. 'This is not a nice business. Snakes are fast, but alligators... we're going to teach them how to run away from an alligator, okay? 'If they escape prison, how to run away. Don't run in a straight line. Run like this. And you know what? Your chances go up about one percent.' But Trump later embarked on one of his dark diatribes about immigration in a news conference at the site, describing an influx of undocumented migrants under Democratic predecessor Joe Biden as 'disgusting' and falsely conflating most migrants with 'sadistic' criminal gangs. The name 'Alligator Alcatraz' is a reference to Alcatraz Island, the former prison in San Franciso that Trump recently said he wanted to reopen. That plan has apparently stalled after officials said it would cost too much and be too impractical to reopen the prison surrounded by shark-infested waters. As it seeks to look tough on migration, the Trump administration is also sending some undocumented migrants to the former 'War on Terror' prison at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.


Daily Tribune
8 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
US Senate approves divisive Trump spending bill
AFP | Washington The Republican-led US Senate approved President Donald Trump's mammoth domestic policy bill yesterday by the narrowest of margins, despite misgivings over delivering deep welfare cuts and another $3 trillion in national debt. Republican leaders had struggled to corral support during a record 24-hour 'vote-a-rama' amendment session on the Senate floor, as Democrats offered dozens of challenges to the most divisive aspects of the package. Senate Majority Leader John Thune was able to turn around two moderates considering siding with Democrats, to deliver a 50-50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie. The sprawling text now heads to the House of Representatives, where it faces unified Democratic opposition and multiple Republicans balking at slashed health care and food aid programs for poor Americans. Trump's bill proposes a $4.5 trillion extension of his first term tax cuts, contentiously offset with $1.2 trillion in savings mainly targeting the Medicaid health insurance program that will strip coverage from an estimated 12 million low-income and disabled Americans. It also rolls back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits while providing a $350 billion infusion for border security and Trump's mass migrant deportation program. The president made clear that the goal remains to get the bill through the House in the coming days and sign it into law by Friday's July 4th Independence Day holiday, although he acknowledged that the self-imposed deadline could slip. 'It's going to get in, it's going to pass, and we're going to be very happy,' he told reporters as arrived in Florida to view new migrant detention facilities. 'Bad legislation' Polls show the bill is among the most unpopular ever considered across multiple demographic, age and income groups, and Democrats hope to leverage public anger ahead of the 2026 midterm elections when they aim to retake the House. Backed by extensive independent analysis, they say the bill's tax cuts would disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of social safety net programs for the poorest Americans. 'It's bad legislation,' Arizona Senator Mark Kelly told MSNBC. 'If this passes, this is a political gift for Democrats.' A handful of senators in the Republican majority had also threatened to upset the apple cart, echoing Democratic concerns that the bill would add more than $3.3 trillion to the nation's already yawning budget deficits over a decade. The most high-profile opposition has come from outside Congress, however, in the shape of tech billionaire and estranged former Trump aide Elon Musk, who balked at the bill's debt implications and stripping of clean energy subsidies. In a dramatic reignition of his feud with Trump, Musk vowed to launch a new political party to challenge lawmakers who campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill. Musk -- whose businesses include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX, which has about $22 billion in federal contracts -- has been campaigning against the bill since quitting as a Trump advisor in May. A furious Trump on Tuesday said he would consider deporting Musk and ending federal funds for his companies. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far,' Trump posted in a retort on social media, 'and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.' Focus on House Although the House of Representatives has already passed their own version of the bill, it will have to come back to the lower chamber for a final rubber stamp before it reaches Trump's desk. House Republicans were watching anxiously from the sidelines to see if their Senate colleagues would adopt changes that would be hard for Speaker Mike Johnson to sell to his lawmakers. Fiscal hawks in the lower chamber are furious at what they say is $651 billion of extra deficit spending in the Senate's tweaks. A House vote could come as early as Wednesday but even with full attendance, House Republicans can only afford to lose three votes. 'We're going to pass this bill one way or the other,' Johnson told reporters at the Capitol on Monday.


Daily Tribune
2 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Trump says 'very wealthy' group to buy
TikTok AFP | Washington President Donald Trump said yesterday a group of buyers had been found for TikTok, which faces a looming ban in the United States due to its China ties, adding he could name the purchasers in two weeks. "We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way," Trump said in an interview on Fox's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo. "Very wealthy people. It's a group of wealthy people," the president said, without revealing more except to say he would make their identities known "in about two weeks." The president also said he would likely need "China approval" for the sale, "and I think President Xi (Jinping) will probably do it." TikTok is owned by China-based internet company ByteDance. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's inauguration on January 20. But the Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media and who has said he is fond of TikTok, put the ban on pause. In mid-June Trump extended a deadline for the popular video-sharing app by another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. Tech experts quickly described the TikTok kerfuffle as a symbol of the heated US-China tech rivalry. While Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, he reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform -- which boasts almost two billion global users -- after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. "I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump told NBC News in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." Now after two extensions pushed the deadline to June 19, Trump has extended it for a third time. He said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay ByteDance "a lot of money" for TikTok's US operations. The previous month he said China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over Trump's tariffs on Beijing. ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law."