Veterans Affairs Confirms 29,000 Jobs Will Be Eliminated By September 30
The good news: the projected 76,000 Veterans Affairs layoffs won't happen. The bad news: the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs confirms it's cutting nearly 30,000 jobs.
There are about 263 million adults in the United States (age 18 and up). A little more than 6% are veterans—not 10%, not 8%: six percent.
This percentage is small. It's not small because the work veterans do lacks value or purpose. It's not small because there is a lack of need. The percentage is small, in part, because military service demands an unusually high level of commitment and sacrifice.
In order to become a U.S. veteran, you first have to serve in the military and subject yourself to possible long stretches of time away from friends and family and also the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Then—to hold veteran status for the purposes of receiving VA benefits, you can't receive a dishonorable discharge at the conclusion of your service.
This is what Veterans Affairs says about status of discharge and benefits:
Military service is a unique career choice. Active-duty military personnel aren't typically considered employees because they aren't civilians. And, once you enter, you don't have the option to simply walk away whenever you feel like it.
Those who sign up for military service become legally obligated to complete preset time commitments (with few exceptions for early discharge).
Veterans Affairs will eliminate 29,000 jobs by September 30.
As of September 2024, the federal government (as a whole) employed 3,009,000 federal workers (civilians). This three (3) million number excludes active-duty military because (again) they aren't deemed civilians.
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs reported Monday that it employed an estimated 484,000 employees as of January 1, 2025. By September 30, 2025, the agency says it will have reduced this number to approximately 455,000 employees.
The 29,000 difference between the two numbers represents the nearly 30,000 federal jobs that the VA is on track to eliminate. However, instead of using the term layoffs, the Veterans Affairs describes this effort as 'the reduction."
Within the government, a mass layoff is known as a RIF (a reduction-in-force). Given that the VA intends to eliminate 29,000 jobs (instead of the earlier projected 76,000), the agency says there will not be a disruption with veterans' care and benefits. The press release states,
Veterans Affairs already eliminated 17,000 positions.
12,000 more to cut. Veterans Affairs says that between January 20 and June 1, 2025, it has already eliminated 17,000 of the 29,000 positions that it intends to cut.
And, 'between now and Sept. 30, the department expects nearly 12,000 additional VA employees to exit through normal attrition, voluntary early retirement authority" or by accepting the large-scale buyout (deferred resignation program) the administration put forward.
25.3% of Veterans Affairs employees are veterans with no protections.
Veterans Affairs - 25.3% of its workforce are veterans.
As you can see from the chart, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs employed 122,015 veterans as of September 2024. While it's not the highest percentage of veteran employees, it's still a good amount.
The Trump administration has taken steps—notably the buyout offer and a hiring freeze—to reduce the federal workforce. Most government agencies, including Veterans Affairs, have been directed to conduct mass layoffs, push retirements and offer buyout plans where possible.
The Pew Research Center shows that 25.3% of federal workers employed with the VA are veterans. When more than a quarter of the workforce are veterans (and have no carve-out protections) it stands to reason that many—who served their country honorably—will either lose their jobs or access to future employment as a result of the thousands of job cuts.
What is Veterans Affairs, and what is its FY 2026 budget request?
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (first designed in 1930 as the Veterans Administration) was established as a way for the government to demonstrate an ongoing appreciation for the service and sacrifice of veterans.
In 1989, after several different iterations, Veterans Affairs became an executive branch cabinet-level agency with a goal to support and advance veterans and their families in the following areas:
For FY 2025, Veterans Affairs requested a budget of 369.3 billion (up 9.8% from FY 2024). For FY 2026, the VA requests a budget of 441.3 billion. Congress has not yet passed the bill. The House passed its version in June 2025 and has sent it to the Senate.
Recommended reading:
New Federal Hiring Freeze End Date And Hiring Restrictions
How Long Will The Federal Hiring Freeze Last? Implications For Government Employees
Can Trump Dissolve USAID? 10,000 Jobs Hang In The Balance
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada holds out hope of trade deal as US talks tough on tariffs
Canada said it was hopeful it can still strike a deal with the US to bring down its tariff rate even as the Trump administration denied Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DigitalOcean Holdings (DOCN) Stock Falls 11% Over Past Week Amid Tech Sell-Offs
DigitalOcean Holdings announced the launch of its GradientAI Platform, a major leap in simplifying AI integration for enterprises. Despite this launch, the company's stock dropped 11% over the past week. The broader market decline, provoked by weak job data and tariff-related uncertainties, may have influenced this dip. The tech-heavy Nasdaq's struggle, combined with widespread tech sell-offs, likely added weight to DigitalOcean's stock movement, rather than countering it. While the company's innovative platform aims to drive growth, its recent price movement reflects broader market trends more than the company's specific developments. You should learn about the 2 possible red flags we've spotted with DigitalOcean Holdings. We've found 22 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. DigitalOcean Holdings' recent announcement of the GradientAI Platform may significantly impact future revenue and earnings by simplifying AI integration for its enterprise clients. This aligns with their ongoing expansion in AI activities, as highlighted in their 160% year-over-year AI ARR growth, and could enhance their revenue stream. However, despite these developments, the company's shares have not shown immediate positive returns. Over the last year, DigitalOcean's total shareholder return was a 10.28% decline, reflecting broader challenges in the tech sector, particularly within the context of US$806.59 million in revenue and US$108.56 million in earnings. This underperformance is also evident when compared to both the US market and the IT industry, which saw returns of 17.5% and 22.8%, respectively, over the same period. The launch of DigitalOcean's AI initiatives indicates potential upside in revenue and earnings forecasts, partially supported by projections of a 13.2% annual revenue growth. Analyst forecasts suggest earnings could rise, fueled by strategic investments in data center expansion and increased ARPU. These forecasts support a price target of US$38.82, representing a significant potential upside from the current share price of US$25.74. However, the ambitious price target requires future performance alignment with analyst expectations, including substantial revenue and earnings improvements. Thus, while the GradientAI launch is promising, its immediate effect on share prices appears muted by larger market dynamics, leaving analysts' projections to reflect more optimistic longer-term potential. Click here to discover the nuances of DigitalOcean Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include DOCN. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
A Banker's Guide To Trump's Digital Finance Innovation Agenda
OBSERVATIONS FROM THE FINTECH SNARK TANK In 2022, President Biden signed an executive order directing the government to develop a framework for digital assets and financial technologies. In July, the US Treasury released Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology, a policy roadmap for federal agencies with innovation implications for banks. For too long, innovation in US financial services has proceeded without a cohesive national strategy. As a result, regulation has lagged behind market developments, and public infrastructure has failed to keep pace with the needs of a digital economy. Meanwhile, other nations—notably China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union—have made significant investments in their digital finance capabilities, coordinated regulatory reforms, and launched government-backed initiatives to modernize payments, identity, and data frameworks. The Treasury's report is a wake-up call: if the US is to remain a global financial leader, the public and private sectors must align around a shared vision for modernization. From Fragmentation to Coordination US innovation in financial technology has been fragmented across state lines, regulatory jurisdictions, and technological platforms. This fragmentation has led to inefficiencies, confusion, and lost opportunities. Banks face a regulatory patchwork that stifles experimentation while allowing unregulated fintechs to exploit gaps. Meanwhile, consumers encounter inconsistent standards for data privacy, interoperability, and identity verification. The Treasury says this is no longer tenable and calls for a national strategy that unifies public and private sector innovation. The bank connection: The message for banks is clear: future success will depend not just on internal innovation, but on strategic alignment with public policy goals and infrastructure initiatives. Faster Payments as the Linchpin The Treasury views instant payments as a building block for a digital financial system. In addition to recommending that government payments move to instant rails, it encourages government assistance to financial institutions to upgrade legacy systems, and provide technical assistance to smaller institutions that struggle with the transition. While the private sector has made strides in faster payments—through The Clearing House's RTP network and FedNow—adoption has been uneven, especially among smaller institutions. According to Cornerstone Advisors, heading into 2025, just 45% of banks and 38% of credit unions offered real-time (or faster) payments. Among them, however, roughly 80% only receive instant payments. While there are plenty of use cases for faster payments, banks are lacking business models for faster payments. The bank connection: These aren't just recommendations--they're signals. Banks that fail to adopt or integrate with real-time payment networks will find themselves at a competitive disadvantage—not only in terms of customer experience, but also in areas such as cash management, fraud mitigation, and liquidity optimization. The Missing Layer: Digital Identity An often overlooked barrier to financial innovation in the US is the lack of a trusted, interoperable digital identity system. Without secure digital identity credentials, banks rely on inefficient, error-prone, and--worse--fraud-prone methods for onboarding, authentication, and compliance. This imposes high costs, increases friction, and limits the potential for automation and innovation. The Treasury's report calls for investment in digital public infrastructure, with digital identity as a core component. While the private sector has offered various proprietary solutions, none have reached scale, in part because no actor can mandate adoption. The bank connection: Banks need to solve this problem—not just to reduce fraud losses, but to unlock the next generation of digital experiences. Bankers should advocate for public-private collaboration on digital identity standards, support pilot programs, and explore partnerships with providers working toward scalable solutions. Data and the (Possibly) Coming Open Banking Era To date, the US has taken a market-led approach to data access--relying on aggregators to bridge the gap between consumers and third-party applications--which has led to tensions over data security, user control, and liability. Poorly crafted rules from the CFPB--and two subsequent flip-flops--have caused more problems than they've solved. Other countries, however, have implemented formal open banking regulations with mandatory APIs, standardized data formats, and consent frameworks. The Treasury report calls for the development of a national strategy for data access. This includes support for secure, standardized APIs and policies that protect consumers while fostering competition. The bank connection: Instead of viewing open banking as a regulatory burden, bankers should see it as an opportunity to differentiate on trust, transparency, and user experience. Safely sharing data and integrating with external ecosystems are already key competitive differentiators. Global Competition and the Risk of Falling Behind The Treasury warns that the US is losing ground in the global race for digital financial leadership. China has deployed digital currencies at scale while the European Union has launched frameworks for instant payments, digital identity, and data portability. Even smaller jurisdictions like Singapore, Hong Kong, and New Zealand are punching above their weight by creating fintech sandboxes, government-backed infrastructure, and progressive regulatory environments. The Treasury is urging greater US engagement in international standard-setting bodies and greater coordination across agencies. The bank connection: Domestic policy, infrastructure investments, and international alignment are all part of the same strategic picture. Banks with international exposure should assess how shifts in regulatory and infrastructure alignment will affect their business models. Those without global operations should still recognize that domestic innovation will increasingly be influenced by international trends. What Banks Should Do About Digital Finance The Treasury's report isn't a roadmap for banks, but it is a clear signal of where federal policy is heading—and what will soon be expected of financial institutions. Waiting for regulatory mandates is a losing strategy. Banks that want to remain relevant must take proactive steps to align with the emerging digital finance agenda: 1) Accelerate adoption of real-time payments. Whether through FedNow, RTP, or both, institutions must modernize their payment infrastructure, align internal systems, and educate their customers and staff on the benefits and use cases. 2) Increase investment in--and deployment of--secure API frameworks. Update consent management systems and build partnerships with fintechs and aggregators. This is not just about compliance, but about creating new value propositions and customer experiences. 3) Support the development of a digital identity infrastructure. This includes participating in pilots, contributing to standards efforts, and aligning internal authentication and KYC processes with best practices in identity verification. 4) Reevaluate their data governance policies and practices. As data becomes the currency of digital finance, banks must ensure that their data is secure, accurate, and accessible—both to internal systems and authorized external partners. Digital Finance Isn't a Technology Initiative Digital finance isn't simply a technology initiative—it's a business imperative. Boards should ask tough questions about how the bank is preparing for a digital-first future, and how it's competing--and partnering--with fintechs, big techs, and global players. The Treasury report marks the beginning of a more coordinated, intentional strategy to modernize the financial system, protect consumers, and promote American leadership in an revolving global landscape. For banks, this is both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge lies in adapting legacy systems, aligning with new expectations, and navigating a regulatory environment that is still taking shape. But the opportunity is far greater. Banks have the customer relationships, the trust, and the infrastructure to lead the next chapter of financial innovation—but must take advantage of these assets.
