
Latino tenants sued their landlord. A lawyer told them they would be 'picked up by ICE.'
McCracken, a tenants' rights lawyer at Tobener Ravenscroft, is currently representing a Latino family suing a landlord and real estate agent for illegal eviction after being kicked out of their Baldwin Park home last year.
A few weeks after being served, amid a series of ICE raids primarily targeting Latino communities in L.A. County, Rod Fehlman, the lawyer who appeared to be representing the agent at the time, sent McCracken's team a series of emails disputing the lawsuit and urging them to drop the case.
He ended the correspondence with this: 'It is also interesting to note that your clients are likely to be picked up by ICE and deported prior to trial thanks to all the good work the Trump administration has done in regards to immigration in California.'
'It's racist,' McCracken said. 'Not only is it unethical and probably illegal, but it's just a really wild thing to say — especially since my clients are U.S. citizens.'
The comment arrived as ICE raises tensions between landlords and Latino tenants. According to California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, ICE has been pressuring some landlords to report their tenants' immigration status.
Bonta's office issued a consumer alert on Tuesday reminding landlords that 'it is illegal in California to discriminate against tenants or to harass or retaliate against a tenant by disclosing their immigration status to law enforcement.'
Fehlman didn't respond to requests for comment, nor did the clients he seemed to be representing: real estate agent David Benavides and brokerage Majesty One Properties, Inc. Fehlman's role in the case is unclear; following requests for comment from The Times, Benavides and the brokerage responded to McCracken's complaint using a different law firm.
But according to McCracken, Fehlman serves as the defendants' personal attorney and will likely still take part in the lawsuit in an advisory role.
Evicted
From 2018 to 2024, Yicenia Morales rented a two-bedroom condo in Baldwin Park, which she shared with her husband, three children and grandson. According to her wrongful eviction lawsuit filed in May, the house had a slew of problems: faulty electricity, leaks in the bathroom, bad ventilation, and a broken heater, air-conditioning unit and garage door.
'There was a lot that needed to be fixed, but we accepted it because we were just happy to find a place to live,' Morales said.
The real problems started in 2024, when her landlord, Celia Ruiz, started asking the family to leave because she wanted to sell the property, which isn't a valid reason for eviction under California law or Baldwin Park's Just Cause Eviction Ordinance, the suit said.
According to the lawsuit, Ruiz then changed her story, alleging that she wanted to move into the house herself, which would be a valid reason for eviction. According to the suit, Ruiz and her real estate agent, David Benavides of Majesty One Properties, constantly urged Morales and her family to leave.
In September, the pressure mounted. Ruiz penned a handwritten note saying she needed the house back, and Benavides began calling them almost every day, the suit said.
In November, assuming Ruiz needed to move back in, Morales left. But instead of moving in herself, Ruiz put the property on the market in January and sold it by March.
'I really believed she needed the house for herself,' Morales said. 'I'm just tired of people taking advantage of others.'
Lawyer tactics
Depending on your interpretation of California's Business and Professions Code, Fehlman's comment could be illegal, McCracken said. Section 6103.7 says lawyers can be suspended, disbarred or disciplined if they 'report suspected immigration status or threaten to report suspected immigration status of a witness or party to a civil or administrative action.'
In addition, the State Bar of California bans lawyers from threatening to present criminal, administrative or disciplinary charges to obtain an advantage in a civil dispute.
You could argue that Fehlman's email isn't a threat. He never said he'd call ICE himself, only claiming that Morales and her family 'are likely to be picked up by ICE and deported.'
Morales and her entire family are all U.S. citizens. But she said she feels racially profiled because of her last name.
'It's not fair for him to take advantage of that,' she said. 'I was born here. I have a birth certificate. I pay taxes.'
Just to be safe, Morales sent her birth certificates to McCracken's team. Even though she's a citizen, if Fehlman reports her to ICE, she still doesn't feel safe.
Federal agents have arrested U.S. citizens during its recent raids across L.A, and a 2018 investigation by The Times found that ICE has arrested nearly 1,500 U.S. citizens since 2012, detaining some for years at a time.
'I was already depressed over the eviction. Now I'm hurt, embarrassed and nervous as well. Will he really call ICE on us?' Morales said.
McCracken said Fehlman's message is a byproduct of the current anti-immigrant political environment. Fehlman sent the email on June 25, the end of a jarring month that saw the agency arrest 2,031 people across seven counties in Southern California, 68% of which had no criminal convictions.
'People seem to be emboldened to flout the law because they see people at the top doing it,' she said. 'It's totally unacceptable behavior.'
An ironic twist, she added, is that Fehlman's own client at the time was also Latino.
'I don't know if Benavides was aware that his lawyer is making racially profiling comments, but I don't think he'd want to work with someone like that,' McCracken said.
The case is still in its early stages. Benavides and Majesty One Properties responded to the complaint on July 17, and McCracken's team hasn't officially served the landlord Ruiz yet because they've been unable to locate her.
In the wake of the ICE comment, communication between McCracken and Fehlman halted. McCracken decided Fehlman's rant and possible threat didn't warrant a response, and Fehlman hasn't said anything else in the meantime. Her team is still deciding how they want to proceed in the wake of the comment, which could justify legal action.
She called it a dangerous attempt to chill her client's speech and a failed attempt to intimidate her into dropping the case. But he took it way too far.
'We're at a point in time where lawyers need to be upholding the rule of law,' she said. 'Especially in a time like this.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Epstein is our national horror story
The Epstein story has consumed Trump's Washington for weeks, dividing the MAGA movement and handing Democrats a rhetorical foothold they've been searching for ever since Trump retook office. Why, of all things, is this the story that connects with people? According to writer Dan Brooks, it touches on a kind of fundamental metaphor in our culture — one that speaks to how we understand power, predation and corruption today. 'As a vehicle for our worst fears about the 21st-century United States,' he writes, 'Epstein is our Dracula.' Read the story. MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. 'Did anyone really think the sexual predator president who used to party with Jeffrey Epstein was going to release the Epstein files?' Can you guess who said this about Trump? Scroll to the bottom for the answer.** An Epstein Scandal Timeline ... As scrutiny on the administration and its allies in Congress mounts over the Epstein saga, the rhetoric of senior officials has begun to shift. So legal columnist Ankush Khardori put together a timeline of the statements and stories we've heard from figures like FBI Director Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Trump himself. 'Taken together,' he writes, 'Trump's comments suggest the possibility that he suspected that there may be politically damaging information about him in the files and wanted to preemptively discredit revelations about him.' South Park Slaps Trump ... South Park returned to the airwaves with a comedic blitzkrieg on Trump, whom it depicts as Satan's lover — a role in which he has replaced Saddam Hussein. Perhaps most notably, the show leans hard into Trump's past connections with Epstein. 'It's the latest sign that Trump has lost control of the Epstein narrative, and that the saga has broken Washington containment and permeated deep into popular culture,' writes Calder McHugh. 'That makes it the worst kind of White House mess.' History's Warning for ICE ... ICE raids are already leading to dramatic sights in communities across the United States, with un-uniformed, masked agents arresting not the kids of hardened criminals you find in Trump's rhetoric, but everyday people who are beloved members of their towns, workplaces and churches. As ICE grows into the largest law enforcement agency in history, those sights will only increase the spectacle — and according to historian Joshua Zeitz, we've seen something similar play out before. 'In the 1850s, the federal government enforced a brutal dragnet aimed at hunting down and returning 'fugitive slaves' — formerly enslaved persons who had escaped captivity and fled north,' he writes. 'The political response proved explosive. Seemingly overnight, white people who previously cared little for the plight of Black Americans, free or enslaved, became committed antislavery voters.' From the drafting table of editorial cartoonist Matt Wuerker. **Who Dissed? answer: That would be Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff, who is running for reelection in Georgia. politicoweekend@
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fewer than half of ICE arrests under Trump are convicted criminals
A woman cries after her husband is detained by federal agents during a mandatory immigration check-in in June in New York City. The Trump administration's arrests have been catching a smaller share of criminals overall, and a smaller share of people convicted of violent and drug crimes, than the Biden administration did in the same time frame last year. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images) Despite Trump administration rhetoric accusing Democrats of protecting violent criminals and drug-dealing immigrants, the administration's arrests have been catching a smaller share of criminals overall, and a smaller share of people convicted of violent and drug crimes, than the Biden administration did in the same time frame. While the Trump administration has caught more immigrants with convictions for drugs and violence, their share of the rising arrest numbers is smaller, as more people get swept up for minor traffic violations or strictly immigration crimes, according to a Stateline analysis. Forty percent of the nearly 112,000 arrests by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from Jan. 20 through late June were of convicted criminals. That's compared with 53% of the nearly 51,000 arrests for same time period in 2024 under the Biden administration. Trump's deportations could cost 6M jobs, report finds The share of people convicted of violent crime fell from 10% to 7% and drug crimes from 9% to 5%, according to a Stateline analysis of data from the Deportation Data Project. The project, led by attorneys and professors in California, Maryland and New York, collects and posts public, anonymized U.S. government immigration enforcement datasets obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests. Some Democratic states are among those with the highest share of violent criminals in this year's ICE arrests: Hawaii (15%), Vermont (13%), and California and Nebraska (12%) — while some of the lowest shares were in more Republican states: Maine (2%), and Alabama, Montana and Wyoming (3%). Immigration attorneys see an increased push to arrest and detain immigrants for any type of violation or pending charge as President Donald Trump pushes for higher arrest and detention numbers to meet his campaign promise for mass deportation. Trump officials have called for 3,000 arrests a day, far more than the current average of 711 as of June and 321 a day during the same time period under Biden. The majority of recent ICE detentions involve people with no convictions. That's a pattern I find troubling. – Oregon Republican state Rep. Cyrus Javadi Arrests have accelerated since about mid-May, when government attorneys began asking to revoke bail and arrest people who show up for court hearings after being released at the border, said Vanessa Dojaquez-Torres, practice and policy counsel for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, which represents more than 16,000 immigration attorneys. 'We're not completely sure what the reasoning or the goal is behind some of these policies, other than they want detention numbers up,' Dojaquez-Torres said. 'They seem to have really been struggling to get their deportation numbers up, and so I think that's one of the reasons why we see a lot of these policies going into effect that are meant to kind of circumvent the immigration court process and due process.' Arrests of people convicted of violent crimes increased by 45% from about 5,300 to 7,700 compared with last year. For drug crimes, the increase was 21% — and they fell as a share of total arrests, from 9% under the Biden administration to 5% this year. If Trump wants more deportations, he'll need to target the construction industry Arrests for those not convicted of any crime nearly tripled to about 67,000, and increased from 47% to 60% of arrests. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security defended ICE arrests Wednesday. Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that the agency was 'targeting dangerous criminal illegal aliens and taking them off American streets. Violent thugs ICE arrested include child pedophiles, drug traffickers, and burglars.' In Oregon, arrests during the first part of last year increased from 51 under the Biden administration to 227 under the Trump administration, with those not convicted of any crime increasing from 34 to 137. Those with convictions for violent crime increased from 3 to 16. Even some Republicans are concerned with the new emphasis on non-criminals. 'The majority of recent ICE detentions involve people with no convictions. That's a pattern I find troubling, especially when it risks sweeping up people for things like expired tags or missed court dates,' said Oregon state Rep. Cyrus Javadi, a moderate Republican representing Tillamook and Clatsop counties. Nationally, nonviolent crimes have risen as a share of immigration arrests. The most common crime conviction for those arrested this year is driving while intoxicated, which was also the top offense last year under Biden. But this year it's closely followed by general traffic offenses, which rose to second place from sixth place, surpassing such crimes as assault and drug trafficking. More cities, counties join immigrant sanctuary lawsuit seeking to block Trump funding cuts Traffic offenses, outside of driving while intoxicated and hit and run, rose almost fourfold as the most serious conviction on record for those arrested, the largest increase in the top 10. Those offenses were followed by increases in the immigration crime of illegal entry, meaning crossing the border in secret, which tripled. The increase in traffic violations as a source of immigration arrests is a reason for cities to consider limiting traffic stops, said Daniela Gilbert, director of the Redefining Public Safety Initiative at the Vera Institute of Justice, a nonprofit devoted to ending mass incarceration. 'It's an important point to consider intervening in so that there can be less interaction, and so ICE has less opportunity to continue its indiscriminate dragnet of enforcement,' Gilbert said. The institute argues in general that traffic stops should be limited to safety issues rather than low-level infractions such as expired registrations or single burned-out taillights, both because they do not improve public safety and because they disproportionately affect drivers of color. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Such policies limiting stops under some conditions are in place in 10 states and in cities in six other states, according to the institute. The most recent state polices took effect last year in California and Illinois, while a policy is set to take effect in October in Connecticut. The most recent city policies were in Denver and in East Lansing and Ypsilanti, Michigan. Six other states have considered legislation recently. Stateline reporter Tim Henderson can be reached at thenderson@ SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Attorney ‘unapologetically' prosecutes ICE agent assailants with federal criminal charges
U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli details the criminal charges facing those who 'obstruct, assault' I.C.E. agents on 'America Reports.' Solve the daily Crossword