
What have the women of the coalition said about pay equity?
As the government pushed through sweeping changes to New Zealand's pay equity regime that will extinguish existing claims and make the criteria for bringing new ones much stricter, Nicola Willis faced media, flanked by three other female National MPs. The finance minister denied the move was to plug a gap in the forthcoming budget – contradicting her Act Party coalition partners. Act leader David Seymour had said his deputy Brooke van Velden, who is in charge of the amendments as workplace relations minister, 'has saved the taxpayer billions. She's saved the budget for the government.' Willis, meanwhile, said the changes were about 'ensuring we are clear, transparent, and fair to ensure that where those claims are made they relate to gender-based discrimination and that other issues to do with pay and working conditions are raised during the normal employment relations process'.
The amendments, which are likely to be passed today under urgency, will undo previous amendments made to the Equal Pay Act by the Labour government in 2020, with the support of all parties in parliament. At the time, National MPs were highly critical of the delays in passing the legislation – Labour had ditched a similar bill introduced by National in 2017 and then, in 2018, failed to support a member's bill in the name of National MP Denise Lee, before introducing the Equal Pay Amendment Bill in October 2018.
A trawl through Hansard shows what some of the current coalition MPs have said about pay equity over the years.
Louise Upston (National), August 3, 2017, joint working group on pay equity principles recommendations and legislation
'The reality is we have a piece of legislation that enables both equal pay and pay equity, and, as the member has just said, over 55,000 New Zealand women have benefited exactly from our government's work on pay equity.'
Judith Collins (National), November 8, 2017, reinstatement of business in first sitting of new parliament
'Why is it that New Zealand women are now going to be asked to wait for years more for the new legislation to come into the House? It's taken two years of intensive negotiations and intensive consultation right across New Zealand, right across business, right across employers, and with the unions as well – it's taken two years. And what we're seeing today is that this new Labour-led government is happy to say to New Zealand women, 'Go take another two years, honey. Go take another two years because you're not going to be man enough to stand up for yourself.'
Upston, April 4, 2018, first reading of Employment (Pay Equity and Equal Pay) Bill, a member's bill in the name of National's Denise Lee
'I don't think there would be any member of parliament in this House that wants to see further delays in real solutions and real pay increases for real New Zealand women. Unfortunately, by members opposite not supporting this legislation to go forward to the select committee, that's exactly what's happening.'
Parmjeet Parmar (then National, now Act), October 16, 2018, first reading of the Labour-led government's Equal Pay Amendment Bill
'The whole world is actually working towards this issue that is to reduce the gender pay gap, and National has shown they are committed.'
Upston, October 16, 2018, first reading of Equal Pay Amendment Bill
'I'm very pleased to stand and speak in this first reading of the Equal Pay Amendment Bill and say that the National Party will be supporting this legislation in the first reading and on its way to select committee.'
Willis, June 24, 2020, second reading of Equal Pay Amendment Bill
'National supports the Equal Pay Amendment Bill. We support it for the very good reason that we think that gender should not be the basis for determining the pay that someone gets and that men and women deserve not only equal pay for doing the same work but equity in the payment for the work that they do based on the value of that work rather than the gender of the people doing it. This is what this bill sets out to achieve and it establishes mechanisms which allow people to make claims where pay equity and equal pay principles are not upheld.
'So when my two daughters grow up, how will we know whether this bill has actually been successful? Well, we know that this bill's been successful when we actually see that these sorts of claims are no longer necessary, because we've established a framework in which people don't want to have to be doing compensation and that they pay people fairly to begin with. But we will also see that that gap between the pay of men and women, which currently sits at about 9.3%, is reducing in real time.'
Willis, July 22, 2020, third reading of Equal Pay Amendment Bill
'I'm proud to stand in this House tonight and say that National will support this final reading of the Equal Pay Amendment Bill. And I'm proud that our party has contributed to crafting this legislation and bringing it to the House. We support the simple concept that people should be paid the same for the same work, regardless of their gender, and we support the equally important concept that, if someone has been doing work and there are reasonable grounds to believe that that work has been historically undervalued based on their gender and has been underpaid because of that, they should be able to make a pay equity claim.
'I want to put on the record that we are hopeful this process works as well as possible for all parties to it. We want to see women being able to progress their claims for pay equity as easily as possible, and we want to see employers being engaged in good faith in that process to address claims.
'This is an important moment. Equal pay matters. We still have an outstanding gender pay gap in this country. We all, I believe, want to live in a country and a world in which men and women have equal opportunities, are equally rewarded for their work, and are able to progress and fulfil their own potential to the maximum extent possible. This legislation provides a further step in the right direction, and I commend it to the House.'
Erica Stanford, July 22, 2020, third reading of Equal Pay Amendment Bill
'The dreams I have for my daughter and my grandchildren – one day, when I have them, hopefully – is that they will grow up in a country where the work that they do is equally valued and compensated equally to that of their male counterparts. This bill sets out the framework that we will achieve that outcome.'
Willis, May 27, 2024, having disestablished the pay equity taskforce that the previous National government set up in 2015
'The government remains committed to upholding its obligations under the Equal Pay Act and continues to have funds set aside, including in tagged contingencies for settlements in both the public and funded sectors.'
Upston, May 6, 2025, first reading of Equal Pay Amendment Bill 2025
'This is where things went astray with the 2020 legislation, because, all of a sudden, the government in power wanted to wrap a whole bunch of other issues into a piece of legislation that removed it from its core purpose, which was about pay equity.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
National Party president: Voters aren't seeing PM Christopher Luxon's ‘humanity'
National Party leader and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon claps alongside his party colleagues during last year's party conference. Photo / Claire Trevett Luxon will also be partnering Speaker of the House and long-time National MP Gerry Brownlee to give the members some entertainment. Speaking to the Herald from Christchurch, Luxon said his party was in 'very good heart' and believed its membership was feeling upbeat. 'We've been able to raise funds and we've got very good support, the members and supporters are very energised.' He said his central messages would be squarely focused on the Government's long-term economic plan. 'We're making progress. There's more to do, but we've got a very good economic plan that's doing the right things for the long-term.' Espousing National's economic management while in Government has been a common theme for Luxon and Finance Minister Nicola Willis in recent weeks as cost of living issues, such as the high price of butter, dominate public concern. In June, the Ipsos Issues Monitor found voters believed Labour was better equipped than National to manage the cost of living, which was ranked the issue of highest concern. National Party president Sylvia Wood spoke to the Herald ahead of the party's annual conference. Photo / Mark Mitchell Sitting down with the Herald ahead of the conference, Wood echoed her party leader by noting polls 'bounced around' but acknowledged the strain New Zealanders were under. 'We're good at economic management, but it's tough and you know, Liberation Day (US president Donald Trump's tariff announcement) didn't help,' she admitted. 'I'm very comfortable that we're working at the macro-level to get the fundamentals right that will really pay dividends downstream.' President since 2022, Wood would be putting herself forward to continue in the role as part of the party board selection process, which would include former president Peter Goodfellow stepping down as a board member. At last year's conference, Wood declared National should be polling in the mid-40s before the 2026 election after receiving 38% of the vote in 2023. Across several opinion pollsters, National hasn't registered above 40% since January last year and hasn't breached 35% since April. National Party president Sylvia Wood believed her party could achieve a mid-40s party vote percentage in the next election. Photo / Mark Mitchell Wood maintained a target in the 40s was feasible but said it relied heavily on the economy. 'When New Zealanders can see the cost of living easing and the economy thriving and the confidence that that will continue, I see party vote going up.' She believed the same would apply to Luxon's preferred PM ratings. Taxpayers' Union – Curia polling, which also conducted polling for National, found Luxon had dropped more than 15 percentage points in the last year to be neck-and-neck with Labour leader Chris Hipkins. Wood argued she saw a side to Luxon that often wasn't seen by the public. 'I think perhaps that the humanity of the man is perhaps not as visible,' Wood said. 'He's business-like and business isn't always seen as a hero in New Zealand. 'I would love the public to see the warmth and the humanity.' She recalled the popularity of Key and Ardern, and believed Luxon could match them, by leading economic recovery. 'We've had a couple of engaging leaders, Kiwis pretty much loved them in broad terms. 'But we've got someone who will thrive on that competency factor because he is really good at that.' Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has dropped in preferred PM ratings in some polls. Photo / Mark Mitchell Wood credited Luxon with managing what she described as a 'challenging' three-party coalition. 'We've got two [party] leaders who are clear about their particular positions, and our job is to address the cost of living and restore law and order … Erica [Stanford] is doing a wonderful job in education. 'The members are very, very comfortable with the progress we're making, but we appreciate it's difficult for people out there at the moment, the cost of living pressure is tough.' Adam Pearse is the Deputy Political Editor and part of the NZ Herald's Press Gallery team based at Parliament in Wellington. He has worked for NZME since 2018, reporting for the Northern Advocate in Whangārei and the Herald in Auckland.


The Spinoff
9 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The Weekend: Oh no, it's starting to feel like 2021…
Madeleine Chapman reflects on the week that was. Usually I try my best not to think about being in lockdown for four months in 2021. It feels like a fever dream now but for a period there a whole million Aucklanders were collectively losing their minds and it felt like no one else, including the government, noticed or cared. And underneath the desperate chaos there was a genuine anger. It was anger at being condescended to, asked to 'do more' without any assurance that help was on the way. But that 2021 lockdown began four whole years ago (in August, even) and most of us are happy to leave it there. So I was surprised to find myself feeling nostalgic while reading Anna Rawhiti-Connell's satirical diatribe as the government's anger translator. A short, aggressive call to New Zealanders to toughen up and get to work. Evidently others felt something too as it's the most-read article of the week but why did it hit such a nerve? I think it's because there's a nihilistic humour in thinking you can simply talk people into doing anything, especially when it's virtually impossible for that thing to be achieved. I guess that's just politics 101 but Anna yelling at all of us to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps while also pointing out that most people can't afford boots really did echo the 2021 calls to just-stay-home-for-maybe-a-long-time-we're-not-sure-just-keep-doing-it-thanks. A tsunami emergency alert and a pandemic lockdown are very different circumstances but New Zealanders feeling deeply frustrated at being told to 'just deal with it' – whether it's Covid restrictions, an unaffordable cost of living or a hostile job market – is always the same. Being called dropkicks by the deputy prime minister is kind of funny when people are feeling secure in their jobs and homes. It's a lot less funny when many feel like they're the ones being constantly kicked. At any rate, it has never served a government well to try to shift blame or responsibility for the country's ills onto the people. Labour has still not recovered its support in Auckland after 2021. How many 'just suck it up and sort it out' calls will be one too many for New Zealanders? The stories Spinoff readers spent the most time with this week 'Fake news. No one's flush enough to waste a whole block of butter on lubing up a goat ' 'A couple of years ago, we had a Tūī in our neighbourhood singing Super Mario music. It was both hilarious and horrifying…'

RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Luxon to tell National faithful country is 'turning the corner'
Luxon to tell National faithful "we're turning the corner" National leader Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro National Party members are gathering in Christchurch to cap off a week in which MPs attempted to steer public minds back towards the government's cost of living policies. Members will also farewell a party stalwart, with former president Peter Goodfellow retiring from National's board of directors. While leader Christopher Luxon will be speaking to the converted, he will be acutely aware the cost of living has become front of mind . Earlier this week, he was asked what his message to the party faithful would be. "Look, they know it's been a tough time, they know that we're turning the corner," Luxon said. "But really ... this country's got great potential and a great future ahead of it, and we've just got to keep working at it." National's deputy leader, Nicola Willis, said the conference would be focused on the steps the government was taking to make the country "an easier, better place to do business, to hire people, to create well paying jobs". "It is our job as a government not to moan about the things we can't control, but to focus on how we can make things better here in New Zealand, and we're very proud of the efforts we're making," she said. It is a stark contrast to this time last year, where Luxon's message ahead of the first conference since National returned to government was its focus on action and delivery . It shows just how much the cost of living crisis is lingering, and National has spent the week attempting to convince the public it has got it under control. With no announcement to make at this week's post-Cabinet press conference (bar the card surcharge ban, which had already been announced), Luxon and Willis gave a more than 10-minute address about the economy and cost of living, and actions the government had taken. "The most important thing we can do to make you better off is to double-down on our long-term economic plan," Luxon said. Willis used her speech to remind people of National's tax changes, FamilyBoost policy and a falling Official Cash Rate. It prompted Labour to accuse the government of "more spin than a front-load washing machine" . The latest Ipsos Issues Monitor has Labour in front of National as the party New Zealanders consider most able to handle the cost of living, despite releasing no substantive policy since the election. In 2023, National won 38.06 percent of the party vote, but since then has failed to poll above that. Recent polls have had National in the low thirties, with some showing the left bloc would have enough numbers to form a government. Other polls give the coalition the numbers to form a government, but only just. National party ministers will hold panels on health, education, law and order, agriculture, and the economy and cost of living. Members will also elect board positions. Long-serving board member and former party president Peter Goodfellow will be retiring from the board. Goodfellow was president from 2009 to 2022 before stepping down but remaining on the board. ANZCO Foods founder Sir Graeme Harrison, who joined the National board in 2021, has also decided to retire. Current board member Rachel Bird is up for re-election. Under National's constitution and rules, board members serve three years and then retire. They can then be eligible for re-election. Craig Carr, Andrew von Dadelszen and Edgar Wilson have also put their names forward for the vacancies. Party president Sylvia Wood and board members Jannita Pilisi, Stefan Sunde and David Ryan are not up for re-election, and so will remain on the board. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.