
Trump could bomb Iran again
Judging by the comments of the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Trump may find himself with this dilemma sooner than he thinks.
Iran could return to enriching uranium in 'a matter of months', according to Rafael Mariano Grossi, IAEA's director-general, in an interview with CBS News at the weekend.
However, a number of questions need to be asked before the B-2s take off again from their Whiteman Air Force base in Missouri.
Trump hopes that the combination of twelve days of Israeli air raids and the one-off attack by seven B-2s each armed with 30,000lb Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs) will persuade the Tehran regime to give up any ambitions of building a bomb and focus all efforts on a long-term diplomatic deal to bring the nuclear nightmare to an end.
The chances are slim. The survival of the Islamic Republic under the leadership of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei largely depends on its often-stated position which is that Iran has the right to enrich uranium and it will never give that up, however many 'western' bombs fall.
The IAEA chief clearly believes that, despite serious damage to the three main nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, Iran still has sufficient stocks of unharmed gas centrifuges secreted away to continue the process of enriching its stock of 400 kilos of 60-per-cent-grade uranium, potentially to reach the 90-per-cent level required for a bomb.
Grossi's assessment unfavourably, for Trump that is, echoes the sombre report leaked from the Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency soon after the B-2 bombing of the three nuclear sites which claimed the strikes had only set back Iran's nuclear programme by a few months.
There are important nuances here. There can be little doubt that the 14 MOPs dropped through ventilation shafts to reach a long way down towards the deeply buried nuclear plants caused a lot more damage than the DIA seemed to be implying.
Furthermore, and crucially, the bombings did destroy (or obliterate in Trump's language) the metal conversion facility at Isfahan whose role was to transform enriched uranium gas into dense metal, a process known as metallisation, which is one of the key last stages of forging the explosive core of a bomb.
CIA director John Ratcliffe reportedly told a classified congressional hearing that the destruction of the sole metal-conversion plant would put back Iran's suspected nuclear bomb programme by years.
So, whether the 400 kilos of highly-enriched uranium Iran developed are buried under rubble at Isfahan or one of the other sites, or have been removed to an unknown bunker (depending on which report you believe), the destruction of the metal-conversion plant is a plus for Trump's obliteration mantra; and possibly a reason for the US president to hold back the B-2s for a second go for the moment.
The other big question: what will Israel do?
That's not to say he won't be tempted to launch another bombing raid if Tehran refuses to cooperate on the offered diplomatic path. Majid Takht-Ravanchi, Iran's deputy foreign minister, told the BBC that the US would have to rule out any further strikes if diplomatic negotiations were to be resumed. Trump isn't going to fall for that one.
Trump knows that he won't face any trouble from Congress if he decides to bomb again. Attempts by the Democrats to obligate the president to seek authority from Congress before pursuing more attacks on Iran were thwarted by the Republican-majority Senate in a 53-47 vote.
The other big question: what will Israel do?
Mossad and the rest of the Israeli intelligence apparatus will be keeping the closest eye and ear on what Iran does next after seeing its prized nuclear facilities hammered by nearly two weeks of targeted strikes.
Last week, Israel Katz, the Israeli defence minister, ordered the military to draw up an 'enforcement plan' against Iran, including maintaining air superiority over the country and taking whatever steps are necessary to prevent progress in Tehran's nuclear programme.
'Operation Rising Lion [codename for the Israel Defence Forces' twelve days of attacks] was just the preview of a new Israeli policy,' Katz wrote on X.
So, Operation Rising Lion has been granted longevity. That has to mean further attacks on nuclear sites and against nuclear scientists in the future, whether Trump and the B-2s are going to be involved or not.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
5 minutes ago
- NBC News
Senate narrowly passes massive Trump agenda bill
After a marathon voting session, the package heads back to the House, where the GOP hopes to approve it and send it to Trump before July 4. NBC News' Julie Tsirkin reports how VP Vance cast the tie-breaking 1, 2025


Sky News
11 minutes ago
- Sky News
'Alligator Alcatraz': The airport of the future becomes symbol of Trump's migrant clampdown
"If people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons." That's what Florida 's attorney general has said about the new 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre in the southern US state. It is a symbol of the White House's determination to deport migrants from America which it says do not have a right to be in the country. Located on a mostly abandoned airport once built to house supersonic jets, detainees would have to "know how to run away from an alligator" to escape the facility, President Donald Trump said on Tuesday. But for critics, it's a dehumanising "theatricalisation of cruelty" that will cost hundreds of millions of dollars to run each year. What is Alligator Alcatraz? The Dade-Collier airport was once destined to be the world's largest airport and would have been five times the size of New York City's JFK, but it never fulfilled its potential. Instead, the 39-square-mile facility located about 50 miles from Miami has been used as a training facility for years - until now. "This is an old, virtually abandoned airport facility right in the middle of the Everglades," Florida's attorney general James Uthmeier said as he introduced it last month. "I call it: Alligator Alcatraz." He touted it as an "efficient, low-cost opportunity" to build a "temporary" detention centre "because you don't need to invest that much in the perimeter". It's believed that the facility could house 5,000 detainees when up and running and, according to CNN, will cost $450m (£328m) annually. Mr Uthmeier added: "If people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide." People sent there will be housed in repurposed Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) emergency trailers and "soft-sided temporary facilities". 16:08 Trump visits new facility "This is not a nice business," Mr Trump said while leaving the White House. Then he joked that "we're going to teach them how to run away from an alligator if they escape prison", ahead of visiting the centre. "Don't run in a straight line. Run like this," he said, as he moved his hand in a zigzag motion. "And you know what? Your chances go up about 1%." According to the University of Florida, it's actually best to dash in one direction in the rare situation when an alligator chases you. Mr Trump is using 'Alligator Alcatraz' as a symbol of his border crackdown. He wants to pressure Congress to pass a sweeping spending bill this week which would ramp up deportations. Immigrants 'do not deserve' to be at facility There has been heavy criticism of the detention centre from Democrats and activists, with protesters often gathering nearby. Former congressman David Jolly, an ex-Republican who is now running for Florida governor as a Democrat, called the facility a "callous political stunt". "The fact that we're going to have 3,000 people detained in tents, in the Everglades, in the middle of the hot Florida summer, during hurricane season, this is a bad idea all around that needs to be opposed and stopped," Thomas Kennedy, a policy analyst for the Florida Immigrant Coalition said, according to CNN. "It's like a theatricalisation of cruelty," immigration activist Maria Asuncion Bilbao said. Phyllis Andrews, a retired teacher who travelled to the area to protest against Mr Trump's visit, said: "I have a lot of immigrants I have been working with. They are fine people. They do not deserve to be incarcerated here.


ITV News
12 minutes ago
- ITV News
Palestine Action Group stage rooftop protest at Brandon warehouse in Suffolk
Members of the group Palestine Action have staged a rooftop protest ahead of proposed legislation that will ban the campaign group under anti-terror law. Members of the group climbed on to the roof of the Guardtech Group in Brandon in Suffolk on Tuesday, over its work with Elbit Systems based in Bristol. Elbit Systems is an Israeli defence company whose UK headquarters are based in the south-west of England.. The action comes as a draft order was laid before Parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. MPs and peers are expected to debate the legislation on Wednesday and Thursday and if approved, the ban could come into force by Friday. A Suffolk Police spokesman said: "Officers and specialist negotiators are currently at the location and our immediate priority is to bring this to a conclusion and to ensure the safety of everyone at the scene." Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the government's bid, with a hearing expected on Friday to decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought. Commenting on the proscription on Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'The right to protest and the right to free speech are the cornerstone of our democracy and there are countless campaign groups that freely exercise those rights. 'Violence and serious criminal damage has no place in legitimate protests.'