logo
How demand for rubber led to the gory exploitation of native populations in South America and Africa

How demand for rubber led to the gory exploitation of native populations in South America and Africa

Scroll.in28-04-2025
On 27 August 1883, the earth shook again.
This time the volcano Krakatoa, in the Sunda Strait between Java and Sumatra, erupted. News of the colossal eruption was quickly carried on gutta-percha-coated underwater cables between Java and Singapore eventually to London, and thence to Europe and the United States, all within twenty-four hours of the eruption.
Gutta-percha is a tree exudate and relative of rubber from Southeast Asia with waterproofing properties shared with rubber, but with resilience to saltwater that outstrips it. Gutta-percha was not the only latex material to be associated with Krakatoa's eruption. Some 15 miles from Krakatoa, sheltering in the lee of a nearby island was the German ship Berbice, under the command of Captain William Logan. It was carrying thousands of gallons of combustible paraffin under wooden decks, but miraculously escaped annihilation from the pyroclastic eruption that had fiery sparks falling from the sky onto the ship's masts and sails. Sheltered in Captain Logan's personal chambers was a handwritten note addressed to the curator of the Botanical Gardens in Buitenzorg (present-day Bogor) in Java.
In the accompanying package were five seedlings of Hevea brasiliensis, a portion of the living confetti scattered around various British colonies in the Far East with the directive to establish rubber plantations, and thereby free the British from Brazilian and Belgian rubber hegemony. The Berbice, Logan and the seedlings all survived. These and other plants brought by stealth from the Amazon, specimens that were mercifully resistant to the South American Leaf Blight (SALB) caused by the Ascomycete fungus Pseudocercospora ulei, allowed the establishment of large rubber-producing plantations to supply the burgeoning demand. More importantly, this new supply of rubber accelerated the demise of the Congo and Amazon as primary sources of rubber, and the associated slavery and abuse of indigenous communities.
The drudgery of these indigenous tappers was photographically documented by travellers to the area, among them Walter Hardenburg in Putumayo in the Amazon and Lady Alice Seeley Harris in the Belgian Congo. The ensuing investigation by British Consul Roger Casement would expose the abuses to the world.
With maritime sayings such as 'at 40 degrees latitude there is no law; at 50 degrees latitude there is no God', and with winds named 'the Roaring Forties', 'the Furious Fifties' and 'the Screaming Sixties', sailors were merely expressing their experiences. Before GPS and satnav, sailors on featureless ocean voyages took bearings from the sun's risings and settings, star declinations, chronometers recording time differences, sextants, compasses, the behaviour of animals and how their vessels reacted to wind and water currents. There is no historical record of the ocean crossings of the earliest Australians or Polynesians; yet their achievements still evoke awe and disbelief. The earliest recorded circumnavigators, Ferdinand Magellan, Francis Drake and Thomas Cavendish, had to contend with previously unmapped currents and winds. With the advent of sailing ships and navigational aids, trans-oceanic voyages became longer and more frequent.
Navigating the treacherous waters off the southern tips of Africa and South America presented enormous challenges. Cape Agulhas near Africa's Cape of Good Hope means 'cape of needles' in Portuguese. The word 'needles' cleverly referenced both the needle-like rocks that could wreck a ship and a curious observation of the time that north and magnetic north were mysteriously aligned at this place. The stormy weather and underwater tows caused by the merging of the Indian and Atlantic Ocean currents made disaster a very real possibility.
A similar situation exists at Cape Horn, at the tip of South America. These waters were considered so treacherous that even famous sailor-navigators such as Ferdinand Magellan in 1519 and Thomas Cavendish in 1586 negotiated passages in the archipelago near Tierra del Fuego rather than rounding Cape Horn. Such voyagers filled in blank ocean maps with potential ports of call and trading posts to re-provision, repair and otherwise break up long journeys. Thus, trans-oceanic trading routes became established, and the easterly winds near the equator that helped drive the ships from east to west were called trade winds. North of the equator, westerly winds pushed ships towards Europe and Africa.
This set up a clockwise route where ships leaving European ports could hug the coastline down to Africa, take on board slaves, travel westwards with the easterly trade winds to the West Indies, South, Central and North America where they would unload the slaves, and load up rubber, cotton, tobacco, sugar and other merchandise produced using slave labour. Then they would use the westerly trade winds to blow them back to European ports. This three-step journey came to be called the Atlantic Triangle.
Other seafaring routes also opened up to the Far East: the overland journey from Europe to Asia along the Silk Road was replaced by the maritime spice route to the Moluccas (part of the Indonesian archipelago). But the maritime journey was difficult because of the enormous distances and the navigation challenges around the Cape of Good Hope and Cape Horn. Two canals changed all this: the Suez Canal, which opened in 1869 between the Mediterranean Sea and the Red Sea, rendering travel around the Cape of Good Hope null, and the Panama Canal, which opened in 1914, connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, making it unnecessary to navigate Cape Horn. Trading grew enormously in response, and the whole world was linked by commerce. The main cash crops for trade were spices, grain, sugar, tobacco, tea, coffee, silk, cotton and, of course, rubber. All of these crops were labour-intensive, and the use of forced human labour soon followed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Optical illusion personality test: Duck, Rabbit or both? What do you see first reveals if you are rigid or mentally flexible
Optical illusion personality test: Duck, Rabbit or both? What do you see first reveals if you are rigid or mentally flexible

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

Optical illusion personality test: Duck, Rabbit or both? What do you see first reveals if you are rigid or mentally flexible

Credit: X/@jaxonreborn Some of you must have stopped looking at it, thinking, 'Where's the debate? It's clearly a rabbit,' while for others, 'It's clearly a duck.' This is a classic example of a 6 for you, which may be a 9 for someone else. Just like that, this image can be a duck or a rabbit fo different people depending on how the viewer looks at first. History behind this picture: The earliest known version of this Duck-rabbit illusion came in the October 1892 issue of Fliegende Blätter, a German humour magazine. The caption roughly translates to "Which animals are most like each other?" Later on, Ludwig Wittgenstein, who primarily worked on logic, took the reference of this picture to describe different ways of seeing the same thing. The matter of perspective. Now, on the count of 3… it out loud, what you can see? Credit:CANVA If you see the duck first: You must be focusing on the image from left to right. The bill of the duck is what looks like the ears of the rabbit. The eye is perceived as facing to the left, like how a duck would. The duck's head is pointing left, and you're interpreting the shapes as a beak opening slightly. If you see the rabbit first: You may be looking from right to left. The same features that form the duck's bill now appear as the rabbit's ears, sticking out behind its head. The eye is now seen as facing to the right, as a rabbit would. The rabbit's nose and mouth are to the right side, where the back of the duck's head would be. Have you seen only one? It's a sign that maybe you have a more focused, detail-oriented mind, which makes you a perfect fit for deep, single-focus tasks, but slower to adapt to shifting contexts. Are you the one who switches easily between duck and rabbit? It indicates you are likely to be mentally flexible and open to multiple perspectives. You are not stuck with what you saw first; rather, you choose to explore the possibilities of understanding the same picture in different ways. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn How To Write Faster for Work (Find Out Now) Grammarly Learn More Undo How to make this interesting among your friends? To make the duck-rabbit illusion game faster and showcase everyone's convincing power, have each person quickly state what they see first, then take turns giving a 30-second pitch to persuade others to switch their view. After each pitch, everyone votes secretly on whether they were convinced to change their answer. Award points for each successful persuasion and rotate turns rapidly. This way, it can actually help to increase the convincing power and the clarity of mind. Why is this optical illusion still famous today? The idea behind this image is to show that our perspective on the same thing can be completely opposite. It highlights how we embrace opposing opinions and whether we are willing to accept different points of view or not.

Rising seas, shifting sands threaten ancient Alexandria
Rising seas, shifting sands threaten ancient Alexandria

Deccan Herald

timea day ago

  • Deccan Herald

Rising seas, shifting sands threaten ancient Alexandria

From her ninth-floor balcony over Alexandria's seafront, Eman Mabrouk looked down at the strip of sand that used to be the wide beach where she played as a child. "The picture is completely different now," she said. The sea has crept closer, the concrete barriers have got longer and the buildings around her have cracked and shifted. Every year 40 of them collapse across Egypt's second city, up from one on average a decade ago, a study shows. The storied settlement that survived everything from bombardment by the British in the 1880s to attacks by crusaders in the 1160s is succumbing to a subtler foe infiltrating its foundations. The warming waters of the Mediterranean are rising, part of a global phenomenon driven by climate change. In Alexandria, that is leading to coastal erosion and sending saltwater seeping through the sandy substrate, undermining buildings from below, researchers say. "This is why we see the buildings in Alexandria being eroded from the bottom up," said Essam Heggy, a water scientist at the University of Southern California who co-wrote the study published in February describing a growing crisis in Alexandria and along the whole coast. The combination of continuous seawater rises, ground subsidence and coastal erosion means Alexandria's coastline has receded on average 3.5 metres a year over the last 20 years, he told Reuters. 'For many people who see that climatic change is something that will happen in the future and we don't need to worry about it, it's actually happening right now, right here," Heggy said. The situation is alarming enough when set out in the report - "Soaring Building Collapses in Southern Mediterranean Coasts" in the journal Earth's Future. For Mabrouk, 50, it has been part of day-to-day life for years. She had to leave her last apartment when the building started moving.

Why do we really get wrinkles? Scientists finally explain it's not just age or sun exposure, it's physics
Why do we really get wrinkles? Scientists finally explain it's not just age or sun exposure, it's physics

Economic Times

timea day ago

  • Economic Times

Why do we really get wrinkles? Scientists finally explain it's not just age or sun exposure, it's physics

The Science behind wrinkles Live Events What happens inside the skin? Age isn't the only factor (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Scientists at Binghamton University in New York have discovered the exact reason why human skin forms wrinkles over time. Using real samples from people aged 16 to 91, they found that as we age, our skin stretches unevenly and contracts in ways that eventually lead to folds and process, they say, is similar to how Silly Putty behaves when stretched, pulling it one way makes it shrink in the opposite time, this contraction grows stronger, and the skin can no longer hold its shape, causing it to buckle and now, the idea that skin wrinkles due to changes in elasticity or loss of collagen and elastin was mostly based on theory or computer models. But this new study offers direct experimental Professor Guy German and his team used a low-force tensometer, a machine that stretches materials, to pull strips of human skin and measure how it discovered that skin doesn't stretch or shrink uniformly. Instead, it stretches more laterally (sideways) as we get older, while also being under constant internal stress, even at mechanical forces, always pulling the skin in different directions, increase the likelihood of wrinkling, especially when the skin's structure weakens with middle layer of the skin (the dermis) is home to proteins like collagen and elastin. These provide strength and flexibility. As we age, this layer changes. The skin becomes thinner and loses its ability to bounce time, the uneven pulling forces lead to buckling, the folds and lines we see as commonly start appearing after age 25, but age isn't the only culprit. Sun exposure plays a big role too. Long hours outdoors can cause 'photoaging,' which has the same wrinkling effects as natural aging.'If you spend your life working outside, you're more likely to have more aged and wrinkled skin than those who are office workers,' said Professor German. Sun damage weakens the skin and speeds up the wrinkling is the first time researchers have tested these theories on real human skin rather than relying on models or assumptions. For Professor German, understanding skin aging wasn't just academic, it was personal.'There's so much conflicting advice on skin health out there,' he said. 'I wanted to find out what's really true.'The findings could help shape future treatments and skincare products. Instead of simply adding moisture or boosting collagen, future solutions might target the way skin responds to tension and form because aging skin stretches unevenly and contracts more over time. This leads to internal stress and visible lines. While genetics and sun exposure still play a role, this study confirms that physics and skin mechanics are the main forces behind wrinkle formation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store