Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar pays tribute to Syama Prasad Mookerjee on 91st birth anniversary
New Delhi [India], June 23 (ANI): Vice-President of India, Jagdeep Dhankhar on Monday paid homage to Syama Prasad Mukherjee, saying, 'It's a great day in the history of our nation. One of the finest sons of our soil, today, his Balidan Diwas is Shyama Prasad Mukherjee.
Dhankhar further added, 'We suffered from Article 370 for too long. It bled us and the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Article 370 and the draconian Article 35A deprived people of their basic human rights and fundamental rights. We had a visionary Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, and a Home Minister in the shoes of Sardar Patel, Amit Shah. Article 370 does not exist now in our Constitution. It was abrogated on 5th August 2019, and the legal challenge to the Supreme Court failed on 11 December 2023. I, therefore, cannot be at a more befitting place than this to pay tribute to one of the finest sons of our soil. My tributes to him.'
Addressing the inaugural session of the 99th Annual Meet and National Conference of Vice Chancellors (2024-2025), organised by the Association of Indian Universities (AIU), at Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, Dhankhar said, highlighting the National Education Policy, 'I must share with you something which happened after more than 3 decades, that has really changed the landscape of our education. I am referring to the 'National Education Policy' 2020. As governor of the State of West Bengal, I was associated with it. Some major inputs -- in the hands of thousands -- were taken into consideration for the evolution of this policy.'
'The policy resonates with our civilizational spirit, essence, and ethos. It is a bold reaffirmation of India's timeless belief that education is the awakening of the self, not just for the education of skills,' he added.
'I have firmly believed that education is a great equaliser. Education brings about equality as no other mechanism does. Education decimates inequities. As a matter of fact, education gives life to democracy,' he further stated.
Congratulating the Government of Uttar Pradesh, he stated, 'My congratulations to the Government of Uttar Pradesh. The Chief Minister has done a great initiative. IT was given 'Industry Status'. That has a huge consequence for positive development. Another aspect for which UP is getting increasingly recognised is at the school education level. The transparency and accountability in administration is becoming a hallmark.'
Applauding India's national progress, the Vice-President said, 'India has emerged as a land of opportunity, of entrepreneurship, of startups, of innovation, of unicorns. In every parameter where growth and development can be gauged, we are rising.'
On the role of universities, the Vice-President emphasised, 'Our universities are not meant to just hand out degrees. The degrees must carry great weightage. Universities must be sanctuaries of ideas and ideation, crucibles of innovation. These places have to catalyse big change.'
'That responsibility lies on the Vice-Chancellors in particular and the academia in general. I appeal to you, there must be space for disagreement, debate, dialogue and discussion. That is how the mind cells are activated. Abhivyakti, Vaad Vivaad, Anant Vaad -- these are inalienable facets of our civilisation, of our democracy.'
Highlighting India's potential to lead in knowledge domains, he said, 'When you look around the world, you'll understand its significance. The state of education defines not only the state of academics, but the state of the nation. We cannot remain perpetual students of Western innovation when our demographic dividend position says, as the world's knowledge epicenter.'
'And when we look back in our ancient history, we are reminded of our rich past. It is time Bharat must build world-class institutions, not just to teach, but to pioneer. These are not mere disciplines. These are levers of assurance of our sovereignty in all times to come.'
Calling for equitable expansion of higher education, the Vice-President observed, 'A lot of our institutions have remained brown-field. Let us fall in line with the global groove -- let's go green. Greenfield institutions alone bring about equitable distribution. There is clusterization in metros and Tier 1 cities. Many regions remain untouched.'
'Let's go in for greenfield institutions in such areas. Vice Chancellors are not only the watchdogs, but also impregnable bulwarks against the commodification and commercialisation of education. One of our fundamental objectives is to ensure affordability, reach, and accessibility of quality education for ordinary people.'
Concluding his address with a call to establish leadership in emerging domains, the Vice-President asserted, 'Establish institutions of uncompromising excellence in emerging domains -- artificial intelligence, climate change, climate technology, quantum science, digital ethics -- then Bharat will lead, others will follow. That's a challenge.'
'Education is not just for the public good. It is our most strategic national asset. It is integrally connected not only with our development journey in infrastructure or otherwise, it assures national security also.'
'Friends, I am before academicians and therefore I will reveal my thought process a little more critically for your analysis. Impossible choices define our character and strength. We must not take the easy route. Impossible choices define that we really have a great inheritance. Taking the easy path is getting into mediocrity, and then into irrelevance and insignificance.'
'Universities are crucibles to generate such choices. They prepare minds. They prepare people to be intrepid -- to go in for impossible choices.'
Sunil Kumar Sharma, Minister for IT and Electronics, Government of Uttar Pradesh; Ashok K. Chauhan, Founder President, Amity Education and Research Group; Vinay Kumar Pathak, President, AIU; and Pankaj Mittal, Secretary General, AIU, and other dignitaries were also present. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Odisha govt to appoint Sishu Sevikas
BHUBANESWAR: The state government on Sunday announced to appoint Shishu Sevikas (child caregivers) in Sishu Batikas (childcare centers) of the state. A decision in this regard was taken by Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi. The Shishu Sevika will assist the children in the Sishu Batika and help reduce the non-teaching workload of teachers, allowing them to focus on education. The chief minister said this move is expected to improve the quality of education for children in pre-primary classes. The decision comes as part of the implementation of the National Education Policy, which gives priority to early childhood education. The state government has opened in 45,000 government primary schools, catering to children aged 5-6 years.
The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
SC junks Lalit Modi's plea seeking BCCI to pay ED penalty
The Supreme Court on Monday junked a plea filed by former cricket administrator Lalit Modi seeking an order to the BCCI to pay a penalty of ₹10.65 crore imposed on him by the ED for violating the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). A Bench of Justices P. S. Narasimha and R. Mahadevan, however, said Mr. Modi will be entitled to avail civil remedies as available according to law. The Bombay High Court on December 19 last year had imposed a cost of ₹1 lakh on Mr. Modi while dismissing his petition seeking an order to the BCCI to pay a penalty of ₹10.65 crore imposed on him by the Enforcement Directorate for violating FEMA. The high court had said the petition was "frivolous and wholly misconceived" as the adjudication authority under FEMA has imposed the penalty on Mr. Modi. Mr. Modi, in his plea, said he was appointed as vice president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India, during which period he was also the chairman of the Indian Premier League governing body, a subcommittee of the BCCI. The plea claimed that the BCCI is supposed to indemnify him as per the bylaws. The HC Bench, however, referred to a Supreme Court judgment of 2005, which said the BCCI does not fall under the definition of a 'state' as defined under Article 12 of the Constitution. Despite clear orders from the apex court, Mr. Modi filed this petition in 2018, the HC Bench noted. "In matters of alleged indemnification of the petitioner [Modi] in the context of penalties imposed upon the petitioner by the ED, there is no question of discharge of any public function, and therefore, for this purpose, no writ could be issued to the BCCI," the HC had said. "In any event, the reliefs are wholly misconceived. This petition is frivolous, and accordingly, we dismiss this petition," the court had said and directed Mr. Modi to pay a sum of ₹1 lakh to the Tata Memorial Hospital within four weeks.
The Print
19 minutes ago
- The Print
BJP constitution must be amended. Modi-Shah get another reason
ThePrint supported Hosabale's demand editorially. 'Ideological debates apart, Constitutional amendments from an illegitimate Emergency-era Parliament in its sixth year have no sanctity,' ThePrint said in its 50-word edit, adding that all the remnants of the 42nd Amendment, not just those two words, should go. The emphasis was on the 'illegitimate Parliament'. Among many remnants of the 42nd Amendment today are 'fundamental duties', fulfilment of which should be the 'first priority' of citizens, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has repeatedly said . These changes were made in the Constitution when the Parliament was ineffective, the judiciary was crippled and citizens' rights were suspended, the senior RSS functionary elaborated. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale has fired the imagination of Bharatiya Janata Party leaders. Last week, he demanded a review of the Emergency-era inclusion of 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble of India's Constitution. He was careful in framing his demand, though. These ideas might have been part of governance and state policy, but they were not part of the original Constitution, he said . To cite another example, the 42nd Amendment also transferred five subjects—education, forests, weights and measures, administration of justice, and protection of wild animals—from the State to the Concurrent List. States would love to get the exclusive law-making powers in these subjects back. BJP constitution vs the Preamble From Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar to Union Ministers Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Jitendra Singh, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma and his Maharashtra counterpart Devendra Fadnavis—everybody jumped in to support and carry forward Hosabale's demand for a review of the two words in the Preamble. It was understandable. After all, Hosabale is a putative successor of RSS sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat. The Sangh Parivar circles are already abuzz with speculation about the Sangh chief's decision when he turns 75 in September. Bhagwat must be curiously watching the BJP leaders' enthusiastic reactions to Hosabale's observation. Bhagwat may be wondering: 'Why don't they react the same way when I talk about the DNA of the Hindus and the Muslims being the same, or no need to look for a shivling in every mosque?' Anyway, in their enthusiasm to support Hosabale's demand for the review (read removal) of words 'socialist' and 'secular', BJP leaders end up undermining the party's own constitution. Let's leave Dhankhar out in this context because he is not a BJP leader today, not technically at least. But how come top BJP leaders don't seem to remember what their party constitution says? Article II of the BJP constitution—on the very first page—says that 'The Party shall bear true faith and allegiance…to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy….' How can leaders who are bound by the party constitution to bear allegiance to socialism and secularism want the same to be removed from the Preamble of India's Constitution? Socialism and secularism are obviously ideas that BJP leaders are ready to neither gulp down nor spit out. That explains the party's rather clumsy attempt to come up with its own versions. Article IV of the BJP constitution says: 'The Party shall be committed to… Positive Secularism, that is, Sarva Dharma Samabhava….' The BJP's 'Panch Nishthas' or five guiding principles include a commitment to Gandhian Socialism, which it defines as a 'Gandhian approach to socio-economic issues leading to the establishment of a samaras samaj free from exploitation.' In the 'Our Philosophy' section on BJP's official website, it says, 'Secularism, a leitmotif of Indian politics, has been distorted beyond recognition. Secularism had emerged in the West as a reaction to clash between Papal control of politics. It talks of separation of the State and the Church. In India, neither was there theocracy ever, nor can it be in future. Indian culture is a culture of 'equal respect for all religions'. It can be translated as 'sarva panth samabhaav' or 'panth nirapeksha'.' It adds: 'Unfortunately in India, Secularism has been reduced to minority appeasement, that, too, at the cost of majority. This is what Shri Lal Krishna Advani called 'Pseudo-Secularism'. When we say 'Ram Rajya' or 'Dharma Rajya' we mean an ethical governance based on rule of law of Constitution. It is not linked to any faith or way of worship.' Also read: Modi vs Indira is a needless debate. Operation Sindoor has defined PM Modi's legacy 'True secularism' Now, let's look at what PM Modi has to say on secularism, given that his government is already more socialist than most in the past. 'We are secular not because the word was added in our Constitution. Secularism is in our blood. We believe in Sarva Pantha Sambhava,' Modi tweeted on 28 April 2014. That was weeks before he became Prime Minister. And this is what he said a decade later, in 2024: 'Modi guarantees 100 per cent benefits of schemes to 100 per cent beneficiaries. That is true social justice. That is true secularism.' The more you hear and read about BJP leaders' stance on 'secularism' and 'socialism', the more you will get confused about where they stand. It's unlikely that Dattatreya Hosabale's push for a 'review' of the Preamble, even though backed by many Union Ministers and Chief Ministers, would lead to any follow-up. Not just because the Supreme Court has already upheld these changes. Most constituents of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) won't come on board. The Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas), an NDA constituent, has already opposed any such move. Unless and until PM Modi or Union Home Minister Amit Shah breaks their silence on the Preamble review, the current debate is likely to be confined to Hosabale and those who want to ingratiate themselves with him and the RSS leadership. Modi and Shah should, however, think of amending the BJP's constitution, at least. Not just to clear the ambiguities—rather doublespeak—-on the BJP's stand on socialism and secularism. The bigger reason for an immediate amendment is that the BJP's constitution is increasingly looking irrelevant and outdated in the Modi-Shah era. Let me cite just one instance—the most glaring one today. The BJP constitution says: 'No post will remain vacant for more than 6 months.' The party's national president's post has been vacant for exactly a year. The BJP national executive had given the former BJP president JP Nadda an extension till June 2024. Neither the national council nor the national executive nor the parliamentary board gave him another extension after that. Could it be that the parliamentary board met to give him another extension, and nobody got to know about it? Well, it may sound absurd but one can't rule out anything about Modi-Shah's BJP. If that were to happen, why would the BJP not announce it officially—for Nadda's sake, at least? He would definitely hate to be seen as an unauthorised occupant of the national president's post. It's also possible that Modi and Shah verbally asked Nadda to continue in the post until they sort out the issue of his successor with the RSS. Nobody should have any objection. After all, Modi is BJP and BJP is Modi. He has delegated his authority to Shah, his man Friday. It does not matter what the BJP constitution says. It's not above the winning combo, is it? DK Singh is Political Editor at ThePrint. He tweets @dksingh73. Views are personal. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
