PETA claims monkey died ‘painful death' at OHSU research center, requests investigation
In a sent to the director of the National Institutes for Health's Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, PETA urged the Division of Compliance Oversight to probe the Oregon National Primate Research Center.
Feds add Portland site to list of properties up for 'accelerated disposition'
Located on Oregon Health and Science University's West campus in Beaverton, the facility has been accused of ignoring the symptoms of a Japanese macaque that died from sepsis last October. The U.S. Department of Agriculture cited this incident in its inspection report from March 4.
The a technician neglected to notify a veterinarian when the 4-year-old female monkey was found 'lying down multiple times' the day before her death.
'The failure to report unexpected signs of illness/distress such as repeatedly lying down to ensure timely delivery of veterinary medical care directly impacted the welfare of this animal,' USDA wrote.
The department further noted that several other animals spent 96 hours in an enclosure that did not meet regulators' minimum space requirements.
Harassment in Vancouver: Hypnosis, witchcraft, scare tactics
Amy Meyer, associate director of PETA's primate experimentation campaigns, argued the facility is likely in noncompliance with NIH's Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
'We urge your office to thoroughly investigate the failures detailed in the USDA inspection report and assess whether OHSU has complied with its obligation to self-report problems in its laboratories,' Meyer wrote. 'Prompt and decisive action is warranted to address these apparent violations and to help prevent future lapses in oversight and animal welfare.'
The facility has received plenty of backlash from animal rights activists and, in response, researchers held an of their work just a few weeks ago. Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek has asked OHSU to close the center in response to the pushback, but the institution contends it is committed to providing humane treatment.
TriMet warns of 'drastic' service cuts without funding boost in Oregon transportation package
The university also 'implemented measures to prevent a recurrence' of the death at the center of PETA's complaint, according to its statement to KOIN 6.
'Dozens of highly trained veterinary professionals engage with these animals daily to ensure their ongoing safety, enrichment, health and well-being,' OHSU said. 'These dedicated individuals develop strong bonds with the animals entrusted to their care — often for many years, and, in some cases, decades – so, the unexpected death of any animal is distressing, and their passing is grieved.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
7 hours ago
- CNBC
I just visited a Costco in Japan—the variety of foods was 'incredible': 6 things I wish they sold in the American stores
As a Japanese nutritionist living in the U.S., I love shopping for traditional foods that I grew up eating, such as seaweed, beans, matcha, multigrain rice, and sweet potatoes. I sometimes go to Costco to buy those staples in bulk. But during a recent trip to Japan, I had the chance to shop at the Costco Yawata Warehouse in Kyoto, which you can visit using your U.S. membership card. I was curious to see how it compared to the American stores, and I ended up being very surprised. While the layout and many of the products were similar to the U.S. stores, the variety of Japanese foods was incredible. There were regional items, seasonally sourced ingredients, and healthier snacks that I rarely find back home. It was fun to browse through the foods and brands that were exclusive to stores in Japan. Here are six things I wish U.S. Costco stores carried more of. Seaweed is a staple in Japan. It's packed with minerals, vitamins, and polyphenols, making it one of the most nutrient-dense, plant-based foods you can eat. I found a wide selection, including: Other varieties included kombu, hijiki, aonori, and kanten — all of which I like to keep in my pantry. Tofu is one of my favorite foods. It's a great source of plant-based protein and is very versatile across cuisines. You can eat it plain or throw it in soups or salads. Even my dogs enjoy it! Japanese Costcos sell an amazing variety of soy-based items, many of which are vacuum-sealed for freshness and shelf-life. Options included: One of my go-to recipes involves soaking koya tofu, cutting it into cubes, then simmering with kombu, dried shittake mushrooms, carrots, peas, and ginger. I finish it with homemade miso paste for a satisfying, balanced dish. I always encourage my clients to incorporate a wide range of vegetables, roots, and herbs into every meal. Greater plant variety means more fiber, antioxidants, and essential nutrients for a long life. I was excited to see all kinds of produce that are a little harder to find in American supermarkets: Even the potatoes from Hokkaido, known for their high quality, were available in bulk. I love to cook, but sometimes life gets busy and I need fast, healthy options for myself and my clients. Costco Japan offered a smart range of ready-to-eat items, including (my favorite) microwavable multigrain rice bowls, pickled vegetables, instant miso soups in both powdered and paste form (just add hot water and throw in some seaweed and tofu), Japanese-style cooked fish, and many unique condiments. Of course, you can find some of these items in American stores, like Whole Foods, but they're often pricier. Rice crackers (soy-flavored rice crisps) are one of my favorite snacks. At Costco Japan, I saw kakino-tane, crescent-shaped crackers often mixed with peanuts. Other rice crackers were made with sesame seeds, seaweed, soy powder, nuts, and even some herbs. In Japan, green tea is more than just a beverage — it's a daily ritual. You'll find it in vending machines, restaurants, and pretty much in every home. At Costco Japan, I saw bottled green teas, tea bags and loose-leaf options, and powdered teas in family-sized packages. Almost every shopper had a green tea product in their cart. Green tea has been associated with better heart health and longer life in many studies. I always recommend swapping it in place of soda for a low-calorie, antioxidant-rich alternative.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Floss-based vaccine delivers flu antibodies to bone marrow, saliva, and more
Flossing might soon do more than protect your teeth. Scientists have developed a new vaccine delivery method that uses specialized dental floss to trigger an immune response, without the need for needles. In the study, researchers tested the novel technique by applying vaccine components such as proteins and inactivated viruses along the gum lines of mice. The floss-based approach effectively stimulated immunity and protected the rodents from a lethal flu strain. Flossing mice for science The team flossed 50 mice every two weeks over a 28-day period. One researcher gently pulled down each mouse's jaw using a keychain ring, while another flossed the gums with vaccine-laced strands. After four weeks and three flossing sessions, the mice faced a lethal dose of influenza. All of the vaccinated mice survived. Those that hadn't received the floss-based vaccine died. Researchers found signs of a systemic immune response in the flossed mice. Flu-fighting antibodies appeared in their feces, saliva, and bone marrow. That last discovery was key, antibodies in bone marrow suggest long-term immunity. The vaccinated group also showed elevated T cell levels in their lungs and spleens. T cells help the body destroy virus-infected cells and prevent future infections. The results suggest this flossing method doesn't just offer local protection in the mouth, but activates a strong immune response throughout the body, something that traditional mucosal vaccines have struggled to achieve. Testing for human feasibility To explore whether the technique might work in people, scientists recruited 27 healthy adults. Each participant used dental picks coated in food dye. On average, the dye reached gum tissue in about 60% of flossing attempts. That level of contact shows potential, though further refinement is needed for consistent delivery. The gums between teeth are highly permeable, which allows vaccine molecules to pass through more easily than skin or other tissues. The oral cavity is also a frontline entry point for viruses. But developing vaccines for the mouth and nose has proven difficult due to the body's natural resistance to foreign agents in these regions. Floss, however, might offer a way to bypass those defenses. 'These findings establish floss-based vaccination as a simple, needle-free strategy that enhances vaccine delivery and immune activation compared with existing mucosal immunization methods,' wrote the researchers. Pandemic-ready and needle-free Beyond effectiveness, this method offers practical advantages. Needle-phobic patients may be more willing to receive vaccines delivered via floss. The treatment also doesn't require cold-chain storage, which simplifies distribution. Floss-based vaccines could even be mailed to households during outbreaks, enabling faster, more widespread immunization during pandemics. While the method is still in early stages, it marks a significant step toward making vaccinations more accessible and less invasive. With further development, a daily health habit like flossing could double as disease prevention on a global scale. The study is published in Nature Biomedical Engineering. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Science Officially Confirmed That The 10,000 Steps Rule Is Outdated. Here's The New Number To Target.
A new meta review published in the Lancet officially confirmed that we've been calculating our step count number all wrong. The new findings suggest that you can actually reap the major health benefits well before you hit 10,000 steps. Here's what experts say about the 10k number and how this applies to your life. The idea that you need to log 10,000 steps a day for good health has been health gospel for ages. But as Women's Health previously reported this year, the 10,000-a-day steps goal (which roughly equates to five miles) isn't really based in science. In fact, it's more marketing than anything. But it's a nice, round number, and it's built into most fitness trackers. Now, a new scientific analysis in The Lancet Public Health officially confirms that this lofty steps count goal isn't actually necessary—and the potential health benefits start to level off well before you reach that point. If you've been happily clocking 10,000 steps a day and feel like it's working for you, there's no reason to stop. But if that number is intimidating and feels impossible to reach with everything else you've got going on in your life, this study probably has some findings you can use. Here's what the scientific review discovered, plus where experts and trainers recommend you try to land with your new step count goal. Meet the experts: Albert Matheny, RD, CSCS, co-founder of SoHo Strength Lab; Dani Singer, CPT, founder of Fit2Go Personal Training What did the new meta review find? For the review, researchers analyzed data from 88 different studies, looking at how step counts were linked with the risk of developing a slew of health conditions. Overall, the researchers discovered that the risk of developing serious health conditions like cardiovascular disease, dementia, cancer, type 2 diabetes, and depression was lower in people who logged 7,000 steps a day compared to those who only did 2,000 daily steps. But they also discovered that the health perks beyond 7,000 steps were actually pretty minimal. "Although 10,000 steps per day, an unofficial target for decades without a clear evidence base, was associated with substantially lower risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease incidence, cancer mortality, dementia, and depressive symptoms than 7,000 steps per day, the incremental improvement beyond 7,000 steps per day was small, and there was no statistical difference between 7,000 steps per day and a higher step count for all the other outcomes," the investigators wrote. "Therefore, 7,000 steps per day might be a more realistic and achievable recommendation for some, but 10,000 steps per day can still be a viable target for those who are more active.' Where did the 10,000 number come from? The famous steps goal number has a long history behind it (you can do a deep dive here). But here's a quick recap: This number was formulated by a Tokyo doctor named Iwao Ohya who created a fitness tracker called Manpo-Kei (in Japanese, that means "10,000 step meter) with engineer Jiro Kato. It's been suggested that 10,000 steps was chosen because the Japanese character for 10,000 looks like a man running or walking, but it's not really clear if that's truly one of the reasons behind the number. (Both inventors have since died.) The number 10,000 eventually got picked up by researchers and fitness tracker developers, and its popularity spread. These days, almost everyone knows the number. Still, "no clinical data backed it then, and none was added later," says Dani Singer, CPT, founder of Fit2Go Personal Training. Why is it not accurate? While hitting 10,000 steps isn't bad for you (and means you're moving a lot throughout the day) the exact number is pretty much made up. "It was a marketing campaign,' says Albert Matheny, RD, CSCS, co-founder of SoHo Strength Lab. 'There wasn't a scientific basis for it.' Matheny stresses that the 10,000 steps a day goal isn't necessarily inaccurate from a health POV—but many people can get serious health perks between 5,000 to 7,000 steps a day. "The data show health gains level off well before 10,000," Singer says. "Mortality and cardiovascular risk improvements start at just 2,000. It's important to understand this so that you avoid an all-or-nothing mindset—especially one that isn't based on any actual data." If that's the number you like, and you hit it consistently, stick with it! But just remember: '10,000 steps per day is not the magic number," per Matheny. So, how many steps should I take per day? Based on the scientific review's findings, aiming for 5,000 to 7,000 steps a day is a good goal to reach for. That's roughly two to 3.5 miles per day, depending on your stride. 'There's nothing wrong with 10,000 steps, but it isn't based in science,' Matheny says. If you want to still aim for 10,000 steps, Matheny says you should go for it. 'If you don't get there, maybe you still get to 7,000,' he points out. But any amount of walking is helpful. 'A thousand steps is way better than zero,' Matheny says. You Might Also Like Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals
