Gurvinder Singh Wasan, CFA, Senior Fund Manager, Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund
Let's start with your personal story
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
How did you land this job?
Which funds are you currently managing?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What is your investment philosophy, and how would you describe your investment strategy?
What gives you the kick while managing other people's money?
I am a Mumbai boy, born and brought up in a joint family of businessmen. I have completed a Master's in Commerce and am a Chartered Accountant by qualification. In addition, I am a CFA charter holder from the CFA Institute, USA.I have been working in the fixed income industry for about 21 years now. All my previous roles have been great learning curves, where I had the opportunity to learn from experienced colleagues, talented subordinates, and enthusiastic peers.This is a small industry where most professionals in the investment segment know each other. I would say I was at the right place at the right time, and was fortunate to land my current role as Senior Fund Manager with Baroda BNP Paribas Mutual Fund Prior to this, I was associated as a Senior Fund Manager and Credit Analyst with JM Financial Mutual Fund. Before that, I was part of Principal Mutual Fund, where I had my longest stint. I have also worked as a structured finance analyst at CRISIL and ICICI Bank I have been entrusted with a diverse mix of funds that stimulate my interest and enhance my professional profile. On the duration side, we manage Gilt and Dynamic Bond Funds. On the shorter end of the curve, there are Ultra Short Term and Low Duration Funds. In the mid-tenor segment, we have Short Term and Corporate Bond Funds. We also manage a Credit Risk Fund with a credit play.On the hybrid front, I manage Balanced Advantage, Conservative Hybrid, Aggressive Hybrid, Equity Savings, and Retirement Funds. Additionally, I handle Fund of Funds schemes such as the Multi Asset Fund of Fund, as well as passive offerings like the Nifty SDL and Gold ETFs.My investment philosophy combines a top-down macro approach with a core-tactical strategy. We closely track macroeconomic indicators and, based on our assessment, determine a suitable duration profile for each mutual fund scheme.Within this framework, we construct a core portfolio and aim to generate alpha through tactical allocations, which we actively manage to take advantage of market opportunities. Overall, our mandate is to prioritize safety and liquidity while consistently seeking alpha generation.The real kick lies in being entrusted with the responsibility of managing someone's hard-earned savings. That trust itself is a powerful driving force.(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What is moonlighting? Soham Parekh's blunt statement 'I love what I do' sparks fresh outrage online
Soham Parekh, the Indian tech professional who became a lightning rod in the global startup ecosystem for simultaneously working full-time jobs at multiple companies, is once again in the public spotlight. Known for triggering widespread discussions around moonlighting ethics, work-life balance, and hustle culture, Parekh now claims that his life has remained 'unchanged' following the controversy. In a recent post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), he offered a candid glimpse into his current state of mind, sparking renewed debate across tech circles. His remarks reflect deeper concerns about modern professional life, burnout, and ethical boundaries in remote work. Who is Soham Parekh and why was he controversial Soham Parekh, a Mumbai-based software engineer, was publicly accused in 2023 of secretly holding full-time roles at multiple US-based startups. The accusations were led by the co-founder of Playground AI and former CEO of Mixpanel Suhail Doshi who alleged that Parekh was drawing salaries from as many as three to four companies simultaneously, some of which were Y Combinator-backed ventures, including Dynamo AI and Synthesia. Parekh later acknowledged these claims, stating in an interview that he was driven by financial distress, which compelled him to accept overlapping roles. He also revealed that he worked up to 140 hours per week, navigating tight deadlines, multiple meetings, and high-performance expectations. While some in the tech community were impressed by his time management and technical capabilities, the majority criticized his actions as unethical, especially because he failed to disclose his dual employment to employers. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo 'I Love What I Do': Soham Parekh's latest remarks In his latest public post, Soham Parekh shared a screenshot of a message exchange where someone asked how he manages to work so much. He replied bluntly, 'I love what I do. Lol. I don't have anything else to do.' He added in a follow-up caption, 'My life hasn't changed one bit.' Though casual in tone, the statement quickly went viral, drawing strong reactions. The message struck a chord with many professionals navigating the high-pressure environments of startups, where identity and productivity often overlap. Parekh's comments reignited discussion around the emotional toll of hustle culture, especially in sectors where overworking is normalized and sometimes even glorified. What is the moonlighting debate The moonlighting debate refers to the growing controversy around professionals taking on multiple jobs often simultaneously without informing their primary employer. While moonlighting traditionally meant holding a second job outside regular working hours, the rise of remote work and gig culture has blurred these boundaries, especially in tech and startup industries. At the center of the debate are ethical, legal, and productivity concerns. Some companies view undisclosed secondary employment as a breach of trust or a conflict of interest, especially when employees hold multiple full-time roles. Others, however, argue that moonlighting is a personal right—especially in economies where one job may not be financially sufficient. Key issues in the moonlighting debate The moonlighting debate stems from a complex interplay of transparency, contractual obligations, performance expectations, economic realities, and evolving workplace norms. Employers emphasize transparency and trust, arguing that undisclosed secondary jobs raise concerns about divided attention, compromised performance, and potential misuse of confidential information. Employment contracts often explicitly prohibit outside work that might conflict with the company's interests, further complicating the issue. Critics of moonlighting warn that juggling multiple demanding roles can lead to burnout and reduced productivity, ultimately affecting team outcomes. However, proponents highlight economic necessity, pointing to inflation and stagnant wages as reasons why professionals seek additional income. The rise of remote work post-COVID has only intensified this dynamic, enabling individuals to pursue side gigs or full-time dual roles with less oversight, blurring the lines between flexibility and ethical responsibility. Social media reacts to recent Soham Parekh's remarks The public response to Parekh's remarks was mixed and emotionally charged. Many users on social media platforms expressed concern, calling the statement a 'cry for help,' while others found it relatable. Some viewed Parekh's work ethic as admirable, even inspirational, in a results-driven industry where multi-tasking is often seen as a valuable skill. However, others interpreted his message as a symptom of a larger burnout epidemic. They raised questions about mental health, personal fulfillment, and the cost of tying self-worth solely to productivity. The debate also reflected generational shifts in how work and life priorities are viewed—particularly among millennial and Gen Z tech professionals. Ethical dilemma surrounding Soham Parekh's undisclosed moonlighting At the heart of the controversy lies the question of ethics. Moonlighting, particularly without employer consent, presents serious implications in terms of transparency, trust, and data security. While side gigs are common in the tech industry, especially among freelancers and consultants, holding multiple full-time roles simultaneously as Soham Parekh did creates an undeniable conflict of interest. His defenders argue that the industry itself is partly to blame. Many startups demand long hours, deliverables at breakneck speed, and loyalty that often exceeds what compensation justifies. In such an environment, Parekh's actions have been seen by some as a form of survival, albeit a controversial one. However, critics argue that regardless of intent, undisclosed dual employment undermines accountability and could lead to compromised performance, divided attention, and violations of employment contracts. Also Read | Anand Mahindra shares one powerful lesson from 44 years of leadership to help you overcome stress AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
Theobroma set for ownership change as ChrysCapital nears 90% stake buy
Three private equity firms — Aqua Investments Ltd, Infinity Partners, and Atreides Investments BV — have approached the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to acquire a stake in Mumbai-based bakery chain Theobroma Foods, according to a PTI report. Infinity Partners and Atreides Investments are affiliated with ChrysCapital. The development comes amid reports that ChrysCapital is set to acquire a 90 per cent stake in Theobroma for approximately ₹2,410 crore. The deal involves purchasing shares from both the company's promoters and current investor ICICI Venture. However, the founding family is expected to retain a 10 per cent stake post-transaction. Theobroma stake sale: Details of CCI filing In their submission to the CCI, the three firms stated: 'The proposed transaction pertains to the acquisition by the acquirers (Aqua Investments Ltd, Infinity Partners, and Atreides Investments BV) collectively, of certain equity shareholding of Theobroma.' Theobroma operates in the bakery and confectionery segment, offering products through patisseries and retail outlets across more than 30 Indian cities. It also distributes via its online platform and through third-party e-commerce channels. The applicants noted that there is no direct operational overlap between their existing businesses and Theobroma. 'The parties... do not have any direct horizontal overlaps, vertical or complementary relationships. One of the affiliates of the group to which the acquirers belong is engaged in the market for the provision of logistics services in India,' the filing said. ICICI Venture's exit ICICI Venture, which invested around $20 million in Theobroma in 2017, currently owns close to 42 per cent of the company. The current deal will result in its full exit from the business. Theobroma was founded in Mumbai in 2004 by Kainaz Messman, a former pastry chef at Oberoi Hotels. It began as a single-store bakery and has since grown into a nationwide chain of 194 outlets known for its signature brownies, cookies, crackers, pastries, and sandwiches. Before the Covid-19 pandemic, Theobroma operated just 50 stores, primarily in Mumbai and Delhi. Since then, it has significantly scaled its presence across cities such as Pune, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Chandigarh-Mohali, Chennai, and Surat.
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Who was Przemyslaw Jeziorski? UC Berkeley professor shot dead; family says 'doing everything to ensure justice is served'
UC Berkeley professor who went to Greece for child custody battle killed by masked gunman. A University of California, Berkeley professor was fatally shot in broad daylight in a suburb of Athens, Greece, on July 4, while visiting the country in connection with a child custody dispute. Przemyslaw Jeziorski, aged 43, was gunned down near the home of his ex-wife by a masked assailant who fled the scene on foot. Who was Przemyslaw Jeziorski? Jeziorski, a Polish-born scholar, was an Associate Professor of Marketing at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley, where he also held the Egon and Joan von Kaschnitz Distinguished Professorship in Business Administration. With over 15 years of academic experience, Jeziorski was widely regarded as a leading authority in quantitative marketing, industrial organisation, and applied microeconomics. His research spanned diverse sectors, including mobile money in Africa, online advertising, radio broadcasting, car insurance, and public health campaigns such as breast cancer prevention. He published extensively in leading academic journals such as Marketing Science, Management Science, and the RAND Journal of Economics. His work received support from prestigious institutions, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cardiologists Recommend: Eat 1 Teaspoon Tonight – Wake Up With a Flatter Stomach Hollywood News | USA Click Here Undo Jeziorski served as Associate Editor for Management Science and Quantitative Marketing and Economics, and was also on the editorial board of Marketing Science. As an educator, Jeziorski was known for his passion and dedication, having mentored more than 1,500 MBA and PhD students at Berkeley Haas, particularly in Marketing Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Digital Marketing. He held a PhD in Economics from Stanford Graduate School of Business, as well as degrees in Mathematics and Economics from the University of Arizona and the Warsaw School of Economics. 'Our family is heartbroken': Brother His brother, Lukasz Jeziorski, posted a message on the European crowdfunding platform WhyDonate, stating, 'Our family is heartbroken, and we are doing everything we can to ensure that justice is served. Przemek was a loving father to two young children and a beloved professor at UC Berkeley. He loved teaching and sharing his passion with students.' Funds are being raised to support legal proceedings, repatriation of Jeziorski's remains, and related expenses. The professor's ex-wife, who returned to Greece six years ago, reportedly told police she had no knowledge of anyone who would want to harm him, according to Greek news outlet Zougla. Berkeley Haas Dean, Jennifer Chatman, expressed deep sorrow in a statement to ABC7 News: 'We are heartbroken by the tragic and sudden death of Professor Przemyslaw Jeziorski, a beloved member of our marketing faculty and the Haas community. While authorities are continuing their investigation, our focus is on supporting our students, staff, and faculty during this incredibly difficult time. My heart goes out to Przemek's family and loved ones. We will miss him dearly.' Greek authorities are actively investigating the murder. No arrests have yet been made.
