Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng
SINGAPORE - It is no longer feasible nor practical for Singapore to avoid working towards a net-zero future, said Dr Tan See Leng, Singapore's Minister-in-charge of Energy and Science & Technology.
Fluctuations in the prices of fossil fuels due to geopolitical conflicts have driven up energy prices. Dealing with the impacts of climate change, such as rising sea levels, is also critical for Singapore, he said.
'Energy is existential for us, just like water was existential in the 90s,' said Dr Tan in his first formal interview as Minister-in-charge of Energy and Science & Technology on July 21.
The portfolio sits under the Ministry of Trade and Industry, and was created in the
latest round of Cabinet changes in May. Dr Tan was previously Second Minister for Trade and Industry, and he continues to helm the Manpower Ministry in the new Cabinet.
Prime Minister Lawrence Wong had said that science and technology are key drivers of growth, while energy – especially clean energy – will be an important part of his Government's agenda.
Singapore now relies on natural gas, a fossil fuel, for about 95 per cent of its energy needs.
The Republic's goal is to reach net-zero emissions – where the total amount of emissions is balanced by activities to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – by 2050.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Sewage shaft failure linked to sinkhole; PUB calling safety time-out on similar works islandwide
Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts
Singapore Workers used nylon rope to rescue driver of car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole
Asia Singapore-only car washes will get business licences revoked, says Johor govt
World Food airdropped into Gaza as Israel opens aid routes
Sport Arsenal beat Newcastle in five-goal thriller to bring Singapore Festival of Football to a close
Singapore Benchmark barrier: Six of her homeschooled kids had to retake the PSLE
Asia S'porean trainee doctor in Melbourne arrested for allegedly filming colleagues in toilets since 2021
Achieving this would require the energy sector, which makes up about 40 per cent of the nation's total emissions, to cut its emissions.
Dr Tan said Singapore is exploring all possible options in its energy transition to ensure its energy needs are met in a sustainable, resilient and cost-effective way.
'Nothing is off the table. We will explore every single pathway, every single possibility, and... make sure it is cost-effective and sustainable,' he said.
During the 90-minute interview, Dr Tan fielded a range of questions about Singapore's energy future, from developments in the Asean power grid, to the country's
exploration of nuclear and geothermal energy , and the role of emerging technologies such as carbon capture and storage.
He acknowledged that Singapore's energy transition will result in higher costs, and said the Government will provide support to help people cope.
For example, utility rebates such as the U-Save rebates help households to offset utility expenses, while climate vouchers are meant to encourage them to switch to green appliances. Meanwhile, he said the Government will work with businesses such as through energy efficiency grants to help them manage this impact.
'It is not going to be possible for the cost to not go up,' Dr Tan said. 'But what we will endeavour to do is to manage that gradient... and supplement it with rebates, with grants to help our local population, our households and businesses.'
The promise of energy imports
Dr Tan said that in the near term, renewable energy imports hold the most promise for Singapore.
The Republic has limited access to renewable energy resources, so importing clean electricity generated elsewhere can help.
In 2024, Singapore
raised its low-carbon electricity import target from 4 gigawatts (GW) to 6GW by 2035. This is expected to make up around a third of the country's energy needs by 2035.
Dr Tan said there is a possibility to increase the target beyond this, depending on partnerships.
The Asean power grid – which will allow countries to share renewable energy resources – is also gaining traction, with a growing number of bilateral discussions on the issue.
For example, Singapore and Indonesia in June
inked three key agreements to strengthen cooperation in clean energy and sustainable development, including agreements on cross-border electricity trade.
A regional grid is a win-win for countries importing and exporting renewable energy, Dr Tan noted.
It will not only help Asean achieve its net-zero ambitions earlier, he said, but also bring about economic growth to the countries. 'Given the vast amount of potential that is within Asean itself, you could unlock significant economic opportunities,' he added.
A
US-Singapore study on energy connectivity in South-east Asia had assessed that building the Asean power grid can generate US$2 billion (S$2.6 billion) annually in research and development, and create as many as 9,000 jobs a year.
Asked if the breakdown of multilateralism around the world helped to focus attention on the importance of the regional grid, Dr Tan said: 'I think that in a way, we've all been encouraged as a result of all of the recent developments.'
He added: 'I don't think there's any one major particular push. It's a whole series of nudges. I think the tariffs could also be one of those reminders to encourage all of us to come together and work even more closely as one united Asean.'
Dr Tan said the other pathways that Singapore is exploring – such as the use of carbon capture technologies, the potential of hydrogen as a clean fuel, or tapping nuclear energy – are 'still some distance away'.
'So I think in the foreseeable next five years, you will see a lot of work on renewable energy imports, and at the same time, still natural gas, and how to decarbonise natural gas.'
The importance of partnerships
Calling his new portfolio a 'redesignation' since he had also overseen energy issues as Second Minister for Trade and Industry, Dr Tan said the new title will help him up the ante in international partnerships.
'It allows a more seamless coordination across the different government agencies within Singapore and also at the same time, when we negotiate internationally,' he said, noting that many countries have dedicated energy ministers.
Dr Tan said that while progress on the Asean grid has been made, challenges remain. These include logistical issues like the need to upgrade existing infrastructure to transfer energy.
This is where Singapore could step in to provide investments, such as initial funding to crowd in more capital for cross-border energy projects.
For example, the Government has appointed Singapore Energy Interconnections, a newly incorporated government-linked company, to specialise in developing cross-border power infrastructure.
Singapore's
$10 billion Future Energy Fund – set up to catalyse investments in clean energy technology that may involve high upfront costs and significant commercial, technological and geopolitical risks – could also provide initial funding.
But to attract other sources of capital, such as from the private sector, government-to-government frameworks will be needed to give investors greater certainty, said Dr Tan.
That would improve the 'bankability' of such projects, he said. 'I think it will attract significant investments, both from public capital, private capital, and even longer-term philanthropic capital.'
Going forward, Dr Tan said natural gas will likely remain a core pillar in Singapore's energy mix.
But its share will change depending on the development of technologies.
'A good position for Singapore is that by the mid-2040s, natural gas will be around just slightly below 50 per cent of our mix,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Digital literacy: About 250,000 people to benefit from S$3m boost to national fund, workshops
About 250,000 seniors, youths and individuals with special needs will benefit from a new S$3 million boost to a national fund promoting digital inclusion. Separately, there will be workshops on everyday banking and Generative AI to help people build practical digital skills. It is part of a renewed three-year tie-up between Singapore's largest bank and the Infocomm Media Development Authority. Karen Ngui, MD and Head at DBS Foundation, and Douglas Goh, Director, Digital Engagement and Adoption at the SG Digital Office at the Infocomm Media Development Authority, talk about why this initiative is important for Singapore and DBS. They also talk about how they will recruit participants for these workshops.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Local antique stores see boost in sales of Singapore-related items
Some local antique stores have seen sales of Singapore-related items increase by up to 40 per cent this year, compared with last year. This is as the nation celebrates its 60th birthday. Their customers are also younger, as a new generation, spurred by social media, unpacks the nation's history through vintage items. In this lead-up to National Day, Muhammad Bahajjaj finds out the appeal of these items.


Independent Singapore
2 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Stuck in reception but dreams of banking: 'Should I quit now or power through to land my real career?'
SINGAPORE: Starting a new job can be exciting. You have a fresh environment, new coworkers, and the rewarding feeling of earning your own money, but what if that job feels completely wrong from the very beginning? That's the situation for one recent graduate who sought advice, information, and a different viewpoint on Reddit. After just one month as a receptionist at a large consulting firm, she was already doubting her choice. With a degree in banking and dreams of a career in finance, this current job felt more like a distraction than a step forward, even though it was secure. The big question is whether she should stay, quit, or leave this short experience off her resume as if it never happened. Experience vs. direction The Reddit post sparked a lively discussion among users. Many recognised the poster's situation as a common early-career crossroads. One user asked a blunt question: 'Why did you take the job in the first place?' It's a fair challenge. Was it just to pay the bills? To gain some workplace experience? Or was it a temporary choice until a better opportunity came along? Whatever the reason, the reality is clear: The longer someone stays in an unrelated role, the more it risks pulling them off course. 'You need to move ASAP to avoid getting stuck in your current role,' one commenter urged. Staying too long in a non-finance position could make it harder to convince future employers of your commitment to the industry. See also Revenge quitting is the new rage—but here's why it could backfire However, others warned against quitting without a plan. 'If you need the money, keep working while you search for a job. If you don't need the income, think about quitting and concentrating fully on landing a finance role,' another person advised. In short, it's not just about appearance; it's also about your financial situation. The resume debate: To list or not to list? Some people had mixed feelings about the idea of simply leaving out a job that lasted only one or two months from a resume. While it's true that you don't have to mention every short-term job, some wondered if hiding it would really help your long-term goals. 'If it doesn't relate to your field and doesn't add value, you might leave it off,' one commenter said. 'But it's still a valid job at a respected company, and if you present it well, it can show that you are adaptable and hardworking.' Ultimately, the choice depends on how well the experience fits your story. If you're applying for finance roles, a customer-facing position might not seem directly relevant, but it can highlight communication skills, professionalism, and reliability—all important in any field. See also 8 proven tips for successfully scaling an e-commerce business What employers in finance actually want Several users brought the talk back to the basics: What do employers in banking and finance look for? 'Relevant internships, good grades from a respected university, and connections who can recommend you,' one experienced user summarised. 'The closer the role is to the front office, the tougher the competition.' This means that a receptionist role, while respectable, might not add much to your resume. Instead, users encouraged the original poster to take action: Enrol in relevant courses, get certifications like CFA Level 1 or in financial modelling, and apply for internships aggressively—even unpaid ones if possible. Internships in finance aren't just stepping stones; they often lead to full-time jobs. So, what must be done? If you find yourself in a similar situation—stuck in a job that doesn't match your degree or goals—here's a summary of your options based on the advice given: Quit immediately (if you can afford it): Focus entirely on applying for finance jobs, take courses to improve your skills, and network actively. You might leave the receptionist job off your resume entirely. Stay (if finances require it): Continue job hunting in your free time. Present the current role as a transitional one on your resume, emphasising transferable skills. Upskill and intern : Whether you quit or stay, find time for courses and certifications. Seek internships—some users stressed that they can be more valuable than entry-level jobs when moving into finance. Final thoughts Starting in the 'wrong' job doesn't mean your career is doomed. However, staying there without a plan might be. Whether you include that short-term role on your resume or not is less important than what you do next. Focus on improving your skills, building connections, and aiming for roles that match your degree. Your true career hasn't started yet; it's just waiting for you to show up.