
How to rebuild trust after a viral CEO controversy: Advice for leaders, employees
When the chief executive of data software company Astronomer was caught on a concert Kiss Cam this month, cuddling with the company's HR chief — who was not his wife — that viral moment led to their resignations and questions about leadership culture.
Nearly 30% of large companies experienced abrupt drops in stakeholder trust during a crisis, and almost all struggled to recover without visible, sustained leadership action, according to BCG's Trust Index.
For employees, it can raise an unsettling question: Where do we go from here?
While PR teams work to manage the external message, repairing internal trust is far more complex. Rebuilding company trust requires honest leadership, true accountability and a thorough examination of the company's values — and whether they're being lived or merely listed on the company website.
To understand how companies can move forward after a CEO controversy and how employees can gauge whether trust can be rebuilt, we asked experts what companies should do after a controversy goes viral.
What good leadership looks like after a controversy
After a controversy, leadership sets the tone for how trust can be rebuilt.
Lisa Burke, an organizational development consultant with Energage, says leaders must do more than tout company values; they need to live them.
'It's so often about leaders walking the talk,' she says. 'Values really set the standard for what our culture looks like and feels like.'
When leaders embody those values in their actions and decisions, she says, employees begin to rebuild confidence in the culture.
It's also important to reassure employees that their work still matters, despite the controversy.
'Yes, we've been through a challenge,' Burke says. 'Let's all come together and help move this organization forward and become better because of it. What lessons can we learn? And how do we get better?'
Burke notes that becoming better starts with rebuilding trust from the top down.
After a controversy, companies must begin rebuilding trust with their employees, and that starts with taking ownership of the issue.
'The first thing is to own it,' says Burke. 'People feel when it's performative. They also feel when it's authentic.'
Rather than delaying, downplaying or shirking blame, leadership should acknowledge the situation promptly, she says, even with a simple message like, 'This thing has occurred, we're handling it.'
She adds that it's essential for the company to reaffirm its core values and acknowledge that the incident may not have aligned with those values, but that they remain important.
'You should be as transparent as possible, because employees are already giving feedback. The way our brain works is we make up stories in the absence of information, and most often, we make up a negative story,' Burke says.
After a viral controversy, 'I think the biggest answer is some communication,' says Ashley Herd, who spent 20 years working in human resources before launching her own company, Manager Method. 'That's the biggest gap.'
Scandals spread quickly, but companies often hesitate to respond, waiting days while uncertainty festers. But while companies wait to finalize a polished statement, employees are often left with unanswered questions. According to Herd, a lack of transparency can allow underlying issues to simmer. If unaddressed, they can surface publicly through Glassdoor reviews, employee chatter or social media posts.
Herd emphasizes: 'What people, especially people at the company, care about most are the things that you're saying to them. Are you talking to them as a human?' she asks.
It doesn't have to be perfect. Even simple communication helps, she says. She recommends something like, 'This is really hard. I'm still trying to figure this out. I'm here to support you and the team members, and my focus is on you all as an organization.'
She also recommends holding a candid meeting, even if it feels tense, and creating space for open conversation without making it feel like an obligation.
The message should be clear, she advises: 'We want to give you the opportunity to talk honestly about this, because this isn't just a news story; this is something that impacts the trust of the organization.'
Even though it won't be fun, she says it's best to focus on the outcome.
'Having a meeting that doesn't go well is a million times better than having silence that goes worse,' she says.
Senior leaders should become more visible, Burke says, especially to help coach managers who feel uneasy addressing tough topics. One way to achieve this is through listening sessions, where groups of employees and managers share their concerns about the organization's future with leadership.
'It's a great opportunity to build trust and relationships,' Burke explains.
Another possible approach is role-playing.
'If you're nervous about sharing this with your team, is there an individual you're most nervous about?' she says. 'Let's have a role play, and I'll play that person so the mid-level manager can feel more confident.'
Burke also recommends offering open office hours for unstructured conversations. You might say, "Hey, I have open office hours on Friday from three to four," allowing for good discussions about what's going on in the organization and giving employees a chance to see where their role is headed.
Even small, informal check-ins signal that leadership is present and paying attention. By showing up consistently and creating space for honest dialogue, leaders prove that rebuilding trust isn't just a message, it's a mindset.
However, listening to employees isn't enough; leaders also need to take action.
'If I'm a senior leader and I've just had a listening session where you shared concerns as my employee, my responsibility is now to take action,' Burke explains.
That could mean scheduling a follow-up to share potential solutions or progress.
'It isn't always taking action based on what I think would be best,' Burke says, 'but listening to those who are on the front line. You might then ask them, 'What's the solution you see?''
Even small steps toward progress help reinforce that employee feedback matters and that leaders are listening with intention to act.
What to do when your company's culture starts to feel broken
When a company fails to respond transparently after a controversy, it can reveal deeper cracks in the culture. And for employees, those cracks are often easier to feel than to name.
According to Herd, a lack of genuine recognition of human values is something employees should watch out for.
Ashley Herd warns that a major red flag is when 'employees are asking for some sort of meeting, and the company just shuts them down across the board and says 'no.'
Another red flag, she adds, is if 'you have a meeting, and it's stopped right away.' In those cases, leadership may say things like, 'We're not going to talk about these things. Get back to work.'
Lisa Burke notes that poor company culture often becomes tangible to employees over time.
'You will start to feel it if you're not in a great culture,' she said. 'The worst ones are gaslighting or not sharing any information. You're just not hearing anything for a month about something.'
These patterns, Burke explains, tend to be strong signals that the culture 'may not be doing what it needs to do in order for us to achieve our mission.'
For employees facing these challenges, Burke recommends honest self-reflection. Ask yourself, 'Is this the place I really want to be working? What are my pros and cons?'
She encourages looking ahead: 'The next thing would be, let me play the movie to the end. So if I did leave, where would I go? What would that look like? Would the grass be greener or not?'
Finally, while it's important to provide honest feedback to your employer, Burke reminds employees to be mindful about maintaining professional relationships. 'Make sure you aren't also burning bridges on the way out,' she said.
Leadership that earns trust, not just headlines
In the end, rebuilding trust in the wake of a CEO controversy isn't about perfect statements; it's about communication, ownership and transparency. According to these experts, it comes down to four simple, if uncomfortable, steps:
According to experts, when companies commit to their values, employees can sense they're not just being heard, they're being led.
What is USA TODAY Top Workplaces 2025?
Does your company have your trust? Each year, USA TODAY Top Workplaces, a collaboration between Energage and USA TODAY, ranks organizations across the United States that excel at creating a positive work environment for their employees. Employee feedback determines the winners.
In 2025, over 1,500 companies earned recognition as top workplaces. Check out our overall U.S. rankings. You can also gain insights into more workplace trends and advice by checking out the links below.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
a day ago
- Business Upturn
Building Tomorrow's Insurance Today: HDFC ERGO's TechPreneur Season 2 Grand Finale Showcases ‘Deep Connect' Breakthroughs
With an aim to encourage tech-innovation through out-of-the-box ideas in insurance, HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company, India's leading private sector general insurer, today announced the winners of Techpreneur Season-2, a launchpad for emerging startups to co-create the future of insurance in India. Business Wire India With an aim to encourage tech-innovation through out-of-the-box ideas in insurance, HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company, India's leading private sector general insurer, today announced the winners of Techpreneur Season-2, a launchpad for emerging startups to co-create the future of insurance in India. This is a first-of-its-kind program in the country that promotes unique tech ideas in the insurance sector by partnering with startups that are trying to address real business challenges and problems. Backed by BCG and Google, the programme invited cutting-edge start-ups to present scalable solutions with new-age tech such as- Claims Efficiency, Agentic AI, Sales Assist, Smart Underwriting Automation, Enhanced Experience for customers and employees, among others. The second season challenge was designed to foster co-creation, moving beyond pitches to a model where start-ups and industry leaders build solutions together. After a rigorous multi-stage evaluation, 32 shortlisted start-ups moved to the next level with Logicloop, CarePlix and VoiceOwl emerging as the winners. Commenting on the TechPreneur Season 2, Parthanil Ghosh, Executive Director*, HDFC ERGO General Insurance, said, 'India's Insurtech market is growing at an exponential pace. At HDFC ERGO, we strongly believe that while technology cannot replace the human touch, the right blend of human insight and GenAI can establish a 'Deep Connect' and ensure hyper-personalised experiences for every Indian. In line with this belief, the innovations presented at TechPreneur Season 2 were designed to offer tech-driven, empathetic and transformative experiences. We congratulate our winners and all the finalists and look forward to partnering with them to bring these powerful solutions to life, furthering our mission to secure a financially inclusive 'Bharat'.' Themed 'Deep Connect', season 2 of TechPreneur celebrated the powerful convergence of AI-driven intelligence and human empathy—fuelling solutions that reimagine how insurance can be experienced in smarter, more intuitive, and hyper-personalised ways. TechPreneur has rapidly scaled its impact- from reaching out to 140+ start-ups last year to 1000+ start-ups this year, reinforcing its position as a leading platform for start-up collaboration in the insurance sector. The initial rounds of the competition kicked off on 18th July, where 1000 start-ups were reached, and 32 were shortlisted for the second round of pitching. These shortlisted innovators were further put through a rigorous scrutiny in the second round of virtual pitching held on 24th July. The final 12 contenders were selected to present their ideas to an esteemed panel of judges comprising of Mark Klein, Chief Digital Officer and Member of the Board of Management of ERGO Group AG, Parthanil Ghosh, Executive Director*, HDFC ERGO General Insurance, leaders from BCG and Google, and other eminent industry leaders at the grand finale held on 31st July 25. The winners were awarded an opportunity for a paid Proof-of-Concept (POC) with HDFC ERGO. In addition, the winners also received Google Cloud Credits and access to invaluable industry insights and mentorship from BCG and Google, enabling them to further develop and scale their cutting-edge solutions. As a digital first insurer, HDFC ERGO continues to leverage technology to propel financial inclusion in the country and reach the last mile. From launching Here-App, one-of-its-kind insurance-led ecosystem to address real-life needs around health, mobility, and pets—to strategic alliances with IIT Bombay, Duck Creek, and Google Cloud, the company is reshaping insurance into a hyper-personalised, inclusive, and AI-powered experience for every Indian. *Subject to IRDAI approvals Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with Business Wire India. Business Upturn take no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash


Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
AI Levels The Playing Field, But Trust Still Wins
AI can now synthesize mountains of research in minutes. Market trends, competitive benchmarking, even complex scenario planning, what once took consulting firms weeks and clients hundreds of thousands of dollars, can now be generated in seconds. If you're a business leader, this sounds like liberation. Suddenly, anyone can be a strategist. Fire up ChatGPT, type in your challenge, and out comes a polished report that rivals what you'd expect from a junior consultant at a top-tier firm. So why are companies still writing seven-figure checks to Deloitte, McKinsey, and BCG? Why, in an age of hyper-smart machines, do the world's most sophisticated businesses still crave human-led validation? The answer reveals a truth that's more relevant now than ever: information has been democratized, but authority has not. AI Has Democratized Knowledge, Not Confidence Let's be honest: Generative AI is an incredible equalizer. A mid-sized retailer can now access insights that, two years ago, only Fortune 100s could afford. Want a competitor analysis? Done in minutes. Need a five-year market entry strategy? Easy. The playing field has shifted, but not in the way you might think. AI doesn't just make information cheaper. It makes it abundant. In a world where everyone has access to powerful tools, the scarce resource isn't data. It's trust. Because when the stakes are high, whether it's a $2 billion M&A deal, a global rebrand, or a supply chain overhaul, executives don't want an answer. They want the right answer, and more importantly, they want to know someone, from a trusted firm, will stand behind it when the heat is on. The Power of the Stamp The power of the consulting brand lies in its ability to provide reassurance rather than just insights. Picture a CEO presenting a bold new strategy to the board: Option A says, 'AI recommended this approach based on market signals and risk analysis,' while Option B states, 'Deloitte validated this recommendation after rigorous analysis and modeling.' Which one earns approval? Boards, investors, and regulators prioritize risk mitigation, and big-name firms offer something AI cannot: reputational insurance. A Deloitte stamp signals governance, accountability, and liability—elements no open-source model can replicate. Consulting firms today are less about crunching numbers and more about giving leaders cover when things don't go as planned. AI + Brand = The Next Consulting Model This isn't an either-or story. The firms that thrive in this new era aren't the ones resisting AI, they're the ones embracing it, while doubling down on their core asset: trust. AI is now the first draft of analysis, the backroom researcher that never sleeps. But consultants? They're the interpreters, the storytellers, the validators. They frame the data in the context of organizational politics, market nuance, and cultural dynamics—things AI still struggles to read. Think of AI as the lab generating a new drug. Deloitte is the FDA stamp that says it's safe to use. Without that stamp, would you risk your career betting on an algorithm? The irony here is rich: As technology gets smarter, the human role becomes more about signal than substance, a signal of reliability, accountability, and alignment with best practices. The old cliché that 'nobody ever got fired for hiring McKinsey' may be even more relevant in the AI age. The Leadership Mandate: Validate at Speed For leaders, the message is clear: AI accelerates insights, but trust accelerates decisions. The organizations that win won't just use AI, they'll design trust mechanisms around it. Some firms are already doing this by blending AI precision with human authority. They use algorithms for data synthesis, but the final deliverable still carries the Deloitte or BCG imprimatur. It's a hybrid model that marries speed with certainty. In practice, this means rethinking value delivery by moving away from selling research hours and focusing instead on selling risk mitigation. It also means upskilling for trust; consultants can no longer be just analysts; they must act as advisors, storytellers, and change agents. Finally, it requires building a brand as a moat, because in a market where AI can mimic expertise, reputation becomes the ultimate differentiator. AI has changed the game, but it hasn't changed the rules of trust. Businesses don't just want answers. They want someone they believe in standing behind those answers. As insight becomes instant, the new premium isn't speed or cost, it's confidence. And confidence still wears a human face, backed by a brand that says, 'We've got you.'


Forbes
3 days ago
- Forbes
How To Deal With Four Common Traps That Sabotage AI Success
Stoyan Mitov is the CEO of Dreamix, a custom software development company helping tech leaders increase capacity without giving up quality. As AI becomes increasingly central to business operations in 2025, I've witnessed a troubling pattern: Despite massive investments, 74% of companies still struggle to achieve meaningful value from their AI initiatives, according to BCG research. After dozens of AI implementations at our software development company, I've identified the most common misconceptions that consistently derail projects, often before organizations even realize they're off track. Trap 1: 'AI Will Fix Everything' I often encounter the belief that AI is a silver bullet for organizational problems. Last year, we worked with a manufacturing client who insisted AI would solve their inventory management issues. Three months in, we discovered the real problem wasn't forecasting—it was inconsistent data entry by warehouse staff. This reflects a broader misconception that AI can compensate for broken processes or poor data hygiene. In my experience, AI tends to amplify what's already there, both strengths and weaknesses. If your manual processes are chaotic, AI will make them chaotically automated. The reality check: Before implementing any AI solution, we now work with clients to understand their current processes thoroughly. If you wouldn't trust a new employee to succeed with your existing workflow, AI may face similar challenges in delivering meaningful results. Trap 2: 'More Data Is Always Better' Another costly mistake I see repeatedly is the assumption that AI requires massive datasets to be effective. Organizations often spend months trying to compile comprehensive historical data, believing that more information will automatically lead to better AI performance. In reality, the quality and relevance of data matter far more than quantity. Poor data quality costs organizations an average of $12.9 million annually, and it is estimated that 80% of the effort in machine learning projects is spent on ensuring data quality. Clean, consistent data from a shorter period often outperforms larger datasets with quality issues. I've seen companies achieve meaningful results with focused, high-quality datasets while others struggle despite having years of poorly structured information. The trap here is perfectionism. Organizations delay AI implementation while pursuing data perfection that may never come and often isn't necessary. This can postpone valuable initiatives indefinitely, while competitors move forward with smaller but sufficient datasets that still deliver business value. Trap 3: 'Technical Excellence Guarantees Adoption' Many of the most challenging setbacks I've witnessed stem from treating AI implementation as purely a technical challenge. Organizations often focus entirely on building sophisticated systems while completely overlooking the human side of adoption. What's often missing is that the company culture determines whether AI initiatives succeed or fail. According to EY's research, 50% of senior business leaders report declining company-wide enthusiasm for AI integration, while 54% feel they are failing as leaders amid AI's rapid growth. I've learned to spot the warning signs early: If business stakeholders aren't actively involved in defining success metrics, if end users aren't part of the design process or if leadership talks about AI as something "the IT department is handling," the project is likely headed for trouble. Without buy-in from the people who will actually use the system, even the most technically advanced AI solution can become an expensive digital paperweight. Trap 4: The 'Quick Win' Pressure Cooker Executives often demand immediate results from AI initiatives, creating a dangerous cycle of overpromising and underdelivering. This impatience can be particularly destructive because many AI benefits compound over time, yet leadership may lose confidence and cut funding just as systems are beginning to learn and improve. This rush for immediate returns reflects a broader misunderstanding of how AI value creation works. BCG research shows that AI leaders pursue fewer opportunities than their peers but expect more than twice the ROI by focusing on the most promising initiatives. They understand that sustainable AI success requires patience and commitment rather than scattering resources across multiple quick-win attempts. The most successful organizations resist the pressure to show immediate results across every initiative, instead concentrating their efforts on fewer, more strategic opportunities that can deliver meaningful long-term value. The Self-Assessment That Could Save Your AI Investment Based on these patterns, I've developed a simple diagnostic that reveals whether your organization is walking into these traps: • Can you name exactly which business problem your AI initiative will solve and how you'll measure success? • Are the people who will use the AI system daily involved in its design? • Do you have at least one dataset that your team trusts completely for business decisions? • Is your timeline realistic enough to allow for learning and iteration? • Are you focusing on a few high-impact opportunities rather than experimenting everywhere? If you answered "no" to any of these questions, you're likely setting up your AI initiative for the same struggles that plague 74% of companies. Moving Forward The organizations that achieve 1.5 times higher revenue growth from AI—as BCG research demonstrates—aren't necessarily more technically sophisticated. They're more honest about their limitations and more disciplined about avoiding these common traps. Start small, measure relentlessly and remember that successful AI implementation is as much about changing how people work as it is about changing what technology can do. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?