Israel outlines plans to pack Gaza's population into a closed border zone
By JULIA FRANKEL
Israel's defense minister has outlined plans to pack hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into a closed zone of the Gaza Strip along the border with Egypt, according to local media reports.
It appears to be the latest version of plans by the Israeli government to maintain lasting control over the territory and relocate much of its population of some 2 million. Critics say that would amount to forcible displacement in violation of international law because Israel's offensive and blockade have made Gaza largely uninhabitable.
Israeli officials say the aim is to separate the civilian population from Hamas, which still controls parts of Gaza and holds dozens of hostages abducted in the Oct. 7 attack that triggered the war 21 months ago. Palestinians would then be given the option of emigrating, they say.
U.S. President Donald Trump, who has said he is narrowing in on a ceasefire and hopes to eventually end the war, has also voiced support for the mass transfer of Palestinians out of Gaza.
Defense Minister Israel Katz outlined the latest plans in a closed briefing with Israeli military reporters on Monday. His office did not respond to a request for comment on their reports, which appeared in several Israeli media outlets.
Katz reportedly said he had ordered Israel's military to draw up plans to build what he called a 'humanitarian city' in Rafah, Gaza's southernmost city, which has been heavily damaged in the war and is now largely uninhabited.
Katz reportedly said that Palestinians would not be able to leave once they enter the zone.
The military would initially move 600,000 Palestinians from an existing so-called humanitarian zone along the coast, with the aim of eventually transferring the whole population to Rafah. Katz said Israel was searching for an unspecified international body to deliver aid as Israeli troops secured the perimeter.
He said the military could start building the 'city' during a 60-day ceasefire that Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are discussing in Washington this week.
Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces. Palestinians view Gaza as an integral part of their national homeland and oppose any plans to uproot them.
Both Trump and Netanyahu have said Gaza's population should be relocated to other countries through what they refer to as voluntary emigration. During their meeting on Monday at the White House, Netanyahu said Palestinians should have a 'free choice' on whether to stay or leave.
Palestinians fear that even if they leave temporarily to escape the war, Israel will never allow them to return — a possible repeat of the mass exodus that occurred before and during the 1948 war surrounding Israel's creation.
Katz expressed hope that the 'emigration plan' would happen and said Netanyahu was already leading efforts to find countries willing to take in Palestinians, according to Israel's Haaretz newspaper.
Rights groups fear that concentrating the population along the border with Egypt would create catastrophic conditions that leave Palestinians no choice but to leave.
'Forcing people into what amounts to a large concentration camp echoes dark chapters of history," said Tania Hary, executive director of Gisha, an Israeli group advocating Palestinians' right to freedom of movement.
"Israel's leadership hasn't been shy about the goal to expel Palestinians from Gaza and maintain permanent control over wide swaths of the territory,' she said.
Israel and the United States have already rolled out an aid distribution program in Rafah that has been marred by violence and controversy.
Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed or wounded while trying to reach sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a contractor supported by Israel and the U.S., according to local hospitals.
Palestinian witnesses and health officials say Israeli forces have repeatedly opened fire toward crowds of people heading to the sites. The military says it has fired warning shots at people who approached its forces in what it describes as a suspicious manner.
GHF denies there has been any violence in or around the sites themselves, which are in Israeli military zones off limits to independent media. Two U.S. contractors told The Associated Press that their colleagues used live ammunition and stun grenades as crowds scrambled for food, allegations denied by the foundation. GHF has also denied involvement in any population transfer plans.
But in a press conference in May, Netanyahu appeared to link the two initiatives, saying Israel would implement the new aid program and then create a 'sterile zone' in southern Gaza, free of Hamas, where the Palestinian population would be relocated.
Netanyahu has said Israel will maintain lasting control over Gaza and has ruled out any role for the internationally-recognized Palestinian Authority, led by political rivals of Hamas.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
In Expanding Trade War, Trump Digs U.S. into a Geopolitical Hole
On Monday, the White House launched new salvos in its widening trade wars. President Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs of between 25 percent and 40 percent on imports from 14 countries, including Japan, South Korea, Thailand and Bangladesh, unless they address his concerns over perceived bilateral trade imbalances. The renewed tariff threats went down like a lead balloon in capitals across the world, including among some of the U.S.'s closest allies. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba described the developments as 'deeply regrettable.' His colleague, Itsunori Onodera, policy chief for Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party, said Trump's decision 'to notify a key ally with nothing more than a single letter is extremely disrespectful, and I feel a strong sense of indignation.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio's decision to drop stops this week in Tokyo and Seoul during a quick Asia trip underscored the fresh tensions. Various governments fitfully tried to hash out new understandings with the Trump administration to stave off the threatened tariffs. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said that the 30 percent tariff Trump sought to impose on his country as a 'reciprocal' measure was 'not an accurate representation of available trade data.' Thailand's acting prime minister, Phumtham Wechayachai, bemoaned the 'contradiction' as Trump's latest edict seemed to undo the progress made amid trade talks just last week. Over the weekend, Trump also lashed out at the BRICS grouping of non-Western powers, threatening its 10 members and other partner states with additional tariffs because of the bloc being supposedly 'anti-American.' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who was hosting a BRICS leaders' summit in Rio de Janeiro, rebuffed Trump's bullying. 'The world has changed. We don't want an emperor,' Lula said, adding: 'This is a set of countries that wants to find another way of organizing the world from the economic perspective. I think that's why the BRICS are making people uncomfortable.' Trump had threatened 100 percent tariffs on the BRICS countries – which include putative Washington adversaries in Russia, China, and Iran, but also close partners such as India – if the bloc pursued attempts to break the global influence of the U.S. dollar. Some members had offered vague proposals for a new common currency to undercut dollar dominance, but the project has not got off the ground amid frictions within the bloc and wariness of courting Washington's wrath. Nonetheless, Celso Amorim, Lula's chief foreign policy adviser, said Trump's new threat 'reinforces the willingness of [BRICS] members and associated partners to chart our path and seek greater independence.' That's a calculation other U.S. allies are making as well. On a visit to Britain, French President Emmanuel Macron warned of Europe's overreliance on the United States and China. 'If we want to build a sustainable future for all children [we have] to de-risk our economies and our societies from these dual dependencies,' he said. France wants 'an open world,' Macron added, gesturing to the 'strategic autonomy' for the continent that he has long championed. 'We want to cooperate, but not to depend.' The frustrations and concerns being aired by world leaders are borne out by public sentiment. A Pew poll published Tuesday found that a significant proportion of citizens of U.S. allies see Trump's America in a gloomy light. Majorities in Canada and Mexico view their neighbor as the 'greatest threat' facing their country, marking significant increases since a similarly worded survey in 2019. Further afield, more than a third of South Africans, 40 percent of Indonesians, 30 percent of all Turks, and almost a fifth of respondents in Japan – a treaty ally protected by U.S. forces – also singled the United States out for the singular threat it posed. Trump and his allies cast their trade wars as a necessary effort to restructure global trade and bring more manufacturing home. Whatever the merits of their case, analysts see their approach as potentially damaging to the geopolitical interests of the United States. 'The president is determined to light a fire under those trading partners who he thinks are not moving fast enough,' Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute and a former U.S. trade negotiator, told my colleagues. 'But to hit two of our closest allies [Japan and South Korea] with high tariffs – particularly when we have benefited from cooperation with them on semiconductors and energy and chip building, and when their companies invest a lot in the United States – it is hard for me to circle the square here.' 'Many in Asia are going to ask, 'Is this how the U.S. treats its friends?'' Manu Bhaskaran, chief executive of Centennial Asia Advisors, a research firm, told the New York Times. 'Will there be permanent damage to American standing and interests in Asia and elsewhere through these crude threats and unpleasant language?' Oliver Stuenkel, an associate professor of international relations at the Getulio Vargas Foundation in São Paulo, said Trump's broadsides against the BRICS shook up a rather sleepy summit that various heads of state, including the Russian and Chinese presidents, had chosen to skip. The bloc had put out a careful joint statement that expressed disapproval of Israel's conduct of the war in Gaza and concern over the strikes on Iran, but did not call out U.S. involvement in either instance. 'Trump's attack was counterproductive,' Stuenkel told me. 'If his intention was to make countries move away from BRICS, I think that's probably not going to work out.' Instead, Trump's antagonism might provide more impetus for the bloc's diverse membership to find genuine common cause. 'The rank unilateralism and casual abandonment of international law when it comes to regions such as the Middle East and arenas such as global trade call for a stabilizing countercurrent that can strengthen norms of cooperation,' wrote Sarang Shidore, director of the Global South program at the Quincy Institute, a Washington think tank. 'Global South states, as weaker actors, rely even more on international cooperation in their attempts to achieve security and prosperity for their people.' During the Cold War and its initial aftermath, the United States worked with a host of partners to strengthen 'a community of shared values, compatible political ideals, international institutions and mutual support within those institutions,' wrote Andrea Oelsner, a professor of international relations at San Andrés University in Argentina. 'In recent months, the Trump administration has sharply eroded the country's credibility with these friends,' she added. 'And credibility and trust are much more easily destroyed than built … never mind rebuilt.'
Yomiuri Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump's Crackdown on Renewable Energy Has Just Begun
President Donald Trump issued an executive order Monday evening ordering his administration to crack down on remaining loopholes allowing access to renewable energy tax breaks, after Congress voted last week to overwhelmingly roll back the subsidies. The order aims to placate the right-wing House Freedom Caucus, which argued the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed by Trump on July 4 should have gone further to cut subsidies and reduce the law's impact on the deficit. Share prices of at least a dozen solar companies, including Enphase Energy and Sunrun, dropped after the order was signed. A last-minute deal between Senate and House Republicans last week agreed to allow wind and solar facilities that break ground within 12 months to receive subsidies for several years. Democrats uniformly opposed the bill, which gutted the Inflation Reduction Act, President Joe Biden's signature climate law. Deficit hawks in the Freedom Caucus signed onto the deal after the White House assured them it would take further action to strictly enforce those rules in a bid to cut back the number of projects that qualified for subsidies. 'We met with President Trump and he did a masterful job of laying out how we could improve it, how he could use his chief executive office to make the bill better,' said Rep. Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina) told CNBC on Thursday. 'We accepted the bill as-is. What is different is President Trump is going to use his powers to – like on the subsidies – to make sure a lot of these subsidies won't remain in effect from here on out.' In a statement Tuesday, Norman praised Trump for keeping his pledge by issuing the executive order. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Monday's order directed the treasury secretary to narrowly define what it means for projects to be 'under construction' by the deadline. The order says the department should prevent projects from circumventing rules about what counts as beginning construction, 'unless a substantial portion of a subject facility has been built.' Restricting that loophole could reduce the number of projects that qualify for the tax breaks and potentially save the government hundreds of millions of dollars, said Thomas Pyle, president of the Institute for Energy Research, a conservative think tank. 'The Trump administration could, when they issue guidance, tighten up the definitions and make it very specific in terms of what is under construction,' Pyle said. 'There's attention on the language that the administration, when it issues guidance, will be doing so in a way to make sure these guys aren't gaming the system.' Manish Bapna, president of the environmental Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group, said the executive order could be used merely to enact the One Big Beautiful Bill Act – or it could be used to overstep and go beyond what the law mandates. 'The real question is whether this is more bark than bite,' Bapna said. 'If we see this go beyond the letter and intent of the law, we will take the administration to court.' The order also directs the Interior Department to eliminate any policies that give preferential treatment to wind and solar. Trump's order appears to be targeting established tax rules that are aimed at allowing for a realistic timeline for financing energy projects of all kinds, including solar and wind, said Abby Hopper, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a statement. 'We will continue to make the case that business certainty, predictability, and even-handedness are bedrocks of federal policy that cannot be undone by the stroke of a pen,' Hopper said. 'We expect the Treasury Department to follow the law.'
Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Japan's sticky problem with Trump, tariffs and rice
The surging cost of rice has become a political hot topic in Japan heading into elections this month. By Hiroshi HIYAMA and Harumi OZAWA Donald Trump's insistence that "spoiled" Japan imports more U.S. rice is adding to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's problems ahead of elections that could sink his premiership after less than a year in office. Japan is one of more than 20 countries receiving letters this week from the U.S. president warning of "reciprocal" tariffs from August 1 failing a trade agreement with Washington. The 25 percent across-the-board levy for Japan is separate from similar charges for cars, steel and aluminium that have already been imposed. Trump wants to get Japanese firms to manufacture more in the United States and for Tokyo to buy more US goods -- notably gas and oil, cars and rice -- to reduce the $70 billion trade deficit with the Asian powerhouse. "I have great respect for Japan, they won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage," Trump said on Truth Social on June 30. Rice, though, is small fry in the grand scheme of bilateral business between the countries. BMI Fitch Solutions said that it accounts for only 0.37 percent of U.S. exports to Japan, and that even doubling that would have a "negligible" effect on overall trade. "The Trump administration seems more concerned with the optics of striking deals than with meaningfully narrowing the U.S. trade deficit," BMI said. For Japan, doubling imports could be swallowed if only the economic impact is considered. It could be well worth it if such a concession could reduce or even remove Trump's damaging 25 percent tariff on Japanese autos. But the politics of rice are fraught for Ishiba, whose ruling coalition disastrously lost its majority in lower house elections in October. Upper house elections on July 20 could see a similar drubbing, which might prompt Ishiba to quit, 10 months after taking the helm of the long-dominant but unloved Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Rice holds a cherished place in Japanese national culture -- samurai reputedly used to be paid in it. Relying on imports -- currently almost all rice consumed is grown domestically -- would be seen by many as a national humiliation for the country of 124 million people, and risky. "Culturally, and historically, the Japanese people are all about rice," Shinichi Katayama, the fourth-generation owner of 120-year-old Tokyo rice wholesaler Sumidaya, told AFP. "I personally welcome having an additional option for Japanese consumers. But I also feel the move (letting in lots of foreign rice) is too early from the standpoint of food security," he said. "If we become reliant on rice imports, we may face shortages again when something happens." While Japan already imports rice from the United States, many consumers see foreign, long-grain varieties as being of dubious quality and lacking the requisite stickiness of the homegrown short-grain rice. Bad memories linger from when Japan suffered a cold summer in 1993 and had to import large volumes of the grain from Thailand. American rice "tastes awful. It lacks stickiness", said Sueo Matsumoto, 69, who helps families where children have hearing difficulties. "If they (the Americans) want to export to Japan, they must work at it. They must think about consumer preference," he told AFP in Tokyo. As a result, Ishiba's government has been at pains to say it won't bend on the issue -- although this may change after the election. "We have no intention of sacrificing agriculture in future negotiations," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said recently. "Ishiba is walking a narrow plank, wary of provoking powerful domestic lobbies like rice farmers, while juggling an approval rating that would make aggressive trade moves politically perilous," said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management. The government has already been under fire for the recent skyrocketing of rice prices, which have roughly doubled in 12 months. Factors include a very hot summer in 2023, panic-buying after a warning of an imminent "megaquake" in 2024, alleged hoarding by some traders, and a surge in rice-hungry tourists. To help ease the pain, Tokyo is tapping emergency stockpiles, and imports have risen sharply -- led by rice from California -- but these are still tiny compared with domestic production. "All these problems with rice prices show the LDP's agriculture policy has failed," retiree Yasunari Wakasa, 77, told AFP. © 2025 AFP
