Sri Lanka to sack jailed police chief over a botched drug raid
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake's ruling coalition submitted a resolution to that effect in parliament, beginning a lengthy legal process to dismiss Inspector-General Deshabandu Tennakoon.
"We hope the speaker will act promptly on the resolution," lawmaker and deputy labour minister Mahinda Jayasinghe told reporters outside the legislature.
"We want him removed on four counts -- corruption, misconduct, abuse of power, and gross partiality in office."
Dissanayake is required to address parliament before appointing a three-member panel to investigate the allegations.
If Tennakoon is found guilty, an absolute majority of lawmakers must endorse his removal.
Dissanayake's leftist National People Power (NPP) coalition has the numbers to comfortably remove Tennakoon after a landslide election victory last year.
The police chief turned himself in to authorities last week after more than a fortnight on the run from an arrest warrant.
He stands accused of authorising an ill-fated drug bust in 2023, allegedly in violation of internal regulations, which triggered a gun battle between competing police units in the southern coastal resort town of Weligama.
One police officer was killed, and another was critically wounded in the incident. No drugs were found.
Tennakoon was appointed police chief in November 2023, but the move was challenged in the Supreme Court, which suspended him last July pending the outcome of a separate case.
He was given the top job despite Sri Lanka's highest court ruling that he had tortured a suspect in custody by rubbing menthol balm on his genitals.
The Supreme Court ordered Tennakoon to pay half a million rupees ($1,666) in compensation to the victim, but the previous government ignored judicial orders to take disciplinary action against him.
State prosecutor Dileepa Peeris told a court last week that Tennakoon was the "head of a criminal network" and unfit to lead the 85,000-strong police force.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
20 hours ago
- Filipino Times
House to File Appeal After SC Voids VP Duterte Impeachment Articles
The House of Representatives is preparing to file a motion for reconsideration following the Supreme Court's (SC) unanimous decision declaring the impeachment articles against Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional. According to House spokesperson Atty. Princess Abante, Speaker Martin Romualdez confirmed the move, citing overlooked factual details in the SC's ruling—particularly the claim that the complaint never went through plenary, which the House says is contradicted by their official records. Abante stressed that these details were included in previous documents submitted to the SC. The motion seeks to give the House a chance to clarify these points and assert its constitutional role in initiating impeachment proceedings. The SC ruled 13-0 that the impeachment violated the one-year ban under the Constitution and lacked due process. However, Abante argued that the due process standard used by the Court is not part of existing laws or House rules. The House maintains that the impeachment process was valid and insists on defending its institutional independence. Abante said the prosecution panel will continue preparing the case while waiting on the outcome of their appeal. Meanwhile, Abante expressed hope that the Senate will fulfill its role in the impeachment process, despite the Supreme Court ruling. She added that the House is fully prepared for the opening of the 20th Congress on Monday, July 28, with all necessary precautions in place—including skipping the usual red carpet to focus on the President's State of the Nation Address.
Filipino Times
2 days ago
- Filipino Times
Palace: Respect Supreme Court ruling on VP Duterte impeachment
Malacañang urged the public to respect the Supreme Court's decision declaring the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. Presidential Communications Office Press Officer Undersecretary Claire Castro said the Palace has not yet fully reviewed the ruling but emphasized the importance of upholding the judiciary's independence. 'The impeachment process is a matter handled by the legislative and judicial branches, and we recognize their independence in carrying out their constitutional mandates,' she added. The Supreme Court earlier ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte violated the one-year bar rule unde Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution and infringed on her right to due process. The decision, penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, stated that the high court could not acquire jurisdiction over the proceedings due to the constitutional prohibition. Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa inhibited from the case, while Associate Justice Maria Filomena Singh was on leave. The case stemmed from the consolidated petition filed by Duterte, her counsel Atty. Israelito Torreon, and several others seeking to nullify the impeachment complaint filed by the House of Representatives. Supreme Court spokesperson Atty. Camille Ting clarified that while the high tribunal nullified the complaint, it is not clearing Duterte of the charges but added that 'any subsequent impeachment complaint' may only be filed starting February 6, 2026.
Filipino Times
3 days ago
- Filipino Times
Supreme Court voids impeachment case vs VP Sara, cites one-year bar
The Supreme Court has declared the impeachment complaint filed against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional, citing the one-year prohibition on filing successive impeachment cases. In its ruling, the High Court emphasized that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the case due to the procedural safeguard enshrined in the Constitution. 'Therefore, the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment complaint,' SC spokesperson Camille Ting announced in a press briefing. Ting clarified, however, that the decision does not amount to clearing the vice president of all allegations. She explained that the ruling is limited to procedural grounds and does not delve into the merits of the accusations raised in the dismissed complaint. According to the Court's decision, a fresh impeachment case against Duterte may be filed once the one-year period lapses, specifically starting February 6, 2026.
