Severe warning on extending Help-To-Buy to second-hand homes
Internal briefing documents prepared for Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe, obtained by Extra.ie caution that extending grants to second-hand homes, which has since been provided for in the Programme for Government,' represents an additional upside risk to prices'.
The Help-to-Buy and First Home schemes, which only apply to newly built properties, are widely agreed by experts, including the ESRI and Central Bank, to have driven up house prices. Minister Paschal Donohoe. Pic: Leah Farrell/RollingNews.ie
The Opposition says that if second-hand homes are now included, it would 'turbo-charge' inflation and push even more people out of the property market.
The price of new and second-hand homes has soared in recent years, with a report from DNG estate agents last month finding the average price of a resale property in Dublin is almost €600,000 – an increase of €50,000 in 12 months, even while excluded from the grants.
Former finance minister and Fianna Fáil TD Michael McGrath warned against the move of extending grants ahead of last October's budget, saying it would 'provide no incentive effect to encourage the building of new homes and would be likely to have a significant dead-weight element and a high Exchequer cost'.
Despite this, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael both campaigned on including second-hand homes in the grants in the November election. Michael McGrath. Pic: Sam Boal/RollingNews.ie
Mr Donohoe's Fine Gael party pledged to expand the Help-to-Buy scheme to include second-hand homes if re-elected.
The scheme provides first-time buyers with an income tax rebate of €30,000 if they purchase a newly built home up to €500,000.
During the election, Fine Gael pledged to increase this to €40,000 and include second-hand homes.
Fianna Fáil committed to including second-hand homes in the First Home scheme, which allows the Government and banks to provide up to 30% of the property's cost in exchange for a proportional stake in the home. Pic: Getty Images
The promises were branded as 'classic auction politics' that were 'using young people as a tool' during the campaign by Technological University Dublin lecturer and housing expert Professor Lorcan Sirr.
The Programme for Government, agreed between Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, and the Independents, commits to 'retain and revise' Help-to-Buy. It also says it will work with banks to 'expand the First Home scheme to first-time buyers of secondhand homes'.
Both schemes are 'demand-side' supports, meaning they help individuals purchase homes rather than increase housing supply.
A briefing note for Mr Donohoe, last month, warned that extending 'demand side' supports to the second-hand market risks stoking home inflation further, at a time when falling interest rates are making housing more affordable. Paschal Donohoe. Pic: Niall Carson/PA Wire/PA Images
'Lower interest rates and robust income growth will improve the purchasing power of buyers, while the potential for extension of demand-side measures to existing dwellings represents an additional upside risk to prices,' the officials wrote.
They noted that second-hand home sales are now the primary driver of residential property prices'.
'Rising property prices continue to reflect a structural shortage of supply, with strong demand for existing dwellings now the key driver of price growth,' the officials wrote.
Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin, whose party campaigned to phase out Help-to-Buy during the election, told Extra.ie that adding second-hand homes to the schemes would 'turbo charge' inflation. Pic: georgeclerk/Getty Images
'If you were to extend Help-To-Buy or First Homes, or worse, both, to second-hand homes, all you are going to do is turbocharge what is already a high rate of inflation,' he said.
Mr Ó Broin also said that the consequence of including second-hand homes would be to lock more people out of the housing market, adding: 'This is a disaster of a policy and the Government shouldn't proceed with it.
'Not only is the advice [from officials] correct, I would suggest you won't find a policy expert or economist who will disagree with it,' he said.
There have also been warnings from within the Government's own ranks at such a move. On May 21, 2024, Ireland's European Commissioner, Michael McGrath, also a former finance minister, ruled out extending the Help-to-Buy (HTB) scheme. Eoin O'Broin. Pic: Leah Farrell/RollingNews.ie
He said: 'HTB is specifically designed to encourage an increase in demand for newbuild homes in order to support the construction of an additional supply of such properties.
For a property to qualify for HTB, it must be new or converted for use as a dwelling, having not previously been used as a dwelling.
A move to include properties which were previously used as residential homes/second – hand proper – ties within the scope of the scheme itself would not improve the effectiveness of the relief; on the contrary, it could serve to dilute the incentive effect of the measure in terms of encouraging additional supply.'
He added: 'For these reasons, there are no plans, at present, to extend the HTB scheme to include such properties.' Pic: Getty Images
When asked if second-hand homes would be added to the HTB scheme, a Department of Finance spokesman directed Extra.ie to a recent parliamentary question response from Mr Donohoe, in which he said it will be considered in the next budget in October.
Mr Donohoe said: 'Any revisions to the scheme would have to be considered in advance of the annual Budget and Finance Bill processes, having regard to the Department of Finance Tax Expenditure Guidelines and the sound management of the public finances; and would take into account the effective operation of the scheme and the impact any proposed changes would have on the broader housing market.'
A Department of Housing spokesman said work is ongoing to assess the impact of the proposed change.
He said the First Home scheme is 'being examined by the department and Housing Minister [James] Browne' with analytical and technical work underway to look at the potential for such an expansion as soon as possible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Expect plenty of cribbin' and moanin' as the budget games begin
The budget games are under way, right enough. Impending decisions about spending priorities for next year and into the future are now the unavoidable context of every political exchange – especially those within Government , some of which you'll see, most of which you won't. They are the subtext of every interview, news story and speech between now and October. As ever, the management of expectations at the centre is essential at this stage. At the recent National Economic Dialogue Paschal Donohoe solemnly warned of deep uncertainty about the future and that (inconveniently) positive headline economic figures so far this year mask 'considerable vulnerabilities'. 'The mood music is changing,' Donohoe warned. His party leader saw 'dark clouds on the horizon'. For the Taoiseach , 'challenging,' was the mot juste. In the Dáil this week, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers returned to the theme. READ MORE 'We face significant economic uncertainty,' he said. 'Everyone in this House needs to realise the level and degree of ... corporate risks that exists right now.' As the Bert used to say during the late stage hubris of the Celtic Tiger, sure this is all cribbin' and moanin' and talkin' down the country. Still, you can see what they're at. The country and its political system have become accustomed to massive giveaway budgets, and cannot contemplate restraint. Well, let me qualify that thought: everyone can contemplate restraint, just not for themselves. Everyone has a demand for extra spending, sourced from the public purse. Some have a good case; all believe they deserve priority. Much of our media – especially RTÉ – is in the habit of promoting the causes of all comers relentlessly and uncritically. Of course, RTÉ might feel a special affinity with bodies looking for money from the Government. But still. Some context would not go amiss – how much would this cost? What is the existing budget? Where might the money come from? What should not be done in order to pay for this? What taxes should be increased? The list of supplicants for greater public funding is literally unending. A casual glance at a political correspondent's inbox gives a flavour of the requests bombarding the budget ministers: extra provision for education for people with disabilities; extra funding for school capitation; VAT cuts for the embattled hospitality industry; a €25 per week increase in welfare rates; this week's cause celebre – retaining the €1,000 discount on fees for third level students; and so on, and so on. [ The Irish Times view on college fees: Government has a choice to make Opens in new window ] Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan played a more subtle hand. Speaking at the Free Legal Advice Centre in Dublin, he said it was clear that Ireland has 'a big problem' with domestic violence. He would like to provide more resources for Flac and for civil legal aid – but 'I'm limited in terms of budget'. He is getting to the heart of the entire question of budgeting: it's all a question of priorities. Few people would quibble with increasing the budget for legal aid to ensure that people can have access to justice and to the protection of the law, when that question is taken in isolation. But governments cannot take any of these questions in isolation – they must weigh it all up as part of a coherent and credible whole of Government budgetary plan. Within the justice budget, for example, how does that measure up as a priority against recruiting more gardaí? Or fixing the problem of prison overcrowding? Or supporting the victims of crime? Or rehabilitating young people who have fallen into criminality? And how should the justice allocation be compared to the other budgets within Government? Should justice be constrained so that we can spend more money on health? On disabilities? On child poverty? Not so simple now, is it? And, yes, you might want to do all these things. But you can't. Anyone who pretends you can isn't being straight. You have to choose. Now let's not feel too bad for Messers Donohoe and Chambers. It may be hard being in charge of budgets during a time of plenty, but it's better than being Rachel Reeves . As the tears rolled down Reeves' cheeks in the House of Commons on Wednesday, both sterling and the UK's standing in the bond markets were headed in the same direction. Whatever the problems of prosperity that Jack and Paschal have to manage, they are far, far preferable to the other kind of problem, now facing Reeves and her prime minister. Better to have surpluses than deficits. So you might think that an overriding national priority would be to maintain steady and stable public finances. To do that, the budget ministers and the leaders of the Government parties have decided, they must eliminate the once-off giveaways of the last three budgets. 'We can't and we won't' continue with them, Donohoe told Ivan Yates on Newstalk on Thursday. But how firm is that determination? My sense is that Donohoe's is rock solid. He is not, however, in charge of the Government. Both Simon Harris and Micheál Martin, while ruling out another goody basket of one-off giveaways, have insisted that they will also seek to help people with rising costs in the budget. Does this signal a middle ground will be found? This week's controversy over student fees shows just how hard it is to withdraw benefits to which voters have become accustomed. Does the Government have the political will and the capacity to restrain itself and take politically difficult but necessary decisions to position the country for future growth and to protect it against future adversity – or will we cross our fingers, plough on and hope for the best? We'll see. But I know one thing: the politics of no hard choices never, ever ends well.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Three positive metrics point to health of economy
It might be the calm before the storm, but the Irish economy remains on a positive growth trajectory despite the global uncertainty. This week, we got three bits of data testifying to the health of the economy. First, the IDA's half-year results pointed to an increased flow of multinational investment into Ireland in the first half of 2025. The agency said it supported 179 investments in the six months to June with the potential to create more than 10,000 jobs, up 37 per cent on the same period last year. READ MORE This was followed on Thursday by the latest exchequer returns for June, detailing another spike in corporation tax. There had been concern that we might see a downturn in receipts from the business tax given the faltering global environment but, in the end, corporate tax generated €7.4 billion last month, which was €1.5 billion or 25 per cent up on the same month last year. June is the second most important month of the year for corporate tax – behind November – accounting for 20 per cent of full-year receipts. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe cautioned about the inherent volatility of the tax, while noting the Government was likely to generate another big budget surplus this year. And then on Friday we got figures from Dublin Airport operator DAA indicating the capital's airport had experienced its busiest-ever June with more than 3.5 million passengers travelling through the hub. It said it would have to turn away four million passengers this year if it is to comply with the cap, which was imposed by An Bord Pleanála in 2007. Ahead of next week's EU-US trade talks deadline and the potential escalation of tariffs between Brussels and Washington, the Irish economy is purring. Unemployment is anchored near a historic low of 4 per cent. All this might yet change, particularly if Trump goes after the pharma sector but, for now, that remains outside the tariff net. How a 10 per cent blanket tariff on EU exports to the US and possibly worse for German car exports, which appears to be landing point for negotiations at this stage, will play out is something of an unknown.
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Students in line for permanent fee cut as Coalition parties move on to budget battle over welfare payments
The Sunday Independent can also reveal Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are on a collision course over welfare in the budget talks, after the first major row last week, on college fees. Further and Higher Education Minister James Lawless will now push for budget measures to reduce the €3,000 annual fees for college students by several hundred euro permanently. Students will also be in line for more targeted measures, with disadvantaged students set to get greater support with paying their college fees. Permanent cuts to college fees will be seen as a win for Fine Gael, after the party clashed with its coalition partner last week after Fianna Fáil minister Mr Lawless initially poured cold water on the prospect of reducing fees. In previous budgets, college fees fell by €1,000 due to a temporary subsidy introduced in cost-of-living packages. However, the Government had signalled there would be no cost-of-living supports in Budget 2026, and that they would also end the €250 energy credit to help reduce household bills. This weekend, Mr Lawless insisted he would seek 'discounts to the student contribution fee'. 'I am going into the budget negotiations this autumn seeking the very best possible outcome for students and their families, of course by seeking discounts to the student contribution fee, and in line with our Programme for Government commitments, but also by examining complementary, targeted measures which can be very impactful for cohorts like larger families or the 'squeezed middle',' he said. The Kildare North TD also hit out at Tánaiste Simon Harris, by saying families have faced 'uncertainty' in recent years as 'support schemes were, by design, temporary and not guaranteed year-on-year'. I feel it's important that I'm straight with people Mr Harris had cut fees on a temporary basis when he was further and higher education minister, but these were not put on a permanent footing. 'I feel it's important that I'm straight with people, and that whatever I do in this budget is there to stay — repeatable, costed and sustainable,' Mr Lawless said. He also told Sinn Féin TD Donna McGettigan, the party's spokesperson on further and higher education, that the Government is 'committed to reducing the student contribution fee over the lifetime of the Government, in a financially sustainable manner'. Mr Lawless called on Sinn Féin to provide a 'costed, evidence-based appraisal', prompting Sinn Féin to accuse the minister of being 'tone deaf'. The latest Sunday Independent/ Ireland Thinks poll shows most people believe cuts to student fees should apply to all students and not just those on lower incomes. Most people also believe the Government should cut fees further after previously cutting them by €1,000. But Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael are set to clash on weekly welfare hikes for the unemployed, with Fine Gael believing people who 'refuse' to work should not be 'rewarded'. The party instead wants lower increases — or none at all — for Jobseeker's Allowance, with higher rates for pensioners and the disabled. I've never been into the characterisation of people on welfare However, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he does not like 'drawing distinctions'. 'I've never been into the characterisation of people on welfare. I've never been into those politics,' he said. The Taoiseach instead spoke about 'turning the dial' on child poverty. 'We do have to make priorities. In terms of how we allocate, my view is that we have, over the last two years, committed to doing something significant on child poverty, to turn the dial around on child poverty — and that's where I would like to see a targeted set of measures emanating from the Department of Social Protection,' he added. His comments stand in stark contrast to those of Mr Harris, who said he believes there is 'merit' to get rid of 'uniformity' in rising all welfare payments — such as Jobseeker's and the pension — by the same weekly amount. 'Roughly speaking, the equivalent of €1.20/€1.25 on every social welfare payment is roughly the equivalent of reducing college fees by €1,000. So budgets are all about choices,' he said last week. 'I'm not convinced that you need to see as significant a rise in the dole as in the pension, at a time when our country is in full employment and when there's lots of supports out there for people getting into work. There's other supports out there for people who can't work for very many good reasons.' Chair of the Oireachtas Social Protection Committee, Fine Gael TD John Paul O'Shea, previously called for 'vulnerable groups' to be prioritised over the unemployed. Proposals to have smaller increases to Jobseeker's than to pensions were rejected by previous governments.
