
Cracks in the Crinks play into Trump's hands
But for team Trump, the 12-day scrap was always about more than fixing the Middle East. It was about clearing the decks, creating global room for manoeuvre in the coming stand-off with China. The resolution of that multi-layered conflict with Beijing will be the true measure of Donald Trump's success.
What counts now is not the number of years Tehran will take to get close to a nuclear arsenal but rather spurring on the collapse of confidence within the Crinks. That's China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, the Marvel comic super-villains who seem determined to end what they see as Captain America's grip on all corners of the world.
Fact is, the Crinks were already in trouble even before American bombs hit the Fordow nuclear lair. Russia, once desperate for Iranian Shahed 136 combat drones for its war against Ukraine, now produces them in Russia without Tehran's help. Russian military bloggers are contemptuous of Iranian assistance: a batch of Iranian Fath-360 missiles was delivered last autumn but appears not to have been deployed yet in Ukraine.
Iran is plainly the most dodgy member of the axis of evil, a liability. China and Russia make their own calculations, reassessing perhaps whether a nuclear-armed Iran enhances their collective potential to disrupt or drags them into an utterly unpredictable all-out war. If the clerical state collapses, its failure will end the illusion that the Crink club is in some way a collective security arrangement. Iran's do-or-die choice now — whether to make a secret dash to weaponise what remains of its nuclear programme — wouldn't just threaten the West. It would trigger a nuclear arms race in the Middle East and deeply compromise China and Russia as would-be global players.
North Korea too is being sidelined in the Götterdämmerung of the Crinks — just study Kim Jong-un's tear-swollen face this week. He was watching footage of himself laying flags on the coffins of North Korean troops killed fighting for Russia in Ukraine. Perhaps he was commiserating with the families of the fallen — 15,000 North Korean soldiers have been sent into Russia's war — but more likely he was crying tears of humiliation. Despite sending millions of artillery rounds to Russia, he has so far received in return only body bags, a hug from Vladimir Putin and some Russian help in modernising air defence.
Kim wanted more. Carefully edited film of his trips to arms factories in North Korea and Russia shows what he really expected from the Kremlin: Russian help in building a supersonic cruise missile, AI-equipped suicide drones, air-to-air missiles. The whole world is cranking up its war economies and Kim wanted to be part of the show. Instead, when he rushed to launch a second destroyer in May, the ship capsized. A dozen officials were promptly arrested.
This axis of evil is being reduced to its core, China and Russia. And they too are at odds. A recently leaked planning document from the FSB, the security service, set out how Russian counterintelligence should deal with a surging Chinese spying effort. Beijing, it said, was looking to gather information about how Russia was dealing with a western-backed army; how drone warfare tactics were changing, the modernisation of software and the damaging potential of long-range western weapons.
China was on the hunt, said the nine-page paper, for former Russian pilots and engineers. Russia frets that China, despite swearing an oath of limitless friendship with Moscow, is building influence in Siberia and the Arctic while Russia was distracted by a full-on war in Ukraine.
Even limitless friends can spy on each other of course; it may even be the secret of a happy marriage. But stories about Chinese hacking of the Russian military establishment suggest core-Crink is confused and consumed by doubt.
If China's biggest looming geopolitical challenge is a perceived independence push by Taiwan then it needs to overhaul its variously rehearsed battle plans. There have been multiple lessons from the current wars — Trump's readiness to mount a jaw-dropping, one-off preventive attack that stops just short of an act of war, closer US supervision of Taiwan's AI-enhanced drone fleet — and Beijing needs to game the risks. What new weapons systems does China need for an offshore war? Can it penetrate the Taiwanese army as deeply as the Israelis wormed inside the brains of the Iranian military?
These sensitive questions seem to demand a new approach to war — hence perhaps Xi Jinping's purge of parts of the top brass including the recently arrested General He Weidong, former commander of the Eastern theatre. If nothing else, this shake-up suggests high anxiety regime stress, part of the Trumpian everyday. Western allies try desperately to second guess Trump. China and Russia meanwhile seem not to trust each other in their separate dealings with Trump. It is becoming a free-for-all, a meltdown of the blocs.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Military leaders aghast as Meta founder Zuckerberg crashes classified Oval Office meeting on fighter jets: report
So a Facebook founder walks into an Oval Office meeting ... No, it's not the start of a bad joke, just the latest reminder that In Donald Trump's White House, the easiest way to avoid being surprised is to remember that anything can happen. Air Force leaders learned that lesson earlier this year when they arrived for a top-secret briefing with Trump in the Oval Office, which according to NBC News was scheduled for them to discuss plans for America's sixth-generation fighter aircraft, dubbed the F-47 in a nod to Trump's status as the 47th President of the United States. As the generals were going over the details of the super-stealthy plane, which Trump has called the most advanced, capable and lethal combat aircraft platform ever built, they were startled by the appearance of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg popping into the Oval Office. According to NBC, White House officials became concerned that Zuckerberg, one of the wealthiest men in the world, lacked the security clearance required to be present for talks about such a sensitive national security matter. With that in mind, Zuckerberg was politely asked to step out of the Oval while the conversation continued, though other Trump aides wandered in and out to show the president information on computer screens while his mobile phone rang intermittently. The incident, which one administration official said was an example of the 'bizarro world' atmosphere in the Trump White House, reportedly rattled the generals in attendance, who were 'mystified and a bit unnerved' by the lack of privacy in the Oval Office — so much so that they 'quietly discussed among themselves whether the visitors and calls might have compromised sensitive information' afterwards. But the freewheeling atmosphere they encountered during their effort to brief the president on a top-secret fighter plane project has been part and parcel of how Trump has transformed the West Wing since returning to power this past January. The president reportedly has taken to referring to the Oval Office — the iconic inner sanctum of American executive power — as 'Grand Central Terminal,' comparing it to the bustling train station of his native New York City. For the most part, he's not wrong to do so. Unlike in most other administrations where the president's office is a tightly-controlled environment with only a select few top aides given so-called 'walk-in privileges,' Trump's Oval is the center of his world of friends, confidantes, advisers and employees who often mill about nearby in the West Wing, even when they might not have much to do there. Even Trump's cabinet secretaries, who ostensibly have their own, often ornate offices and large bureaucracies to attend to themselves, have taken to spending time at the White House to pop in and out of meetings with top Trump aides, such as Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. One person who has been on the inside for such meetings told NBC: 'No one wants to miss the decision.' Trump himself also contributes to this dynamic by routinely asking people who've come for one meeting to stay around for another one. One White House aide who spoke to The Independent on condition of anonymity said the freewheeling atmosphere there is a product of Trump's nature as a 'people person.' 'He likes to schmooze and bounce things off of whoever is around,' the aide said.


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
University of Virginia president resigned after ‘pressure campaign' from Trump admin to remove him from post
The president of the University of Virginia has resigned after facing pressure from the Justice Department over his institution's alleged failure to DEI values, according to reports. James Ryan submitted his resignation on Friday and posted an open letter on social media explaining the decision, saying he had made it 'with a very heavy heart' and that, while he is 'inclined to fight for what I believe in,' he could not 'make a unilateral decision to fight the federal government in order to save my own job.' His departure from the school he has served since 2018 will be effective 'no later than August 15,' The New York Times has since reported. The NYT first reported that the administration was trying to force Ryan out of his role on Thursday, a saga that began earlier this year when members of the UVA board alleged that it was not in compliance with Trump's January executive order banning organizations that receive federal funding from engaging in DEI hiring practices. The UVA's Board of Visitors voted unanimously to shut down its DEI offices in March but Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the Justice Department's civil rights division, went on to write to Ryan on April 28 notifying him about the complaints regarding his leadership. That was followed by another letter on June 17 that warned the administrator: 'Time is running short, and the department's patience is wearing thin.' Ryan's resignation letter last week made clear that he felt he faced an ultimatum: step down or cost the university millions of dollars in vital support. 'While there are very important principles at play here, I would at a very practical level be fighting to keep my job for one more year while knowingly and willingly sacrificing others in this community,' he wrote. Dhillon, who happens to be an alumna of the UVA School of Law, responded to his ousting by saying: 'The United States Department of Justice has a zero-tolerance policy toward illegal discrimination in publicly-funded universities. We have made this clear in many ways to the nation's most prominent institutions of higher education, including the University of Virginia. 'When university leaders lack commitment to ending illegal discrimination in hiring, admissions, and student benefits – they expose the institutions they lead to legal and financial peril. We welcome leadership changes in higher education that signal institutional commitment to our nation's venerable federal civil rights laws.' A spokesperson for the university said: 'UVA is committed to complying with all federal laws and has been cooperating with the Department of Justice in the ongoing inquiries. The federal government's support of the university is essential to continue the core mission of research, education and clinical care.' Two of the state's Democratic senators, Mark Warner and Tim Kaine, have since leapt to Ryan's defense, declaring in a joint statement: 'It is outrageous that officials in the Trump Department of Justice demanded the Commonwealth's globally recognized university remove President Ryan – a strong leader who has served UVA honorably and moved the university forward – over ridiculous 'culture war' traps. 'Decisions about UVA's leadership belong solely to its Board of Visitors, in keeping with Virginia's well-established and respected system of higher education governance. This is a mistake that hurts Virginia's future.' Warner also spoke up for Ryan on CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday morning, telling anchor Margaret Brennan: 'This is the most outrageous action, I think, this crowd has taken on education. 'Jim Ryan had done a very good job; just completed a major capital campaign. For him to be threatened, and, literally, there was indication that they received the letter that if he didn't resign on a day last week, by five o'clock, all these cuts would take place.' The Trump administration has shown an appetite for taking on America's elite Ivy League universities as centers of entitlement and liberal values, attacking both Harvard and Columbia in a very public manner, although its battle with UVA was conducted much more discreetly, a process enabled by internal conservative opposition to Ryan's tenure. Several members of UVA's board were appointed by the state's Republican governor Glenn Youngkin while the institution also has an outspoken right-leaning alumni organization known as the Jefferson Council, whose co-founder, Jim Bacon, has accused Ryan of 'indoctrinating' students by championing social justice and diversity. Ross Mugler, acting CEO and board chair of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, warned: 'The situation at the University of Virginia represents a serious escalation in the political pressure campaign against higher education – and a clear signal that this fight is not confined to elite private institutions like Harvard or Columbia. 'What we're seeing is a widening effort to reshape governance, leadership and institutional autonomy across the entire sector – including public universities that serve as civic anchors and engines of opportunity in their states.'


The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Kirsten Gillibrand apologizes to Zohran Mamdani over ‘jihad' claim
The New York Democrat senator Kirsten Gillibrand has apologized to Zohran Mamdani, the party nominee for New York City mayor, for comments she made claiming that Mamdani had made 'references to global jihad'. 'Gillibrand apologized for mischaracterizing Mamdani's record and for her tone on the call,' according to a readout of a phone call between Gillibrand and Mamdani that was obtained by Politico. The apology comes after an interview the Democratic senator gave to the Brian Lehrer radio show last week in which Gillibrand was asked if she would hold Mamdani accountable for 'glorifying' Hamas. That was prompted by an ongoing controversy over Mamdani – who would become New York City's first Muslim mayor if he wins the election – declining to condemn the phrase 'globalize the intifada' while also emphasizing that he plans, if elected, to be a mayor 'that protects Jewish New Yorkers'. Gillibrand said in the interview that Jewish New Yorkers were alarmed by Mamdani's statements. While there is no evidence that Mamdani supports the Palestinian militant group, the city has been host to scores of pro-Palestinian protests. Some critics have called them antisemitic. Reacting to a listener's call-in question, Gillibrand said she would like to talk through the issues with Mamdani and that he should denounce the phrase 'globalize the intifada'. Gillibrand said that her constituents in upstate New York were 'alarmed' by Mamdani's past public statements, 'particularly references to global jihad. This is a very serious issue because people that glorify the slaughter of Jews create fear in our communities.' Mamdani argues that the phrase 'globalize the intifada' has been deliberately misinterpreted to smear him and others who stand up for Palestinian rights. He also said in an MSNBC interview that comments like Gillibrand's represented 'a language of darkness and a language of exclusion'. Mamdani supporters have protested outside Gillibrand's office and called for her resignation. 'I find it disgusting that someone who is one of the most powerful people in this country would repeat rightwing talking points to diminish' Mamdani, said the New York state representative Emily Gallagher. Gillibrand's comments also appeared to be rebuked by New York's governor, Kathy Hochul, who said, 'no one should be subjected to any comments that slur their ethnicity, their religious beliefs, and we condemn that anywhere it rears its head in the state of New York.' Gillibrand had earlier backed away from her comment, releasing a statement on Friday saying she 'misspoke'. In Gillibrand's call with Mamdani, they 'discussed the need to bring down the temperature around the issue' of the war between Israel and Hamas, and that she 'regretted not separating her own views from the radio show caller's more clearly'. 'Gillibrand said she believes Mr Mamdani is sincere when he says he wants to protect all New Yorkers and combat antisemitism,' the readout continued. 'She said the GOP attacks on him are outrageous and unacceptable.' Those attacks continued on Tuesday when Donald Trump reasserted an earlier statement branding Mamdani as a communist, which Mamdani denies, and threatened to cut off federal funds to New York City if Mamdani becomes mayor and 'doesn't behave himself'. 'We don't need a communist in this country, but if we have one, I'm going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation. We send him money, we send him all the things that he needs to run a government,' Trump said. Trump also made a baseless allegation that Mamdani, 33, who was born in Uganda to ethnic Indian parents and became a US citizen in 2018, obtained his citizenship 'illegally'. The Trump administration is engaged in an aggressive effort to deport foreign-born citizens convicted of certain offenses, and Mamdani has pledged to maintain New York City as a 'sanctuary' city that resists federal deportation efforts. Eric Adams, the incumbent mayor who is running as an independent in November's election, has said the city would not stand in the way of immigration authorities. 'The federal government is in charge of immigration enforcement, but we are not gonna collaborate with civil enforcement, and we're gonna encourage people to not live in fear and go on with their lives,' he said last month. According to a Bloomberg report this week, more than 1,900 people have been arrested in New York City by federal immigration authorities since Trump's inauguration, a 31% increase from the same period last year, according to figures obtained by the Deportation Data Project, which is so far a smaller percentage rise than in Los Angeles (112%), Chicago (97%) and Miami (238%).