Family of woman who died after misdiagnosis by 'substitute doctor' criticise govt review
The parents of a woman who died after her blood clot was misdiagnosed by someone who she thought was a doctor have called a government-ordered review "a missed opportunity".
Marion and Brendan Chesterton have welcomed many of the recommendations in Professor Gillian Leng's review of the role that physician associates (PAs) perform in the NHS, but say "they don't go far enough".
Emily died in November 2022 after suffering a pulmonary embolism. She went to see her GP twice in the weeks before her death - and on both occasions was seen by a physician associate who missed the blood clot and instead prescribed propranolol for anxiety.
She had told her worried parents that she had been seen by a doctor, but she had not.
Her father Brendan told Sky News: "If she come out and said I've seen someone called the physician's associate I'm sure we would have insisted that, you know, let's go back and insist that you see a doctor. She never knew."
Now a government-ordered review led by Prof Leng, president of the Royal Society of Medicine, has recommended NHS physician associates should be banned from diagnosing patients who have not already had contact with a doctor for their illness.
The report suggests a major change to the role of PAs after it acknowledged they have been used as substitutes for doctors, despite having significantly less training.
More than 3,500 PAs and 100 anaesthesia associates (AAs) are working in the NHS and there have been previous calls for an expansion in their number.
But a general lack of support for the roles from the medical profession - plus high-profile deaths of patients who were misdiagnosed by PAs - led Health Secretary Wes Streeting to order a review.
Presenting her findings, Prof Leng said: "Crucially I'm recommending that PAs should not see undifferentiated or untriaged patients.
"If (patients) are triaged, they (PAs) should be able to see adult patients with minor ailments in line with relevant guidance from the Royal College of GPs."
She said more detail was needed on which patients can be seen by PAs and national clinical protocols should be developed in this area.
She added: "Let's be clear, (the role of PAs) is working well in some places, but there indeed has been some substitution and any substitution is clearly risky and confusing for patients."
Prof Leng also recommended PAs should be renamed "physician assistants" to position them "as a supportive, complementary member of the medical team" - and have standardised uniforms to distinguish them from doctors - while AAs should be renamed "physician assistants in anaesthesia".
Newly qualified PAs should also work in hospitals for two years before they are allowed to work in GP surgeries or mental health trusts.
The report said that while research suggests patients are satisfied after seeing a PA, some did not know they were not seeing a doctor.
Prof Leng concluded there were "no convincing reasons to abolish the roles of AA or PA", but there is also no case "for continuing with the roles unchanged".
She recommended that both PAs and AAs should have the opportunity for ongoing training and development, with potential to prescribe medicines in the future, and they should also have the opportunity to become an "advanced" PA or AA.
Six patient deaths linked to contact with PAs have been recorded by coroners in England.
Emily's mother Marion said some of the review's findings were significant and her daughter would still be alive if the recommendations had been in place when she fell ill.
She said: "I think so, yes, which is so important, which is why we're so pleased that this review has been made."
But Mrs Chesterton added that more could have done, including stopping all PAs from prescribing drugs.
"We feel it's a missed opportunity. It could have gone all the way there and cleared things up totally. Our daughter died. She was prescribed a drug that she should not have been prescribed. And it had absolutely catastrophic circumstances. She died for goodness sake."
The Chestertons' concerns are shared by the British Medical Association (BMA).
Dr Emma Runswick, BMA's deputy chair, said: "It is definitely a problem that the roles of doctors and now physician assistants has been blurred and it's positive that their name is going to change, that there will be a uniform.
"But whilst they continue to be deployed in a way that mimics doctors at the behest of any local employer decision, we have to have ongoing concerns about their safety."
But UMAPs, the trade union which represents both PAs and AAs, has warned the changes will undermine their qualifications and their role, lengthen waiting lists and worsen the impact of any strike action.
"By trying to placate them, at a time when they're striking - and they want their strikes to bite the hardest by taking us out of the workforce - we're now putting patients at risk," said Steve Nash, general secretary of UMAPs.
"I think the biggest patient safety risk, out there right now, is the BMA," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
13 minutes ago
- ITV News
NHS nurse who complained about sharing changing room with transgender doctor cleared of bullying
A NHS trust has dropped misconduct and bullying allegations against an emergency department nurse who complained about having to use a changing room with a transgender doctor, following a UK Supreme Court ruling on gender. Nurse Sandie Peggie was suspended from Victoria Hospital in Fife, Scotland in January last year after a transgender medic, Dr Beth Upton, made allegations of bullying and harassment towards Ms Peggie. Ms Peggie was stood down while the hospital board considered four gross misconduct allegations against her, including one of misgendering the doctor and over an encounter with the doctor in the female-only changing room. Dr Upton also cited concerns about 'patient care'. Ms Peggie then took the health board and the doctor to the employment tribunal, lodging her own complaint of sexual harassment over incidents in that changing room. Ms Peggie's lawyer, Margaret Gribbon, said the night before the tribunal was due to recommence hearings, the Fife health board decided not to uphold the misconduct allegations towards her client. 'Sandie is relieved and delighted that this 18-month-long internal process has concluded and cleared her of all allegations," she said. NHS Fife confirmed it had concluded its internal investigation into the nurse's conduct. "It considered several allegations, including regarding interactions between colleagues and patient care," the health board said. "After reviewing the evidence presented, including written submissions and witness testimony, the panel found that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of misconduct. "While no formal sanctions have been imposed, the panel concluded that a facilitated reflective practice discussion would be appropriate." The employment tribunal hearing will continue to take place and is expected to resume on Wednesday and last 11 days. The tribunal began in Dundee in February but resumes after the UK Supreme Court ruled in April that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'. NHS Fife has spent more than £220,000 defending itself in the employment tribunal so far.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Skin cancer peaks in summer – so why is early detection still an afterthought?
Summer is the season of sun-drenched beaches, long outdoor afternoons and much-needed holidays. But it's also melanoma season, a time when skin cancer risk quietly surges while most people let their guard down. As UV exposure intensifies, so does the risk of developing malignant skin lesions. Melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, is directly linked to sunburns and overexposure to UV radiation. According to data from SkinVision, skin cancer cases, including melanoma are most commonly checked and detected during the summer months. One reason is that we're simply seeing more of our skin. Short sleeves, swimsuits and sunbathing make skin more visible, both to ourselves and to others, making it a time when early signs are more likely to be noticed. And yet many people let that moment slip by without taking action. We pack sunscreen. We stay in the shade. We wear hats. But we rarely check our skin, and that may be one of the most significant missed opportunities in cancer prevention. Melanoma rates have risen by more than 30 per cent in the past decade in the UK, with forecasts predicting further increases by 2040. And while skin cancer is often associated with older adults, cases in young people, particularly women under 40, are climbing fast, largely driven by tanning culture, sporadic sunburns and limited awareness. Skin cancer is one of the most preventable cancers – and one of the most detectable. The warning signs of melanoma are often visible: a mole that changes in shape, colour or size, or a new spot that doesn't look quite right. When caught early, melanoma has a five-year survival rate of around 99 per cent. But that figure drops sharply – to around 75 per cent or lower – once the cancer has spread. Early diagnosis is not just beneficial, it's life-saving. Yet too many people ignore skin changes until they become impossible to dismiss. And during summer, when changes may be easier to notice, distractions, travel and a sense of holiday relaxation mean that many warning signs go uninvestigated. People delay appointments until they return from holiday. Or they tell themselves they'll deal with it in autumn. But that delay can be critical. Summer's paradox: high risk, low action There's an irony to how we treat summer. Our skin is exposed more than at any other time of year, but our healthcare routines are often paused. Sunburn risk increases. UV radiation peaks. In some countries, people accumulate more sun exposure during two weeks abroad than in the rest of the year combined. And yet we often deprioritise health checks in favour of holiday plans. What's more, UV damage is cumulative. Even if melanoma doesn't 'start' in summer, years of exposure build risk. A mole that's changed this summer may be a sign of damage done long ago, but it's still a signal that needs to be checked. Why early detection still gets left behind Part of the problem is logistical. Seeing a dermatologist during the summer is often harder than usual. Clinics are understaffed. Appointments are delayed. Many people are abroad or traveling. And without a pressing reason, it's easy to put off a check-up until autumn, or later. But it's also cultural. We're conditioned to treat skin changes as cosmetic, not clinical. A new freckle? Probably harmless. A mole that looks different? Maybe it's always been that way. Unlike breast or prostate cancer, there's no widespread cultural routine for skin checks. No regular screening reminders. No strong public narrative around vigilance. This mindset delays care. And while many people are vigilant with sunblock, they forget to follow up on what's already there: a mark, a mole, a spot that's changed. Technology can close the gap This is where digital tools such as SkinVision come in. Rather than waiting weeks for an appointment, users can analyse a suspicious mole or spot on their skin and receive feedback immediately. The app uses clinically validated AI to assess whether the mark is low risk or may require follow-up. Behind the algorithm, a team of dermatologists provides oversight where needed. This doesn't replace doctors, but it does provide a valuable first step. Especially during summer, when travel, limited clinic access and wait times can all discourage action. Importantly, most assessments result in reassurance, helping users avoid unnecessary worry or appointments. But in the small percentage of high-risk cases, that quick feedback leads to timely medical care. Expanding the summer health conversation We already talk about protecting skin in summer. But protection is just one half of the story. Detection completes the loop. It's not about replacing advice, it's about enhancing it: Keep wearing sunscreen Keep staying in the shade But also check your skin And if something seems off, don't wait. Making skin checks part of the summer health checklist, just like hydration or UV alerts, can shift behaviour in small but powerful ways. Skin cancer doesn't develop overnight. It grows silently. But the signs are often right in front of us, and summer may be the only time we're looking. Instead of missing that window, we should be seizing it. Let this be the year that summer season becomes a moment for action, not just risk. A moment to combine sun protection with proactive skin checks. A moment to notice a mark, take a closer look and follow up, even while on holiday. Because when it comes to skin cancer, early detection isn't just better. It's life-saving.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Warning over ‘contaminated' tomatoes sold across UK
A potentially deadly salmonella outbreak has been linked to tomatoes health and safety watchdogs have warned. The outbreak caused more than 100 people to get sick and at least 14 to be hospitalised with the diarrhoea-causing bug in 2024. Food safety chiefs believe the outbreak was caused by multiple foods including eggs, red meat products and tomatoes. The cases caused by the salad staple were not confined to a certain area of the UK, according to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA). As a result, it is unknown whether they were grown in the UK or imported from another country. Seven outbreaks of Salmonella were reported to national surveillance in 2024, comprising 304 cases of which 280 cases were confirmed in a lab. Testing revealed all cases were caused by salmonella strains Blockley and Strathcona – which can cause diarrhoea, fever, abdominal cramps, nausea, and vomiting. But health and safety watchdogs have warned the strain Salmonella Strathcona can cause particularly severe illness. However, Salmonella Blockley - which is usually found in East Asia and the US - has only been recorded a handful of times across Europe, making this spike in the UK alarming. Salmonella is one of the most common causes of food poisoning. It takes 12 to 72 hours for the symptoms to develop after swallowing a contaminated product. While most people suffer with vomiting and diarrhoea those with weakened immune systems such as children and the elderly are most at risk of suffering with severe illness. In some cases, those that become seriously ill need hospital care because dehydration caused by the illness can be life-threatening. UKHSA data for 2024, revealed there were 81 cases of Salmonella Blockley confirmed by lab testing – of these 14 were hospitalised. The Salmonella Strathcona outbreak, also caused by tomatoes, affected 24 people. These infections are typically contracted through the consumption of contaminated food, such as undercooked poultry, meat, eggs, or unwashed raw fruit and vegetables. Unpasteurised milk and cheese also pose a risk. Water supplies used to grow the tomatoes can cause salmonella contamination and can even persist in the soil and continue to contaminate them as they grow. A separate Salmonella Typhimurium outbreak linked to red meat caused 109 cases. There were also 24 cases of Salmonella Enteritidis linked to eggs. UKHSA figures released last month showed salmonella cases hit a record decade high in 2024 reaching more than 10,000 cases. Data showed a 17.1 per cent increase, from 8,872 cases in 2023 to 10,388 in 2024.
