India ‘disappointed' after talks at Bonn
The dispute centred on Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, which mandates that developed countries provide financial resources to assist developing nations with both mitigation and adaptation efforts. The debate over the 9.1 agenda item proposal led to a 30-hour delay before talks could begin.
'We are extremely disappointed with the reluctance of developed countries to discuss their legal obligations to provide finance to developing countries,' said Amandeep Garg, additional secretary at ministry of environment, forests and climate change, who represented the Indian delegation.
The Like Minded Developing Countries (LMDC) group and the G77 and China had proposed agenda items on both the legal obligation of wealthy countries to provide climate finance and another on unilateral trade measures. However, these were not adopted after the European Union and other developed nations refused to agree.
'Without enough affordable financial support, developing countries cannot address the challenges posed by climate change,' Garg said during his intervention at the agenda adoption session, backing the LMDC position. 'This is completely unacceptable. We do not understand how this process can engage in article 9.1 without which climate action in developing countries cannot be taken in scale, scope and speed'
Garg added: 'It has been 10 years of the Paris Agreement and still the items which are required to be discussed, we are not discussing them.'
Diego Pacheco, Bolivia's negotiator and spokesperson for the LMDC group, warned that the issue would resurface at COP30. 'Public finance from developed countries is a necessary condition for implementation of the Paris Agreement,' he said. 'You can deny us the starting point but be rest assured, the LMDC will raise these items at COP30.'
The African Group also highlighted the implementation of Article 9.1 as critical to their region, emphasising the need to address resource provision for nationally determined contributions, national adaptation plans, and just transition measures.
EU negotiators said their 'positions and motivations being mischaracterised' and urged parties to respect all positions in a constructive spirit.
The agenda was finally adopted on Tuesday evening after extensive behind-closed-doors consultations. Simon Stiell, the UN climate chief, acknowledged the difficulty of the negotiations whilst urging progress on mandated items.
'The past 30 hours have been hard and have not reflected the urgency that we face,' Stiell said. 'Through cooperation and compromise, we have resolved the impasse. We must now move the work ahead.'
This year's Bonn talks agenda includes discussions on Global Goal on Adaptation indicators under the UAE–Belém Work Programme, the UAE Dialogue on implementing global stocktake outcomes, the UAE Just Transition Work Programme, and the Baku to Belem roadmap to 1.3 trillion dollars.
Avantika Goswami, programme manager at the Climate Change Centre for Science and Environment, said the European Union and its allies had blocked the G77's demand to discuss developed countries' climate finance obligations. 'The fight is not over, as the LMDC bloc and India have vowed to bring focus back to this at COP30,' she said.
The dispute comes as climate change appears to be losing prominence in some international forums. The International Institute of Sustainable Development noted that G7 statements following recent talks between leaders in Kananaskis omitted references to climate change, with only the chair's summary making a passing reference to the issue.
'The G7 sidestepped climate change in the leaders' statements, despite acknowledging increased wildfires,' said Patricia Fuller, IISD president and chief executive. 'Previous G7 commitments to action on climate change remain on the books and must be delivered.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
16 minutes ago
- Hans India
Study abroad: Redefining education for students
Studying abroad has transformed from a niche aspiration to a mainstream ambition for millions of Indian students in recent decades. However, in 2025, Indian students' dreams are facing the toughest test. As countries tighten immigration policies, introduce financial restrictions, and prioritize local labour markets, the once-straightforward path to a foreign degree is now a complex maze. Despite these headwinds, international education continues to thrive, but has not diminished. Shifting policies, shrinking access? Several study destinations have undergone drastic visa and policy changes over the last year, which have put students and institutions scrambling to adjust. Canada, which was the preferred destination for Indian students, was slated to introduce a study permit cap of 437,000 for 2025, while increasing the requirement for proof of financial means to CAD 20,635, an increase of over 100% from the usual upward adjustment witnessed in previous years. Furthermore, Canadian authorities have tightened the criteria of the Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP), with higher requirements of English language proficiency being imposed: CLB 7 for university graduates and CLB 5 for college graduates. Whereas in the UK, the Graduate Route visa is still there, which allows international students to work for two years post-graduation (three for PhDs), the money-proof requirements were raised. Australia, well known for being a state with many privileges to students, has increased the financial requirement to AUD 29,710 and has made things hard with its English language assessments. The country is considering an enrollment cap for international students, but in parallel, it is granting extended work rights in priority sectors such as healthcare and engineering. The US, with fewer structural changes, remains good at maintaining the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, through which STEM graduates get up to 36 months of work experience. However, increased scrutiny on visas and growing concerns on the possible H-1B routes continue to shadow the long-term outlook for some students. A diversifying map of destinations Amidst the tightening grip of traditional education hubs, emerging contenders are claiming their spots. Germany, Ireland, Finland, and New Zealand are gaining attention for their student centric visa policies, high-quality education systems and increasing opportunities for post-study work. There has particularly been a 26% spike in Indian student enrollment in Germany in the past academic year alone, courtesy of no tuition fees, public universities and strong STEM reputation. The diversification of destinations is yet another example of something getting a little stranger: a change in the mindset of students. It is no longer just about a university's rank or a country's prestige has to be about long-term ROI, work rights, safety, and living costs. The rising role of education loans As financial barriers grow, the relevance of education loans has become more pronounced. According to a Shiksha study in 2024, 49% of Indian students relied on education loans to fund their international education. The average cost of studying in countries like the U.S., Canada, or Australia now ranges between INR 25 to 50 Lakh, depending on the course and institution. In 2025, that number is projected to rise further as parent's savings alone can no longer meet the steep financial requirements set by many countries. Traditional banks still hold a strong position; however, NBFCs and FinTechs have managed to enter the market by way of offering tailor-made loans without collateral and with faster turnaround times. Such institutions are critical for students of Tier-II and Tier-III cities who may not have, at least, property to offer or a strong credit history, but do have academic skills. Apart from that, the financial advice is being actively sought by students before their initiation on their roads. Platforms that offer loan comparisons, EMI calculators, and amortization simulations have slowly but surely become a relevant aspect of the actual decision-making process. Reinvention, not retreat The narrative around international education in 2025 isn't one of decline but of reinvention. Yes, there are more hoops to jump through, but those who do, arrive better informed and better financially planned. The value of an international education is still strong for individuals, communities and economies alike. For Indian students, the key lies in strategic planning, early financial preparedness, and a willingness to explore new global frontiers. And for stakeholders, governments, lenders, and universities, it is imperative to keep the system equitable and aspirational.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
19 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Meeting held under pressure: Jairam Ramesh attacks ECI over INDIA bloc meet
A day after Election Commission of India (ECI) met with the delegation of 11 parties to discuss its decision of conducting "electoral" revision ahead of the Bihar elections, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh slammed ECI stating that the meeting "ultimately" took place "under pressure". The Congress leader noted that the Election Commission earlier refused a meeting, however, later only allowed two leaders from a party, due to which some leaders could not even meet with the officials of the ECI. "Yesterday evening, the delegation of the INDIA bloc met with the Election Commission regarding the special voter intensive revision ("SIR") in Bihar. Initially, the Commission had refused to meet, but ultimately, under pressure, the delegation was called. The Commission arbitrarily allowed only two representatives from each party, due to which many of us could not meet with the Commission. I myself sat in the waiting room for almost two hours", Jairam Ramesh said in his 'X' post. The Congress MP stated that the ECI's attitude "weakens" the "basic structure" of the Indian democracy. He asserted that ECI is a government body and it can't refuse the opposition's request for hearings. "Over the past six months, the Commission's attitude has consistently been such that it weakens the basic structure of our democracy. The Election Commission is a constitutional body. It cannot regularly reject requests for hearings from the opposition. The Commission must work in accordance with the spirit of the Constitution and its provisions", Jairam Ramesh's 'X' post said. The Congress leader emphasised that the ECI cannot impose "arbitrary rules" for engaging with political parties. "Most importantly, the Election Commission cannot make arbitrary rules for engaging with political parties--such as the number of representatives, their positions, or deciding who is authorized and who is not", the Congress leader said. Claiming that when the opposition called the rules from the ECI "arbitrary and misleading", the body replied, "This is the new Commission." Ramesh said that this answer from the ECI, the concern of the opposition has deepened as they feel that what will be the next step of the electoral body. "When the delegation called these rules arbitrary and misleading, the Commission responded: "This is the new Commission." Hearing this, the concern deepens--what will be the next move of this "new" Commission? And how many more "masterstrokes" are yet to be seen? Just as the "demonetization" of November 2016 dealt a severe blow to our economy, similarly, this "voter suppression", which is emerging in the form of SIR in Bihar and other states--will destroy our democracy", Jairam Ramesh said in his 'X' post.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
MRF declares record date for payment of final dividend for FY25. Details here
Dividend stock: Tyre manufacturer and India's highest-priced stock, MRF Limited, announced the record date for its final dividend for the fiscal year 2024-2025 (FY25). The company had announced a final dividend of ₹ 229 per share of ₹ 10 each, amounting to a payout of 2,290% in May along with its Q4 results. Consequently, MRF, on July 3, announced the record date for determining the eligible shareholders to receive the said dividend as July 18. Investors looking to seek the benefit of MRF's dividend announcement must purchase their shares at least one day prior to the record date for their names to be appear on the shareholders' list, given the Indian stock market's T+1 settlement system. The date of payment of MRF's final dividend is on or after August 18, 2025, the company added. Additionally, MRF also announced the date for its Annual General Meeting (AGM). "The 64th Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held on Thursday, 07th August, 2025 "through Video Conferencing/Other Audio Visual Means in accordance with the relevant circulars issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Securities and Exchange Board of India," MRF said in a filing. Following the announcement of the dividend record date, MRF shares were trading in the green on the BSE. MRF share price rose to the day's high of ₹ 147890, recording an upside of 1.9% over the last closing price. Despite high stock market volatility, MRF shares have delivered a 13% gain in the last one year. On a longer time frame of five and ten years, MRF stock has surged 121% and 319%, respectively, delivering multibagger gains to investors. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
